「process design」の検索結果

請求書やフォームなどの規則的なテキストから情報を取り出す処理を、正規表現とLLMで設計し、抽出結果の信頼度が低い項目だけを確認・修正する流れを示します。

• 問題文・選択肢・解答の抽出
• フォームや請求書の抽出処理設計
• 正規表現とLLMを選びたいとき

Rustのコード作成・レビュー・改修で、所有権やエラー処理、型設計、並行処理を見直し、安全性・性能・保守性を意識した実装へ整えるスキル。

• Rustの所有権と借用のレビュー
• 異常時に停止するエラー処理の改修
• Rustアプリの型とモジュール設計

Node.js、Express、Next.jsのAPIとデータ処理を設計・レビューするスキル。DBへの問い合わせ、キャッシュ、認証、エラー処理を整理します。

• API設計と業務処理・データ取得の分離
• 重複するDB問い合わせを減らしたいとき
• キャッシュと非同期処理の導入

A design-school graduation project: a civic wayfinding system for a transit hub — the brief, the process, and the outcome. Built as a decision-grade coursework defense deck for crit panel, faculty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create branded architecture, architecture delta, IT current-state, flowchart, sequence, state machine, ER/data model, timeline, swimlane, quadrant, radar/spider, polar chart (polar/radial lollipop), loop/flywheel, nested, tree, org chart, layer stack, exploded axonometric, axonometric plan, Venn, pyramid/funnel, treemap and marimekko, heatmap, bar and dumbbell, waterfall, line (slopegraph, ridgeline, streamgraph, bump), Gantt and scatter charts (bubble, beeswarm), high-level, process, medallion, data flow, DP integration, DP security matrix, Sankey, fishbone, Wardley map, kanban, user journey, service blueprint, deployment, dependency graph, UML class, story map, or database schema diagrams as HTML/SVG/PNG, with .drawio, Mermaid, and .excalidraw import, plus lifecycle phase maps, block decomposition trees, and onboarding guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply GDPR-compliant engineering practices across your codebase. Use this skill whenever you are designing APIs, writing data models, building authentication flows, implementing logging, handling user data, writing retention/deletion jobs, designing cloud infrastructure, or reviewing pull requests for privacy compliance. Trigger this skill for any task involving personal data, user accounts, cookies, analytics, emails, audit logs, encryption, pseudonymization, anonymization, data exports, breach response, CI/CD pipelines that process real data, or any question framed as "is this GDPR-compliant?". Inspired by CNIL developer guidance and GDPR Articles 5, 25, 32, 33, 35.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft anonymous one-page company teasers for sell-side M&A processes. Creates a compelling summary without revealing the company's identity, designed to gauge buyer interest before NDA execution. Triggers on "teaser", "blind teaser", "anonymous profile", "one-pager for process", or "draft teaser for sell-side".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design identity governance and lifecycle (IGA) programs on platforms like SailPoint, Saviynt, or Entra ID Governance, covering joiner-mover-leaver (JML) automation, role mining, access requests, periodic recertification, and orphaned-account remediation sourced from an HR feed. Use when automating cross-system JML provisioning, remediating former-employee access, or building lifecycle processes for SOX, HIPAA, or GDPR compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive guide for creating software diagrams using Mermaid syntax. Use when users need to create, visualize, or document software through diagrams including class diagrams (domain modeling, object-oriented design), sequence diagrams (application flows, API interactions, code execution), flowcharts (processes, algorithms, user journeys), entity relationship diagrams (database schemas), C4 architecture diagrams (system context, containers, components), state diagrams, git graphs, pie charts, gantt charts, or any other diagram type. Triggers include requests to "diagram", "visualize", "model", "map out", "show the flow", or when explaining system architecture, database design, code structure, or user/application flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure mesh files against Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) rules and report printability findings per process (FDM, SLS, SLA/DLP, metal PBF, MJF). Use when the user asks whether a part is printable, wants overhang/wall-thickness/support analysis of an `.stl`, `.obj`, `.ply`, or `.3mf` mesh, wants a build-orientation recommendation, or wants DfAM redesign guidance before slicing with `$gcode` or regenerating geometry with `$cad`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lark/Feishu real-time event listening / subscribing / consuming: stream events as NDJSON via `lark-cli event consume <EventKey>` (covers IM messages/reactions/chat changes, Approval status changes, Task updates, VC meeting started/joined/ended, Minutes generated, Whiteboard updated, etc.). Use for Lark bots, real-time message processing, long-running subscribers, streaming webhook/push handlers. Supports `--max-events` / `--timeout` bounded runs and a stderr ready-marker contract — designed for AI agents running as subprocesses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design taste and process for anything a person will look at in a browser — landing page, dashboard, prototype, deck. The default design driver for a browsable artifact, with an anti-slop playbook for the visual language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DO NOT USE when the target already consumes an injected interface or built-in abstraction such as IFileSystem or TimeProvider, even if the request says "generate a wrapper"; no new wrapper is needed. Use only when C# source calls an ambient/static dependency and no injectable seam exists: first-time TimeProvider, IHttpClientFactory, or System.IO.Abstractions adoption; minimal Environment/Console/Process wrappers; IProcessRunner; DI registration; or an ambient seam that preserves a static API. Exclude static detection (detect-static-dependencies), migration to an existing/registered abstraction (migrate-static-to-wrapper), one blocked behavior plus deterministic tests (testability-obstacle), and general interface design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate comprehensive technical design translating requirements (WHAT) into architecture (HOW) with discovery process. Use when creating architecture from requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and implement repeatable preprocessing pipelines for cleaning, encoding, transforming, and validating ML input data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate workloads from Microsoft Azure to AWS. Triggers on: migrate from Azure, Azure to AWS, move off Azure, migrate AKS to EKS, migrate App Service or Azure VMs to AWS compute, migrate Azure SQL or Azure Database to RDS, migrate Cosmos DB to DynamoDB, migrate Azure OpenAI to Bedrock, move Azure AI or agentic workloads to AWS, estimate AWS costs for my Azure infrastructure, what-if workshop. Runs a 6-phase process: discover Azure resources from Terraform, the live `az` CLI, app code, and billing exports, then clarify, design, estimate costs, optionally reprice scenarios, generate artifacts, and collect feedback. Clarify gates Design, Estimate, and Generate; Generate is opt-in at the post-Estimate decision gate. Bicep/ARM discovery is not yet implemented; a Bicep/ARM-only workspace halts. Do not use for: GCP migrations (see gcp-to-aws), Heroku migrations (see heroku-to-aws), general AWS architecture advice (see architect-for-startups), AWS-to-Azure reverse migration, or Azure-to-Azure refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate workloads from Google Cloud Platform to AWS — plus AI and agentic workloads from any provider. Triggers on: migrate from GCP, GCP to AWS, move off Google Cloud, migrate Terraform to AWS, migrate Cloud SQL to RDS, migrate GKE to EKS, migrate Cloud Run to Fargate, migrate App Engine to Elastic Beanstalk, migrate from OpenAI to Bedrock, move off OpenAI, switch from ChatGPT API to AWS, migrate from Gemini to Bedrock, migrate LangChain to Bedrock, migrate LangGraph to AWS, migrate agentic workloads to AWS, move AI workloads to AWS, migrate my AI app to AWS. Runs a 6-phase process: discover GCP resources from Terraform, app code, or billing exports, then clarify, design, estimate costs, generate artifacts, and collect feedback. Clarify must finish before Design, Estimate, or Generate. Do not use for: Azure migrations (see azure-to-aws), on-premises migrations, AWS-to-GCP reverse migration, general AWS architecture advice without migration intent, or GCP-to-GCP refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate workloads from Heroku to AWS. Triggers on: migrate from Heroku, Heroku to AWS, move off Heroku, migrate Heroku Postgres to RDS, migrate Heroku Redis to ElastiCache, migrate Heroku Kafka to MSK, migrate dynos to Elastic Beanstalk, migrate dynos to Fargate, migrate Heroku Private Space, Heroku to ECS, leave Heroku, what-if workshop, compare migration scenarios, workshop mode. Runs a 6-phase process: discover Heroku resources live via the authenticated Heroku CLI (read-only, consent-gated) and/or from Terraform, Procfile/app.json, and billing exports, then clarify, design, estimate costs, generate artifacts, and collect feedback. Clarify must finish before Design, Estimate, or Generate. An optional post-Estimate what-if workshop reprices region/HA/compute/Graviton scenarios. Do not use for: GCP migrations (see gcp-to-aws), Azure migrations (see azure-to-aws), AWS-to-Heroku reverse migration, general AWS architecture advice without migration intent, or Heroku-to-Heroku refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive guide for creating software diagrams using Mermaid syntax. Use when users need to create, visualize, or document software through diagrams including class diagrams (domain modeling, object-oriented design), sequence diagrams (application flows, API interactions, code execution), flowcharts (processes, algorithms, user journeys), entity relationship diagrams (database schemas), C4 architecture diagrams (system context, containers, components), state diagrams, git graphs, pie charts, gantt charts, or any other diagram type. Triggers include requests to "diagram", "visualize", "model", "map out", "show the flow", or when explaining system architecture, database design, code structure, or user/application flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement the Entrepreneurial Operating System (EOS) to align vision and execution across a company. Use when the user mentions "EOS", "Entrepreneurial Operating System", "V/TO", "quarterly rocks", "Level 10 meetings", "accountability chart", "IDS process", "my company feels chaotic", "we keep having the same problems", or "get the whole team aligned". Also trigger when a growing company needs meeting structure, goal-setting frameworks, or a systematic way to solve recurring organizational issues. Covers the six EOS components: Vision, People, Data, Issues, Process, Traction. For team motivation design, see drive-motivation. For lean experimentation, see lean-startup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a structured 5-day process to prototype, test, and validate product ideas with real users. Use when the user mentions "design sprint", "validate before we build", "rapid prototype", "test with users", or "should we build this". Also trigger when a team is stuck in endless debate over a high-stakes product decision, or wants to de-risk a costly idea before investing in development. Covers mapping, sketching, deciding, prototyping, and testing across Monday-Friday. For ongoing experimentation and MVPs, see lean-startup. For customer job analysis, see jobs-to-be-done. For non-leading user interviews, see mom-test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs the joining and leaving experience — first-day readiness, ramp to productivity, knowledge capture, and clean exits. Use this to design or fix onboarding, shorten time to productivity, structure a leaver process, capture knowledge before someone leaves, or coordinate the access and asset steps around a joiner or leaver.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and audits who can reach what — authentication, authorization models, privileged access, service credentials, and joiner-mover-leaver process. Use this to design a permissions model, run an access review, reduce standing privilege, handle offboarding, set up SSO or MFA, manage service and machine credentials, or diagnose why permissions have sprawled.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Owns execution: how work actually gets done across the organization, including process, program management, capacity, vendors, supply chain, and service delivery. Use this when execution is the problem rather than strategy, to design or fix a process, to resolve cross-functional handoff failures, to plan capacity, to assess delivery risk, or when the same failure keeps recurring. Also use to decide whether to build, hire, or outsource a capability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。