3,240 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Central utility skill for GSD operations. Provides config parsing, slug generation, timestamps, path operations, and orchestrates calls to other specialized skills. Acts as the unified entry point that the original gsd-tools.cjs provided via its lib/ modules (commands, config, core, init).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be considered when you need to normalize testing engineers' written defect reasons following the provided product codebooks. This skill will correct the typos, misused abbreviations, ambiguous descriptions, mixed Chinese-English text or misleading text and provide explanations. This skill will do segmentation, semantic matching, confidence calibration and station validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes provided content for quality, E-E-A-T signals, and SEO best practices. Scores content and provides improvement recommendations based on established guidelines. Use PROACTIVELY for content review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate or edit images using OpenAI GPT Image API (gpt-image-2, gpt-image-1, etc). Use ONLY when the user explicitly names OpenAI or GPT as the provider: "gpt image", "openai image", "generate image with openai", "用 openai 画图", "用 GPT 生成图片". For generic image requests without a provider, use nanobanana-skill instead. Do NOT use for diagrams (架构图/流程图) — draw those with Mermaid or code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
视频脚本洗稿和二创脚本工作流。Use when the user provides an existing transcript, oral draft, viral script, competitor video text, rough topic notes, or wants 洗稿, 二创改写, 爆款视频脚本重写, 逐字稿改成短视频脚本, rewrite with ra-人话, and queue the approved script into 01-内容生产/视频工作台/待制作/ as the handoff contract for video production. If the user provides a video URL or local video file and asks 视频洗稿、视频二创、洗稿并制作视频, use ra-video-wash-pipeline first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reapply and repair Windows Codex Desktop after Store upgrades, including custom provider models hidden by Statsig available_models filtering, the dependent blue-purple Power slider and its Ultra toggle, Fast Mode request/UI gates, locale i18n, plugin UI gates, Chrome/browser_use gates, Goal command gates, Windows Computer Use availability gates and plugin/runtime repair, phone remote-control pairing under third-party/API-key main app usage, Desktop dynamicTools/inputSchema thread-start schema drift, local conversation visibility recovery after model_provider switches, restored-conversation missing-cwd continuation repair, ASAR integrity repair, signing/installing patched MSIX packages, SDK cleanup, Fast Mode wire verification, local plugin marketplace registration, and optional custom model_instructions_file setup (the bundled system prompt, also called 听话水).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shared helper that routes ALL paid media generation (FAL image/video, ElevenLabs music) through the GooseWorks proxies so every call bills the Ads agent — never a provider SDK's default host. Host-swaps the FAL queue URLs, loads the agent token from the sandbox env (GW_MEDIA_PROXY_TOKEN) or ~/.gooseworks/credentials.json, and returns the result CDN URL. Every video-ad media capability imports this; templates never call a provider directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build reactive/event-driven C# with R3 (Cysharp's modern reimplementation of Reactive Extensions). Covers the Observable<T>/Observer<T> model, the OnErrorResume error contract, async dispatch with AwaitOperation, Task/IAsyncEnumerable integration, TimeProvider/FrameProvider scheduling, the concurrency contract, and how R3 differs from System.Reactive (Rx.NET).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement, review, or improve WidgetKit widgets and controls. Use when building Home Screen, Lock Screen, StandBy, or CarPlay widgets with timeline providers; configurable widgets with AppIntentTimelineProvider; interactive widgets or Control Center controls with Button/Toggle wiring; WidgetKit push reloads, refresh budgets, deep links, Smart Stack relevance, Liquid Glass/accented rendering, widget extension setup, WidgetBundle, App Groups, and entitlements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks about Stripe Connect configuration, charge patterns, Dashboard access, or how to get started with Connect, is building a marketplace, platform, multi-vendor store, gig platform, or subscription platform, needs to pay out sellers, vendors, or providers, mentions split payments, revenue sharing, multi-party payments, or similar payment distribution concepts, provides a company URL or business description for a recommendation, builds SaaS that routes money between parties (for example, POS, booking, invoicing — not operational SaaS without payment routing), asks about onboarding or KYC for merchants, sellers, and vendors, mentions connected account Dashboard or responsibility configurations, or asks about payment flows, white-label payments, or embedded payments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement multi-layer LLM caching with exact match, semantic similarity, and provider-side prompt caching. Reduce API costs by 30–70%, cut latency, and improve throughput using Redis, GPTCache, and provider caching APIs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configure and validate CCAM webhook targets across supported chat, incident, automation, and generic providers. Use when listing provider requirements, creating or updating a target, scoping it to alert rules, sending a test notification, reviewing delivery history, or deleting a target.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect and install CCAM monitoring hooks for Claude Code and Codex. Use when onboarding a provider, repairing missing hooks, checking which provider is active, or validating that installation preserved unrelated user hooks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 — Digital Operational Resilience Act) compliance advisor for EU financial entities. Use this skill whenever a user asks about DORA compliance, ICT risk management frameworks, ICT incident classification or reporting, threat-led penetration testing (TLPT), ICT third-party risk management, Register of Information, contractual provisions with ICT providers, ICT concentration risk, oversight of critical ICT third-party service providers (CTPPs), or any DORA RTS/ITS obligation. Also trigger for: "DORA gap analysis", "DORA readiness", "Art. 6 ICT risk framework", "Art. 17 incident reporting", "Art. 26 TLPT", "Art. 28 third-party policy", "Art. 30 contractual provisions", "Register of Information CIR 2024/2956", "critical TPSP designation", "DORA vs NIS2", "DORA simplified framework", or EBA/ESMA/EIOPA digital resilience guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert TISAX (Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange) advisor for the automotive supply chain — the ENX/VDA assessment regime that OEMs like VW, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz require from suppliers and service providers. Covers the VDA ISA 6 catalogue (current through 2026) and the ISA2027 transition (published July 1, 2026; mandatory for assessments ordered from January 1, 2027), assessment levels AL1/AL2/AL3, all 12 assessment objectives/labels (Confidential, Strictly Confidential, High/Very High Availability, Proto Parts/Vehicles, Test Vehicles, Proto Events, Data, Special Data), maturity scoring (0–5, target 3, cutback rules), the ENX portal process, scoping, audit-provider selection, corrective action plans and the 9-month window, 3-year label validity, and ISO 27001 mapping. Use for any TISAX, VDA ISA, ENX, automotive information-security assessment, prototype protection, or OEM supplier-security requirement question — gap assessments, label selection, readiness, and audit prep.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate, configure, and migrate workloads to AWS Lambda Managed Instances (LMI). Triggers on: Lambda Managed Instances, LMI, capacity provider, multi-concurrency Lambda, dedicated instance Lambda, EC2-backed Lambda, cold start elimination, Graviton Lambda, instance type for Lambda, scheduled scaling for LMI, Lambda cost optimization with Reserved Instances or Savings Plans. Also trigger when users describe high-volume predictable workloads seeking cost savings, want to scale LMI capacity on a schedule, or compare Lambda vs EC2 for steady-state traffic. For standard Lambda without LMI, use the aws-lambda skill instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement Terraform Provider actions using the Plugin Framework. Use when developing imperative operations that execute at lifecycle events (before/after create, update, destroy).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic contract negotiation strategies for technology services agreements with German/EU law specificity. Provides three-position framework (provider-favorable, balanced, client-favorable), deal-size calibration (€100K to €10M+), five-tier objection handling with regulatory leverage (GDPR, DORA, NIS2, BGB), concession packaging, and position matrices for liability, IP, payment, SLA, data protection, and termination. Use when: (1) Developing negotiation strategies for SaaS, cloud, or managed services agreements, (2) Preparing position papers and fallback positions, (3) Responding to counterparty objections, (4) Structuring concession packages that protect core economics, (5) Calibrating tactics to deal size and leverage, or (6) Applying German contract law constraints (BGB §§ 305-310 AGB, § 309 Nr. 7 liability limits, § 288 statutory interest).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Panel structure design, firm selection criteria, right-sourcing analysis, and coverage gap assessment for in-house legal teams. Build panel frameworks from scratch or formalise existing informal arrangements. Define weighted selection criteria for firm evaluation. Run right-sourcing analysis (ABC tiering) to identify work sent to expensive providers that doesn't require that level of resource. Assess existing panels for practice area, geographic, and capability gaps. Trigger on: 'design our panel', 'how many firms do we need', 'panel structure', 'firm selection criteria', 'which firms should we use', 'right-sourcing', 'are we sending work to the right firms', 'panel gaps', 'too many firms', 'consolidate our panel', 'we need a firm for', 'preferred provider', 'panel tiers', 'do we need BigLaw for this', 'convergence', 'D&I panel targets', 'how do we choose firms'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mandatory external verification workflow for ALL non-trivial factual claims before presenting them as true. This skill MUST be used whenever Claude is asked to research any topic, answer factual questions, provide current information, draft documents containing factual claims, give legal advice or cite legal authority, discuss current events or public figures, provide technical or scientific information, state statistics or data points, or answer ANY question where the answer could have changed over time. Also trigger when the user asks Claude to 'check', 'verify', 'confirm', 'research', 'look up', or 'find out' anything, or when the user needs information that requires freshness, precision, or source accuracy. This skill overrides any default tendency to answer from memory. If a task involves stating facts, citing sources, or providing current information — use this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classify AI systems under the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) and determine compliance obligations. Use when asked to assess AI risk level, check if an AI system is prohibited, determine high-risk status, identify GPAI model obligations, map provider/deployer responsibilities, or build an AI Act compliance roadmap. Covers the full classification decision tree (Prohibited → High-Risk → Limited → Minimal → GPAI), obligations by role (provider, deployer, importer, distributor), compliance timelines, and DACH-specific considerations (German works council, BaFin, BSI, BNetzA). Triggers on phrases like "classify this AI system", "is this high-risk under the AI Act", "AI Act risk assessment", "EU AI Act compliance", "prohibited AI practice", "GPAI obligations", "AI Act timeline".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 — Digital Operational Resilience Act) compliance advisor for EU financial entities. Use this skill whenever a user asks about DORA compliance, ICT risk management frameworks, ICT incident classification or reporting, threat-led penetration testing (TLPT), ICT third-party risk management, Register of Information, contractual provisions with ICT providers, ICT concentration risk, oversight of critical ICT third-party service providers (CTPPs), or any DORA RTS/ITS obligation. Also trigger for: "DORA gap analysis", "DORA readiness", "Art. 6 ICT risk framework", "Art. 17 incident reporting", "Art. 26 TLPT", "Art. 28 third-party policy", "Art. 30 contractual provisions", "Register of Information CIR 2024/2956", "critical TPSP designation", "DORA vs NIS2", "DORA simplified framework", or EBA/ESMA/EIOPA digital resilience guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Use when asked to determine GPAI model provider obligations, assess Code of Practice compliance, evaluate transparency or copyright requirements for GPAI models, check systemic risk obligations, build a GPAI compliance roadmap, or prepare for AI Office requests. Covers all three Code chapters (Transparency, Copyright, Safety & Security), the 12 commitments and their measures, systemic risk classification (Article 51), provider obligations (Articles 53 and 55), open-source exemptions, enforcement timeline, Commission/AI Office supervision, and DACH-specific overlays such as BSI cybersecurity and works council implications. Triggers on phrases like "GPAI compliance", "Code of Practice assessment", "GPAI model obligations", "systemic risk evaluation", "AI Act transparency requirements", "GPAI copyright policy", "general-purpose AI compliance".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess and operationalize implementation readiness for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act Annex III, including provider and deployer obligations, conformity assessment, post-market monitoring, and EU database registration. Use when users say things like “we classified this as high-risk, what now?”, “build an EU AI Act readiness plan”, “assess our Annex III compliance gaps”, “what do providers/deployers of high-risk AI need to implement?”, “prepare for conformity assessment”, or “create a high-risk AI implementation roadmap.”
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。