「edge」の検索結果

Processes external resources into stored knowledge with quality scoring and routing. Use when ingesting articles, papers, or docs into a memory palace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix wildcard subdomain routing for Fastly Compute@Edge services when subdomains resolve but return 500 "Domain Not Found" or empty responses. Use when: (1) TLS subscription "issued" but edge serves default certificate (CN=j.sni-644-default), (2) Fastly domain-v1 create succeeds but subdomain returns 500, (3) Static publisher/PublisherServer returns empty content for subdomain requests, (4) DNS wildcard CNAME resolves to wrong target. Covers TLS configuration SNI endpoint selection (x.sni vs j.sni vs w.sni), DNS trailing dot issues, Fastly domain-v1 activation, and reading from KV store directly when PublisherServer fails for subdomains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use BIRD Book Deconstructor 2.2 to apply the formal BIRD 2.1 Knowledge Address protocol to complex manuscript text and TheBrain Thoughts. Use when splitting books into chapter/section/item knowledge nodes, assigning Book Address, structured Knowledge Index (Weight, Type, Keyword, Alias), Routes, verified Deep Links, and Semantic Roles; producing BIRD Excel workbooks, TheBrain scaffolds, Roam JSON, monochrome printable double nine-grid cards, or a routed handoff from iMandalArt to A4 eight-page booklets; or auditing and migrating existing BIRD/TheBrain indexes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build structured knowledge graphs from unstructured text by extracting entities, mapping relationships, generating graph triples, and visualizing the result. Use when the user requests knowledge graph creation or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Knowledge Representation Researcher. Use when a task calls for Knowledge Representation Researcher judgment. Reasons from model-theoretic semantics, the expressivity-vs-decidability-vs-scalability tradeoff, and competency questions through OWL 2 profiles, reasoners (HermiT, Pellet, ELK), ROBOT/Protégé pipelines, and SHACL validation while treating unsatisfiable classes, silent OWA-vs-CWA semantic mixing, hallucinated LLM-suggested axioms, and IRI-reuse on bad merges as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Edge / Embedded AI Engineer. Use when a task calls for Edge / Embedded AI Engineer judgment. Reasons from tensor-arena budgets, full-int8 PTQ with representative calibration, and TFLM/CMSIS-NN or Vela/Ethos-U compile paths through ONNX Runtime QNN HTP and mobile delegates—treating train–serve preprocessing skew, float thresholds on quantized outputs, and NPU operator fallback as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform differential expression analysis using edgeR in R/Bioconductor. Use for analyzing RNA-seq count data with the quasi-likelihood F-test framework, creating DGEList objects, normalization, dispersion estimation, and statistical testing. Use when performing DE analysis with edgeR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ingest public or authenticated knowledge bases and docs portals with Firecrawl browser. Use for JS-heavy docs, login-gated portals, paginated help centers, support knowledge bases, or structured JSON/markdown extraction from documentation sites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Serverless vector database at the edge with Cloudflare Vectorize. Use when: building semantic search on Cloudflare Workers, RAG pipelines at the edge, low-latency vector similarity search, or storing and querying embeddings without managing a separate vector database.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cloudflare Workers is an edge computing platform for running JavaScript, TypeScript, and WebAssembly close to users worldwide with sub-millisecond cold starts. Use when working with the Workers runtime, the Wrangler CLI, KV, D1, R2, Durable Objects, Queues, or Hyperdrive, or when a user asks to build and deploy an edge function.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure Amazon CloudFront for global content delivery. Set up distributions with S3 and ALB origins, define cache behaviors and TTLs, invalidate cached content, and use Lambda@Edge for request/response manipulation at the edge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge graph specialist for entity and causal relationship modelingUse when "knowledge graph, graph database, falkordb, neo4j, cypher query, entity resolution, causal relationships, graph traversal, graph-database, knowledge-graph, falkordb, neo4j, cypher, entity-resolution, causal-graph, ml-memory" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert 3D modeling specialist with deep knowledge of topology, UV mapping, game-ready and film-ready pipelines, DCC tool workflows (Blender, Maya, ZBrush, 3ds Max, Houdini), retopology, LOD systems, and export pipelines. This skill represents years of production experience distilled into actionable guidance. Use when "3d model, 3d modeling, mesh topology, uv unwrap, uv mapping, retopology, retopo, low poly, high poly, subdivision, subdiv, edge flow, edge loops, polygon modeling, box modeling, hard surface, organic modeling, sculpting, zbrush, blender modeling, maya modeling, 3ds max, LOD, level of detail, game ready mesh, film ready, baking normals, high to low, fbx export, gltf export, texel density, 3d, modeling, topology, uv, game-dev, vfx, blender, maya, zbrush, retopology, lod, hard-surface, organic, sculpting" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end substantive-integrity forensic sweep of a research paper (especially autoresearch / AI-Scientist-style output). Orchestrates the whole pipeline: ingest (arxiv-id | pdf | dir → working dir + pdftotext for L0) → /evidence-ledger (artifact manifest + observability level L0/L1/L2 + span-anchored claims.json) → fan out the integrity auditor skills (consistency, citation, baseline, experiment, presentation, proof-derivation, eval-design — each reads the ledger, emits span-anchored findings) + the zero-verdict-weight AIS writing-style track → advisory memos (/adversarial-case-builder + /novelty-duplication-advisory, no verdict weight) → deterministic tools/adjudicate_findings.py (--ledger REQUIRED) → reviewer-ready Integrity Forensics Report. Cross-model (fresh codex per dimension) and reviewer≠adjudicator: the model proposes findings, the deterministic adjudicator decides the verdict. Observability-aware, detect-only, never an opaque AI-text classifier (a separate zero-weight AIS section lists AI writing-style impressions, never moving the verdict). Triggers: "anti-autoresearch", "integrity audit this paper", "forensic review", "audit a submission", "审一篇投稿的诚信".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transparent, itemized impressions of AI-generated WRITING STYLE — the repo's ONLY non-integrity track. Two passes: a deterministic defensive-hedge density screen (tools/check_ai_style.py, AIS-DEFENSIVE-HEDGE) plus a fresh cross-model GROSS-cases-only semantic pass over the 13 AIS-* style tells (broken narrative arc, LLM phrase tics, jargon-stuffing, invented codenames, clause/formula walls, gratuitous pseudocode, bullet overuse, bold-module spam, restatement loops, focus drift, single-style figures, appendix dumping). Every finding is named, LOCATED, span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json), carries not_integrity_finding:true + false_positive_risk:high + an fp_case, and gets ZERO verdict weight: the adjudicator forces it to info, excludes it from overall_verdict, and renders it in a SEPARATE report section. NOT an AI-text classifier — no scores, no "this is AI-written", no authorship probability; a paper can be CLEAN_GIVEN_EVIDENCE and still list many. Emits ai-style-impressions.findings.json; computes NO verdict; if a tell is actually substantive it routes to the integrity auditor. Triggers: "AI style", "vibe check", "writing fingerprint", "AI 文风", "vibe paper".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit experiment integrity against the evidence ledger. At L2 (repo + result files present) a fresh cross-model reviewer reads the eval code line-by-line for fake/derived ground truth, score self-normalization, phantom results (a paper number with no backing file/key), dead/uncalled metric code, verified-scope inflation, method-described ≠ method-evaluated drift, synthesized-looking results, placeholder/fake data still wired into a released result, code-output ≠ reported-number mismatch, and missing reproducibility artifacts (an empirical/agent/LLM paper shipping neither code nor the prompts/configs its results need) — every finding span-anchored to a ledger claim_id. At L0/L1 (PDF / source only) the same patterns are surfaced as info-level 'could-not-verify' signals where the ledger gives an anchor (observability_level_required:2) — NEVER a fraud verdict from a PDF. The reviewer PROPOSES findings; tools/adjudicate_findings.py computes the verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "experiment forensics", "audit the results", "check the eval code", "实验诚实度".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic research methodology for building comprehensive, current knowledge on any topic. Requires web_search tool. Use when questions require thorough investigation, recent developments post-cutoff, synthesis across multiple sources, or when Claude's knowledge may be outdated or incomplete. Triggered by "Research", "Investigate", "What's current on", "Latest info on", complex queries needing validation, or technical topics with recent changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate progressive disclosure indexes for GitHub repositories to use as Claude project knowledge. Use when setting up projects referencing external documentation, creating searchable indexes of technical blogs or knowledge bases, combining multiple repos into one index, or when user mentions "index", "github repo", "project knowledge", or "documentation reference".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ingest public or authenticated knowledge bases and docs portals with Firecrawl browser. Use for JS-heavy docs, login-gated portals, paginated help centers, support knowledge bases, or structured JSON/markdown extraction from documentation sites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search and manage hyperedges — n-ary relationships between memories. Use for swarm membership, multi-cause incidents, or any "this involves all of (A, B, C, D)" relationship that doesn't fit a binary edge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design learning tasks built on Ubuntu philosophy emphasising collective knowledge-building and mutual responsibility. Use when fostering collaboration that values community over individual competition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design discipline-specific critical thinking tasks grounded in knowledge-contingent reasoning rather than generic skills. Use when embedding higher-order thinking into subject content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walk every branching path and boundary condition in content, report only unhandled edge cases. Orthogonal to adversarial review - method-driven not attitude-driven. Use when you need exhaustive edge-case analysis of code, specs, or diffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React Flow (@xyflow/react) for workflow visualization with custom nodes and edges. Use when building graph visualizations, creating custom workflow nodes, implementing edge labels, or controlling viewport. Triggers on ReactFlow, @xyflow/react, Handle, NodeProps, EdgeProps, useReactFlow, fitView.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。