「systems」の検索結果

Design scalable distributed systems using structured approaches for load balancing, caching, database scaling, and message queues. Use when the user mentions "system design", "scale this", "high availability", "rate limiter", "design a URL shortener", "design Twitter", "design Uber", "design a news feed", "system design interview", "capacity planning", or "distributed architecture". Also trigger when estimating infrastructure requirements, choosing between microservices and monoliths, or designing for millions of concurrent users. Covers common system designs (TinyURL, feeds, chat) and back-of-the-envelope estimation. For data fundamentals, see ddia-systems. For resilience, see release-it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design data systems by understanding storage engines, replication, partitioning, transactions, and consistency models. Use when the user mentions "database choice", "which database should I use", "SQL or NoSQL", "replication lag", "partitioning strategy", "consistency vs availability", "stream processing", "ACID transactions", "eventual consistency", "my queries are slow at scale", or "data is inconsistent across replicas". Also trigger when choosing a datastore, designing data pipelines, or debugging distributed-system consistency issues. Covers data models, batch/stream processing, and distributed consensus. For system design, see system-design. For resilience, see release-it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design motivation systems using Autonomy, Mastery, and Purpose (AMP) for products and teams. Use when the user mentions "intrinsic motivation", "gamification isnt working", "rewards arent working", "autonomy", "mastery", "purpose-driven", "my team is disengaged", or "how do I motivate people". Also trigger when designing onboarding progression, fixing broken gamification, or building team structures that sustain high performance. Covers why carrot-and-stick fails and how to build progress systems. For habit-forming product loops, see hooked-ux. For retention behavior design, see improve-retention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master context engineering for AI agent systems. Use when designing agent architectures, debugging context failures, optimizing token usage, implementing memory systems, building multi-agent coordination, evaluating agent performance, or developing LLM-powered pipelines. Covers context fundamentals, degradation patterns, optimization techniques (compaction, masking, caching), compression strategies, memory architectures, multi-agent patterns, LLM-as-Judge evaluation, tool design, and project development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build robust backend systems with modern technologies (Node.js, Python, Go, Rust), frameworks (NestJS, FastAPI, Django), databases (PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Redis), APIs (REST, GraphQL, gRPC), authentication (OAuth 2.1, JWT), testing strategies, security best practices (OWASP Top 10), performance optimization, scalability patterns (microservices, caching, sharding), DevOps practices (Docker, Kubernetes, CI/CD), and monitoring. Use when designing APIs, implementing authentication, optimizing database queries, setting up CI/CD pipelines, handling security vulnerabilities, building microservices, or developing production-ready backend systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs cell-based and animal-based validation plans that translate computational, omics, biomarker, genetic, or clinical findings into experimentally testable validation routes. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to move from an in silico, statistical, or clinical association finding toward wet-lab validation using cell systems, organoid-like systems, xenograft or genetically relevant animal models. It should define the exact claim to test, separate mechanism-testing from association-support and translational-support goals, choose the best-fit model family, specify perturbation strategy, readouts, controls, sequencing of experiments, and four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with one recommended primary plan. Never fabricate model availability, reagent availability, species relevance, assay feasibility, phenotype penetrance, expected effect sizes, validation success, or literature references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create interface designs, wireframes, and design systems. Masters user research, accessibility standards, and modern design tools. Specializes in design tokens, component libraries, and inclusive design. Use PROACTIVELY for design systems, user flows, or interface optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build scalable design systems with Tailwind CSS, design tokens, component libraries, and responsive patterns. Use when creating component libraries, implementing design systems, or standardizing UI patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems for LLM applications with vector databases and semantic search. Use when implementing knowledge-grounded AI, building document Q&A systems, or integrating LLMs with external knowledge bases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master Rust 1.75+ with modern async patterns, advanced type system features, and production-ready systems programming. Expert in the latest Rust ecosystem including Tokio, axum, and cutting-edge crates. Use PROACTIVELY for Rust development, performance optimization, or systems programming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Elite AI context engineering specialist mastering dynamic context management, vector databases, knowledge graphs, and intelligent memory systems. Orchestrates context across multi-agent workflows, enterprise AI systems, and long-running projects with 2024/2025 best practices. Use PROACTIVELY for complex AI orchestration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build automated billing systems for recurring payments, invoicing, subscription lifecycle, and dunning management. Use when implementing subscription billing, automating invoicing, or managing recurring payment systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master authentication and authorization patterns including JWT, OAuth2, session management, and RBAC to build secure, scalable access control systems. Use when implementing auth systems, securing APIs, or debugging security issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Japanese (and other non-Hollywood) screenwriting methods (日本编剧方法/原创剧本实战) — distilled from ten Japanese directors and writers in ゼロからの脚本術; Kosawa Ryota (three acts as 起承转合, speed by jumping), Uchida Kenji (beautiful structure, time-axis tricks), Miki Satoshi (small-material notebook, theme emerges later), Sono Sion, Omiya Ellie (dialogue from inner monologue), Kakei Masaya ("if + moreover"), Fukuda Yuichi (character = actor + flaw, audience as tsukkomi), Yokohama Satoko, Takahashi Izumi ("pain"), Yukisada Isao (situation-born originals); plus Arai Haruhiko (IP adaptation, "write what you're ashamed of"). Neighbours; sw-korean-french-screenwriting, ozu-screenplay-style. Use when writing an original Japanese-style script or TV drama, working from small material and fragments, choosing between structure-first and character-first methods, building a Japanese 企画書, designing comedy tsukkomi systems, or when Hollywood models feel wrong for a quiet, daily-life, non-goal-driven story.

Extract design systems from reference UI images and generate implementation-ready UI design prompts. Use when users provide UI screenshots/mockups and want to create consistent designs, generate design systems, or build MVP UIs matching reference aesthetics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when targeting Nature Food or deciding whether a food-systems manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the food-systems-significance and transdisciplinary bar, evidence and reproducibility expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building figures and tables for an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript so exhibits communicate interactions, dynamics, trade-offs, and model performance clearly. AgSy is a systems journal, so the best exhibits show trade-off frontiers, observed-vs-simulated fit, resource flows, and conceptual system diagrams — not just a bar chart of one treatment. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when articulating why an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) result matters — its relevance for farm design, management, decision support, or policy. AgSy values systems analysis that informs a decision, so this is what separates an AgSy paper from a methods demo. It frames implications honestly within the model's scope; it does not over-claim or invent impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use to understand how Agricultural Systems (AgSy) evaluates a manuscript — single-anonymized peer review with a minimum of two reviewers and an editor decision, desk screening for fit and systems content, what reviewers weigh, and the rapid-review track for Perspectives. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when targeting Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment or deciding whether an agroecosystem-environment manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the field-to-landscape environmental-outcome bar, data-reporting expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when framing the system and describing the model for an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript — defining system boundaries, components, hierarchical levels, and feedbacks, then choosing, describing, and calibrating the model (process/simulation, whole-farm, bio-economic, agent-based, or integrated assessment). This is the distinctive core of an AgSy paper. Structures the model and system; it does not run code for you.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing the response to an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) revision decision. AgSy review is single anonymized with at least two expert systems reviewers and an editor decision, and revisions often turn on model evaluation, sensitivity/uncertainty, and trade-off framing. The response must convert each reviewer without alienating the editor. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting or polishing an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript so it reads clearly for a systems-science audience, follows the journal's format, and meets front-matter requirements (abstract <= 250 words, Highlights, graphical abstract). Research papers run to about 8,000 words (no hard cap). Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating the model and analyzing results for an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript so it survives expert systems review — independent model evaluation (observed vs. simulated, fit statistics), sensitivity and uncertainty analysis, and trade-off / scenario analysis across the system. Guides evaluation norms; it does not fabricate results or run the model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。