「used」の検索結果

Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Use when the user says "review for over-engineering", "what can we delete", "is this over-engineered", "simplify review", or invokes /ponytail-review. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs pooled sgRNA libraries for CRISPR knockout, interference (CRISPRi), activation (CRISPRa), Cas12a multiplex, base-editor, and prime-editor screens. Covers on-target scoring (Rule Set 2, Azimuth, DeepSpCas9, CRISPRon), off-target scoring (CFD, MIT), TSS-relative positioning for CRISPRi/a (Horlbeck, Dolcetto, Calabrese), PAM-variant chemistries, control-guide composition, oligo cloning architecture, and library QC. Use when choosing a genome-wide library (GeCKOv2 vs Avana vs Brunello vs TKOv3 vs Inzolia), designing a focused or paralog-focused custom library, picking CRISPRi vs CRISPRa TSS windows, deciding control-guide proportions, or diagnosing library skew and dropout in a freshly cloned pool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when buying a used tractor or trailer. Covers verifying compliance status, hidden issues, and what to inspect before signing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retiring a dead table by moving it to the deprecated schema and clearing every reference in both repos. Use when asked to deprecate or retire a table, when a table is no longer used, or to take a table offline without dropping it. NOT for relocating a still-used table (use db-move-table-schema).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "プロジェクトを解析して", "コードベースを調べてドキュメント化して", "移行作業の準備をして", "新機能実装の前にプロジェクトを整理して", "analyze this codebase", "document the project structure", "既存プロジェクトのCLAUDE.mdを作って", or wants to prepare CLAUDE.md and architecture docs before a migration, feature development, or onboarding.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "このファイルを変えたら何が壊れる？", "what depends on this function", "影響範囲を調べて", "show me what imports this module", or wants to understand the blast radius before modifying a shared utility, exported type, or public API. Traces import/require references up to two levels deep and lists affected test files.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "これらのIssueを全部実装して", "implement these issues autonomously", "Issue一覧を自動で片付けて", "これらのタスクを順番に実装してPRにして", or provides a list of GitHub Issue numbers/URLs for autonomous batch implementation. Fetches all specified Issues, resolves dependency order, then iterates through each — creating a worktree, implementing, and opening a PR — without user intervention.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "既存プロジェクトのタスクを整理して", "技術的負債をIssue化して", "このコードベースを改善するタスクを洗い出して", "GitHub Projectに健全化タスクを登録して", "break down what needs to be fixed in this project", "surface tech debt as issues", or "create a project board for cleanup work". Diagnoses pain points and codebase health of an existing project, then registers improvement tasks as GitHub Issues and a Project Board.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "このエラーを直して", "help me debug this", "fix this stack trace", "なぜこのエラーが出るの", "CI が落ちた", or pastes an error message or stack trace and wants help diagnosing it. Classifies the error type, identifies related files, and proposes up to three root-cause hypotheses with concrete fix plans.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "ドキュメントを更新して", "sync the docs", "update CLAUDE.md after this change", "実装に合わせてドキュメントを直して", or notices that docs have drifted from the codebase. Diffs git history to identify what changed, proposes targeted updates to CLAUDE.md, docs/architecture.md, docs/requirements.md, and README.md, then applies only approved changes.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "PR を出す前に確認して", "check if this branch is ready to merge", "run pre-PR checks", "PRを作る前にチェックして", or wants to verify a branch before opening a pull request. Executes verification commands, validates Conventional Commits format, and confirms documentation is updated, then reports whether gh pr create is safe to run.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "このIssueを実装して", "implement this issue", "fix this bug", "このタスクをやって", "Issue

This skill should be used when the user asks to "sandboxの互換性をチェックして", "sandbox設定を確認して", "このプロジェクトでsandboxが使えるか調べて", "sandboxでコマンドが失敗する", "check sandbox compatibility", "verify sandbox settings", "sandbox is blocking my commands", or wants to ensure their development workflow works within Claude Code's sandbox restrictions — either proactively before starting work or reactively after encountering sandbox-related failures.

This skill should be used when the user wants to "test a claim against data", "validate an empirical hypothesis", "refine a model/theory with evidence", "characterize a pattern and verify it", "演繹と帰納で検証", "仮説をデータで検証して更新", "実例と反例で確かめる", "弁証法ループ", "主張を現物で裏取り", "傾向分析を検証して精緻化", or mentions iteratively updating a hypothesis by deriving predictions and testing them against a real corpus. NOTE: Use this for VALIDATING/REFINING an empirical claim or model against real data through a derive→test→update loop. Use strong-inference for debugging an UNKNOWN cause, and devils-advocate for adversarially stress-testing a DESIGN proposal.

This skill should be used when the user wants to "stress-test a design", "challenge an idea", "red team a proposal", "get critical feedback on a design", "validate a design", "adversarial architecture review", "risk assessment", "設計を検証して", "反論をもらいたい", "設計を批判的にレビュー", "デビルズアドボケート", "ストレステスト", "弱点を指摘して", "穴を見つけて", "この設計で良いか", "リスク評価", "設計のアーキテクチャレビュー", or mentions structured adversarial review of a proposal or design. NOTE: Use this for validating PROPOSALS and DESIGNS through adversarial debate, NOT for generic code review, PR review, or normal review requests (use /codex:review or /codex:adversarial-review for those). Also NOT for investigating unknown bugs (use /agent-dialectics:strong-inference for that).

This skill should be used when the user wants to "synthesize two competing solutions without averaging", "resolve a design/value disagreement by lifting to a higher frame", "止揚 / アウフヘーベン", "矛盾を止揚", "独立案を統合", "平均化せず統合", "contradiction lift", "sublate competing designs", or has two good-but-divergent answers to the same question and wants a higher-order resolution (a selection mechanism) or an honest aporia — not a compromise. NOTE: Use this when two independent solutions diverge and you want to PRESERVE both truth-moments while lifting to a higher frame. Use devils-advocate to stress-test ONE proposal with an assigned opponent, strong-inference to find an unknown cause, and dialectic-loop to validate a claim against a real corpus.

This skill should be used when the user wants to "investigate a bug", "debug an issue", "figure out why something is happening", "find the root cause", "troubleshoot", "強い推論で調査", "仮説を立てて検証", "原因を特定", "バグの原因調査", "なぜ動かないか調べて", "問題を切り分け", "原因不明", "デバッグ", or mentions systematic hypothesis-driven debugging. NOTE: Use this for investigating UNKNOWN causes, not for validating design proposals (use devils-advocate for that).

Code quality standards for OneKey. Use when fixing lint warnings, running pre-commit tasks, handling unused variables, writing comments, or ensuring code quality. All comments must be in English. Triggers on lint, linting, eslint, oxlint, tsc, type check, unused variable, comment, documentation, spellcheck, code quality, pre-commit, yarn lint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Socratic mentoring for junior developers and AI newcomers. Guides through questions, never answers. Triggers: "help me understand", "explain this code", "I'm stuck", "Im stuck", "I'm confused", "Im confused", "I don't understand", "I dont understand", "can you teach me", "teach me", "mentor me", "guide me", "what does this error mean", "why doesn't this work", "why does not this work", "I'm a beginner", "Im a beginner", "I'm learning", "Im learning", "I'm new to this", "Im new to this", "walk me through", "how does this work", "what's wrong with my code", "what's wrong", "can you break this down", "ELI5", "step by step", "where do I start", "what am I missing", "newbie here", "junior dev", "first time using", "how do I", "what is", "is this right", "not sure", "need help", "struggling", "show me", "help me debug", "best practice", "too complex", "overwhelmed", "lost", "debug this", "/socratic", "/hint", "/concept", "/pseudocode". Progressive clue systems, teaching techniques, and success metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cloud IAM red-team attack chain across AWS, Azure, GCP — focused on EXTERNAL exploitation paths and post-credential-discovery privilege analysis. Covers IAM enumeration (aws iam, az role, gcloud iam), STS/AssumeRole chaining, Azure Managed Identity abuse (via SSRF/leak), GCP service account JSON abuse, IMDSv1/v2 attacks via SSRF, K8s ServiceAccount token privilege analysis once held (token discovery / cluster exposure is owned by hunt-k8s), role-trust-policy confused-deputy, cross-account assume-role enumeration, IAM privilege escalation patterns (24+ AWS, 8+ Azure, 6+ GCP), and AWS Cognito Identity Pool unauthenticated-role attack chain (GetId → GetCredentialsForIdentity → IAM role abuse). Built for the case where recon yields a credential (key, JSON, token) and you need to know what it grants and how to escalate. Use when an AWS key / Azure secret / GCP service account JSON / K8s SA token surfaces from a code repo, JS bundle, APK, breach corpus, or SSRF chain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

新規・既存テストが守る動作と不具合を確かめ、重複や実装への依存を見直すスキル。削除の根拠を整理し、必要な検証を残してテスト用コードも整理します。

• 新規テストの必要性を確かめたいとき
• 重複や実装依存のテストの点検
• テスト専用の公開コードの見直し

FaceTimeの内部状態や発信準備を確認し、設定済みの所有者宛てに承認付きで音声・ビデオ通話を発信したり、通話の終了をリクエストしたりします。

• 通話の内部状態と発信準備の確認
• 設定済みの所有者へ音声通話したいとき
• 明示的にビデオ通話を頼みたいとき

Parallelsの仮想マシンでOpenClawの導入・初期設定・更新を検証するスキル。macOS、Windows、Linuxの基本動作確認と失敗の切り分けを扱います。

• 3つのOSで新規導入を確認したいとき
• OpenClawの更新処理を検証したいとき
• 既存スナップショットから検証をやり直す

macOS上のOpenClawをmainの最新版へ更新し、Gatewayとアプリの動作を確認します。CIの失敗修正や、公開を伴わないリリース検証も扱います。

• macOSのOpenClawを更新したいとき
• 更新後のGatewayとアプリの動作確認
• 現在のmainに対するCIの失敗修正