「depth」の検索結果

Analyze assertion quality, depth, variety, and false confidence in existing tests. ALWAYS USE when asked about weak, shallow, trivial, always-true, self-referential, assertion-free, presence/truthiness-only, or insufficiently diverse assertions, including MSTest, Jest, pytest, and Go. DO NOT USE for direct fixes: writing-mstest-tests owns supplied MSTest assertions; code-testing owns new cases. Use test-gap-analysis when asked whether tests would catch a production change, and test-anti-patterns for general severity-ranked audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GraphQL security hunting — introspection abuse, field suggestion enumeration (clairvoyance), batching DoS, IDOR via aliasing, auth bypass, injection via arguments, subscription abuse, depth/complexity bombs, and WAF bypass. Covers graphw00f fingerprinting, gqlmap, graphql-cop, and inql. Use when a target exposes a /graphql, /api/graphql, or GQL-over-HTTP endpoint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to work in a Codebase Wiki project (the `codebase-wiki` starter pack): an agent-authored, source-grounded wiki of the surrounding codebase. Read when the project has a `wiki/` knowledge base with `architecture/`, `modules/`, `flows/`, `concepts/`, and `guides/` sections plus `wiki/OVERVIEW.md`, or when asked to generate or refresh a wiki of this codebase. Carries the per-folder rules and freshness + log discipline, summarizes the audience/depth knobs and source-reference convention, and bundles the full generate/refresh procedure in `references/`. Complements the platform `open-knowledge` skill; does not replace it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meta-skill for internal codebase exploration at varying depths (quick/deep/architecture)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Single-page SEO audit: content quality under Google's E-E-A-T framework and Helpful Content guidelines, on-page factors, search intent, technical signals and readability. Pulls GSC data for the page, crawls the live HTML, checks metadata, schema, internal linking and depth, and produces a scored report with fixes. Use whenever the user wants to analyze a specific page or URL, not the whole site. Trigger on: "analyze this page", "audit this URL", "how is this page doing", "evaluate my blog post", "check this landing page", "page SEO", "content quality check", "is this page good enough", "review this page's SEO", "what's wrong with this page", "how can I improve this page", "page analysis", "single page audit", "content audit for [URL]", or any request naming a specific URL/page for SEO evaluation. If the user provides a specific URL (not just a domain), this is likely the right skill; use /seo-analysis for full-site audits instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Competitor page gap analysis — take a query you want to win and the pages currently outranking you, and produce a concrete brief on what to add or change to compete. Compares content depth and coverage (subtopics they cover that you don't), structure (headings, format, tables, media), search-intent match, E-E-A-T signals, schema/rich-result eligibility, internal linking, and on-page optimization — across your page vs. the top-ranking competitors. Use this skill whenever the user wants to know why a competitor outranks them on a specific query, what a top-ranking page does better, a content-gap analysis against specific competitor URLs, or a brief to beat a specific SERP. Trigger on: "why does competitor X outrank me", "content gap analysis", "competitor page analysis", "what does the top result have that I don't", "how do I beat this page", "analyze competitor pages", "SERP gap", "compete for [keyword]". For seed keyword discovery use /keyword-research; for a content calendar use /content-planner.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforces completion discipline for substantial autonomous work by writing acceptance gates before execution, decomposing work with the Depth Tree, running approved checks, and re-verifying evidence before reporting. Use when an agent faces a long or multi-part task, work that has returned half-done, an exhaustive audit or build, parallel leaves or pipelines, or explicit triggers such as /unlazy, $unlazy, "tree N", "gates", and "do not stop until it is done".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Company discovery and deep research skill. Researches a company's product and ICP, discovers target companies to sell to using Browserbase Search API, deeply researches each using a Plan→Research→Synthesize pattern, and scores ICP fit — compiled into a scored research report and CSV. Supports depth modes (quick/deep/deeper) for balancing scale vs intelligence. Use when the user wants to: (1) find companies to sell to, (2) research potential customers, (3) discover companies matching an ICP, (4) build a target company list, (5) do market research on prospects. Triggers: "find companies to sell to", "company research", "find prospects", "ICP research", "target companies", "who should we sell to", "market research", "lead research", "prospect list".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Jetson codec, profile, chroma, bit-depth, dimension, engine-count, or operational support must be reconciled from live APIs, authenticated NVIDIA samples, and NVIDIA documentation; also applies the content-DRM scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user is doing hands-on NVMe-over-Fabrics storage-target work on a BlueField DPU or ConnectX NIC with DOCA STA — standing up a doca_sta DOCA Core context that accelerates the target-side NVMe-oF data path over RDMA, defining doca_sta_subsystem targets (NQN + namespaces) backed by local NVMe-PCI backend disks (doca_sta_be), checking device support via doca_sta_cap_is_supported, sizing the per-connection I/O queues, or debugging DOCA_ERROR_* from a STA call. Trigger even when the user does not say "DOCA STA" — typical implicit phrasings include "my NVMe-oF Connect never completes", "Identify Controller times out over RoCE", "16 I/O queues at depth 1024 — does this BlueField support that", "offload the nvmf target onto the DPU", or "DOCA_ERROR_IO_FAILED on an NVMe read". Refuse and route elsewhere for DOCA install, raw RDMA data movement, raw packet I/O, flow-rule programming, or initiator-side / host NVMe stack work — those belong to other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adapt BOP datasets, run the FoundationPose perception pipeline with TAO depth, and evaluate or re-score pose results. Use for dataset runs and result comparisons; environment installation belongs to foundationpose-setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user is invoking `doca_telemetry_utils` on a host with DOCA installed — discovering the diagnostic-counter schema, translating counter names to binary Data IDs, validating per-device counter support before committing a DOCA Telemetry exporter config, or reverse-resolving a captured Data ID. Trigger even when the user does not explicitly mention "doca_telemetry_utils" or "Data ID" — typical implicit phrasings include "my exporter ships but the collector sees nothing", "this metric silently drops downstream", "which counters does this BlueField expose", "translate this 0x... back to a counter name", "what do node / pcie_index / depth mean here", or "is this counter supported on this device before I commit it". Refuse and route elsewhere for developer-side collector / exporter library programming, DTS deployment, or DOCA install / repair — those belong to doca-telemetry, doca-public-knowledge-map, and doca-setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install or repair the FoundationPose perception pipeline and build its FoundationStereo TensorRT engines. Use for SAM3/TAO dependency conflicts, CUDA library failures, and depth-engine shape or precision decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive guide to stretchr/testify for Golang testing. Covers assert, require, mock, and suite packages in depth. Use when writing tests with testify, creating mocks, setting up test suites, or choosing between assert and require. Covers testify assertions, mock expectations, argument matchers, call verification, suite lifecycle, and advanced patterns like Eventually, JSONEq, and custom matchers. Apply when the codebase imports github.com/stretchr/testify.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Price changes within the store's guardrails, rate recommendations from demand, occupancy, or sell-through pace, promotions with their scope, depth, and dates, the markdown option for stock or capacity that is not selling, and the margin preview before any of it is staged. Not needed for explaining why revenue moved (performance-insights) or writing promotional copy (marketing-campaigns).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spatial depth design with isometric views, vanishing points, and layered elements that guide attention through 3D-like realism.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Smooth color transitions and gradient-rich surfaces for modern, playful interfaces with visual depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Frosted glass effect with translucent layers, subtle blur, and luminous borders for depth and modern elegance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates rich technical documentation pages with dark-mode Mermaid diagrams, source code citations, and first-principles depth. Use when writing documentation, generating wiki pages, creating technical deep-dives, or documenting specific components or systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts multi-turn iterative deep research on specific topics within a codebase with zero tolerance for shallow analysis. Use when the user wants an in-depth investigation, needs to understand how something works across multiple files, or asks for comprehensive analysis of a specific system or pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screen US stocks for Stockbee-style selling-exhaustion hammer setups using prior momentum, pullback depth, undercut/reclaim, long lower-wick geometry, close-location, volume confirmation, quality/liquidity gates, and risk-distance scoring. Use when the user asks for Stockbee, Pradeep Bonde, exhaustion setup, selling exhaustion, hammer reversal, undercut reclaim, near-close reversal candidates, or pullback entries in high-quality funds-owned stocks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-grow a pro-workflow wiki by running a budget-capped BFS research loop over pluggable source fetchers (web, arXiv, GitHub). Each iteration pops a seed from the queue, fetches sources, drafts a wiki page, dedupes claims against existing pages, enqueues follow-up seeds. Halts on budget cap, depth cap, or convergence. Use when the user says "research <topic>", "grow the <slug> wiki", "auto-research", or wants a knowledge base that builds itself overnight.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the Law of Figure-Ground — establish which layer is foreground and actionable versus background. Use when designing modals, overlays, and depth. For emphasising one element among peers, use `von-restorff-effect`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Org-grade attack-surface mapping: given a company's legal identity, discover its ENTIRE owned internet footprint — corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets — with attribution discipline, not just DNS breadth. The org-first attribution pyramid (legal entity -> LEI/registration -> corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets). Corporate-identity resolution via the GLEIF LEI API (legal name -> LEI, exact-LEI direct-children expansion, downward-only depth-capped BFS, NEVER a name re-resolution), SEC-EDGAR full-text search + Exhibit-21 subsidiary entity names, OpenCorporates entity corroboration, Wikidata SPARQL corporate graph (P856/P355/P749/P1830). Domain attribution via reverse-WHOIS (WhoisXML preview-then-purchase quota guard, SecurityTrails associated-domains — both paid), crt.sh O= certificate-transparency organization pivot (keyless), infrastructure correlation (shared NS/MX/SaaS-TXT, netblock membership, reverse-DNS PTR), and the independent-evidence combiner (1-prod(1-w_i), rule of three, OwnerTier NONE/WEAK/MODERATE/STRONG/CONFIRMED) — discover-only `related:` candidates are NEVER auto-scanned. Netblock/ASN attribution via org-first RIR queries (ARIN Whois-RWS org-handle search, RIPE DB organisation + inverse-org search) that recover 'dark netblocks' with no DNS link to the seed, ASN discovery (RIPEstat + BGPView union), the HYPERSCALER-SCOPE GUARD (never attribute a whole AWS/GCP/Azure/Cloudflare announced range to a tenant — keep only the seed-containing block, tag shared_hosting_cdn), and org-identity-seeded internet-scan-index queries (Shodan/Censys/ZoomEye/FOFA/BinaryEdge org: filters + an always-on keyless crt.sh fallback). Promote-to-scan triage ranks forgotten discover-only netblocks by remote-access exposure (gateway-vendor/KEV/control-plane/datastore port scoring) into an operator queue. Attribution confidence rubric + anti-patterns (namesake grafting via GLEIF name re-resolution, single-signal ownership, hyperscaler over-attribution, privacy-WHOIS pivot poisoning, RIR org-name collisions). Passive/keyless-first OSINT only — every paid-key dependency is enrichment on top of a keyless core, never a hard requirement. Use when mapping an organization's full corporate-family internet footprint, resolving a legal entity to its LEI/subsidiaries, discovering domains/netblocks/ASNs an org owns beyond its one seed domain, auditing M&A/shadow-IT sprawl, or scoping an engagement that starts from a company NAME rather than a domain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。