783 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use this skill when implementing form submissions, data mutations, or any 'use server' function in Next.js 16. Trigger words: フォーム送信, mutation, 更新処理, 保存, Server Action, use server, useActionState, revalidatePath, データ更新.
Evaluates code against Apple's App Store Review Guidelines. Use this skill when reviewing iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, or visionOS app code (Swift, Objective-C, React Native, or Expo) to identify potential App Store rejection issues before submission. Triggers on tasks involving app review preparation, compliance checking, or App Store submission readiness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fetch external documents linked in SCF submissions — Google Docs, Google Drive PDFs, GitHub, Notion, IPFS. Use when a submission links to an architecture doc, whitepaper, or technical spec hosted externally. Handles URL transformation for Google services.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review and rank an entire SCF round end-to-end from a CSV export. Supports Open Track, Integration Track, and RFP Track with track-specific scoring dimensions. Reads submission data directly from an Airtable CSV, auto-detects columns, categorizes, runs parallel batch reviews, cross-batch calibration, and final ranking. All output is markdown. Use when you have a CSV export of an SCF Build Award round and need to review, score, and rank every submission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft Stellar Community Fund Build Award applications interactively. Use when helping teams write their SCF submission — walks through project description, Stellar integration rationale, technical architecture, team section, deliverables, budget, and traction evidence. Produces a complete draft aligned with what funded projects look like.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Surface current and recent Stellar Community Fund (SCF) round activity. Use when a user says "current SCF round", "what's happening with SCF", "active SCF submissions", "should I apply to SCF this round", "SCF deadline", "who is applying to SCF right now", "SCF round status", or "show me this round's submissions". Fetches live data from communityfund.stellar.org and cross-references with the LumenLoop ecosystem DB to flag repeat builders and category trends.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze the competitive landscape for an SCF submission. Identifies similar projects on Stellar and other chains, assesses overlap and differentiation. Use when reviewing or drafting an SCF submission and you need to map similar projects on Stellar and other chains and articulate the differentiation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate and analyze budgets for SCF Build Award submissions. Use when reviewing whether a submission's budget is proportional, justified, and well-structured based on patterns from 215 funded Build Awards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Packages an agent for CARLA Leaderboard submission — builds the docker image with make_docker.sh (plain or ROS variant), checks the four required roots and the egg layout it assumes, sets the agent/track/routes environment inside the image, and verifies the image can import the stack and load the agent before submission. Use when the user asks to "build the leaderboard docker image", "submit to the leaderboard", "package my agent", or make_docker.sh fails.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Annotates bacterial and archaeal genomes (isolates, MAGs, plasmids) with Bakta (active versioned databases, NCBI-compliant output) or Prokka (legacy), producing GFF3/GenBank/EMBL/FASTA with INSDC locus tags. Covers Bakta-vs-Prokka-vs-PGAP-vs-DFAST choice, light-vs-full database tiers, translation-table selection (11/4/25), archaeal and leaderless-gene caveats, the small-ORF blind spot, pseudogene-vs-phase-variation, the pangenome re-annotation trap, and submission compliance. Use when annotating a newly assembled prokaryotic genome, choosing an annotation tool, re-annotating a collection for pangenomics, or preparing annotations for NCBI/DDBJ submission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects and removes contamination in genome assemblies via two disjoint workflows - foreign-sequence screening of a single-organism (eukaryote/isolate) assembly with NCBI FCS-GX (GenBank-submission-mandatory), FCS-adaptor, and BlobToolKit blob plots; and MAG/bin quality assessment with CheckM2 plus GUNC (chimerism) plus GTDB-Tk taxonomy, judged against MIMAG. Covers why CheckM2 alone is blind to disjoint-marker chimeras, the FCS-GX RAM wall, organelle/NUMT triage, strain heterogeneity, and the HGT-vs-contamination (tardigrade) trap. Use when screening an assembly for foreign contamination before GenBank submission, assessing MAG completeness/contamination/chimerism, deciding which contigs to remove, or distinguishing real HGT from contaminant contigs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects and removes contamination in genome assemblies via two disjoint workflows - foreign-sequence screening of a single-organism (eukaryote/isolate) assembly with NCBI FCS-GX (GenBank-submission-mandatory), FCS-adaptor, and BlobToolKit blob plots; and MAG/bin quality assessment with CheckM2 plus GUNC (chimerism) plus GTDB-Tk taxonomy, judged against MIMAG. Covers why CheckM2 alone is blind to disjoint-marker chimeras, the FCS-GX RAM wall, organelle/NUMT triage, strain heterogeneity, and the HGT-vs-contamination (tardigrade) trap. Use when screening an assembly for foreign contamination before GenBank submission, assessing MAG completeness/contamination/chimerism, deciding which contigs to remove, or distinguishing real HGT from contaminant contigs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Annotates bacterial and archaeal genomes (isolates, MAGs, plasmids) with Bakta (active versioned databases, NCBI-compliant output) or Prokka (legacy), producing GFF3/GenBank/EMBL/FASTA with INSDC locus tags. Covers Bakta-vs-Prokka-vs-PGAP-vs-DFAST choice, light-vs-full database tiers, translation-table selection (11/4/25), archaeal and leaderless-gene caveats, the small-ORF blind spot, pseudogene-vs-phase-variation, the pangenome re-annotation trap, and submission compliance. Use when annotating a newly assembled prokaryotic genome, choosing an annotation tool, re-annotating a collection for pangenomics, or preparing annotations for NCBI/DDBJ submission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing CS research papers (conference, journal, thesis), reviewing scientific manuscripts, improving academic writing clarity, or preparing IEEE/ACM submissions. Invoke when user mentions paper, manuscript, research writing, journal submission, or needs help with academic structure, formatting, or revision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Microsoft Store Developer CLI (msstore) for publishing Windows applications to the Microsoft Store. Use when asked to configure Store credentials, list Store apps, check submission status, publish submissions, manage package flights, set up CI/CD for Store publishing, or integrate with Partner Center. Supports Windows App SDK/WinUI, UWP, .NET MAUI, Flutter, Electron, React Native, and PWA applications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
相談内容と選んだファイルを別のAIモデルに渡し、コードレビューや不具合調査、設計の助言を得るスキル。送信内容とトークン量を実行前に確認できます。
論文や研究計画を共通の評価基準で読み、研究方法、根拠、引用、文章構成を点検するスキル。評価の理由と修正の優先順位、次に直す内容を整理します。
機械学習・AIの研究論文を、関連文献の調査から実験設計、結果分析、執筆、投稿準備まで支援します。引用の検証や査読への対応も扱います。
Check a GitHub, GitLab, or Perforce PR/MR/CL for review comments, failing checks, and PR-body gaps. Use when asked to inspect, fix, or prepare a change for submission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Walk through a complete GAIA benchmark→submit flow — from key resolution through HAL-compatible package generation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan inputs for prompt injection, unsafe content, and adversarial attacks using AIDefence. Use when processing untrusted input (user submissions, API payloads, webhook data, tool outputs) before passing it to a model or executing it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing PWA readiness, adding an install prompt, or preparing a web app for submission to Microsoft Store or Google Play via PWA Builder.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automated Cherry Studio review for local branches, PRs, commits, files, architecture docs, and repository skills. Use for code or documentation reviews that need project-specific naming, main/renderer/shared placement and dependency rules, IpcApi and DataApi boundaries, lifecycle/service ownership, renderer hooks, React/UI conventions, and tests. Review depth adapts to diff size and runtime subagent capability (single-agent or multi-agent reviewer-verifier). Report-only by default; code fixes and GitHub submission each require explicit invocation-time authorization (`fix` / `submit`). Normal-review prompts and safe interruption behavior follow the interaction contract below. To diagnose gaps in the skill after a review session, run `/gh-pr-review diag`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepares journal manuscripts, conference papers, research posters, and grant documents using venue-specific formatting guidance and bundled LaTeX scaffolds. Supports selecting an official template, checking current page or anonymity rules, adapting academic writing to a venue, or inspecting a submission PDF.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。