「trade-off」の検索結果

Turn a raw idea into ONE honest recommendation: interview one question at a time until confirmed, then give a verdict with trade-offs and a checklist. Not for options or debate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when answering factual or explanatory questions about the current project — codebase, architecture, conventions, workflows, constraints — with minimal cited evidence. Triggers on "how does X work here", "what does X mean", "why is X structured this way", "is this claim true in the repo", "explain X with sources". NOT for brainstorming or comparing approaches (mk:brainstorming), trade-off decisions (mk:party), debugging/root cause (mk:investigate), code review (mk:review), plans (mk:plan-creator), security audits (mk:cso), visual explanations/diagrams (mk:preview --explain), test-coverage gaps (mk:nyquist), library docs (mk:docs-finder), or workflow navigation (mk:help).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when surfacing architectural friction and proposing deepening refactors (shallow modules → deep modules) for testability and AI-navigability. Triggers on "improve architecture", "find deepening opportunities", "where is this codebase shallow", "architecture review". Emits structured candidates + precise patches; delegates ALL rendering to mk:preview. NOT for diagram/HTML rendering (see mk:preview); NOT for trade-off deliberation (see mk:party); NOT for plan critique (see mk:plan-ceo-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate or compare multiple technical approaches for one validated decision. Do not use for product discovery or an existing plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for ANY of the following — do not skip it even if the query seems simple: strategic decisions, business analysis, thesis building, complex problem solving, geopolitical analysis (non-market), philosophical reasoning, academic research, system design, decision under uncertainty, long-form thinking, or any question that benefits from First Principle deconstruction and multi-agent reasoning. ALWAYS use this skill when the user asks about: why something works the way it does, whether a decision is correct, how to think about a complex problem, what could go wrong, analyzing a situation from multiple angles, or any "should I..." question involving real-world trade-offs. This is NOT a market/trading skill — for financial markets, BTC, gold, stocks, forex, macro economics, use money-atlas-intelligence-os instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce and interpret PCA, t-SNE, UMAP, and PHATE plots for high-dimensional omics data with rigor about which method preserves what (variance, local structure, manifold, transitions), hyperparameter sensitivity, and the well-documented limits of 2D embeddings. Covers PCA biplot/scree/loadings, t-SNE PCA initialization (Kobak-Berens 2019), UMAP n_neighbors/min_dist trade-offs, and the Chari-Pachter 2023 critique. Use when visualizing high-dimensional data — bulk PCA, single-cell embeddings, multi-omics integration projections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Align preprocessed CLIP-seq reads (eCLIP, iCLIP, iCLIP2, PAR-CLIP) to genome with STAR or bowtie2 using crosslink-preserving parameters, choosing between unique-mapper-only and multi-mapper-aware alignment for repeat-binding RBPs, deciding STAR vs HISAT2 memory trade-offs, and applying ENCODE-compatible filters. Use when turning preprocessed CLIP FASTQ into a deduplicated, MAPQ-filtered BAM ready for peak calling or crosslink-site detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bulk-query Ensembl BioMart (and other BioMart instances) for cross-database ID mapping, gene/transcript/exon coordinates, and ortholog tables. Use when batch-converting Ensembl IDs to other namespaces (HGNC, RefSeq, UniProt, Entrez), pulling gene coordinate tables for thousands of genes, building ortholog wide-tables across species, or replacing slow Ensembl REST loops with one-shot bulk export. Encodes BioMart's XML query format, R biomaRt vs Python pybiomart trade-off, mart-vs-dataset hierarchy, and the URL endpoint that's BioMart-specific (separate from rest.ensembl.org).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for choosing the right protein binder design tool. Use this skill when: (1) Deciding between BoltzGen, BindCraft, or RFdiffusion, (2) Planning a binder design campaign, (3) Understanding trade-offs between different approaches, (4) Selecting tools for specific target types. For specific tool parameters, use the individual tool skills (boltzgen, bindcraft, rfdiffusion, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates a plan before committing to it - checks whether the ranking survives the assumptions, finds the most likely way it fails, and makes the trade-offs explicit via a Pareto frontier instead of an invented single score. Use before a launch, price change, migration, infrastructure change or major commitment, when running a premortem, when two objectives conflict, or when a decision depends on an assumption nobody has tested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architecture decisions, trade-off analysis, and ADR authoring. Trigger when a significant technical decision needs to be made, documented, and owned — not when an implementation detail needs a choice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when stakeholders pull a decision in different directions — frames each lens, builds a trade-off matrix, surfaces the cost of every choice — even if the user just says 'PO and ops disagree'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing between alternatives with trade-offs — X-or-Y decisions or a weighted decision matrix / gewichtete Entscheidungsmatrix ('score my options'); ADR via `adr-create`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agents with competing priorities reach consensus through structured trade-offs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Framework de tomada de decisão arquitetural. Análise de requisitos, avaliação de trade-offs, documentação de ADR. Use ao tomar decisões de arquitetura ou analisar design de sistemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Process] Use when the developer wants something explained or taught, or wants to know HOW TO REVIEW a change — by default the current working tasks + changes in context, or whatever the prompt names (a plan, a subsystem, a decision, a concept, a bug). AI derives WHAT to explain from the prompt and ALWAYS delivers a teacher-and-coach review guide, high level first then detail: what was done, a VISUAL MAP (system flowchart, domain ERD, sequence diagrams), the user stories and business rules with their REAL test-case IDs, a REVIEW PATH naming which files to open first and in what order with an exit criterion per stage, the technical concepts needed to follow it, how it works, why THIS solution, every alternative option with pros/cons, the trade-offs accepted, the blast radius, HOW TO TEST AND DEMO the change, the developer's decision levers, and written challenge prompts that provoke the reader to pressure-test the work. Works at ANY scope — from one line of code to the whole project: it SIZES the target into a scope tier, DECOMPOSES a large one into understanding groups, BREAKS the work into tasks before the first deep read, and ACCUMULATES the report group by group on disk so a huge explanation stays complete instead of thinning out. Writes the full report to a single combined markdown file (plans/reports/understand-*.md) that opens with a detailed summary section — or delivers it in full in chat when Step 3 finds no git-ignored directory for it — and always summarizes it in chat. Regardless of coding level. Never interrogates, never quizzes, never blocks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Architecture] Use when designing solution architecture across backend, frontend, data & consistency, integration & APIs, deployment, monitoring, testing, and code quality. Architecture laws, style-selection triggers, coupling taxonomy, trade-off tables and the anti-pattern catalog live in `.claude/docs/architecture-knowledge.md`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Obtain an independent review of the approach and trade-offs in completed work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compose a comparison newsletter from Ahmad's OpenMark saves — A vs B vs C, side-by-side, table-driven. Use when Ahmad wants to compare tools, models, frameworks, approaches, or platforms across his saves. Trigger phrases include "compare", "X vs Y", "head to head", "which should I use", "differences between", "trade-offs between", "/newsletter-comparison". Output centers a markdown table with consistent columns, supports it with short prose blocks, ends with a clear recommendation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Concrete remediation proposal with Safe Harbour confidence — version bump, inline as first-party code, patch, workaround, or advisory. Use when applying a fix for a triaged CVE, evaluating fix-type trade-offs across registry / source / distro patches, producing rollback-safe manifest edits with dry-run verification, or generating a CycloneDX SBOM after the fix lands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lateral-thinking playbook that always returns a five-tier strategy portfolio (Quick Win through Moonshot). Use when you need options, alternatives, or trade-offs; when progress is stalled or failing repeatedly; or when you ask to think creatively, reframe constraints, and choose a strategic path before execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Picks the right WordPress storage primitive for plugin data: options, user/post/term/comment meta, transients, site options, site transients, or custom tables. Covers grouped settings, autoload management, transient TTL rules, serialized/JSON blob trade-offs, multisite storage caveats, and naming conventions. Use when scaffolding settings, choosing persistence for plugin-owned data, or auditing update_option/get_option/get_post_meta/set_transient/autoload usage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。