「independent review」の検索結果

Comprehensive adversarial audit of a theory, proof, math/econ paper, codebase, or set of claims — decompose into components, fan out independent skeptics that must return CONCRETE defects, adjudicate every finding with a separate judge, fix all confirmed defects, then re-verify. Use when correctness must be bulletproof and single-pass or round-by-round review is too slow and too shallow. Invoke for "audit this rigorously", "find ALL the bugs/gaps", "make this rock solid", "converge faster on correctness".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing a written implementation plan across sessions or with review checkpoints. Small or single-slice plans stay inline. For same-session independent tasks, use subagent-driven-development instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the local Codex CLI as an independent second agent. Two branches — (1) proactively run `codex review` for a second opinion after completing a substantive change, before presenting it as done or committing; (2) delegate a well-defined implementation task via `codex exec`, ONLY when the user explicitly asks for Codex to do it. Also covers how to prompt Codex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use AtomLane to compile and execute safe atomic parallel plans on macOS and native Windows Preview for worthwhile independent argv tasks, dependency DAGs, supported platform entrypoints, or Apple-silicon operators. Use at task start or an execution boundary when structured local work may contain two or more worthwhile units; skip plain answers, one quick command, and work whose effects cannot be safely bounded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare independent opinions from several models or contexts without inflating agreement. Use when: wanting a second opinion or debate, or summarizing several reviewers' results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating the model and analyzing results for an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript so it survives expert systems review — independent model evaluation (observed vs. simulated, fit statistics), sensitivity and uncertainty analysis, and trade-off / scenario analysis across the system. Guides evaluation norms; it does not fabricate results or run the model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when strengthening the reproducibility of an ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) paper or preparing for the ACM MM Reproducibility track and ACM artifact badging — capturing environments, media/data access, seeds, and multimodal pipelines so an independent reviewer can rebuild results and reach Artifacts Evaluated or Results Reproduced badges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Report the compatibility redirect to `ap-independent-checker`; this retired role cannot perform new work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, build and quality-check a premium short commercial for a real business (roofing, property, ecommerce, B2B software) using AI-generated footage, code-built motion (HTML/GSAP), selective Three.js and an independent-critic "Gauntlet" loop. Use when asked to make a launch-style / SaaS-style video, business ad, explainer, sample reel or pitch video, or to review and improve one. Encodes motion principles distilled from 28 professional launch films, a quality bar, audio rules and a business-offer playbook.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent source security audit with a coverage ledger, independently verified findings, and machine-checked records. Use when asked to audit a codebase, find vulnerabilities, or run a source-level pen test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a one-line description of a repetitive task into a reusable, self-guarding slash command. loop-forge diagnoses the task into one of 5 loop shapes (Batch / Pipeline / Refine / Watch / Explore), interviews for the blanks, and auto-injects two safety devices the user didn't know they needed — an independent verifier (maker ≠ checker) and a hardstop (a budget/count/cooldown ceiling) — then previews the result and stamps it as a `/command` they can run forever. Use when the user says "/loop", "/loop-forge", "/make-it-loop", "automate this", "make this repeatable", "turn this into a command", "do this for all 100 items", "do X every time Y happens", "generate several and pick the best", or otherwise wants to capture a recurring task as a reusable slash command instead of re-typing the prompt by hand. Works in any language: it interviews the user and writes the stamped command in the user's own language. Non-goal — it does not schedule unattended runs (launchd/cron) or publish externally on its own; it stamps the reusable command and stops there.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize slow React Router loaders by eliminating redundant DB queries, creating slim query variants, and parallelizing independent fetches. Use proactively when writing or reviewing loader code that calls domain operations services (e.g. CourseOperationsService, VideoOperationsService), or when triaging a slow page load.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user mentions Marketing Studio, DTC Ads, ad video, UGC video, the marketing_studio_video MCP model, or wants to generate one of the 9 Marketing Studio ad presets (UGC, Tutorial, Unboxing, Hyper Motion, Product Review, TV Spot, Wild Card, UGC Virtual Try On, Pro Virtual Try On). Also triggers on hook+setting picklist questions, preset-avatar / custom-avatar / text-generated-avatar handling, 4–15s ad video questions, or any reference to Higgsfield's ad-video product surface. Cross-surface workflow handoffs (GPT Image 2.0 / Soul Cinema / Nano Banana Pro / ms_image image gen → Marketing Studio video) covered in the companion cross-surface-workflow.md. Also use for Ad Multiplier (`ad_multiplier` — 'multiply my ad', many independently edited versions of one supplied 4–30s ad) and for Genjutsu one-off edits of a finished ad (swap one object / product / garment → `hf_mult_replace_object`; transfer motion → `hf_mult_motion_control`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adjudicates authorized exercise outcomes against independently held ground truth, redacted evidence, and explicit status boundaries. Use when comparing observations, resolving discrepancies, or preparing evidence-led security-review handoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Captures redacted, provenance-aware cybersecurity observations with shared status fields, independent ground truth, and honest limitations. Use when recording exercise evidence, findings, validation results, or security-review handoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute multi-task implementation plans by dispatching a fresh implementer subagent per task with independent review gates. Use when implementing plans, executing multi-task PRs, or transitioning from planning to implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare independent opinions from several models or contexts without inflating agreement. Use when: wanting a second opinion or debate, or summarizing several reviewers' results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Java change needs independent Behavior-Driven Development guidance from trusted behavior facts through concrete examples and observable scenarios, with focused clarification when behavior is pending or ambiguous. This should trigger for requests such as Apply BDD; Facilitate behavior examples; Discover scenarios with Given When Then; Review these examples for shared domain language; Complete BDD discovery as a self-contained interaction. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a non-interactive Claude Code print-mode call from Codex. Use when the user asks to "claude print", "ask claude", "run claude", "consult claude", or when a Codex Turbo skill needs Claude as an independent peer reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before showing the user any substantive GTM deliverable (positioning, value prop, homepage, launch post, pricing, sales script, the brief or roadmap), stress-test it against the standard as an independent critic, because the agent that wrote it is the worst judge of whether it is good. Use as a gate right before presenting work, or when the user asks whether something is actually strong.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Carry out a released charter to a proven result: plan only as much as the work needs, do the work through the project's own workers, prove every success check with a recorded real run, get one independent review, and close honestly. Invoke explicitly as `$deliver <charter>` (Codex) or `/deliver <charter>` (Claude, Cursor), or the way your agent invokes a skill, or when a dispatch names you the executor of a charter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break a trusted implementation plan (or other provided context) into independently-grabbable, atomic work items, written to a single work-items.md file. Use when the user wants to convert a plan into work items, create implementation tickets or tasks, divide a plan into work units, or break the plan down into grabbable pieces. Do not use when there is no implementation plan yet or the plan is not yet trusted — use plan-implementation to produce the plan or iterative-plan-review to harden it first. Does not sequence work into demoable delivery phases — use plan-a-phased-build for that. Does not write code — use tdd to implement a work item.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independently verify a factory pull request, including fail-closed gates, negative test proof, scope, and load-bearing review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an honest market-fit and viability audit of any project or idea and produce a decision doc, not code. Use when someone asks "is this viable as a business", "audit the market fit", "make the case and compare to competitors", "should I apply to YC or bootstrap", or wants to validate a project, product, or market before investing more time. Gathers verifiable traction data first, researches the competitive field, gets an independent cold read, writes a doc with pre-committed pass/middle/kill criteria and a concrete week-1 assignment, then hardens it with an adversarial review loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。