「rfc」の検索結果

JSON Web Tokens (JWT) defined in RFC 7519 are compact, URL-safe tokens used for authentication and authorization in web applications. bu skill covers implementing secure JWT signing with HMAC-SHA256

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TLS 1.3 (RFC 8446) is the latest version of the Transport Layer Security protocol, providing significant improvements over TLS 1.2 in both security and performance. It reduces handshake latency to 1-R

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a detailed refactor plan with tiny commits via user interview, then file it as a GitHub issue. Use when user wants to plan a refactor, create a refactoring RFC, or break a refactor into safe incremental steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns and architectures for autonomous Claude Code loops — from simple sequential pipelines to RFC-driven multi-agent DAG systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a Beads-first refactor plan through detailed interview, repo verification, alternatives, scope boundaries, testing decisions, and tiny working increments. Use when the user wants to plan a refactor, write a refactoring RFC, or turn a risky change into safe incremental work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TLS 1.3 (RFC 8446) is the latest version of the Transport Layer Security protocol, providing significant improvements over TLS 1.2 in both security and performance. It reduces handshake latency to 1-R

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

NTLM info disclosure is a Medium-severity finding when chained to context — the leak itself is intentional protocol behavior (RFC-compliant NTLMSSP challenge), but on internet-exposed enterprise infrastructure it provides exact reconnaissance for the next stage of an attack. Highest-value targets:

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architects the encryption, codec/transport, and premium-feature layer of a group video-calling product, on top of an already-chosen SFU topology. Covers E2EE patterns (Zoom leader-fan-out, Signal pairwise-fan-out, MLS/TreeKEM as in Discord's DAVE, Telegram's ledger consensus), the SFrame (RFC 9605) + WebRTC Insertable Streams mechanism letting an SFU relay encrypted frames it can't read, codec/transport choice (AV1/VP9 SVC vs. simulcast, Opus, congestion control, Media-over-QUIC, WHIP/WHEP), and which "premium" features (virtual backgrounds, live captions, recording, breakout rooms, spatial audio) survive E2EE vs. structurally can't. Use when adding E2EE to an SFU-based call, choosing a 2026 codec/SVC strategy, or deciding which features to disable under E2EE mode. NOT for call topology/platform choice (see webrtc-adhoc-video-chat, which this composes with). NOT for one-way broadcast (see managed-video-streaming-pipeline). NOT for the DM/group-chat text backend (see realtime-messaging-backend-architecture).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。