「quantitative」の検索結果

Search arXiv preprint repository for papers in physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, and related fields

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level analytical chemistry knowledge. Use when working with chromatography, spectroscopy, electroanalytical methods, sample preparation, quantitative analysis, calibration, statistics, or instrumental analysis. Also use when the user mentions 'HPLC', 'GC', 'mass spectrometry', 'atomic absorption', 'ICP', 'titration', 'calibration curve', 'detection limit', 'NMR', 'chromatography', 'electrochemistry', 'sample preparation', or 'method validation'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, automated anti-pattern detection, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating, revising, or critiquing a chart, dashboard, or KPI display that makes a quantitative comparison someone will act on. Covers honest comparison and rendered checks; leave palette, marks, and library mechanics to the medium's own skill. Skip decorative graphics and diagrams with no data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge pack from 'Towards Digital Engineering: The Advent of Digital Systems Engineering' (Huang et al., Old Dominion University, arXiv:2002.11672, 2020). Use when reasoning about digital engineering, the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy and its five goals, the Authoritative Source of Truth, digitalization vs. digitization, digital augmentation, digitalized models, provenance, unique identification, and the four-level (vision/strategy/action/foundation) DSE research framework. Covers the conceptual/vision layer of the field. SCOPE LIMITS: this is a single ~28-page vision paper, not a methods handbook — it is thin on step-by-step procedures, tooling, case studies, and quantitative evaluation, and it predates 2020 so it does not cover later digital-engineering standards or recent AI/LLM advances. Use the sebok pack for established SE canon and MBSE depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA Human Factors Design Standard (HF-STD-001B, 2016) — the FAA's consolidated human-factors / human-systems-integration design criteria for systems it manages, operates, or maintains. Use for requirement-level design rules on: general human-factors design principles; automation and function allocation; designing equipment for maintenance; displays, controls, and visual indicators; alarms, audio, and voice communications; the computer-human interface (information presentation, coding, interaction styles, windows, dialogue); keyboards, input devices, and workstation/workplace ergonomics; system security, personnel safety, environment, anthropometry, and user documentation; plus intended-use and tailoring guidance. It is a quantified, source-attributed synthesis (heavily citing MIL-STD-1472G, MIL-HDBK-759C, DOD-HFDG-ATCCS, NUREG-0700, NASA-STD-3000, ANSI, OSHA, ISO 9241). Complements nasa-hsi as a parallel HSI tradition from the civil-aviation domain. Scope limits: it is design criteria, NOT an HSI lifecycle/process model (use nasa-hsi, nasa-npr-7123, or dau-se-guidebook for process); it does NOT reproduce the third-party standards it cites; it is FAA-acquisition-oriented (ATC, towers, TRACONs, airway facilities), not a general consumer-UX guide; and it is thin on modern touchscreen/mobile, web, and AI-driven interface patterns and on quantitative human-reliability analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns sustainability or ESG reports the user provides into a DRAFT question pack for reviewers: every quantitative disclosure as stated with unit, period, boundary and page, year-over-year changes computed only from the stated figures with the arithmetic shown, targets with stated and computed progress, restatements and inconsistencies, gaps and specific questions to the report owner. No assurance, accuracy or conformance verdict. Use when the user asks to "prepare review questions on our sustainability report", "what changed year on year in this ESG report", "check the figures in this report before it goes to the board", "find the gaps in this ESG disclosure" or "build a question pack for the report owner". Do not use for reviewing marketing text against environmental-claim rules, use green-claims-review instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep research with structured reports and charts. ONLY use when the user explicitly requests research/analysis, or needs data visualization with charts, or quantitative/comparative analysis across multiple sources. Do NOT use for simple questions or quick lookups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze session replay patterns across experiment variants to understand user behavior differences. Use when the user wants to see how users interact with different experiment variants, identify usability issues, compare behavior patterns between control and test groups, or get qualitative insights to complement quantitative experiment results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select colormaps and qualitative palettes for scientific figures using perceptual-uniformity, color-vision-deficiency safety, and luminance-monotonicity criteria. Covers Crameri scientific colormaps, viridis/cividis/magma, Okabe-Ito categorical, ColorBrewer, and the rainbow/jet critique. Use when choosing palettes for heatmaps, scatter, networks, or any encoding where color carries quantitative or categorical meaning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end GWAS workflow from VCF to association results. Covers PLINK QC, population structure correction, and association testing for case-control or quantitative traits. Use when running genome-wide association studies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quantitative drug-target validation pipeline. Scores druggability, selectivity, safety profile, ADMET feasibility, and structural tractability with a composite Target Validation Score (0-100) and GO/NO-GO recommendation. Use for go/no-go decisions on a target before commit-to-medchem, target prioritization across a list, and target-deselection rationale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and validates quantitative targeted metabolomics assays (MRM/SRM on triple-quadrupole, PRM on high-resolution instruments) to report absolute concentrations. Covers the internal-standard strategy (external cal -> global IS -> standard addition -> stable-isotope-labeled IS), weighted calibration judged by back-calculated %RE not R-squared, ion-ratio quantifier/qualifier confirmation, matrix-effect/recovery characterization, and ICH M10 method validation. Use when quantifying a closed panel of known metabolites with units, building or validating an LC-MS/MS assay, choosing an IS or calibration weighting, or judging whether a reported concentration is trustworthy. For untargeted feature detection see metabolomics/xcms-preprocessing; for group statistics see metabolomics/statistical-analysis; for flux/MID/tracing see metabolomics/isotope-tracing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Design System] Quantitative accessibility audit for UI - contrast ratios, font sizes, tap targets, heading hierarchy. Use when (1) checking WCAG color contrast compliance, (2) auditing text sizes for readability, (3) validating touch/click target sizes, (4) reviewing heading structure and landmarks, (5) user asks to 'check accessibility', 'audit contrast', 'WCAG compliance', or 'a11y check'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select colormaps and qualitative palettes for scientific figures using perceptual-uniformity, color-vision-deficiency safety, and luminance-monotonicity criteria. Covers Crameri scientific colormaps, viridis/cividis/magma, Okabe-Ito categorical, ColorBrewer, and the rainbow/jet critique. Use when choosing palettes for heatmaps, scatter, networks, or any encoding where color carries quantitative or categorical meaning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select colormaps and qualitative palettes for scientific figures using perceptual-uniformity, color-vision-deficiency safety, and luminance-monotonicity criteria. Covers Crameri scientific colormaps, viridis/cividis/magma, Okabe-Ito categorical, ColorBrewer, and the rainbow/jet critique. Use when choosing palettes for heatmaps, scatter, networks, or any encoding where color carries quantitative or categorical meaning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search academic paper repositories (arXiv, Semantic Scholar) for scholarly articles in physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, AI/ML, and related fields

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for reviewing academic manuscripts submitted to journals, particularly in political science, economics, and quantitative social sciences. Use when asked to review, critique, or provide feedback on academic papers, research designs, or empirical strategies. Emphasizes methodological rigor, causal identification strategies, and constructive feedback on research design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quantitative trading expertise for DeFi and crypto derivatives. Use when building trading strategies, signals, risk management. Triggers on signal, backtest, alpha, sharpe, volatility, correlation, position size, risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。