「test」の検索結果

新規・既存テストが守る動作と不具合を確かめ、重複や実装への依存を見直すスキル。削除の根拠を整理し、必要な検証を残してテスト用コードも整理します。

• 新規テストの必要性を確かめたいとき
• 重複や実装依存のテストの点検
• テスト専用の公開コードの見直し

Guide for writing SGLang CI/UT tests. Covers CustomTestCase, CI registration, server fixtures, model selection, mock testing, and test placement. Always read test/README.md for the full CI layout, how to run tests, and extra tips. Use when creating new tests, adding CI test cases, writing unit tests, or when the user asks to add tests for SGLang features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing E2E tests with Playwright, setting up test infrastructure, or debugging flaky browser tests. Invoke to write test scripts, create page objects, configure test fixtures, set up reporters, add CI integration, implement API mocking, or perform visual regression testing. Trigger terms: Playwright, E2E test, end-to-end, browser testing, automation, UI testing, visual testing, Page Object Model, test flakiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MUST USE when an existing .NET test project was excluded from a .slnf/CI solution filter, disappeared from .sln/.slnx discovery, or lost its production ProjectReference; also for requests to set up, create, reuse, add, register, include, or repair a test project. Handles "tests pass directly but CI discovers zero", exact solution wiring, xUnit/NUnit/MSTest, and central packages. DO NOT USE to only author tests in an already-wired project (code-testing), run tests, migrate, or correct MSTest syntax/configuration without changing project or CI files (writing-mstest-tests).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safely change and test untested codebases using Feathers' "Working Effectively with Legacy Code". Use when the user mentions "legacy code", "no tests", "untested codebase", "how do I test this", "seams", "characterization tests", "golden master", "sprout method", "afraid to change this code", "monster method", "dependency breaking", or "inherited a messy codebase". Also trigger when changing code without tests safely, getting a class under test when constructors, statics, or singletons block it, adding features to tangled modules, or planning incremental test coverage for an old codebase. Covers the legacy-code change algorithm, seams, characterization tests, sprout/wrap, and dependency-breaking techniques. For refactoring code that already has tests, see refactoring-patterns. For day-to-day code quality, see clean-code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes turn-level tests for a LiveKit agent in the user's normal test suite: pytest (Python) or Vitest (Node.js). Use when the user asks to "write tests for my agent", "add a test for this tool", "test the handoff", "pin this bug", "why does my agent test fail", or after building or changing agent behavior that needs regression coverage. Covers the SDK's test session harness, assertions on messages, tool calls and handoffs, LLM judging of a reply against an intent, mocking tools, multi-turn tests, and judging whole conversations with the built-in judges. For interactive poking use debugging-livekit-agents. For grading whole conversations at scale use running-livekit-simulations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up Vitest testing in any project — detects type (Cloudflare Workers, React, Node, library), generates vitest.config.ts, test setup, utilities, and a sample test. Covers mocking patterns, coverage config, workspace setup, Jest migration. Use whenever the user mentions adding tests, setting up Vitest, configuring tests, migrating from Jest, fixing testing infrastructure, or asks 'how do I test this'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Terraform provider acceptance test patterns using terraform-plugin-testing with the Plugin Framework. Covers test structure, TestCase/TestStep fields, ConfigStateChecks with custom statecheck.StateCheck implementations, plan checks, CompareValue for cross-step assertions, config helpers, import testing with ImportStateKind, sweepers, and scenario patterns (basic, update, disappears, validation, regression), and ephemeral resource testing with the echoprovider package. Use when writing, reviewing, or debugging provider acceptance tests, including questions about statecheck, plancheck, TestCheckFunc, CheckDestroy, ExpectError, import state verification, ephemeral resources, or how to structure test files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, plan, and analyze A/B tests with statistical rigor. Use when the user asks about A/B testing, split testing, experiment design, statistical significance, sample size calculation, test duration, multivariate testing, or conversion experiments. Trigger phrases include "A/B test", "split test", "experiment", "statistical significance", "sample size", "test duration", "which version wins", "conversion experiment", "hypothesis test", "variant testing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MUST USE when an existing .NET test project was excluded from a .slnf/CI solution filter, disappeared from .sln/.slnx discovery, or lost its production ProjectReference; also for requests to set up, create, reuse, add, register, include, or repair a test project. Handles "tests pass directly but CI discovers zero", exact solution wiring, xUnit/NUnit/MSTest, and central packages. DO NOT USE to only author tests in an already-wired project (code-testing), run tests, migrate, or correct MSTest syntax/configuration without changing project or CI files (writing-mstest-tests).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to set up, review, or improve Java integration tests — including generating a BaseIntegrationTest.java with WireMock for HTTP stubs, detecting HTTP client infrastructure from import signals, injecting service coordinates dynamically via System.setProperty(), creating WireMock JSON mapping files with bodyFileName, isolating stubs per test method, verifying HTTP interactions, or eliminating anti-patterns such as Mockito-mocked HTTP clients or globally registered WireMock stubs. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for integration tests; Apply best practices for integration tests in Java code; Write Java integration tests with real infrastructure boundaries; Improve Testcontainers integration tests for Java code; Review integration test setup and teardown in Java projects. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize test suites using mutation testing to maximize mutation kill rate with minimal tests. Use when you need to reduce test suite size while maintaining quality, identify redundant tests, improve mutation coverage, or validate test effectiveness. The skill analyzes test coverage, execution intervals, and redundancy using mutation operators, selects or generates a minimal subset of tests that maximizes mutation kill rate, and outputs an optimized test suite with detailed reports showing killed and surviving mutants. Supports multiple programming languages and mutation testing frameworks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze existing test suites and source code to suggest additional unit tests that improve test coverage. Use this skill when working with test files and source code to identify untested code paths, missing edge cases, uncovered branches, untested error conditions, and gaps in test coverage. Supports major testing frameworks (pytest, Jest, JUnit, Go testing, etc.) and generates targeted test suggestions based on coverage analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Testing workflow skill for finding high-value test candidates, writing focused tests, generating realistic workloads, reviewing test value, and diagnosing test-suite health. Use for prompts about what to test next, adding or improving tests, reviewing whether a test is worth keeping, low-signal or flaky tests, workload scenarios, or test-suite trust. Do not use for general QA discussion unless the user wants a concrete testing workflow or artifact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and manage test data with factory patterns, fixture strategies, data anonymization, and synthetic data generation. Covers Fishery (TypeScript), FactoryBot (Ruby), Factory Boy (Python), database seeding, cleanup strategies, and GDPR-compliant data handling. Use when: "test data," "fixtures," "factories," "seed data," "synthetic data," "test database," "data anonymization." Not for: migration/integrity testing of the DB itself — use database-testing; environment provisioning and database branching strategy — use test-environments. Related: test-environments, database-testing, api-testing, unit-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a risk matrix or heatmap that quantifies what could break by business impact × probability, runs failure mode analysis on the top items, and maps test coverage to risk zones. Includes stakeholder interview frameworks and continuous reassessment. Run this BEFORE test-strategy or test-planning. Use when: "risk assessment," "risk matrix," "risk heatmap," "what could break," "critical paths," "failure modes," "where to focus testing." Not for: multi-quarter QA direction — use test-strategy. Not for: a single sprint/release test plan — use test-planning. Not for: hands-on session-based bug hunting — use exploratory-testing. Related: test-strategy, test-planning, release-readiness, qa-metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use production telemetry as INPUT to design new tests. Covers OpenTelemetry integration with tests, trace-based assertions, log-informed test creation, production-error analysis for coverage gaps, and telemetry-driven test prioritization. Use when: "trace-based testing," "design tests from logs," "OpenTelemetry assertions," "production errors point to test gaps," "telemetry-driven testing." Not for: safe rollout techniques (flags, canary) during release — use testing-in-production. Not for: scheduled post-deploy probes — use synthetic-monitoring. Not for: triaging CI failures — use ai-bug-triage. Related: testing-in-production, synthetic-monitoring, qa-metrics, ai-bug-triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design CI/CD pipelines that run test suites. Covers GitHub Actions and GitLab CI templates, parallelism and sharding, artifact management, flaky-test quarantine, test-result publishing, coverage quality gates, OIDC keyless deploy, and copy-paste workflows for Playwright, Jest, and multi-stage pipelines. Use when: "CI/CD," "GitHub Actions," "pipeline," "test in CI," "GitLab CI," "continuous integration," "test automation pipeline," "shard tests in CI." Not for: per-test flaky healing at runtime — use test-reliability; go/no-go release decisions and smoke-test checklists — use release-readiness; test-result dashboards and trend reporting — use qa-metrics. Related: playwright-automation, qa-metrics, test-reliability, coverage-analysis, release-readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end testing of email-dependent flows — signup confirmation, password reset, magic-link login, OTP/MFA codes, and notification emails. Covers the capture-inbox decision tree (Mailpit, Mailosaur, MailSlurp, Ethereal), Playwright polling without fixed sleeps, regex extraction of links/OTPs from the email body, deterministic per-test addresses (plus-addressing, per-inbox), subject/from/header/link assertions, and SPF/DKIM/DMARC deliverability checks as a separate suite. Use when: "test the signup confirmation email," "password reset email test," "magic-link login test," "capture OTP from email," "Mailpit," "Mailosaur," "MailSlurp," "email arrives flaky in CI," "assert email subject/from/links." Not for: Sending transactional email from your app code, or API-only contract tests of an email provider — those are api-testing / app concerns. Email HTML rendering across clients (Outlook/Gmail dark mode) is out of scope (note it as a gap; use visual-testing or Litmus). Related: playwright-automation, api-testing, test-data-management, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing Python tests with pytest - fixtures, parametrization, markers, conftest layout, pytest-asyncio, pytest-django, coverage with pytest-cov, mocking with pytest-mock, parallel runs with xdist, mutation testing with mutmut, or CI integration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, run, and maintain API test collections using Bruno (OpenCollection YAML format and legacy Bru format). Use when the user wants to: (1) create a Bruno API test collection from scratch or from OpenAPI/Swagger specs, (2) write API request files with tests and assertions, (3) run API tests using bru CLI, (4) generate test reports (HTML, JUnit, JSON), (5) set up CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions) for automated API testing, (6) debug or fix failing Bruno API tests, (7) add environment configurations for API testing, (8) chain API requests with data extraction, or (9) work with any .yml/.bru Bruno collection files. Triggers on mentions of 'Bruno', 'bru CLI', 'API testing collection', 'OpenCollection', or requests to automate API testing with file-based collections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write unit and integration tests for Angular v20+ applications using Vitest or Jasmine with TestBed and modern testing patterns. Use for testing components with signals, OnPush change detection, services with inject(), and HTTP interactions. Triggers on test creation, testing signal-based components, mocking dependencies, or setting up test infrastructure. Don't use for E2E testing with Cypress or Playwright, or for testing non-Angular JavaScript/TypeScript code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Virtual QA Lead that turns requirements into review-ready, TestRail-importable test cases in one conversation. Use it whenever the user has requirements, a spec, a user story, or acceptance criteria (PDF, DOCX, XLSX, TXT, MD, or pasted text) and wants test cases, a test plan, a checklist, test coverage, a regression suite, or a TestRail/Qase/Zephyr export, even without saying "test cases" ("write tests for this spec", "what should we check here?"). Especially useful when they attach their team's existing test cases to match. When the spec describes an API (endpoints, status codes, schemas, auth, OpenAPI/Swagger), Casely also builds a runnable Postman collection, so use it for "API tests", "Postman collection", or "tests I can run in Newman/CI". Triggers on the same request in any language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ISTQB/JSTQB のテスト完了（test completion）活動のうち、テスト実行結果の評価と完了基準（exit criteria）判定を支援するスキル。テスト実行ログ（test-execution-log.md）と test-plan の完了基準を突き合わせ、完了とみなせるかを判定した test-summary-report.md を作る。テスト完了時の最終レポートにも、テスト途中の中間評価にも使える。「テスト結果をまとめて」「完了基準を満たしたか判定して」「テストレポートを書いて」「今どこまでテストが進んだか評価して」と依頼されたときに使う。単発のテスト作成依頼（単にユニットテストを書きたいだけ）は対象外。/test-report <テスト対象名> で明示的に呼び出されたときのみ使用する。