2,266 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert ISO 27001 compliance assistant for security and compliance teams. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO 27001 or ISO/IEC 27001, including any of the following: gap analysis, auditing, compliance assessments, control checklists, policy writing, document generation, Statement of Applicability (SoA), risk assessment, risk registers, risk treatment plans, Annex A controls, ISMS implementation, clause requirements, certification readiness, transitioning from 2013 to 2022, control implementation guidance, incident response policies, access control policies, supplier security, or any information security management system (ISMS) topic. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "skill" — any ISO 27001 or ISMS question should use this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Use when asked to determine GPAI model provider obligations, assess Code of Practice compliance, evaluate transparency or copyright requirements for GPAI models, check systemic risk obligations, build a GPAI compliance roadmap, or prepare for AI Office requests. Covers all three Code chapters (Transparency, Copyright, Safety & Security), the 12 commitments and their measures, systemic risk classification (Article 51), provider obligations (Articles 53 and 55), open-source exemptions, enforcement timeline, Commission/AI Office supervision, and DACH-specific overlays such as BSI cybersecurity and works council implications. Triggers on phrases like "GPAI compliance", "Code of Practice assessment", "GPAI model obligations", "systemic risk evaluation", "AI Act transparency requirements", "GPAI copyright policy", "general-purpose AI compliance".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
EU AI Act Knowledge Engine — authoritative regulatory Q&A grounded in 70 official EU source documents (including the 2026 Commission draft guidelines on Art. 6 high-risk classification — general principles, Annex I, Annex III). Answers any question about the AI Act with article-level citations from the full regulation text, Commission guidelines, EDPB/EDPS opinions, codes of practice, harmonised standards, FRIA guides, incident templates, and sector-specific guidance. This skill should be used when the user asks about the "EU AI Act", "AI Act regulation", "Regulation 2024/1689", "KI-Verordnung", asks to "explain an AI Act article", "what does Article X say", "AI Act requirements", "AI Act penalties", "AI Act timeline", "GPAI obligations", "high-risk AI", "prohibited AI practices", "AI Act and GDPR", "fundamental rights impact assessment", "AI Act standards", "AI Act national implementation", "AI literacy", "serious incident reporting", "Digital Omnibus", "AI regulatory sandbox", or any question about EU artificial intelligence regulation. Also triggers on German terms: "KI-Gesetz", "KI-Verordnung", "Hochrisiko-KI", "KI-Kompetenz", "Grundrechte-Folgenabschaetzung", "GPAI-Verhaltenskodex". For assessment workflows that produce a classification decision rather than a knowledge answer, offer to run a structured risk-tier classification in-session.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyses contracts for risk across five critical clauses (Limitation of Liability, Indemnities, IP Ownership, Data Protection, Termination). Built for founders with no legal background. Flags red flags, explains risks in plain language, and provides negotiation guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Governance, risk, and compliance — risk assessment and scoring, control mapping across NIST CSF 2.0 / ISO 27001:2022 / SOC 2 / CIS Controls v8, gap analysis, audit evidence preparation, and security policy generation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage a single security finding — from a scanner, audit, advisory, or report — to a defensible disposition with a mitigation plan, false-positive justification, or accepted-risk writeup. Use when the user mentions 'triage this finding,' 'is this a real vulnerability,' 'mitigation plan,' 'false positive,' 'accept this risk,' 'compensating controls,' 'risk justification,' 'security ticket,' 'CVSS this,' 'should we fix this,' 'disposition,' 'sign off on,' or has a single security finding and needs to decide what to do.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classifies agent tasks into 4 risk tiers (GREEN/YELLOW/RED/CRITICAL). Use when assessing action reversibility before committing to an approach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides implementation of the NIST Privacy Framework IDENTIFY function covering ID.BE business environment, ID.DA data actions, ID.IM improvement, and ID.RA risk assessment subcategories. Maps NIST PF controls to GDPR requirements for dual-framework compliance. Keywords: NIST Privacy Framework, IDENTIFY function, ID.BE, ID.DA, ID.IM, ID.RA, privacy risk assessment, data actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement the NIST Privacy Framework IDENTIFY function including ID.BE business environment, ID.DA data actions, ID.IM improvement, and ID.RA risk assessment subcategories. Provides control mapping, gap analysis templates, and implementation workflows for privacy risk identification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assessment of pseudonymization techniques and re-identification risk. Covers tokenization, hashing, encryption-based pseudonymization, and hybrid approaches. Includes re-identification risk scoring using the motivated intruder test, quantitative metrics (marketer, journalist, prosecutor models), and linkage attack resilience evaluation. References ENISA 2019 pseudonymization report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conducts comprehensive inventory of protected health information across the enterprise per HIPAA Security Rule requirements at 45 CFR §164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A) and §164.310(d). Covers identification of all ePHI repositories, data flow mapping, classification of PHI by sensitivity, and integration with risk analysis. Keywords: PHI inventory, ePHI, data mapping, information asset, data flow, HIPAA risk analysis, designated record set.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conducts Data Protection Impact Assessments for AI and ML systems per EDPB Guidelines 04/2025 on AI processing. Covers training data lawfulness evaluation, model risk assessment, automated decision triggers, and AI-specific DPIA methodology. Keywords: AI DPIA, machine learning impact assessment, EDPB AI guidelines, model risk, training data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the reasoning, AI safety frameworks, and deep learning principles of Yoshua Bengio (Turing Award winner, Mila). Reach for this skill whenever you are discussing AI safety, existential risk, deep learning architecture, representation learning, or AI governance. Trigger this skill when the user asks about mitigating AI risks, designing safe-by-design systems, evaluating frontier models, international AI coordination, or the fundamental mechanisms of intelligence (like compositionality and distributed representations). Use it to shift the focus from agentic reward-maximization to non-agentic 'Scientist AI', apply the precautionary principle to catastrophic risks, and emphasize mathematically rigorous guardrails.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Risk Assessment & Position Sizing — analyzes volatility, drawdown scenarios, correlation, liquidity, and provides position sizing calculators (Kelly Criterion, fixed percentage, volatility-adjusted) with a composite Risk Score (0-100) for any publicly traded stock.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
21RISK integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with 21RISK data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Climate Risk Analyst. Use when a task calls for Climate Risk Analyst judgment. Reasons from TCFD/IFRS S2 four-pillar disclosure, NGFS Phase V orderly/disorderly/hot-house scenarios, hazard–exposure–vulnerability and RMS/AIR/CLIMADA cat economics, transition carbon-price and stranded-asset pathways, and PCAF financed emissions while treating exposure geocoding quality, Kotz damage-function retraction, and scenario-not-forecast misuse as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply risk metrics calculation in reproducible local data workflows with version-aware APIs, explicit assumptions, and validation. Use when the user chooses risk metrics calculation or its strengths fit the task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze contracts for risks, check completeness, and provide actionable recommendations. Use when a user asks to review a contract, check an agreement for red flags, analyze contract terms, find risky clauses, review an NDA, evaluate a service agreement, or audit employment contract terms. Supports employment contracts, NDAs, service agreements, and vendor contracts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit dependencies for licensing, security, and maintenance risk. Use when a senior developer needs risk assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the reasoning, AI safety frameworks, and deep learning principles of Yoshua Bengio (Turing Award winner, Mila). Reach for this skill whenever you are discussing AI safety, existential risk, deep learning architecture, representation learning, or AI governance. Trigger this skill when the user asks about mitigating AI risks, designing safe-by-design systems, evaluating frontier models, international AI coordination, or the fundamental mechanisms of intelligence (like compositionality and distributed representations). Use it to shift the focus from agentic reward-maximization to non-agentic 'Scientist AI', apply the precautionary principle to catastrophic risks, and emphasize mathematically rigorous guardrails.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。