「observe」の検索結果

产品设计 / UX 设计 (产品设计 / UX 设计 (Product Design / UX Design) — 数字产品的用户体验设计：从用户研究 → 信息架构 → 交互设计 → 视觉/UI → 可用性测试 → 设计系统的认知操作系统，面向 UX designer / product designer / interaction designer / UX researcher / design systems engineer / design lead，以及想入行、转岗、服务这行(设计外包、设计工具厂商、研究平台)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **用户中心/研究驱动 (user-centered, 'you are not the user', research before pixels, observe behavior not opinions) ⇄ 商业目标/约束/交付 (business goals, north-star metrics, ship it, designer 服务于产品成功不是个人作品集)**; **设计直觉/品味/craft (taste, aesthetics, 'attractive things work better' — Norman 情感化设计) ⇄ 数据/实验/A-B 测试 (data-driven, metrics, experimentation, 'opinions are not data')**; **用户说的 (stated preference, 访谈里说喜欢) ⇄ 用户做的 (revealed behavior, 行为观察 > 自陈, usability test 看人真实卡在哪)**; **一致性/设计系统/规范 (consistency, design system, Jakob's law 用户带着别处的习惯来, 复用组件) ⇄ 创新/打破模式 (innovation, 该不该破规范)**; **减法/简化 (simplicity, Krug 'Don't Make Me Think', less but better — Dieter Rams) ⇄ 功能丰富/利益相关者塞需求 (feature creep, stakeholder pressure)**; **UX(体验/流程/研究) ⇄ UI(视觉/像素/组件)** 的职责之争, **designer 该不该写代码 (design engineer / 'should designers code')**; (b) 核心工作流 / pipeline (最标准、最易蒸高质量+CLI 化) — Double Diamond (发现 discover → 定义 define → 开发 develop → 交付 deliver) / Design Thinking (共情 empathize → 定义 → 构思 ideate → 原型 prototype → 测试 test) / Design Sprint (Jake Knapp 5 天冲刺); 完整链: 用户研究 (访谈/问卷/可用性测试/卡片分类) → persona / journey map / JTBD → 信息架构 IA + 用户流 user flow → 线框 wireframe (低保真) → 交互/原型 prototype (高保真) → 视觉 UI / 设计系统落地 → 可用性测试 usability testing → handoff 给开发 → 度量迭代 (北极星 / HEART 框架); (c) 工具栈 — 设计/原型 (Figma 绝对主导 / Sketch 衰退 / Adobe XD 已停更 / Framer 高保真+建站 / Penpot 开源 / Principle / ProtoPie 微交互); 协作白板 (FigJam / Miro / Mural); 用户研究 (Maze / UserTesting / Lookback / Dovetail 研究库 / Optimal Workshop 卡片分类树测试 / Hotjar / Microsoft Clarity 热图); 设计系统/交付 (Storybook / 蓝湖(中) / Zeplin / design tokens / Tokens Studio); 度量 (Amplitude / Mixpanel / 北极星指标); AI 新兴 (Figma AI / v0 by Vercel / Galileo AI / Uizard / Cursor 给 design engineer); (d) 知识正典 — Don Norman《The Design of Everyday Things》(affordance/signifier/mapping 圣经)、Steve Krug《Don't Make Me Think》(可用性入门)、Alan Cooper《About Face》《The Inmates Are Running the Asylum》(交互设计/persona 起源)、Jakob Nielsen 10 Usability Heuristics + NN/g 文章库、Jake Knapp《Sprint》、Jeff Gothelf《Lean UX》、Teresa Torres《Continuous Discovery Habits》、Erika Hall《Just Enough Research》、Julie Zhuo《The Making of a Manager》、《Refactoring UI》(Adam Wathan/Steve Schoger)、《Universal Principles of Design》、Laws of UX (Jon Yablonski)、《100 Things Every Designer Needs to Know About People》(Susan Weinschenk)、IDEO/Stanford d.school 设计思维材料; (e) figures/流派 — 认知心理/人因派 (Don Norman 认知科学奠基、Susan Weinschenk 行为心理、Kathryn Whitenton); 可用性工程派 (Jakob Nielsen 启发式/折扣可用性、Steve Krug、Jared Spool UIE); 交互设计/目标导向派 (Alan Cooper goal-directed/persona、Kim Goodwin); 设计思维派 (IDEO Tim Brown、David Kelley d.school); 精益/持续探索派 (Jeff Gothelf Lean UX、Teresa Torres continuous discovery、Marty Cagan《Inspired》产品发现); 设计系统/系统化派 (Brad Frost Atomic Design、Nathan Curtis design tokens、Alla Kholmatova); 视觉/UI craft 派 (Adam Wathan & Steve Schoger Refactoring UI、Dieter Rams 'less but better' 工业设计遗产); 设计领导/职业派 (Julie Zhuo、Aarron Walter 情感化设计、John Maeda); 移动优先 (Luke Wroblewski 'Mobile First'); (f) 行业话术/黑话 — affordance 可供性 / signifier 意符 / mental model 心智模型 / IA 信息架构 / heuristic evaluation 启发式评估 / usability 可用性 / a11y accessibility 无障碍 / WCAG / persona 用户画像 / journey map 用户旅程 / JTBD jobs-to-be-done / north-star metric 北极星 / HEART 框架 / wireframe 线框 / mockup / prototype 原型 / fidelity 保真度 (lo-fi/hi-fi) / design system 设计系统 / design token 设计令牌 / atomic design 原子设计 / component library 组件库 / handoff 交付 / red routes 关键路径 / dark pattern 暗黑模式 / Fitts's law / Hick's law / Jakob's law / Miller 7±2 / progressive disclosure 渐进披露 / above the fold / hamburger menu / skeuomorphism vs flat / micro-interaction / empty state / edge case / happy path / design debt 设计债 / dogfooding / dot voting / affinity mapping 亲和图 / card sorting 卡片分类 / tree testing / A/B test / NPS / SUS (System Usability Scale); (

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Disciplined, validation-gated revision of an EXISTING skill so each edit is a measured improvement rather than a guess. Use when editing, revising, or tuning a skill that already exists and there is evidence it underperforms (observed failures, drift, complaints) — invoke by name, or have versioning-skills / creating-skill defer to it before applying edits. Not for authoring a brand-new skill from scratch (use creating-skill) or one-off prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze production Agentforce agent behavior using session traces and Data Cloud, and manage Agent Health Monitoring (AHM) alerts. TRIGGER when: user queries STDM session data or Data Cloud trace records; investigates production agent failures, regressions, or performance issues; asks about session traces, conversation logs, or agent metrics; wants to reproduce a reported production issue in preview; runs findSessions or trace analysis queries; creates, lists, updates, or deletes an AHM data alert on an agent metric (escalation rate, deflection, etc.); asks why an alert is not firing or wants to check whether alerts have fired (notification counts, or the per-alert Incidents view). DO NOT TRIGGER when: user creates, modifies, or debugs .agent files during development (use agentforce-generate); writes or runs test specs (use agentforce-test); uses sf agent preview for local development iteration; deploys or publishes agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, run, and analyze structured test suites for Agentforce agents — functional AND security. TRIGGER when: user writes or modifies test spec YAML (AiEvaluationDefinition); runs sf agent test create, run, run-eval, or results commands; asks about test coverage strategy, metric selection, or custom evaluations; interprets test results or diagnoses test failures; asks about batch testing, regression suites, or CI/CD test integration; requests security testing, OWASP LLM Top 10, red-teaming, penetration testing, prompt-injection tests, a security grade, or a vulnerability assessment of an agent. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user creates, modifies, previews, or debugs .agent files (use agentforce-generate); deploys or publishes agents; writes Agent Script code; uses sf agent preview for development iteration; analyzes production session traces (use agentforce-observe); performs a static safety review of .agent file content (use agentforce-generate Section 15).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you are about to hand off a change a player can see - the exact steps to look at it running (web game in the browser at two viewports plus a seeded Playwright smoke run for input and console errors; engine games through a headless frame capture), the checklist, and how to report what could not be observed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an editor MCP server (unity, godot, unreal, blender) or the browser MCP shows up in your tool list - what each one can observe or change, how to check it is attached to YOUR task workspace, why the repo's tests still decide, the Blender code-execution caution, and the headless fallback when none is connected.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing Bevy (Rust ECS) game code - pin and respect the repo's minor version, plugins/systems/queries/resources, schedules with FixedUpdate and Time, states and run conditions, messages vs observers across versions, required components, testing systems with App::update and a manual time strategy, compile-time and allocation hygiene.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Step 2 of debugging: reason about root cause based on observed symptoms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-fix bugs. Observe symptom, find root cause, apply minimal fix, verify, explain in human terms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a soak test protocol for extended play sessions. Defines what to observe, measure, and log during long play sessions to surface slow leaks, fatigue effects, and edge cases that only appear after sustained play. Primarily used in Polish and Release phases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up, adopt, refresh, or audit a repository's agent instructions (the AGENTS.md block) so AI agents work well in that repo. Also records observed agent mistakes as pitfalls. Use when invoked by name

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold an emergent project from observed children's interests using Reggio-inspired approaches. Use when following children's fascinations into deeper inquiry in early years or primary settings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run this Django app locally against a throwaway database and drive its pages over HTTP to observe a change working. Use when verifying student/cadmin page behavior end-to-end.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews HealthKit code for authorization patterns, query usage, background delivery, and data type handling. Use when reviewing code with import HealthKit, HKHealthStore, HKSampleQuery, HKObserverQuery, or HKQuantityType.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track development session events in a daily markdown changelog, including file changes, test results, and key decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PMU observation pattern for agent health monitoring. Runs patrol loops, detects stalled agents, sends nudges, and escalates persistent failures to the mayor. Never modifies agent work or resolves conflicts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user reports a bug they can't reproduce, asks where to start debugging, or mentions a Heisenbug / production-only failure. Drives the observe→hypothesize→predict→test→iterate scientific method.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conversational guide for using tools/session-retro/observe.mjs to capture friction, wins, corrections, decisions, gaps, tool-use, and checkpoints as they happen during a session. Use at session start (to kick off the log), at inflection points (to record events), and at session end (to archive and feed the retrospective generator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A live visual Kanban board and continuity layer for long-running agentic tasks. Nobody wants to read a markdown plan or stare at raw HTML while an agent grinds for an hour, so Plandeck turns the plan into a board that organizes itself. Use it when a task is multi-step, long-running, or needs visual planning. Break the work into cards, declare which card depends on which, and Plandeck computes the critical path, auto-promotes cards to Ready as their dependencies clear, rolls up story-point estimates into an honest percent complete, and names the one next action. Plans, observed transitions, and last-known-good snapshots stay as plain files on disk, so they survive /clear and context resets. After a reset, run plandeck next to recover the single next move and its recent history. If the plan stops parsing, run plandeck doctor before using git. Renders a live board in the browser over SSE. Triggers on plan a project, break down a task, kanban board, task board, visual plan, long-running agent, agentic task, track dependencies, critical path, story-point estimates, what is next, mission journal, recover plan, plandeck.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate MaaFramework Pipeline nodes and recognition snippets from screenshots or observed UI state. Use for OCR node generation, ROI sweep, choosing TemplateMatch/OCR/ColorMatch/CustomRecognition, preserving target-file schema style, and designing `next`/`[JumpBack]` links before merging generated nodes into pipeline JSON.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when debugging software, investigating incidents, diagnosing flaky tests, or analyzing performance regressions — enforces structured observation recording with evidence IDs, causality validation, and verification gates to prevent correlation-causation pollution. Use when an agent might otherwise summarize or speculate instead of reporting observed evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synchronize existing documentation with an observed code/configuration/API change while preserving each document's purpose and authority. Use after implementation changes can make documentation stale, incomplete, or internally inconsistent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-line definitions of development-harness (dh) plugin terminology — RT-ICA, ARL, SAM, the S1-S7 pipeline stage names, Impact Radius — each with a pointer to its canonical source file. Use when a dh skill, agent, or workflow step references a term without defining it, before guessing what the term means from its observed outputs, or when asked what a dh concept or acronym stands for.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute structured acceptance checks and record their observed results for later comparison. Use to capture a pre-change baseline or a post-change verification state without treating expected nonzero baseline results as execution failure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。