「forensics」の検索結果

Provides malware analysis and network traffic techniques for CTF challenges. Use when analyzing obfuscated scripts, malicious packages, custom crypto protocols, C2 traffic, PE/.NET binaries, RC4/AES encrypted communications, YARA rules, shellcode analysis, memory forensics for malware (Volatility malfind, process injection detection), anti-analysis techniques (VM/sandbox detection, timing evasion, API hashing, process injection, environment checks), or extracting malware configurations and indicators of compromise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides web exploitation techniques for CTF challenges. Use when the target is primarily an HTTP application, API, browser client, template engine, identity flow, or smart-contract frontend/backend surface, including XSS, SQLi, SSTI, SSRF, XXE, JWT, auth bypass, file upload, request smuggling, OAuth/OIDC, SAML, prototype pollution, and similar web bugs. Do not use it for native binary memory corruption, reverse engineering of standalone executables, disk or memory forensics, or pure cryptanalysis unless the web flaw is still the main path to the flag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides reverse engineering techniques for CTF challenges. Use when the main job is to understand how a compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized target works before exploiting or solving it, including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, custom VMs, bytecode, game clients, malware-like loaders, and anti-debug or anti-analysis logic. Do not use it when the vulnerability is already understood and the remaining task is exploitation; use pwn instead. Do not use it for pure web workflows, log or disk forensics, or standalone crypto problems unless reversing the implementation is the real blocker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides binary exploitation techniques for CTF challenges. Use when you already have a vulnerable native target or service and need to turn memory corruption or low-level primitives into code execution or privilege escalation, such as buffer overflows, format strings, heap bugs, ROP, ret2libc, shellcode, kernel exploitation, seccomp bypass, sandbox escape, or Windows/Linux exploit chains. Do not use it when the main blocker is understanding what the binary does; use reverse engineering first. Do not use it for pure web bugs, disk or packet forensics, or standalone crypto/math challenges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides miscellaneous CTF challenge techniques for problems that do not cleanly fit the main categories. Use for encoding puzzles, pyjails, bash jails, RF/SDR, DNS oddities, unicode tricks, esoteric languages, QR or audio puzzles, constraint solving, game theory, unusual sandbox escapes, and hybrid logic puzzles. Prefer a more specific skill first when the challenge is mainly web, pwn, reverse, forensics, malware, OSINT, or crypto. Treat this as the fallback skill for genuine cross-category or edge-case challenges, not the default starting point.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Traffic analysis and PCAP forensics playbook. Use when analyzing network captures including Wireshark filters, protocol analysis (HTTP/DNS/FTP/SMTP/USB/WiFi), data extraction, covert channel detection, PCAP repair, TLS decryption, and tshark command-line analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

1:1 rebuild of award-winning creative websites (WebGL / scroll-animation / portfolio sites). Evidence-driven pipeline - mirror-first forensics, line-number-traceable reverse engineering of minified bundles, verbatim porting, quantitative verification gates. Use when user asks to "复刻网站", "重建网站", "1:1 rebuild", "clone this site", or provides a URL of a creative/award site to reproduce.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

用于磁盘镜像、内存转储、事件日志、PCAP、隐写分析、Windows 注册表、音频信号、Docker 镜像、coredump 以及已删除文件与凭据恢复等取证类 CTF 题;触发名:ctf-forensics

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cyber threat intelligence and OSINT analysis toolkit. Runs structured investigations and delivers analyst-grade intelligence products with sourced, trust-scored findings. Use for OSINT and CTI cases, digital-footprint and exposure review, domain/subdomain/DNS/certificate recon, web-infrastructure pivoting (favicon hashes, tracker IDs, TLS certs, phishing-kit fingerprinting, campaign clustering), username/email/phone enumeration, breach and infostealer-log triage, image forensics, geolocation, crypto-wallet and IBAN/bank-account tracing, darknet search, M365/Azure and SaaS tenant recon, China/Sinophone recon (ICP filings, PRC corporate registries, Baidu/FOFA/Quake/ZoomEye), vulnerability and ransomware lookup, threat modeling, PII redaction, and structured reporting. Commands include /case, /sweep, /query, /webpivot, /username, /phone, /email-deep, /breach-deep, /icp, /cn-corp, /iban, /stealer-log, /exposure, /threat-model, /report, /brief, /redact, /apikeys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides reverse engineering techniques. Use when the main job is to understand how a compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized target works before exploiting or solving it, including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, custom VMs, bytecode, malware-like loaders, and anti-debug or anti-analysis logic. Do not use it when the vulnerability is already understood and the remaining task is exploitation; use pwn instead. Do not use it for pure web workflows, log or disk forensics, or standalone crypto problems unless reversing the implementation is the real blocker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screens biomedical / life-science papers for signs of data fabrication, image manipulation, and statistical anomalies, using the detection techniques distilled from the field's canonical exposure platforms (PubPeer, Data Colada, Science Integrity Digest, For Better Science) and tools (ImageTwin/Proofig, statcheck, GRIM/GRIMMER, Problematic Paper Screener, Seek & Blastn). Use when asked to check a paper/figure for image duplication, blot splicing, impossible statistics, paper-mill or tortured-phrase signals, research integrity, or "is this data faked"; or when a user shares a figure, Western blot, supplementary dataset, or DOI and asks whether it looks manipulated. Reports observable anomalies as questions for clarification — it never accuses anyone of fraud.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CTF challenge router - fingerprint a challenge (file type / prompt / artifacts) into its category (pwn, rev, crypto, forensics, stego, web, osint, hash) and route to the matching wiki page, tools, and first moves. Wiki-first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a comprehensive breach response team playbook defining CSIRT and privacy team structure with named roles (incident commander, legal counsel, communications, IT forensics, DPO), escalation matrices, communication templates, pre-negotiated vendor contacts, and regulatory authority contacts organized by jurisdiction. Keywords: breach response playbook, CSIRT, incident response team, escalation matrix, communication templates, vendor contacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides reverse engineering techniques. Use when the main job is to understand how a compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized target works before exploiting or solving it, including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, custom VMs, bytecode, malware-like loaders, and anti-debug or anti-analysis logic. Do not use it when the vulnerability is already understood and the remaining task is exploitation; use pwn instead. Do not use it for pure web workflows, log or disk forensics, or standalone crypto problems unless reversing the implementation is the real blocker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end substantive-integrity forensic sweep of a research paper (especially autoresearch / AI-Scientist-style output). Orchestrates the whole pipeline: ingest (arxiv-id | pdf | dir → working dir + pdftotext for L0) → /evidence-ledger (artifact manifest + observability level L0/L1/L2 + span-anchored claims.json) → fan out the integrity auditor skills (consistency, citation, baseline, experiment, presentation, proof-derivation, eval-design — each reads the ledger, emits span-anchored findings) + the zero-verdict-weight AIS writing-style track → advisory memos (/adversarial-case-builder + /novelty-duplication-advisory, no verdict weight) → deterministic tools/adjudicate_findings.py (--ledger REQUIRED) → reviewer-ready Integrity Forensics Report. Cross-model (fresh codex per dimension) and reviewer≠adjudicator: the model proposes findings, the deterministic adjudicator decides the verdict. Observability-aware, detect-only, never an opaque AI-text classifier (a separate zero-weight AIS section lists AI writing-style impressions, never moving the verdict). Triggers: "anti-autoresearch", "integrity audit this paper", "forensic review", "audit a submission", "审一篇投稿的诚信".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flagship intra-paper self-consistency forensics: does the paper contradict ITSELF across abstract/intro/tables/body/appendix, and does the method DESCRIBED match the method EVALUATED? Needs no external ground truth — works PDF-only (L0). Runs a deterministic arithmetic pass + a fresh cross-model semantic pass, every finding span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json), reviewer≠adjudicator. Emits consistency-audit.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "consistency audit", "check the paper against itself", "self-consistency", "内部自洽".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-mortem investigation for failed GSD workflows — analyzes git history, artifacts, and state to diagnose what went wrong

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect and explain bmad-loop run artifacts under `.bmad-loop/runs/`. Use for live health checks ("is it stuck?", "is the loop alive?", "what is the agent doing?") and post-run forensics ("what happened?", "why did story X fail?", "where did the tokens go?"). Also triggers on "monitor/check/summarize the loop", "why did the run pause?", Vietnamese "theo dõi bmad loop", "phân tích run", "đọc log của run", and equivalent requests in other languages. Use only for bmad-loop's own run artifacts, not application runtime logs or CI-provider build logs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dispute resolution, forensic investigation, and risk assessment for autonomous AI agent transactions. Reconstruct provenance chains, adjudicate fault, generate actuarial risk profiles for agent insurance. The accountability layer of the Agent Trust Stack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when analyzing Claude Code session transcripts, reviewing agent performance, finding anti-patterns or tool misuse, mining workflow patterns, running kaizen analysis, debugging agent behavior, or performing session forensics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Active Directory, Kerberos, LDAP, OAuth, enterprise messaging, Windows host forensics, credential material, and lateral-movement challenges. Use when the user asks to trace tickets or tokens, inspect mailbox rules, analyze Windows host evidence, understand an AD trust path, or explain a lateral-movement chain across sandbox-linked nodes. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides reverse engineering techniques. Use when the main job is to understand how a compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized target works before exploiting or solving it, including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, custom VMs, bytecode, game clients, malware-like loaders, and anti-debug or anti-analysis logic. Do not use it when the vulnerability is already understood and the remaining task is exploitation; use pwn instead. Do not use it for pure web workflows, log or disk forensics, or standalone crypto problems unless reversing the implementation is the real blocker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever writing, reviewing, or debugging .NET/C# code that uses the BallisticCalculator NuGet package (namespace BallisticCalculator) or its Gehtsoft.Measurements unit types — even when the user doesn't name the package explicitly but is clearly doing external/interior ballistics in .NET (bullet drop, velocity, energy, windage, spin drift, time of flight, zeroing a scope) for rifles, air rifles, bows, or artillery. Covers the full public API (Ammunition, Rifle, Atmosphere, Wind, ShotParameters, TrajectoryCalculator, TrajectoryPoint); standard, custom, .drg, and multi-BC drag tables; saving/loading data and building your own file format around it (BXml and System.Text.Json serialization); and building or rendering scope reticles (e.g. to SVG). Also use it for this library's Gehtsoft.Measurements Measurement<T> unit types (DistanceUnit, VelocityUnit, AngularUnit, WeightUnit, PressureUnit, …). Skip for: generic physics or projectile-motion exercises, a different ballistics library (e.g. GNU/JBM), game-engine or Unity projectile motion, plain unit conversions, and non-code ballistics questions (load-data or forensics advice). Self-contained: no access to the library source or binaries is required — prefer this over scanning the package to rediscover the API. Describes 1.1.13+, including the named ZeroRangeCantBeReachedException / TrajectoryCannotBeCalculatedException failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recover deleted files from disk images and storage media using PhotoRec's file signature-based carving engine regardless of file system damage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。