「specifications」の検索結果

Design privacy API patterns including data subject API for DSAR endpoints, consent API for preference management, deletion API with cascading delete orchestration, and audit API for compliance reporting. Provides OpenAPI specifications, error handling, rate limiting, and authentication patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical architecture guide for building a multi-purpose consent preference center. Covers per-purpose granularity, easy withdrawal under Article 7(3), version history, audit trails, and IAB Transparency and Consent Framework v2.2 integration. Includes database schema, API design, and UI component specifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete, production-ready REST API endpoint specifications for any system or domain the user describes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate comprehensive Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for product managers. Use this skill when users ask to "create a PRD", "write product requirements", "document a feature", or need help structuring product specifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master requirements gathering, user story writing, acceptance criteria definition, and scope management. Transform insights into clear, actionable specifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate formal specifications including preconditions, postconditions, invariants, and contracts from code or requirements. Use this skill when documenting APIs, creating formal verification annotations, defining function contracts, specifying class invariants, writing design-by-contract code, or preparing code for formal verification. Supports multiple specification languages including JML, ACSL, Dafny, Eiffel contracts, and documentation annotations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract language-agnostic pseudocode from formally verified programs (Isabelle/HOL, Coq) while preserving verified control flow, data dependencies, and algorithmic logic. Use when: (1) Users have verified code and need readable pseudocode, (2) Documenting verified algorithms for broader audiences, (3) Translating verified implementations to other languages, (4) Creating algorithm specifications from verified code, (5) Preserving verification guarantees in pseudocode form, or (6) Abstracting proof-heavy code to essential logic. Maintains semantic faithfulness to verified implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically derives TLA+ properties (invariants, safety, liveness) from natural-language requirements or structured requirement documents. Resolves ambiguities, asks clarifying questions for underspecified requirements, and outputs TLA+-compatible property definitions with semantic explanations. Use when translating system requirements, specifications, or behavioral constraints into formal TLA+ temporal logic properties for verification with TLC model checker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate concise, structured summaries of requirements for quick team understanding. Use when analyzing requirements from text documents (MD, TXT, DOCX) or technical specifications to create bullet-point summaries that highlight core functionality and dependencies/constraints. Ideal for sprint planning, stakeholder updates, team onboarding, or any situation requiring rapid comprehension of requirement documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate Python programs into equivalent Dafny code, preserving program semantics and ensuring the generated code is well-typed, executable, and verifiable. Use when the user asks to convert Python code to Dafny, port Python programs to Dafny, add formal verification to Python code, or create Dafny versions of Python algorithms with specifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates comprehensive test scenarios from requirements including BDD/Gherkin scenarios, unit tests, integration tests, and end-to-end test cases. Use when converting requirements, user stories, or specifications into testable scenarios with full coverage including happy paths, error cases, edge cases, and boundary conditions. Outputs structured test suites ready for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract abstract mathematical models from functional code (Haskell, OCaml, F#) for formal reasoning in Isabelle/HOL. Use when users need to: (1) Convert functional programs to Isabelle definitions, (2) Extract high-level algorithm essence from implementation code, (3) Generate formal specifications and properties from code, (4) Create verification-ready models that capture mathematical properties while abstracting away implementation details. Focuses on structural recursion, algebraic data types, higher-order functions, and invariant extraction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate comprehensive test scenarios, user stories, and acceptance criteria from requirements and specifications. Use this skill when planning testing efforts, writing user stories, creating test cases, documenting acceptance criteria, exploring edge cases, designing test coverage, or translating requirements into actionable scenarios. Supports BDD (Given-When-Then), Gherkin syntax, user story format, and test case documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate Isabelle or Coq proofs establishing partial or total correctness of imperative programs from code and formal specifications. Use when users need to: (1) Prove program correctness using Hoare logic, (2) Generate verification conditions from pre/postconditions, (3) Construct loop invariants and termination arguments, (4) Verify imperative programs with assignments, conditionals, and loops. Supports both partial correctness (if terminates, postcondition holds) and total correctness (terminates and postcondition holds) for both Isabelle/HOL and Coq.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically infer formal correctness properties from Verilog/SystemVerilog RTL code and generate SystemVerilog Assertions (SVA). Identifies control-flow invariants (mutual exclusion, valid-ready handshakes, pipeline ordering, safety properties), liveness expectations, and temporal properties. Use when working with RTL designs that need formal property generation, when adding assertions to existing RTL, or when users ask to infer properties, generate assertions, or create formal specifications from hardware designs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically generate TLA+ specifications from program code, repositories, or system implementations. Use when asked to generate TLA+ spec, create TLA+ specification from code, convert program to TLA+, formalize system in TLA+, extract TLA+ model from code, or when working with formal specification of concurrent systems, distributed systems, protocols, algorithms, or state machines that need to be verified.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete modules and components from interface contracts and specifications. Use when Claude needs to build larger software components, implement interfaces, create service layers, or generate complete modules with multiple related classes. Supports Python (with type hints and protocols) and Java (with interfaces and abstract classes). Trigger when users request "implement this interface", "generate a module for", "create a service layer", "build a component that implements", or provide interface definitions that need implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically identify potential boundary and exception cases from requirements, specifications, or existing code, and generate comprehensive test cases targeting boundary conditions, edge cases, and uncommon scenarios. Use this skill when analyzing programs, code repositories, functions, or APIs to discover and test corner cases, null handling, overflow conditions, empty inputs, concurrent access patterns, and other exceptional scenarios that are often missed in standard testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract abstract mathematical models from imperative code (C, C++, Python, Java, etc.) suitable for formal reasoning in Coq. Use when the user asks to model imperative code in Coq, create Coq specifications from imperative programs, extract mathematical models for verification, or translate imperative algorithms to Coq for formal reasoning and proof.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically identify metamorphic properties (symmetry, linearity, additivity, input invariances) from programs or functions. Use when generating metamorphic tests, discovering program properties, validating transformations, or creating test oracles without explicit specifications. Analyzes control flow, data flow, and sample executions to output structured properties for metamorphic test generation and verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Uses abstract interpretation to automatically infer loop invariants, function preconditions, and postconditions for formal verification. Generates invariants that capture program behavior and support correctness proofs in Dafny, Isabelle, Coq, and other verification systems. Use when adding formal specifications to code, generating verification conditions, inferring contracts for functions, or discovering loop invariants for proofs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate concrete counterexamples when formal verification, assertions, or specifications fail. Use this skill when debugging failed proofs, understanding why verification fails, creating minimal reproducing examples, analyzing assertion violations, investigating invariant breaks, or diagnosing specification mismatches. Produces concrete input values, execution traces, and state information that demonstrate the failure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug proof failures using counterexamples from Nitpick (Isabelle) or QuickChick (Coq) to identify specification errors, missing preconditions, and proof strategy issues. Use when: (1) A proof attempt fails and you need to understand why, (2) Counterexamples are generated by Nitpick or QuickChick, (3) Specifications may be incorrect or incomplete, (4) Theorems need validation before proving, (5) Missing preconditions or lemmas need identification, or (6) Proof failures need explanation and correction suggestions. Supports both Isabelle/HOL and Coq equally.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and review APIs with suggestions for endpoints, parameters, return types, and best practices. Use when designing new APIs from requirements, reviewing existing API designs, generating API documentation, or getting implementation guidance. Supports REST APIs with focus on endpoint structure, request/response schemas, authentication, pagination, filtering, versioning, and OpenAPI specifications. Triggers when users ask to design, review, document, or improve APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。