2,352 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Records atomic learned behaviors with confidence scores. Project-scoped instincts are isolated per project and auto-promote to global scope at confidence threshold 0.8. Stores instincts in .claude/context/memory/instincts.jsonl
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write agency scopes of work. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with agency-scope-of-work related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define the scope, success criteria, roles, and boundaries for a consulting engagement. Use when a consultant says "help me scope this engagement", "I need to define what's in and out", "the client keeps adding things", "scope is getting fuzzy", "we need a contracting conversation", "I'm not sure what we actually agreed to", "help me set boundaries with a client", or "what should be in a kickoff". Also trigger when describing an engagement that feels like it is expanding without agreement, or when starting a new client relationship and preparing the initial contract or SOW.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or reviewing Agentforce topic (renamed subagent in April 2026) structure, including topic boundaries, instruction quality, handoff rules, out-of-scope behavior, and topic-selector strategy. Triggers: 'agentforce subagents (formerly topics)', 'topic design', 'topic selector', 'agent scope boundary', 'handoff conditions'. NOT for restricting what the agent may do or say (topic Scope, action filters, abuse prevention) — use agentforce/agentforce-guardrails. NOT for the mechanics of transferring a live conversation out — Omni-Channel routing and the context package — use agentforce/agentforce-agent-handoff-patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mechanical consistency check for game design — answers "is the design consistent with itself?" — plus changed-scope impact analysis across all three GDD axes: systems, flows, and content types. Offline and deterministic: greps the facts registry against the documents (numbers, terms, IDs, duplicate & dangling references, roster↔disk, map freshness, Depends 3-way, status/version, AC presence, placeholder leaks, flow & content schema), and from a git diff computes which dependent systems, flows, and content a change affects. Scope is inferred: a named document checks that document; an unverified diff triggers a changed-scope pass; otherwise everything. Use when the user wants a consistency or impact check, e.g. "verify the design", "what did this change affect", "find broken references in the design". Conflicts triage into four tracks; the entailed fixes hand off to /unikit-gd-apply in one pass. This is the mechanical pass — for a subjective "is this design good" quality critique use /unikit-gd-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft the QA scope and plain-language Given/When/Then test scenarios for a Jira ticket, built from the full ticket, the decisions made in its comments, and the actual code change read commit by commit (open PR, the ticket's merged PR, the branch against its base, or a named commit range). Saves a Markdown draft under docs/, iterates with the user, then posts it to the ticket as a new Jira comment only after explicit approval. Use on "QA scope for PROJ-123", "what should QA test", "write test scenarios for QA", "hand this ticket to QA", "prep the QA handoff", "gherkin scenarios for this ticket", or when a branch is ready for manual testing — even when the user only names the ticket or says "this branch".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates structured multi-file implementation plans before build. Scope-aware: trivial tasks exit early, simple tasks get fast plans, complex tasks get full research + phase files + validation. Enforces Gate 1. Activated by /mk:plan or /mk:cook. NOT for ticket complexity analysis against an existing codebase (see mk:planning-engine); NOT for CEO-level scope review of existing plans (see mk:plan-ceo-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Demonstrates the personal scope for Claude Code skills. Use when testing personal-scoped skills or when the user wants to understand the difference between personal and project skill scopes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a release test-impact analysis for a Tamanu version upgrade: compare two Tamanu releases and classify every functional area as Full Test, Smoke Test, or Skip, each with a short reason and the Linear card or PR reference. Use when the user wants a test plan, QA scope, regression scope, or "what to test" for a Tamanu release or upgrade, wants to compare or diff two Tamanu versions (e.g. v2.57 to v2.59), or asks which areas changed between two releases. Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.Y branches vs vX.Y.Z tags) and maps changed files and PRs to Tamanu functional sections (Patient Management, Encounters/Charting, Surveys & Programs, Medications, Labs, Imaging, Appointments, Vaccinations, Sync, Settings, Reports, Admin/Permissions, Mobile, etc.). Optionally maps against a regression-testing spreadsheet's sections when one is provided.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write agency scopes of work. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with agency-scope-of-work related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fetch personalized daily horoscope forecasts from zodiac-today.com API based on natal chart calculations. Use when a user wants: (1) daily guidance on what activities to pursue or avoid, (2) life planning help — best days for interviews, travel, romance, important decisions, (3) energy/focus/luck/romance forecasts to optimize their schedule, (4) lucky colors and numbers for the day, (5) future date analysis for planning events, trips, or milestones (paid tiers). Triggers: horoscope, zodiac, star sign forecast, daily guidance, lucky day, best day to, astrology advice, what should I do today, is today a good day for, plan my week astrology. Required env: ZODIAC_API_KEY (hsk_ API key), ZODIAC_PROFILE_ID (birth chart profile ID). Collects sensitive PII (email, birth date, birth city) for natal chart — requires user consent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trimmed Forge pipeline (scope → build → wrap) for small, clear-scope work. Use when the user runs /forgemaster-mini or has a small, well-scoped task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep-dive offensive methodology for dependency confusion and namespace attacks across all major package ecosystems. Covers npm scope confusion exploiting the gap between public and private scoped packages and .npmrc misconfigurations where registry mappings fail to pin internal scopes exclusively. Addresses PyPI namespace attacks through --extra-index-url resolution ordering, NuGet feed priority exploitation when multiple package sources are configured without clear directives, Maven and Gradle repository ordering where artifact resolution traverses repositories sequentially, Go module proxy abuse through GOPROXY misconfiguration, Ruby gems namespace squatting, and Docker image tag confusion with unqualified image references. Provides complete proof-of-concept methodology using safe callbacks including DNS canary via interactsh or Burp Collaborator and HTTP beacon with no destructive payload. Covers reconnaissance techniques for discovering internal package names through GitHub repository analysis, error ...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OpenClawの複数のIssueやPRについて、担当を分けて原因調査と修正、検証を進め、許可された範囲でマージや解決済み案件のクローズまで管理するスキル。
曖昧な機能要望や影響の大きい変更を、作業範囲・前提・リスクとともに整理し、期待する動作と検証方法が明確な受け入れ基準や引き継ぎ資料にまとめるスキル。
Analyzes git diffs against a stated intent to detect scope creep, unrelated files, broad pull requests, changes that grew beyond a fix, dependency additions, public API renames, config or CI edits, oversized hunks, and formatting-only files. Use when the user asks whether a change grew beyond the fix, a PR is too broad, or what unrelated stuff they touched, and wants keep, split, or justify guidance. Operates locally and offline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DashScope (Alibaba Cloud Bailian / 阿里云百炼) integration — image generation (qwen-image-2.0-pro), text-to-speech (qwen3-tts-flash), and ASR with word-level timestamps (qwen3-asr-flash-filetrans). Use when generating images via Qwen-Image, narrating via Qwen-TTS, or transcribing with word-level timestamps via Qwen-ASR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepares and structurally reviews readiness evidence for ISO management-system and laboratory-competence standards - ISO 13485 medical device QMS, ISO 14971 device risk management, ISO/IEC 17025 testing and calibration laboratories, and ISO 15189 medical laboratories. Use when organizing declared scope, controlled documents, risk-management files, scope of accreditation, traceability, CAPA, external-provider controls, or bounded local evidence manifests, and when separating ISO certification from laboratory accreditation, FDA QMSR inspection, CLIA certification, MDSAP, and EU MDR/IVDR evidence boundaries. Not for legal applicability, compliance, certification, or accreditation decisions; contains no clause text.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Merges mature lessons from a domain memory file into its instruction file. Syntax: `/memory-merger >domain [scope]` where scope is `global` (default), `user`, `workspace`, or `ws`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute git commit with conventional commit message analysis, intelligent staging, and message generation. Use when user asks to commit changes, create a git commit, or mentions "/commit". Supports: (1) Auto-detecting type and scope from changes, (2) Generating conventional commit messages from diff, (3) Interactive commit with optional type/scope/description overrides, (4) Intelligent file staging for logical grouping
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and execute a comprehensive, MITRE ATT&CK-aligned red team engagement spanning threat modeling, reconnaissance, initial access, and post-exploitation to evaluate an organization's detection, prevention, and response against APT-style behavior. Use when scoping or running a full-scope, objective-based engagement, or purple-teaming against a specific threat actor's TTPs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, audit, and improve harnesses that make AI coding agents reliable: AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md instruction files, feature/state tracking, verification gates, scope boundaries, session handoff, memory persistence, context budgets, tool-permission safety, and multi-agent coordination. Use this whenever a coding agent is unreliable across sessions — forgets context, drifts out of scope, claims "done" before tests pass, or starts each session inconsistently — or when creating or assessing AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, feature_list.json, init.sh, progress.md, or session-handoff files. Reach for it even if the user never says the word "harness."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Publish a long-lived internal web app, site, or dashboard from the agent computer. Scope-bound (only the owner's scope, plus whoever you share it with, can reach it), immutable versions with rollback, a stable friendly link. No public URL.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Findings-driven targeted code review. Understands the patch via patch-explainer and surrounding code via codebase-analysis, then consults a catalog of bug patterns (~11 categories under references/categories/). Picks only categories whose diff-signals match the patch and items whose "look for" hints match actual code shapes, groups them by review focus (function/file/feature), and spawns parallel subagents — each with a tight scope and selective checklist. Use for medium-to-large patches (50-1000 LOC) as a focused alternative to whole-patch ensemble or whole-file deep review. Triggers on: "review this patch/diff/change", "find bugs in this change", "scoped review", "what could go wrong here", "review using findings", or proactive PR review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。