「pact」の検索結果

Compares old and new requirement documents, analyzes code repository impact, and generates detailed modification plans. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Compare requirement versions and identify changes, (2) Map requirement changes to code components, (3) Identify components to modify, delete, or add, (4) Analyze dependencies and integration points, (5) Assess test impact, (6) Generate comprehensive modification plans in Markdown format. Supports text/Markdown requirements and analyzes feature-level, functional, and API changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze detected vulnerabilities to assess realistic exploitability by examining control flow, input sources, sanitization logic, and execution context. Use when users need to: (1) Determine if a vulnerability is actually exploitable in practice, (2) Assess severity and impact of security issues, (3) Prioritize vulnerability remediation, (4) Understand attack vectors and exploitation conditions, (5) Generate exploitability reports with proof-of-concept scenarios. Focuses on injection vulnerabilities (SQL, command, XSS, path traversal, LDAP) with detailed analysis of reachability, controllability, sanitization, and impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

What-if scenario analysis, scenario tree construction, base bull bear case, sensitivity to macro variables, revenue scenario modeling, cost scenario analysis, margin impact scenarios, interest rate sensitivity, currency impact scenarios, commodity price scenarios

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Logician. Use when a task calls for Logician judgment. Reasons from syntax-versus-semantics and object-versus-metalanguage discipline, the ⊢/⊨ distinction, and matching each logic to its intended semantics through natural deduction and sequent calculus (cut-elimination, subformula property), compactness and Löwenheim–Skolem, forcing and diagonalization, and proof assistants (Lean 4/mathlib, Coq, Isabelle/HOL, Agda) with Z3/CVC5/Vampire/Mace4 automation while treating use–mention conflation, second-order misuse of compactness, mis-stated incompleteness hypotheses (ω-consistency vs consistency), and Gödel philosophical overreach as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Mathematical Analyst. Use when a task calls for Mathematical Analyst judgment. Reasons from function-space topology, convergence modes, and constant-dependent inequalities (Hölder, Sobolev, Gronwall) through compactness theorems (Rellich-Kondrachov, Banach-Alaoglu), Calderon-Zygmund and Schauder estimates, and Lax-Milgram while treating limit-integral swaps without dominated convergence, boundary-degenerating constants, weak-versus-classical regularity gaps, and concentration-compactness loss as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Formax repository task is non-trivial and you should analyze goals, non-goals, boundaries, data/type/interface impact, contract impact, test strategy, and whether an xhigh subagent is actually needed before writing a todo or code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

World-class trade execution - minimize market impact, optimize order routing, reduce slippage. The difference between backtest and live is usually execution. Use when "execution, slippage, market impact, order routing, TWAP, VWAP, iceberg, fill rate, best execution, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

数据工程 — 数据平台从业者的认知操作系统, 覆盖把数据从源系统搬运成可靠 / 可查询 / 可信赖形态供分析 / ML / 数据产品消费的全生命周期 (生成 → 摄取 → 存储 → 转换 → 服务 + 安全/数据管理/DataOps/数据架构/编排/软件工程 六条暗流, Reis & Housley 框架): 摄取与集成 (批 + CDC 变更数据捕获 Debezium + EL 工具 Fivetran/Airbyte/Meltano/dlt + Kafka Connect + schema drift) / 存储与文件表格式 (对象存储数据湖 + 列存 Parquet/ORC/Arrow/Avro + 开放表格式 Apache Iceberg/Delta Lake/Apache Hudi + lakehouse + 分区/compaction) / 转换与建模 (ELT dbt/SQLMesh + Spark + 维度建模 Kimball + Inmon + Data Vault + 大宽表 OBT + 渐变维 SCD + 增量模型 + 语义/指标层) / 编排与工作流 (Apache Airflow/Dagster/Prefect/Mage/Kestra/Apache DolphinScheduler + DAG + 幂等 + 回填 backfill + 数据资产调度) / 批流与实时 (Apache Kafka/Apache Flink/Spark Structured Streaming/Kinesis/Pulsar/Redpanda + Lambda vs Kappa + watermark/窗口/exactly-once + 流式 SQL Materialize/RisingWave + 实时 OLAP ClickHouse/Apache Druid/Apache Pinot/StarRocks/Apache Doris) / 数仓与查询引擎 (Snowflake/BigQuery/Redshift/Databricks SQL/Trino/Presto/DuckDB/Polars + 存算分离 + MPP) / 数据质量测试与可观测性 (dbt tests/Great Expectations/Soda + 数据契约 + Monte Carlo data downtime + 新鲜度/量/schema 异常检测) / 数据治理编目与血缘 (DataHub/Amundsen/OpenMetadata/Unity Catalog + 列级血缘 + PII 分类 + 访问控制 + GDPR) / DataOps 与可靠性 (数据 CI/CD + 转换版本控制 + 环境隔离 + 幂等重处理 + 数据 SLA/SLO + 计算存储 FinOps) / 数据架构范式 (现代数据栈 + lakehouse + data mesh + data fabric + 去中心化 vs 中心化所有权) / 分析工程角色 (dbt 时代连接数据工程与分析的桥) — 不含 数据科学/ML 建模本身 (是下游消费者) / BI 仪表盘制作 (serving 下游) / 数据分析报表为终点 / 'data engineer = 跑 Hadoop 的' 过时窄化 / 通用后端应用开发 (平行学科) (Data Engineering — the cognitive operating system of practitioners who design, build, and operate the data platform: moving data from source systems into reliable, queryable, trustworthy form for analytics / ML / products, covering (a) the data engineering lifecycle (generation → ingestion → storage → transformation → serving, with the undercurrents security / data management / DataOps / data architecture / orchestration / software engineering — Reis & Housley framing), (b) ingestion & integration (batch + CDC change-data-capture with Debezium, EL tools Fivetran / Airbyte / Meltano / dlt, Kafka Connect, API + file + database sources, schema drift handling), (c) storage & file/table formats (object storage data lakes, columnar formats Parquet / ORC / Arrow / Avro, open table formats Apache Iceberg / Delta Lake / Apache Hudi, lakehouse architecture, partitioning / compaction / Z-ordering), (d) transformation & modeling (ELT with dbt / SQLMesh, Spark, dimensional modeling Kimball, Inmon CIF, Data Vault, One Big Table / wide tables, normalization vs denormalization, slowly changing dimensions, incremental models, the semantic / metrics layer), (e) orchestration & workflow (Apache Airflow, Dagster, Prefect, Mage, Kestra, Apache DolphinScheduler, DAGs, idempotency, backfills, data-aware / asset-based scheduling), (f) batch vs streaming & real-time (Apache Kafka, Apache Flink, Spark Structured Streaming, Kinesis / Pulsar / Redpanda, the Lambda vs Kappa debate, watermarks / windowing / exactly-once, streaming SQL Materialize / RisingWave, real-time OLAP ClickHouse / Apache Druid / Apache Pinot / StarRocks / Apache Doris), (g) warehouses & query engines (Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, Databricks SQL, Trino / Presto, DuckDB, Polars, decoupled storage & compute, MPP), (h) data quality, testing & observability (dbt tests, Great Expectations, Soda, data contracts, Monte Carlo / data downtime, freshness / volume / schema anomaly detection, unit / integration testing of pipelines), (i) data governance, catalog & lineage (DataHub, Amundsen, OpenMetadata, Unity Catalog, column-level lineage, PII / data classification, access control, GDPR / data privacy), (j) DataOps & reliability (CI/CD for data, version control of transformations, environments, idempotent reprocessing, SLAs / SLOs for data, cost / FinOps for compute & storage), (k) data architecture paradigms (modern data stack, data lakehouse, data mesh, data fabric, decentralized vs centralized ownership), (l) the analytics engineering role (the dbt-era bridge between data engineering and analysis); N

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

管理咨询 (管理咨询 (Management Consulting) — 战略与管理咨询的职业认知操作系统，从业者/咨询顾问/想入行者/采购咨询服务的客户视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 假设驱动 (hypothesis-driven / answer-first / Day-1 answer) 的「先有答案再验证」⇄ 数据驱动 (data-led / bottom-up) 的「先穷尽事实再归纳」，这行的核心张力是「先射箭再画靶 vs 先画靶再射箭」，资深人偏 top-down 假设树减少 boil-the-ocean，但要时刻防 confirmation bias; 以及更深层的张力 — 「卖洞见 (insight / so-what) vs 卖工时 (analysis / 体力)」，「客户影响 (client impact / 落地) vs 智识严谨 (intellectual rigor / 漂亮 deck)」; (b) 方法论正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量) — MECE (相互独立完全穷尽)、issue tree / logic tree (问题树/逻辑树)、hypothesis-driven problem solving (假设驱动)、Pyramid Principle (Minto 金字塔原理: SCQA 情境-冲突-疑问-回答 + 结论先行 + 自上而下 + 归纳/演绎)、80/20 (帕累托/抓大放小)、so-what (所以呢/洞见提炼)、storyline (故事线/ghost deck 鬼影稿)、driver tree / profit tree、2x2 矩阵、value chain、frameworks (Porter 五力/3C/4P/7S/BCG 矩阵/价值链) 既是脚手架也是陷阱 (套框架 vs 真洞见); (c) 行业结构 — MBB (McKinsey/BCG/Bain 战略三巨头) vs Big Four 咨询臂 (Deloitte/PwC Strategy&/EY-Parthenon/KPMG) vs 精品战略所 (Oliver Wyman/Kearney/Roland Berger/L.E.K./Arthur D. Little) vs 专业/职能 boutique (运营/数字化/PE 尽调); up-or-out (非升即走)、leverage model (杠杆模型: 1 个合伙人带多个 EM/咨询师/分析师的金字塔)、partner/principal/EM(项目经理)/associate(咨询师)/analyst(分析师) 职级; (d) 项目交付模型 (the case/study/engagement) — 提案/SOW (scope of work)、problem definition (问题定义/真问题 vs 表象问题)、workplan (工作计划)、hypothesis tree (假设树)、analysis (分析/建模)、synthesis (综合)、recommendation (建议)、implementation (落地); 客户管理 (steering committee 指导委员会、stakeholder 利益相关方、对齐); (e) 产出物 — the deck (PPT 幻灯片是咨询的母语)、executive summary、action title (行动标题/每页一句话结论)、ghost deck (先搭骨架后填数据)、Excel 财务模型、framework 图; (f) 职业/招聘 — case interview 生态 (案例面试: Victor Cheng LOMS/Case in Point/market sizing 市场估算/估算题/fit 行为面)、网申-笔试-案例面、up-or-out、exit options (退出路径: PE/VC/corp dev 企业发展/战略岗/创业/industry); (g) 争议/批判 — 咨询的价值之辩 (「借你的表告诉你时间」「frameworks 是剧场表演 vs 真洞见」Matthew Stewart《The Management Myth》)、McKinsey 的丑闻 (Purdue 阿片类/独裁政府/ICE/利益冲突, Bogdanich & Forsythe《When McKinsey Comes to Town》)、咨询 vs 自建战略部、generalist 通才 vs specialist 专才之争、AI/GenAI 对初级分析师工作的冲击; (h) 流派 — 战略经典 (Porter 定位学派/五力 vs 资源基础观 RBV vs 蓝海战略 Kim&Mauborgne vs 颠覆式创新 Christensen vs Mintzberg 应急战略批判 planning school); 三巨头气质分野 (McKinsey 事实驱动/CEO 信任/通才, BCG 概念/思想领导力/经验曲线/增长-份额矩阵, Bain 结果导向/NPS 净推荐值/PE 关系/与客户深度绑定)。不含: 投行 M&A/财务顾问 (估值/承销超出范畴)、纯 IT 实施/系统集成 (SI 人力外包)、纯审计/税务、纯人力 RPO/猎头、内部战略部 only (虽相关但本 skill 聚焦专业服务咨询的外部视角)。) Master OS — automated mastery of 管理咨询 (Management Consulting) — 战略与管理咨询的职业认知操作系统，从业者/咨询顾问/想入行者/采购咨询服务的客户视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 假设驱动 (hypothesis-driven / answer-first / Day-1 answer) 的「先有答案再验证」⇄ 数据驱动 (data-led / bottom-up) 的「先穷尽事实再归纳」，这行的核心张力是「先射箭再画靶 vs 先画靶再射箭」，资深人偏 top-down 假设树减少 boil-the-ocean，但要时刻防 confirmation bias; 以及更深层的张力 — 「卖洞见 (insight / so-what) vs 卖工时 (analysis / 体力)」，「客户影响 (client impact / 落地) vs 智识严谨 (intellectual rigor / 漂亮 deck)」; (b) 方法论正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量) — MECE (相互独立完全穷尽)、issue tree / logic tree (问题树/逻辑树)、hypothesis-driven problem solving (假设驱动)、Pyramid Principle (Minto 金字塔原理: SCQA 情境-冲突-疑问-回答 + 结论先行 + 自上而下 + 归纳/演绎)、80/20 (帕累托/抓大放小)、so-what (所以呢/洞见提炼)、storyline (故事线/ghost deck 鬼影稿)、driver tree / profit tree、2x2 矩阵、value chain、frameworks (Porter 五力/3C/4P/7S/BCG 矩阵/价值链) 既是脚手架也是陷阱 (套框架 vs 真洞见); (c) 行业结构 — MBB (McKinsey/BCG/Bain 战略三巨头) vs Big Four 咨询臂 (Deloitte/PwC Strategy&/EY-Parthenon/KPMG) vs 精品战略所 (Oliver Wyman/Kearney/Roland Berger/L.E.K./Arthur D. Little) vs 专业/职能 boutique (运营/数字化/PE 尽调); up-or-out (非升即走)、leverage model (杠杆模型: 1 个合伙人带多个 EM/咨询师/分析师的金字塔)、partner/principal/EM(项目经理)/associate(咨询师)/analyst(分析师) 职级; (d) 项目交付模型 (the case/study/engagement) — 提案/SOW (scope of work)、problem definition (问题定义/真问题 vs 表象问题)、workplan (工作计划)、hypothesis tree (假设树)、analysis (分析/建模)、synthesis (综合)、recommendation (建议)、implementation (落地); 客户管理 (steering committee 指导委员会、stakeholder 利益相关方、对齐); (e) 产出物 — the deck (PPT 幻灯片是咨询的母语)、executive summary、action title (行动标题/每页一句话结论)、ghost deck (先搭骨架后填数据)、Excel 财务模型、framework 图; (f) 职业/招聘 — case interview 生态 (案例面试: Victor Cheng LOMS/Case in Point/market sizing 市场估算/估算题/fit 行为面)、网申-笔试-案例面、up-or-out、exit options (退出路径: PE/VC/corp dev 企业发展/战略岗/创业/industry); (g) 争议/批判 — 咨询的

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

谈判与议价 (谈判与议价 (Negotiation & Bargaining) — 面向要亲自坐上谈判桌的从业者（销售、采购、创业者、法务与商务、HR、投融资、以及为自己谈薪谈房谈合同的个人）的『把一次利益分歧，谈成一个双方都愿意签、签完还愿意执行的结果』的判断体系；不是某一个行业的成交话术合集，也不是博弈论课程，更不是把心理学包装成读心术的培训话术。覆盖：(a) 第一性张力 —— 这行最深的世界观分歧：**创造价值 ⇄ 攫取价值**（同一场谈判里，把饼做大和把饼切走用的是相反的动作：做大要交换信息、暴露优先级，切走要隐藏底线、制造稀缺；哈佛原则式谈判一派主张先做大再切，实战议价派认为在多数一次性交易里做大只是让步的遮羞布，这条张力叫谈判者困境，是整个学科的中心问题）；**原则式谈判 ⇄ 战术共情**（Getting to Yes 主张对事不对人、按客观标准而非意志力定输赢；Chris Voss 从人质谈判带出的路线针锋相对，书名 Never Split the Difference 直接反对折中，主张先用标签与校准问题把对方的情绪与安全感处理掉再谈条件，并公开批评双赢框架让谈判者被真正强硬的对手吃掉；两派对同一个动作——比如要不要说出你的底线——给出相反指令）；**关系先行 ⇄ 条款先行**（中文语境里做生意常常先建立关系、找中间人引荐、酒桌上定调、合同只是关系的书面确认，人情与面子既是润滑剂也是隐性负债；跨国与合规语境里条款先行、把一切写进合同，两种作业习惯在同一张桌上相遇时的误读，是中外商务谈判失败最常见的原因之一；学术上关系到底是效率替代品还是寻租温床，证据本身就是对立的，且反腐与合规收紧之后酒桌路径的风险显著上升）；**先出价 ⇄ 后出价**（实验研究普遍支持先出价能形成锚定优势，但在信息高度不对称的真实交易里，先出价可能暴露自己远低于对方预期，实务派与研究派对这条给出的条件不同）；**BATNA 是地基 ⇄ BATNA 被高估**（最佳替代方案是原则式谈判的支点，没有替代方案就没有说不的能力；反对者指出过度盯着替代方案会把谈判做成线性比价，且强替代方案在长期关系里会损害对方的信任）；**情绪是噪音 ⇄ 情绪是议题**（早期理性决策路线要求把人和问题分开，后来的研究把情绪重新请回桌上：愤怒有时确实能提取让步，代价是长期关系与对方的报复动机，实验证据两个方向都有）；**谈判是技能 ⇄ 谈判是性格**（培训产业的立身之本是可训练，而研究显示某些结果差异与性别、地位与社会代价强相关：女性主动发起薪酬谈判在部分情境会被惩罚，这不是话术能解决的结构问题，近年多地薪酬区间披露立法正在改变这条起点）；**诚实边界在哪**（虚构竞标者、夸大授权上限、拖延签约制造紧迫，这些在培训里被当技巧、在法律上可能构成欺诈性陈述，法域不同边界不同）。(b) 工具栈 —— 这一行最重要的工具是纸笔：议题清单与优先级打分表、替代方案与保留价的估算表、可交换筹码矩阵、同时抛出的多个等值报价、让步阶梯与理由库、授权与升级路径表、复盘表；软件侧则是合同全生命周期管理与条款库（Ironclad、DocuSign、Juro、LinkSquares，中国侧法大大、e签宝）、采购电子寻源与反向拍卖（SAP Ariba、Coupa、Keelvar，以及已在大企业跑通的自动化议价机器人 Pactum）、销售侧的折扣审批矩阵与 deal desk、薪酬与职级数据（Levels.fyi、Mercer、Radford 以及各地薪酬透明披露）、可比交易与市场价数据、调解与仲裁机构（CIETAC、SIAC、香港 HKIAC）、以及正在快速变化的大模型陪练与合同审查；选型的真正分岔从来不是功能表，而是『这场谈判赢在信息、赢在替代方案，还是赢在流程设计』。(c) 心智模型层 —— 结果在坐上桌之前就决定了大半；谈的是利益不是立场；议价区间是估计出来的不是给定的；让步是信息不是善意；说不出口的常常是面子与安全感而不是价格；代表别人谈判的人激励与授权跟本人不同；一次性交易与长期关系的最优打法不同而多数人搞错了自己在玩哪一种。(d) 工作流 —— 立项与利益相关方梳理、准备与对手画像、替代方案与保留价、议题打分与打包设计、开场与锚定、探询与试探性提议、让步管理、僵局与第三方介入、收口与防止反悔加码、合同化与争议解决条款、复盘与关系维护，以及薪资谈判、采购年度框架议价、并购价格与条款、多方与联盟、跨文化与远程邮件谈判这些特化路径。(e) 表达 DNA、质量基准（什么算一次好的谈判：不是拿到最低价，而是可执行、可复盘、不透支关系）、反模式（外行最容易犯的错：不准备就上桌、把立场当利益、单方面让步买好感、把折中当公平、拿假竞标者施压、口头承诺不落纸、赢了条款输了执行）、智识谱系（哈佛谈判项目与原则式谈判、行为决策与实验社会心理学派、危机谈判与战术共情派、谈判分析与博弈论派、销售采购的实战议价培训派、争议解决与调解派、跨文化谈判派、中文语境的关系与人情派）。) Master OS — automated mastery of 谈判与议价 (Negotiation & Bargaining) — 面向要亲自坐上谈判桌的从业者（销售、采购、创业者、法务与商务、HR、投融资、以及为自己谈薪谈房谈合同的个人）的『把一次利益分歧，谈成一个双方都愿意签、签完还愿意执行的结果』的判断体系；不是某一个行业的成交话术合集，也不是博弈论课程，更不是把心理学包装成读心术的培训话术。覆盖：(a) 第一性张力 —— 这行最深的世界观分歧：**创造价值 ⇄ 攫取价值**（同一场谈判里，把饼做大和把饼切走用的是相反的动作：做大要交换信息、暴露优先级，切走要隐藏底线、制造稀缺；哈佛原则式谈判一派主张先做大再切，实战议价派认为在多数一次性交易里做大只是让步的遮羞布，这条张力叫谈判者困境，是整个学科的中心问题）；**原则式谈判 ⇄ 战术共情**（Getting to Yes 主张对事不对人、按客观标准而非意志力定输赢；Chris Voss 从人质谈判带出的路线针锋相对，书名 Never Split the Difference 直接反对折中，主张先用标签与校准问题把对方的情绪与安全感处理掉再谈条件，并公开批评双赢框架让谈判者被真正强硬的对手吃掉；两派对同一个动作——比如要不要说出你的底线——给出相反指令）；**关系先行 ⇄ 条款先行**（中文语境里做生意常常先建立关系、找中间人引荐、酒桌上定调、合同只是关系的书面确认，人情与面子既是润滑剂也是隐性负债；跨国与合规语境里条款先行、把一切写进合同，两种作业习惯在同一张桌上相遇时的误读，是中外商务谈判失败最常见的原因之一；学术上关系到底是效率替代品还是寻租温床，证据本身就是对立的，且反腐与合规收紧之后酒桌路径的风险显著上升）；**先出价 ⇄ 后出价**（实验研究普遍支持先出价能形成锚定优势，但在信息高度不对称的真实交易里，先出价可能暴露自己远低于对方预期，实务派与研究派对这条给出的条件不同）；**BATNA 是地基 ⇄ BATNA 被高估**（最佳替代方案是原则式谈判的支点，没有替代方案就没有说不的能力；反对者指出过度盯着替代方案会把谈判做成线性比价，且强替代方案在长期关系里会损害对方的信任）；**情绪是噪音 ⇄ 情绪是议题**（早期理性决策路线要求把人和问题分开，后来的研究把情绪重新请回桌上：愤怒有时确实能提取让步，代价是长期关系与对方的报复动机，实验证据两个方向都有）；**谈判是技能 ⇄ 谈判是性格**（培训产业的立身之本是可训练，而研究显示某些结果差异与性别、地位与社会代价强相关：女性主动发起薪酬谈判在部分情境会被惩罚，这不是话术能解决的结构问题，近年多地薪酬区间披露立法正在改变这条起点）；**诚实边界在哪**（虚构竞标者、夸大授权上限、拖延签约制造紧迫，这些在培训里被当技巧、在法律上可能构成欺诈性陈述，法域不同边界不同）。(b) 工具栈 —— 这一行最重要的工具是纸笔：议题清单与优先级打分表、替代方案与保留价的估算表、可交换筹码矩阵、同时抛出的多个等值报价、让步阶梯与理由库、授权与升级路径表、复盘表；软件侧则是合同全生命周期管理与条款库（Ironclad、DocuSign、Juro、LinkSquares，中国侧法大大、e签宝）、采购电子寻源与反向拍卖（SAP Ariba、Coupa、Keelvar，以及已在大企业跑通的自动化议价机器人 Pactum）、销售侧的折扣审批矩阵与 deal desk、薪酬与职级数据（Levels.fyi、Mercer、Radford 以及各地薪酬透明披露）、可比交易与市场价数据、调解与仲裁机构（CIETAC、SIAC、香港 HKIAC）、以及正在快速变化的大模型陪练与合同审查；选型的真正分岔从来不是功能表，而是『这场谈判赢在信息、赢在替代方案，还是赢在流程设计』。(c) 心智模型层 —— 结果在坐上桌之前就决定了大半；谈的是利益不是立场；议价区间是估计出来的不是给定的；让步是信息不是善意；说不出口的常常是面子与安全感而不是价格；代表别人谈判的人激励与授权跟本人不同；一次性交易与长期关系的最优打法不同而多数人搞错了自己在玩哪一种。(d) 工作流 —— 立项与利益相关方梳理、准备与对手画像、替代方案与保留价、议题打分与打包设计、开场与锚定、探询与试探性提议、让步管理、僵局与第三方介入、收口与防止反悔加码、合同化与争议解决条款、复盘与关系维护，以及薪资谈判、采购年度框架议价、并购价格与条款、多方与联盟、跨文化与远程邮件谈判这些特化路径。(e) 表达 DNA、质量基准（什么算一次

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-change blast-radius report for a symbol or file. Walks tree-sitting references, augments with a plain-text scan over non-parsed files (configs, plain docs), and clusters affected sites by feature (`_FEATURES.md`) or top-level package. Use when about to refactor, rename, or delete something in a repo you don't own — "what breaks if I change `validateUser`", "who calls this", "is this safe to remove", "where is this used", "blast radius", "impact analysis". This is the CONVERGENT pre-change risk skill — for "what is this repo?" use exploring-codebases; for "where is X?" use searching-codebases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, which is a plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill channels the reasoning of Walter C. Willett, nutrition epidemiologist at Harvard University. Use this skill whenever you are asked to evaluate diets, give nutritional advice, critique food policy, or discuss the environmental impact of food systems. Trigger this skill for topics like macronutrient quality (fats vs. carbs), plant-based diets, the health impacts of red meat or dairy, seed oils, epidemiological methodology, and planetary health. Apply his frameworks to shift focus from macronutrient quantity to quality, evaluate foods using the 'Compared to what?' rule, and prioritize public health over personalized nutrition fads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when reasoning about deep tech commercialization, biomedical engineering, drug delivery, material design, or overcoming institutional skepticism. Robert Langer, MIT professor and pioneer of drug delivery systems, approaches problems through first-principles engineering, interdisciplinary convergence, and relentless perseverance against consensus. Trigger this skill whenever the user is evaluating high-risk/high-reward research, deciding between incremental vs. paradigm-shifting impact, spinning out academic discoveries into startups, or designing physical/biological systems from scratch. Apply his frameworks to navigate patenting, funding, and translating lab science into real-world impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check the current status of the Strait of Hormuz — shipping transit data, oil price impact, stranded vessels, insurance risk levels, diplomatic developments, and global trade impact. Use this skill whenever the user asks about the Strait of Hormuz, Hormuz chokepoint, Persian Gulf shipping risk, oil transit disruption, war risk premium in the Gulf, Middle East shipping routes, tanker traffic through Hormuz, oil supply chain risk, or geopolitical risk affecting energy markets. Triggers include: "Hormuz status", "Strait of Hormuz", "is Hormuz open", "shipping through the Gulf", "oil chokepoint", "Persian Gulf tanker traffic", "war risk premium", "Hormuz crisis", "energy supply chain risk", "oil transit disruption", "Middle East shipping", any mention of Hormuz or Persian Gulf in context of oil, shipping, or geopolitical risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a state document (context transfer) that allows any fresh AI instance to resume work without conversation history. Use this skill whenever the user asks to checkpoint, create a state transfer, save state, generate a handoff document, create compaction insurance, or says anything like 'snapshot this', 'create a context transfer', 'checkpoint', 'save state for handoff', 'write a recovery doc', or 'transfer context'. Also trigger when the user mentions compaction concerns, session handoff, multi-session continuity, or wants to preserve the current conversation's state. Works for any conversation type: projects, research, debugging, investigations, design sessions, or long-running chats. This skill produces a structured markdown document optimized for AI cold-start recovery, not human notes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cyber Risk Quantification engineer for CyberRadar. Implements FAIR (Factor Analysis of Information Risk) methodology, Monte Carlo simulation for loss distribution modeling, financial impact quantification in multi-currency (SAR, USD, EUR, GBP), loss exceedance curves, risk treatment ROI calculation, insurance premium optimization, and board-ready financial risk reporting. Transforms qualitative risk assessments into monetary terms for executive decision-making. Triggers on: CRQ, FAIR, Monte Carlo, financial impact, loss modeling, risk quantification, cyber insurance, risk treatment ROI, financial risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a consumer-driven contract testing setup — Pact configuration and CI integration. Use when asked to "set up contract testing", "configure Pact", or "add consumer-driven contracts".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a proposed API change for breaking changes — classification and impact assessment. Use when asked "is this a breaking change", "will this break clients", or "assess the impact of this API change".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bias detection and mitigation, fairness metrics, privacy frameworks, consent models, transparency requirements, and accountability structures for data science practice. Covers algorithmic bias sources, disparate impact testing, differential privacy, GDPR principles, model cards, datasheets for datasets, responsible AI frameworks, and the organizational governance needed to make ethics actionable. Use when auditing models for bias, designing privacy-preserving systems, establishing governance processes, or evaluating the social impact of data-driven decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze the causal system-wide impact of a proposed change across behavior, interfaces, state/data, runtime dependencies, tests, documentation, controls, people/processes, and model/prompt/context behavior. Use before planning when lexical reference search is insufficient to establish blast radius and verification obligations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quantitative cost measurement for technical research — token injection costs, payload sizes, context window consumption, and file-level counts from actual repo files. Use when a technical-researcher orchestrator needs the cost dimension of adding or changing something: how many tokens will it inject, how big are the artifacts, what is the context window impact? This is NOT blast-radius analysis (which files break) — it covers size, tokens, and performance cost only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deterministic Software Graph analysis via Ontoly CLI and MCP. Use when: (1) Codebase architecture, dependency, route, service, module, configuration, or impact questions need graph evidence, (2) A repository should be analyzed before source search, (3) You need a persistent SoftwareGraph.json for validation, MCP, or agent workflows. Triggers: "build software graph", "trace route", "impact analysis", "architecture summary", "dependency graph", "what uses this", "Ontoly".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI agents as force multipliers for quality work. Core skill for all 19 QE agents using PACT principles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。