189 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Inspect scoped Autodesk data, compare versioned BOMs, and prepare ownership-aware drafts or approved custom-property changes. Not for implicit PLM release, membership changes or CAD geometry editing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare, submit and reconcile reviewed Fusion Automation jobs with exact sources, scoped authorization and explicit budgets. Not for arbitrary model-generated cloud scripts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconcile gene trees against a species tree under probabilistic models of duplication, transfer, and loss (DTL) using ALE (Szöllősi 2013 amalgamated likelihood), GeneRax (Morel 2020 ML reconciliation), AleRax (Morel 2024 co-estimation), Whale.jl (Bayesian DL+WGD), RANGER-DTL 2 parsimony, NOTUNG, ecceTERA, and Treerecs. Use when inferring ancestral gene-family content, distinguishing duplication from horizontal transfer from differential loss, rooting deep species trees from gene-content signals (STRIDE / Williams 2017 ALE-rooting), counting DTL events per branch, refining noisy gene trees against a species tree, modeling WGD events jointly with DTL, or producing publication-grade gene-family histories for phylogenomic / comparative analyses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fits structural equation models to GWAS summary statistics using GenomicSEM (Grotzinger 2019), including common-factor models, confirmatory factor models, ESEM, common-factor GWAS with Q_SNP heterogeneity, multivariate Wald tests, and stratified GenomicSEM partitioned heritability. Reconciles results against MTAG multi-trait analysis. Handles sample overlap via the LDSC sampling-covariance matrix, identifies and resolves Heywood cases, and verifies model fit with CFI / RMSEA. Use when modeling latent genetic architecture across correlated traits, running multivariate GWAS on a shared factor, distinguishing factor-mediated from trait-specific SNP effects, or comparing GenomicSEM common-factor results against MTAG when both depend on accurate sampling covariance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Report the health of the central system spec at `docs/system/` across seven checks — coverage gaps, stale elements, dangling anchors, duplicate anchors, orphan shards, unillustrated elements, and shards missing their kind annotation. Report-first and read-only: it repairs nothing until a human confirms a specific item. Use when the corpus has drifted, after a merge that touched `docs/system/`, or from `/archive` Step 5.5 in report-only mode. Requires `memory.architecture_map.enabled`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain a review-first Markdown knowledge base for Codex practices with source provenance, engineering capture, citation-aware queries, explicit archive and promotion, and deterministic linting. Use when asked to capture a durable engineering lesson, ingest Codex research, query or archive what the repository knows, check wiki health, reconcile conflicting guidance, or promote verified knowledge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Import a self-contained NeatContext context bundle shared by another person, or reconcile a newer copy of a context already on this machine, leaving the source bundle unchanged. Use only when the user explicitly invokes this skill or asks to import a NeatContext bundle.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Import a self-contained NeatContext context bundle shared by another person, or reconcile a newer copy of a context already on this machine, leaving the source bundle unchanged. Use only when the user explicitly invokes this skill or asks to import a NeatContext bundle.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test, fold or refute hypotheses beside the knowledge record, and reconcile records across branches. Use when open or check say hypotheses wait or an id is CONTESTED, when a write was refused into a hypothesis, before merging a branch whose record changed, and when a pull request's dry run or remeasure is red. Covers consolidate --dry-run, the fold, --refute, --from, same and distinct at the fold, and remeasure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when constructing the finance-side forecast — top-down vs bottom-up shape, confidence bands, retro-loop. Triggers on 'build the forecast model', 'reconcile top-down with bottom-up'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Documentation] Use to author, audit, amend, or test-spec a business Feature Spec. The single spec skill — modes draft|init|update|audit|amend create/maintain the tech-free 8-section Feature Spec; draft authors a provisional spec from an idea/requirement (no code yet, Evidence: TBD); tests generates Section 8 TC-{FEATURE}-{NNN} test specifications; sync reconciles §8 TCs ↔ executing test code. Per-mode procedure lives in references/{author,tests,sync}.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SOP for the architect-tier campaign workflow (/campaign): exhaustive survey, mitigation planning, tiered orchestration, and reconciliation. Trigger when: - Running a multi-workstream initiative where an expensive architect-tier council surveys, plans, emits worker prompts, and judges landed work. - Conducting production-readiness assessments that fan out into autonomous mitigation dispatches across model tiers. - Prompt contains: /campaign, campaign workflow, survey, orchestrate, reconcile, premise freshness, tier routing, worker IBC, scratch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pull remote changes and reconcile with local work, checking for soft conflicts
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft public Tamanu release notes for a given version. Use when the user wants release notes for a Tamanu release (e.g. "draft release notes for v2.45"). Pulls work from the specs and code that landed in that version's release/X.Y branch, plus the matching issues in the trackers (Linear's Tamanu team and Workhorse's Tamanu workspace), reconciles them, and writes docs/release-notes/vX-YY.md in the canonical v2.44 format for project managers and system administrators, plus a styled HTML rendering at .workhorse/design/designs/vX-YY-release-notes.html. Not for developer changelogs or QA test scoping (use scope-tamanu-release-tests for the latter).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads a risk register together with meeting notes and incident reports and returns a draft update pack: existing risks whose exposure, controls, ownership or status the sources say have changed, new risk candidates, closure candidates, and the one owner decision each item needs. Never assigns or changes a likelihood, impact, score or colour and never edits the register; owners decide. Use when the user asks to "update the risk register from these minutes", "refresh the register with the incidents since the last review", "reconcile the register against the notes" or "what changed on our risks". Do not use for writing up an incident itself, use incident-postmortem-drafter or data-incident-impact-brief instead; to track actions from minutes, use corrective-action-tracker. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a list of KPIs or metrics into a DRAFT definition sheet: one row per KPI with the name as stated, formula quoted from a source, source system, owner, refresh cadence, unit, filters and known caveats, with UNKNOWN in every cell no source fills and a gap list grouped by data owner. Never composes a formula, sets a target or names an owner the sources do not state. Use when the user asks to "define these KPIs", "build a metrics definition sheet", "document how each KPI is calculated", "which of our KPIs have no owner or formula" or "reconcile the two KPI lists". Do not use for the weekly numbers report, use kpi-weekly-report-writer instead; for field-level definitions of a table, use data-dictionary-builder; for logging a wrong figure as a defect, use data-quality-issue-log. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sweeps the last 24 hours of email, chat messages and meeting transcripts for commitments in both directions, what the user promised others and what others promised the user, reconciles them against a running commitments ledger (open, done, overdue), lists overdue items first and returns the updated ledger plus a proposed task list as Markdown for the user to save. Use when the user asks to "check my commitments", "what did I promise", "what am I owed", "did anything slip" or "run the commitment sweep". Do not use for a general morning summary of mail, calendar and mentions, use custom-daily-brief instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Close a work session properly: reconcile it against the wider collaboration, inventory what was actually built from git log and recently-touched files, summarize the arc, classify each artifact as keep, one-off or promote-to-permanent, route the durable ones to memory, canon or a new skill, save the retro as a vault note, and hand back an enriched /compact block so working memory shrinks without losing the thread. Triggers: "/retro", "/rr", "wrap up the session".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "remember project context", review saved findings, initialize runtime memory, archive stale work, reconcile notes, or erase a subject; manages authorized HOT/WARM/COLD working memory across all disciplines while preserving registry event ownership and privacy controls. Not for changing canonical registry facts - route those through the owning registry. 项目记忆/跨会话
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "optimize entity presence", reconcile an entity identity, or update canonical Knowledge Graph facts; audits and maintains machine-facing identity, sameAs, schema, disambiguation, and AI-recognition evidence through the entities registry. Not for page-level AI-citation readiness - use geo-content-optimizer; not for human-facing brand canon - use narrative-registry. 实体注册/知识图谱
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "figure out where our direct traffic really comes from", "measure dark social", "add a how-did-you-hear-about-us field", or "show social drives signups without click data"; produces a share-link/UTM hygiene spec for owned share surfaces, a self-reported attribution field design that replaces an existing form field (free-text first, coded later), a GA4 direct-traffic decomposition read (deep-URL directs, mobile-app skew, private-push correlation) with every derived number hard-labeled Estimated/proxy, and a branded-search-lift proxy from GSC plus Wikipedia pageviews — the declared dark-social method behind ECHO O2. Not for paid-channel attribution reconciliation (platform-claimed vs analytics conversions) — use attribution-reconciler. 暗社交归因/直接流量分解/自报来源字段/分享链路UTM
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "build our social crisis protocol", "mentions are exploding — what do we do first", or "when do we pause the posting queue"; produces a 1-5 severity ladder with tunable Estimated trigger thresholds (mention-velocity multiples vs the 7-day listening baseline, sentiment flip, journalist/regulator contact, employee-conduct class), the first-mechanical-action rule — pause ALL scheduled posts AND paid amplification, with dated state markers dropped to the channels proposal protocol and reconciled post-incident — a pre-approved holding-statement library with committed update cadences, when-NOT-to-post rules, a spokesperson/approval matrix, and a post-crisis retro template; re-runs the social-quality-auditor pre-publish gate before un-pausing the queue. Not for email deliverability incidents (blocklist, spam-rate spikes) — use deliverability-qa; inside a launch window launch-day-conductor owns incident handling. 社媒危机预案/暂停队列/声明库/发言人矩阵
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "set up conversion values so tROAS optimizes profit not orders", "map margin onto my purchase value", "build value rules for lead / phone / signup conversions", or "stop bidding to revenue when I care about profit"; defines and QAs the conversion VALUE model — per-conversion values, margin/net-value adjustment, static-vs-dynamic value rules, proxy values for non-revenue actions, and a value-vs-count sanity check — as a value-model spec plus a pre-launch value QA sheet. Not for whether the tag fires or UTMs are clean — use conversion-signal-qa; not for cross-platform double-count de-dup — use attribution-reconciler; not for scoring R1/R2 — that is a scored veto in ad-account-auditor. 付费广告转化价值建模/利润出价/价值规则QA
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when platform-reported conversions disagree with GA4/ecommerce, when you suspect Meta and Google are double-counting the same sales, or for a standing (monthly) reconciliation workbook that de-dups stacked credit against an order-ID truth set, normalizes attribution windows and currency, compares attribution models, and reads incrementality from a geo/holdout test. Not for the point-in-time R2 veto or RQS gate — use ad-account-auditor; not for the ROI/ROAS ratio math itself — use roi-calculator; not for organic dark-social share attribution or GA4 direct-traffic decomposition — use dark-social-attributor. 付费广告归因对账/去重/增量
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。