「reviewer」の検索結果

API Design Reviewer

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-tests one message (email, announcement, intranet post, town hall script, customer notice or slide) against two to six role personas the user supplies and returns a DRAFT panel report: each persona's likely first reaction, objections, unanswered questions, misreadings and what they would do next, every point tied to the passage that triggers it, plus suggested edits that add no fact the message does not already hold. Use when the user asks to "pre-test this message", "how will the team read this", "run this past the personas", "what objections will this raise", "find the holes before I send" or "check this lands with managers and field staff". Do not use for an in-character review of a proposal or business case by one executive archetype, use the executive-review family (cfo-reviewer, frontline-skeptic-reviewer and siblings) instead; to write the message in the first place, use announcement-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews one employee software request (tool, purpose, users, data handled, cost, urgency) against the approved-tools list and the policies the user provides and returns a draft review for the reviewer: match state on the list with the row quoted, approved tools the list itself describes as covering the same need, policy clauses that bear on the request with quoted text, questions for the requester and the reviewer, and one suggested decision with its basis. Never approves, procures, installs or adds a tool to the list. Use when the user asks to "review this software request", "is this tool on the approved list", "check this request against our software policy", "do we already have something approved that does this" or "prepare the decision note for this tool request". Do not use for a full vendor security assessment, use vendor-risk-screening-brief instead; for sorting mixed requests, use request-intake-triage. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck, plan or restructuring paper in character as a Chief Human Resources Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, people and organisation risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CHRO review", "what would HR say about this", "pressure-test the people impact" or "prepare this for the people committee". Do not use for the employee representatives' own view of a plan, use works-council-reviewer instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Business Officer archetype, covering commercial model, partnerships, deal structure, market positioning, strategic fit and opportunity cost, and returns a DRAFT review with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, commercial risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CBO review", "pressure-test this partnership", "check the deal structure" or "what would a commercial executive say about this". Do not use for pipeline, quota, sales-motion or forecast reviews, use cro-reviewer instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Information Security Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review with a verdict, findings cited to specific passages, security and compliance risks and the five interrogation questions a real CISO would ask. Use when the user asks to "run a CISO review", "pressure-test the security of this plan", "what would our CISO say about this" or "check the privacy and third-party risk". Do not use for contract, liability or regulatory-interpretation reviews, use general-counsel-reviewer instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PRまたはremote branchのレビューに使う。ローカルの未コミット差分やファイル指定はreviewerへ渡す。

Cursorで任意のリファクタリング改善案を返すnative入口。共有refactor-advisorとrefactor-guidanceを読み、reviewerのVERDICTから分離する。

割り当てられたコード・設計・指示の対象を、指定された観点から実際に評価するための手順。担当配分・追加reviewer起動・結果の全体統合は行わない。

ISTQB/JSTQB のテストプロセス各工程の出口ゲートとして、工程成果物（test-plan.md / test-analysis.md / test-design.md / test-case.md / テスト実装 / test-execution-log.md / test-monitoring.md / test-summary-report.md）をレビューするスキル。決定論スクリプトの機械検査（トレーサビリティ ID 突合・テンプレ準拠）と test-reviewer サブエージェントの定性レビューを行い、利用者が通過/条件付き通過/差し戻しを判定して軽量記録 test-review-<工程>.md を残す。上流の仕様・基本設計（spec / design-doc 工程。docs/dev/<対象>/spec.md・basic-design.md）は機械検査と利用者判定のみの軽量ゲートとして扱う。各工程スキル（test-plan〜test-report / feature-spec / basic-design）が完了宣言の前に本スキルの実行を促す。ソースコード diff のレビュー（diff-review）とは別物で、対象はテストプロセスの成果物のみ。成果物の修正・代作はしない。/test-review <テスト対象名> [工程] で明示的に呼び出されたときのみ使用する。

Answer reviewers on your own pull requests in other people's repos: find threads where the ball is on your side, tell humans from bots, do exactly what was asked and reply with evidence. Use at the start of any GitHub session or on a new-review alert. Triggers: /pr-reply, /prr, answer the reviewers, who is waiting on us.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational guide for WordPress.org submission readiness of NV oOS standalone plugins (nvoos-docs-hub live at 0.5.3; nvoos-content-graph live at 1.0.10 in the re-submission loop; nvoos-design-system next in the pipeline — issue #6811). Covers the 18 wp.org guidelines, the Plugin Check (PCP) gate in CI and Docker, PCP finding triage, the reviewer-reply loop (findings taxonomy from the real 0.4.3 review, related-issue sweep checklist, reply-email template), packaging exclusion tri-sync, readme.txt standards, .wordpress-org listing assets, and the NV oOS Complete checkout-flow disclosure discipline (docs-hub 0.5.3, content-graph). Use when preparing a wp.org submission, responding to a reviewer email, fixing the plugin-check CI job, triaging PCP findings, or capturing listing screenshots.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

6つの専門レビュアーロールを並列実行し、consensusLevel（複数ロールの合意度）と Tech Lead レポート（top3指摘・blindSpots・consensusSummary）で結果を統合する マルチエージェントレビュー entry skill。 Parallel multi-role review with consensus scoring (consensusLevel) and Tech Lead report. Use when a major release needs exhaustive multi-angle review, or when a single-perspective review is not enough and you want confidence that no reviewer angle was missed（重要リリース前の網羅レビュー・多視点の確証が 欲しいとき）。

PRをレビューしてGitHubにコメントを投稿する。reviewerエージェントが検証し、結果に応じてapprove/request-changesを実行する

Visual inspection of live websites to find and fix design issues. Use when reviewing UI layout/design, checking responsive design visually, detecting visual inconsistencies, or diagnosing CSS/accessibility problems at the source code level. Not for automated E2E testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

コード品質の最終確認。Skill: code-review (built-in) で correctness bug を検出 → main agent が findings を修正 → lint/ty 静的解析 → 条件付きで security-reviewer / critic を spawn (security 関連変更 or plan/requirements.md がある時のみ)。「品質チェックして」「品質ゲート通して」「レビューして」「コードを確認して」「PR 出す前にチェック」「セキュリティ大丈夫？」「コード見て」で発動。

Build AI performance review assistance systems. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-performance-reviewer related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert code reviewer specializing in code quality, security vulnerabilities, and best practices across multiple languages. Masters static analysis, design patterns, and performance optimization with focus on maintainability and technical debt reduction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-review, audit, or verify CS/AI/ML paper drafts as a critical peer reviewer. Three-round review (evidence→argument→style) with Verification Status and debt tracking. Use when: reviewing a paper draft before submission, checking evidence compliance of claims, simulating peer reviewer feedback, verifying citation closure and evidence debts, performing cross-section consistency checks. Triggers on: 审修, self review, 自查, verification, revise, 修订, check draft, 审稿, evidence compliance, peer review, 论文审查, draft audit, 验证论文, 检查引用, cross-section review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Construye o actualiza el corpus y el perfil técnico de un reviewer real a partir de sus comentarios en PRs de GitHub. Usar cuando se pida "crear el agente reviewer de X", "armar el perfil de X", "actualizar el corpus de X", "agregar el frontend al perfil de X", o "/generate-github-coder-profile <dir> <Nombre> <login>".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convex code reviewer — security, auth, validators, performance, and pattern checks for code in a convex/ directory. Use to review or audit Convex functions before shipping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to create CodeTour .tour files — persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs that link to real files and line numbers. Trigger for: "create a tour", "make a code tour", "generate a tour", "onboarding tour", "tour for this PR", "tour for this bug", "RCA tour", "architecture tour", "explain how X works", "vibe check", "PR review tour", "contributor guide", "help someone ramp up", or any request for a structured walkthrough through code. Supports 20 developer personas (new joiner, bug fixer, architect, PR reviewer, vibecoder, security reviewer, and more), all CodeTour step types (file/line, selection, pattern, uri, commands, view), and tour-level fields (ref, isPrimary, nextTour). Works with any repository in any language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Serves as a reviewer of the codebase with instructions on looking for Apple App Store optimizations or rejection reasons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewer comments arrive and each one needs a tracked decision, when a revise and resubmit letter must map every comment to a manuscript change, or when contradictory reviewer demands need evidence-based, editor-facing framing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。