「plan」の検索結果

Same reverse-thinking method as dh:rt-ica (see dh:rt-ica or dh-glossary for the definition), but localizes any MISSING input to the affected task only, as a non-blocking information-completeness pre-pass before task decomposition and plan generation. Use when grooming backlog items, generating plans, decomposing tasks under uncertainty, or working in brownfield and refactor scenarios. Produces completeness summary (APPROVED-FOR-PLANNING, APPROVED-WITH-GAPS, or BLOCKED-FOR-PLANNING), missing input report with dependency mapping, required unblock actions, and planning annotations for downstream tasks. Use dh:rt-ica instead at the S2 implementation gate where missing inputs must halt execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architect a feature with the Carmack Council before writing code. Use when explicitly asked to plan a feature, do a "council plan", "carmack plan", or invoke /council-plan. Carmack's philosophy chairs a council of domain experts — Troy Hunt (security), Martin Fowler (refactoring), Kent C. Dodds (frontend), Matteo Collina (Node.js), Brandur Leach (Postgres), Vercel Performance, Simon Willison (LLM pipeline), Karri Saarinen (UI quality), Vitaly Friedman (UX quality). Interactive feature discovery followed by parallel subagent dispatch. Produces a sequenced, attributed implementation plan with no code. Stack: Next.js App Router / React / TypeScript / tRPC / Prisma / Neon / Clerk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end international trip planning: turns "I want to go to X for N days" into a verified, bookable plan — route skeleton across cities, flight price scans (international + domestic legs), train-vs-fly decisions, hour-by-hour daily timelines with opening hours, dwell times, holiday collisions and tappable turn-by-turn map links (小时级行程+地图导航+离线KML), hotel shortlists by neighborhood, budget rollup, and a booking checklist with deep links. Use this whenever the user asks to plan a trip, vacation, itinerary or honeymoon, compare flight dates/prices, pick between cities or routes, schedule a travel day hour by hour, fill a spare block of time ("I'm near X with 2 free hours"), turn a finished plan into a designed page (eight themed renders: illustrated / clay / noir / glass / journal / zine / splash / portal — 插画/黏土/夜航/玻璃/手账/Zine/闪屏/穿越版), or asks 旅行规划/行程安排/机票比价/去某国玩N天怎么安排/现在有空档干嘛/把行程做成好看的网页 — even if they only mention one piece (just flights, just hotels, or just navigation), the playbook and verification rules here still apply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and safely gather edible and useful wild plants. Covers safety rules and deadly plant recognition, habitat reading, multi-feature identification methodology, the universal edibility test, sustainable harvesting practices, preparation methods, reaction monitoring, and building knowledge with beginner-friendly universal species. Use when supplementing food supply in a wilderness or survival setting, needing medicinal or utility plants, identifying plants around camp for safety, or in long-term scenarios where foraging extends available rations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a 100-day customer onboarding plan with phase gates based on Never Lose a Customer Again by Joey Coleman. Use when user says "onboarding plan", "new customer onboarding", "customer kickoff", "first 90 days", "activation plan", "customer launch plan", "new customer journey", or "implementation plan" - even if they don't say "100 days" explicitly. Applies to CSMs designing structured onboarding programs that move customers from signed contract to full adoption.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refine an existing implementation plan with a second iteration. Re-analyzes the codebase for gaps, missing tasks, and wrong dependencies. Use after /unikit-plan or to improve a /unikit-fix plan, or when the user says "improve the plan", "what's wrong with the plan", or "update the plan from research". Optional +check flag validates refinements via a fresh-context subagent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization under 11 U.S.C. §§ 1121–1129 with claim classification, treatment provisions, distribution mechanics, executory contract determinations, and confirmation compliance. Use when preparing reorganization plans, restructuring debts, classifying claims, drafting Chapter 11 plans, or helping debtors emerge from bankruptcy. Trigger keywords: reorganization plan, Chapter 11, plan of reorganization, debt restructuring, cramdown, claim classification, confirmation order.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render a plan directory (plan.md + phase-*.md) as a visual: generates/validates visual-plan/plan.json, opens a studio to view/edit, exports plan.html. Pass --static for a legacy single-file render.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when generating visual artifacts — explanations, diagrams, slides, or diff visualizations. Triggers on "explain X visually", "diagram this", "show as slides", "diff against main". NOT for rendering a plan as HTML (see mk:visual-plan), live media generation (see mk:multimodal), browser QA (see mk:qa), or plan critique (see mk:plan-ceo-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Relentlessly interview the user about THEIR plan or design — one question at a time — resolving each branch of a decision tree until shared understanding. Claude is the interviewer; the user is the interviewee. Triggers on "grill me", "stress-test this plan", "get grilled on my design", "interrogate my plan". Checkpoints every answer to docs/knowledge/<slug>.md so progress survives a context-window reset. Flags knowledge the user cannot answer as a gap to chase. Do NOT use to PROPOSE solutions or compare approaches (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to validate "is this worth building?" (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when Claude should ANSWER questions about the repo (→ mk:ask-me). Do NOT use for a one-shot review of an existing plan (→ mk:plan-ceo-review). Do NOT use to apply named reasoning lenses to findings (→ mk:elicit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level planetary science covering solar system formation, planetary interiors, atmospheres, surface processes, astrobiology, and planetary exploration missions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Planning] Use when you need intelligent plan creation with prompt enhancement. Flag: --mode={ci|cro} (default none — standard planning); --mode=ci plans a fix from a GitHub Actions CI run/log, --mode=cro plans conversion-rate optimization (25-item CRO framework).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

採用・人材戦略の専門スキル。職務記述書（JD）作成、採用計画策定、コンピテンシーモデル設計、 面接評価基準設計、オンボーディング計画をサポート。採用要件の明確化から内定後のフォローまで 一貫した人材獲得プロセスを支援。日英両言語のテンプレートを提供し、グローバル採用にも対応。 Use when: creating job descriptions, designing competency models, planning recruitment strategies, developing interview evaluation criteria, or creating onboarding plans. Triggers: "JD作成", "採用計画", "面接評価", "オンボーディング", "コンピテンシー", "人材獲得", "job description", "recruitment plan", "interview evaluation", "hiring", "talent acquisition"

Relentless one-question-at-a-time interview (tappable options with a recommended answer) that sharpens a requirement, business plan, project plan, proposal, or raw idea through conversation, then writes it up as a brief with a glossary and decision log. Use whenever the user wants their thinking stress-tested or pinned down before acting — trigger phrases include "grill me", "grill this", "詰めて", "詰めたい", "壁打ち", "要件を固めたい", "企画を練りたい", "計画を整理したい", "アイデアをぶつけたい", "突っ込んで", "clarify", "質問して", "何が決まってないか教えて", or when the user describes a plan/idea vaguely and asks what to do next. Do NOT use for reviewing a finished document (use a document-review skill) or when the user just wants an answer, not questions.

Internal audit support skill aligned with IIA (Institute of Internal Auditors) International Standards. Provides risk-based audit planning, audit program development, workpaper documentation, finding development (Condition/Criteria/Cause/Effect), and Corrective Action Request (CAR) tracking. Use when: planning annual/quarterly audits, creating risk assessment matrices, developing audit programs and test procedures, documenting audit workpapers, writing audit findings and reports, tracking corrective actions and follow-ups, preparing for external audits (SOX, ISO). Triggers: "internal audit", "audit plan", "audit program", "audit workpaper", "audit finding", "risk assessment", "CAR tracking", "corrective action", "IIA Standards", "COSO framework", "監査計画", "監査プログラム", "監査調書", "是正措置", "リスク評価".

XP-style plan review that identifies gaps, hidden assumptions, and critical misses. Triggers on 'review the plan', 'check the plan', 'audit the plan'. Reviews plans for YAGNI violations, missing feedback loops, and over-engineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage the NV oOS Pro Toolkit Project Management system — projects, tasks, events, sprints, task plans, task templates, and PM workflow rules. Covers complete project lifecycle (planning → active → completed), task tracking with priorities and effort estimation, sprint planning, event scheduling with attendees, and template-driven task plan generation. Use when managing projects, creating or tracking tasks, planning sprints, scheduling events, generating task plans from templates, assigning work to team members, or troubleshooting project management data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lesson-plan generation and compliance-check desk (Busabase App-in-Skill) for a dean of studies or training-program lead. Use when the user invokes $kelly-lesson or /kelly-lesson, mentions lesson plan, 备课, 教案, teaching plan compliance, curriculum template, dean of studies, teacher training, wants lesson plans drafted from curriculum materials and the school template, teacher drafts imported and checked against quality standards, a review queue for approving plans, or a library of approved plans exported as documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a full feature action plan (backend + frontend + tests) with the PWDEVIA 7-question method before any code is written — 'planejar a feature X', 'criar plano de feature', 'plan the user CRUD'. Interviews the human (max 2 rounds) and writes .planning/feat/features/{slug}/plan.md. Do NOT use to write code (feat-exec), for small 1–3 file changes (feat-quick), backend-only or UI-only scope (feat-backend / feat-frontend), tests for existing code (feat-test) or code review (feat-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designer's eye plan review — interactive, like CEO and Eng review. Rates each design dimension 0-10, explains what would make it a 10, then fixes the plan to get there. Works in plan mode. For live site visual audits, use /design-review. Use when asked to "review the design plan" or "design critique". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan with UI/UX components that should be reviewed before implementation. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-review pipeline — reads the full CEO, design, eng, and DX review skills from disk and runs them sequentially with auto-decisions using 6 decision principles. Surfaces taste decisions (close approaches, borderline scope, codex disagreements) at a final approval gate. One command, fully reviewed plan out. Use when asked to "auto review", "autoplan", "run all reviews", "review this plan automatically", or "make the decisions for me". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan file and wants to run the full review gauntlet without answering 15-30 intermediate questions. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "auto plan", "automatic review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan or design doc and is about to start coding — to catch architecture issues before implementation. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "tech review", "technical review", "plan engineering review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a detailed, step-by-step implementation plan for a feature or project. Load when the user asks to plan a feature, create a technical roadmap, break down a PRD into tasks, design an implementation strategy, or sequence engineering work. Also triggers on "how should we build this", "implementation plan for", "technical breakdown", "task list for", or any request to turn a high-level requirement into a concrete execution plan. Supports phased rollouts, architecture-first, and MVP-focused planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose tasks into structured, outcome-defined process entries with complexity triage. Load when user says "decompose this", "break this down", "what steps do I need", "plan this out", "what's the process for", "how do I approach this", or when any complex task needs structured execution planning. Includes a problem-understanding pass before complexity triage. Routes to `problem-to-plan` when the user needs planning deliverables (spec + plan + TODO). Does NOT replace brainstorming — brainstorming is design approval (upstream), this is execution planning (downstream).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。