「fix」の検索結果

Fast structured generation and serving for LLMs with RadixAttention prefix caching. Use for JSON/regex outputs, constrained decoding, agentic workflows with tool calls, or when you need 5× faster inference than vLLM with prefix sharing. Powers 300,000+ GPUs at xAI, AMD, NVIDIA, and LinkedIn.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically fix broken OpenCLI adapters when commands fail. Load this skill when an opencli command fails — it guides you through collecting a trace artifact, patching the adapter, retrying, and filing an upstream GitHub issue after a verified fix. Works with any AI agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix a bug from a GitHub issue, following the reproduce-first workflow. Use when the user asks to fix a bug, investigate a GitHub issue, or debug a user-reported problem. Takes a GitHub issue URL or number as input.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix failing or flaky Playwright tests. Use when user says "fix test", "flaky test", "test failing", "debug test", "test broken", "test passes sometimes", or "intermittent failure".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user asks to debug or fix failing GitHub PR checks that run in GitHub Actions; use `gh` to inspect checks and logs, summarize failure context, draft a fix plan, and implement only after explicit approval. Treat external providers (for example Buildkite) as out of scope and report only the details URL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Emergency fix bypassing normal sprint process — hotfix branch, approvals tracked, backport verified, full audit trail.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design notes on a PR, "Design review (advisory)" in the evidence check, "worth fixing", layout.split-row, OW-LIST, a reviewer says the UI looks off. Use to read what the design review found on a PR's screenshots, fix it in code, and prove the note is gone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interpret validation errors and guide fixing them. Use when encountering validation errors, validation warnings, false positives, operator structure issues, or need help understanding validation results. Also use when asking about validation profiles, error types, the validation loop process, or auto-fix capabilities. Consult this skill whenever a validate_node or validate_workflow call returns errors or warnings — it knows which warnings are false positives and which errors need real fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever you are about to create, push, open, update, or edit a pull request in the Handsontable monorepo – load this BEFORE running `gh pr create` or pushing a feature/docs/fix branch, not only when the user says "PR". Triggers: create/open/submit a PR, push the branch, commit and push, ship it, ready to review, update or fix a PR description, any PR URL, finishing work on a `feature/*`/`docs/*`/`fix/*` branch, or a completed ClickUp/DEV task ready to submit. Covers branch naming, pre-flight lint/tests, the PR-first then changelog flow, `gh auth` fallback, and filling the GitHub PR template.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remediates Google Cloud Security Command Center findings, including IAM permission fixes, cloud resource misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and Toxic Combinations. Use when asked to fix, remediate, or mitigate a Security Command Center finding or address attack paths. Don't use for general IAM policy querying without a Security Command Center finding. For runtime threat detections, this skill provides containment and investigation guidance rather than automated configuration fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when a model gets read-write control over its own live context window instead of a harness-scheduled compaction policy: the context exposed as an editable file the model rewrites with code tools, model-driven eviction and in-place updates, the harness invariants that keep self-editing safe (pinned prefix, edit gate, edit receipts, budget readouts, rollback on overflow), the prefix-cache cost of mid-context edits, and steering or training the model's own context-editing strategy. Route note content and fixed-threshold summarization to context-compression, cache-stable layout under harness control to context-optimization, file offloading to filesystem-context, and loop governance to self-improvement-loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated PR review and CI auto-fix for GitHub and GitLab using the Composio CLI. Pulls diffs, fetches failing job logs, posts review comments, and loops fix commits until checks go green.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect GitHub PR checks with gh, pull failing GitHub Actions logs, summarize failure context, then create a fix plan and implement after user approval. Use when a user asks to debug or fix failing PR CI/CD checks on GitHub Actions and wants a plan + code changes; for external checks (e.g., Buildkite), only report the details URL and mark them out of scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fast structured generation and serving for LLMs with RadixAttention prefix caching. Use for JSON/regex outputs, constrained decoding, agentic workflows with tool calls, or when you need 5× faster inference than vLLM with prefix sharing. Powers 300,000+ GPUs at xAI, AMD, NVIDIA, and LinkedIn.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce the smallest possible code change that fixes a specific, well-scoped issue (CI failure, reviewer comment, typo). Use only when the fix target is explicit. Never refactor unrelated code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly asks to fix and verify a validated or plausible security vulnerability. Do not use for ordinary bug fixes, correctness or design review findings, general validation, or full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous audit-to-fix pipeline — find issues, classify, fix, test, commit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and fix issues from Sentry using MCP. Use when asked to fix Sentry errors, debug production issues, investigate exceptions, or resolve bugs reported in Sentry. Methodically analyzes stack traces, breadcrumbs, traces, and context to identify root causes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate candidate fixes for verified security findings. Consumes TRIAGE.json (preferred), VULN-FINDINGS.json, INCIDENTS.json, or a vuln-pipeline results directory. Pipeline input is delegated to the execution-verified `vuln-pipeline patch` ladder; static-analysis input gets a per-finding patch subagent + independent reviewer and is written as inert diffs for human review. Writes PATCHES/bug_NN/{patch.diff,patch_result.json}, PATCHES.md, and PATCHES.json. Use when asked to "fix the findings", "patch these vulns", "generate fixes", or "close the loop on triage".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs an autonomous review-and-fix improvement loop over any code target — a skill, plugin, module, or directory — using a reviewer the user names: any installed skill or agent. Keeps a cross-round findings ledger, escalates when fixes stop converging, and guards scope mechanically. Use when asked to 'improve this code until review passes', 'run an improvement loop with <reviewer>', or to iterate review-and-fix with a specific reviewer. For skills prefer the skill-improver entry; for a branch prefer pr-improver.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly asks to fix and verify a validated or plausible security vulnerability. Do not use for ordinary bug fixes, correctness or design review findings, general validation, or full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user asks to debug or fix failing GitHub PR checks that run in GitHub Actions. Uses `gh` to inspect checks and logs, summarize failure context, draft a fix plan, and implement only after explicit approval. Treats external providers (for example Buildkite) as out of scope and reports only the details URL. Do NOT use for addressing PR review comments (use gh-address-comments) or general CI outside GitHub Actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interpret validation errors and guide fixing them. Use when encountering validation errors, validation warnings, false positives, operator structure issues, or need help understanding validation results. Also use when asking about validation profiles, error types, the validation loop process, or auto-fix capabilities. Consult this skill whenever a validate_node or validate_workflow call returns errors or warnings — it knows which warnings are false positives and which errors need real fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill enables visual inspection of websites running locally or remotely to identify and fix design issues. Triggers on requests like "review website design", "check the UI", "fix the layout", "find design problems". Detects issues with responsive design, accessibility, visual consistency, and layout breakage, then performs fixes at the source code level.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。