Research npm packages — download stats, dependencies, maintainers, version history, and security advisories. Useful for technology due diligence, dependency auditing, and evaluating package reliability before adoption.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
190 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Research npm packages — download stats, dependencies, maintainers, version history, and security advisories. Useful for technology due diligence, dependency auditing, and evaluating package reliability before adoption.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze GitHub and Discord signals to prioritize maintainer attention. Use when asked about priorities, what's hot, what needs attention, or project status.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
独立开发者与微型 SaaS — 单人或极小团队 (≤3 人) 构建可持续订阅收入的软件产品商业, 有别于自由职业/咨询、企业级 SaaS 和开源维护: (a) 产品发现与验证 (自己的痒 vs 市场优先 Nugent/Walling; 着陆页冒烟测试; 先接 Stripe 再写代码; JTBD 访谈适配独立开发者场景; Reddit/HN/X/社区痛点挖掘; Mom Test 验证框架; 公开构建作为验证机制); (b) 独立开发者技术架构 (无聊技术论 McKinley; 单体优先; serverless vs VPS 在 ≤$100/月预算下的取舍; Rails/Django/Laravel/Next.js 等框架的出货速度选型; 托管服务优先于自建; Supabase/PlanetScale/Neon 数据库即服务; Clerk/Auth0 认证即服务; Stripe/Paddle/LemonSqueezy 支付; Vercel/Fly.io/Railway 部署; AI 辅助编码 Cursor/Copilot 作为力量倍增器); (c) 无营销团队的分发与增长 (SEO 作为微型 SaaS 护城河; Product Hunt 发布; AppSumo 终身授权利弊; 冷邮件; Twitter/X 公开构建; IndieHackers 社区分发; 集成市场 Shopify/WordPress/Zapier/Slack 应用目录; 联盟计划; 一人内容营销); (d) 定价与变现 (SaaS 定价心理学; freemium vs 免费试用 vs 纯付费; 按席位 vs 按用量 vs 固定费率; 年付折扣; 老用户保价; 微型 SaaS 流失率控制; MRR/ARR/LTV/CAC 在微型规模的含义; $10K MRR 里程碑心理学); (e) 独立创始人心智模型与生活设计 (default alive vs default dead Graham; 拉面盈利 Levels; 生活方式生意 vs 增长生意的光谱; 独立开发者倦怠预防; 时间管理与上下文切换成本; 地理套利与远程优先; 一次构建反复销售的资产思维; 社区作为支持网络 IndieHackers/WIP/MicroConf); (f) 法务与运营基础 (公司注册地选择 LLC/Ltd/GmbH 税效; Stripe Atlas vs Firstbase vs 本地律师; 服务条款与隐私政策; GDPR/CCPA 低成本合规; 知识产权基础; 首次雇人的承包商 vs 员工选择; 独立开发者会计 SaaS — Xero/QuickBooks; 多辖区税务义务)。中国独立开发者生态: 出海作为主导策略 (从中国构建面向全球市场的产品以避开国内竞争/监管); 即刻/V2EX/少数派作为社区枢纽; 微信小程序作为替代分发; 小报童/爱发电作为中文市场变现; 人民币定价心理学; 支付宝/微信支付集成; ICP 备案要求; 中国区 App Store 审核差异; 独立开发者周刊。诚实处理: 生存偏差 (每一个 Pieter Levels 背后是数千个从未达到 $1K MRR 的人), AI 对微型 SaaS 生态位的颠覆 (wrapper 产品脆弱), 独自构建的孤独与心理健康成本, 公开构建的表演性质 vs 真正透明, AppSumo 终身授权上瘾毁坏单位经济, 样板代码销售的伦理边界。不含: 企业级 SaaS (不同 GTM/销售/融资模型), 不含: 自由职业/咨询 (用时间换钱非建资产), 不含: 开源维护 (不同可持续性模型), 不含: 风投支持的创业 (不同增长期望), 不含: 无代码/低代码平台构建 (相邻但不同受众), 不含: 内容创作作为主业。 (Independent Developer and Micro-SaaS — the craft of single-person or tiny-team (≤3 people) software product businesses that generate sustainable recurring revenue without venture capital, distinct from freelancing/consulting, enterprise SaaS, and open-source maintainership: (a) product discovery and validation (scratching your own itch vs market-first Nugent/Walling; landing page smoke tests; Stripe checkout before code; Jobs-to-Be-Done interview adapted to solo context; Reddit/HN/X/community pain-point mining; idea validation frameworks Fitzpatrick Mom Test; build-in-public as validation mechanism); (b) technical architecture for solo operators (boring technology thesis Mckinley; monolith-first; serverless vs VPS tradeoffs for ≤$100/mo infra; framework selection for shipping speed — Rails/Django/Laravel/Next.js/Remix/SvelteKit; managed services over self-hosted whenever possible; database-as-a-service Supabase/PlanetScale/Neon/Turso; auth-as-a-service Clerk/Auth0/Supabase Auth; payment integration Stripe/Paddle/LemonSqueezy; deployment Vercel/Fly.io/Railway/Render; monorepo vs polyrepo for solo; AI-assisted coding Cursor/Copilot as force multiplier); (c) distribution and growth without a marketing team (SEO as moat for micro-SaaS Ahrefs-style content marketing on 1-person budget; Product Hunt launches; AppSumo lifetime deals tradeoffs; cold email outreach; Twitter/X building in public; IndieHackers community distribution; integration marketplaces Shopify/WordPress/Zapier/Slack app directories as channels; affiliate programs; content marketing at scale-of-one); (d) pricing and monetization (SaaS pricing psychology Patel/Campbell; freemium vs free trial vs paid-only; per-seat vs usage-based vs flat-rate; annual discount strategies; grandfathering existing customers; churn reduction for micro-SaaS — Baremetrics/ProfitWell/ChartMogul analytics; MRR/ARR/LTV/CAC at micro scale; the $10K MRR milestone psychology); (e) solo founder mental model and lifestyle design (default alive vs default dead Graham; ramen profitability Levels; lifestyle business vs growth business spectrum; burnout prevention for solo operators — no team to delegate to; time management and context-switching costs; geographic arbitrage and remote-first; the 'build once sell twice' asset mindset; community as support network IndieHackers/WIP/MicroConf); (f) legal and operational basics (incorporation LLC/Ltd/Gm
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an OpenClaw maintainer or owner is reviewing a ClawHub malicious-skill profile proposal PR: checking `proposals/<GHSA-ID>/clawscan.yml`, reading the private vulnerability context without leaking it, running the SkillTrustBench Profile Gate or equivalent local benchmark, updating the accepted baseline, and promoting an accepted candidate into `internal/profiles/clawhub/clawscan.yml`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a researcher, maintainer, or contributor found or suspects a malicious skill on ClawHub and needs a private reporting workflow: opening a GitHub private vulnerability report, preparing a proposal-only PR, creating `proposals/<GHSA-ID>/clawscan.yml`, running ClawScan against the malicious skill, and explaining what evidence belongs in private versus public channels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for local GitHub issue/PR archive search, sync freshness, clusters, durable maintainer triage, handoff to Octopool-backed gh reads, and Gitcrawl repo/release work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when launching Clownfish in GitHub Actions to create or update one guarded GitHub implementation PR from issue/PR refs, a ClawSweeper report, a custom maintainer prompt, or opt any PR into ClawSweeper-reviewed Clownfish automerge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find unclaimed open source issues that match the user's skills and experience level. Searches for issues created by maintainers/org admins, checks contribution eligibility, and ranks by learning value. Use when looking for an issue to contribute to, starting OSS contributions, or finding GSoC-friendly issues. Not for finding problems that nobody has filed an issue for yet. Use oss-find-real-issues for that.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintainer-only. Use when triaging inbound GitHub issues and pull requests on skyf0xx/hedgehog — "triage the issues", "check the PRs", "review inbound", "what's in the queue". Reads each item read-only, judges it for security and for whether it is real, then fixes and closes or comments and closes. Not part of the Hedgehog discipline a consuming project copies; this only applies to the Hedgehog repo itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintainer-only. Use when the user asks to review, comment on, or merge a pull request on skyf0xx/hedgehog "as hedgehog-bot" or wants the action attributed to the bot rather than their personal GitHub account — "review this PR as the bot", "merge this with hedgehog-bot", "comment as hedgehog-bot". Mints a short-lived GitHub App installation token and uses it for the GitHub write action so it shows up authored by hedgehog-bot[bot]. Not part of the Hedgehog discipline a consuming project copies; this only applies to the Hedgehog repo itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintainer-only. Use when re-vendoring vendor-skills/BMAD/ against a newer BMAD-METHOD commit — "update BMAD", "re-vendor BMAD", "bump the BMAD pin". Not part of the Hedgehog discipline a consuming project copies; this only applies to the Hedgehog repo itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a maintainer or collaborator explicitly asks to review and land one external pull request. Don't use for internal pull requests or landing without preserving contributor authorship.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI向けマークダウンドキュメント(SKILL.md、AGENTS.md、.agent/*.md など)の健全性チェックと修正を支援するスキル。「ドキュメントの整合性を確認」「SSOT違反を探す」「スキル定義をメンテしたい」「PRの概要を更新したい」と依頼されたときに使用する。
Use after a release succeeds, when maintainers need to sync apps/pythinker-code/CHANGELOG.md into docs/release-notes/changelog.md, then open a PR on a dedicated branch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GitHub/GitLab 贡献真实性核验:逐个查看 PR 的实际 diff、按领域与深度分类统计、核对贡献量级与"Contributor/核心贡献者/Maintainer"类表述是否相符,识别刷绿、刷 PR、刷 star 与领域错配(如自称 AI Infra 实则全是前端提交)。凡是要评估某人 GitHub 的含金量就使用本技能——包括用户说"他这个 GitHub 怎么样""这个 contributor 有多少水分""开源经历值多少""帮我看看这个账号"时。也在 /resume-audit 需要核验代码托管材料时调用。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a pull request or contribution deeply, explain it tutorial-style for a maintainer, and produce a polished report artifact such as HTML or Markdown. Use when asked to analyze a PR, explain a contributor's design decisions, compare it with similar systems, or prepare a merge recommendation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and maintain a persistent, interlinked markdown wiki (second brain / research notebook / personal knowledge base) from raw sources. Use this skill when the user wants to ingest an article / paper / note / URL / PDF into their wiki, ask a question against their wiki, lint/health-check their wiki, or set up a new wiki from a folder. Triggers include phrases like "add this to my wiki", "ingest this", "file this article", "update my notes with this", "what does my wiki say about X", "health-check my wiki", "find stale/orphan pages", or any workflow involving a `raw/` source folder, `wiki/` markdown folder, `index.md`, or `log.md`. Compatible with Obsidian vaults.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintainer side of an outside contribution — find what has arrived (fork PR, issue, or patches sent out-of-band), adopt it into an in-repo branch with authorship intact, review it against the repo's bar, and ship it through the normal merge path. Use when landing work from someone without write access or without the CI fleet.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Document a machine learning model in a structured, transparent format for stakeholders, reviewers, and future maintainers. Use when the user says "document this model", "write a model card", "model documentation", "how should I document my ML model", "bias and fairness report", "model transparency", "what does this model do", "model handoff", "production model documentation", or needs to communicate what a model does, how it was built, where it works, and where it fails.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mechanical documentation hygiene. Spawns a doc-maintainer agent to audit all project documentation and fix correctness, completeness, freshness, and consistency issues autonomously within its authority. Surfaces anything requiring user judgment for approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforces Beads policy for a repository maintained initially by one owner, granting issue-management and commit authority while requiring explicit permission for Git pushes (other than to the user's own fork) and Dolt sync or push operations. Use when the user asks to enroll, repair, or operate a solo-maintainer Beads workspace, and when working with Beads in a repository that may carry a beads-solo enrollment, including when bd refuses a schema migration or mentions a remote.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dev-only check that a drafted spec for THIS baseline repo won't ship dev-tree references to consumer installs. Catches three failure modes — shipped SKILL.md prose that references paths under `src/`, `tests/`, `scripts/`, `obj/` as runtime invocations (in ```bash fences``` OR `inline backticks`, plus shipped `.mjs`/`.js`/`.sh`/`.py` helper-file imports); new Python helpers added under `.claude/skills/<slug>/` (shipped helpers must be `.sh` or `.mjs`/`.js` going forward); and imports of modules that aren't in `obj/template/.claude/manifest.json` (consumer won't have the file). The aggregate scanner (`scan-shipped-skills.mjs`) walks only baseline-owned skill dirs (via `owner: baseline` frontmatter) at top level — `references/` and other subdirs are documentation, not runtime. BLOCKER findings hard-block implementation entry; ADVISORY surfaces but doesn't block. Read-only — surfaces a punch list; maintainer edits the spec and re-runs until CLEAN.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dev-only review of user-facing CLI interface copy in `src/cli/tui/*.js`, `src/cli/*.js` error paths, and `bin/cli.js` help/usage text. Surfaces three failure modes — copy/behavior mismatch, jargon, missing next-action — as a punch list the maintainer addresses before `/grant-commit`. Read-only; no writes to source. Conditionally seeded by `/triage` between `/memory-sync` and `/grant-commit` when the request will touch CLI surfaces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Subagent flow for deep-reading GitHub issues + their linked/closing PRs to the bottom. Captures CURRENT state, maintainer status updates, reporter repro, blocking reviewer concerns, hidden second bugs, cross-repo duplicates. Invoked by weekly-report orchestrator; runs as a general-purpose subagent so the orchestrator's context stays small.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。