2,235 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Verify the approved handoff of clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use when configuring or auditing Abridge-to-Epic documentation flow. Trigger with "verify the Abridge Epic handoff".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-validate CLI flags, docs, tests, and targets for consistency across the codebase. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: audit the codebase, check for consistency issues, find undocumented flags, verify test coverage, validate targets.yaml, check handler split conventions, or verify oplog instrumentation. This is a read-only audit — it reports issues but never modifies files. Use after large refactors, before releases, or whenever you suspect docs/code/tests have drifted out of sync.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify statistics and claims in blog posts by fetching cited source URLs and checking if the claimed data actually appears on the page. Extracts all load-bearing claims (statistics, product or policy claims, ranking and comparative claims, named sources), validates cited URLs before fetching, and scores match confidence (exact match 1.0, paraphrase 0.7-0.9, not found 0.0). Flags uncited claims as UNVERIFIED. Use when user says "fact check", "verify statistics", "check sources", "validate claims", "factcheck", "source verification".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify a WordPress plugin's Abilities API registrations: enumerate abilities, check that callback behavior matches each annotation's claim (the adversarial readonly-but-writes detection), validate permissions and schemas, and validate audit documents produced by wp-abilities-audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify apps/desktop frontend changes visually without launching the Tauri app or a live model
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Chain-of-Verification (CoVe) on a draft or a block of text with factual claims. Spawns the `claim-verifier` agent in a fresh context (never a conversation fork) so it never sees the draft — then reports which claims are supported, contradicted, or unverifiable. Use when user says "verify these citations", "check the claims in X", "did I hallucinate anything", "fact-check this draft", "run CoVe on this", or after any text generation that asserts facts about papers, datasets, or numerical results. NOT for style/grammar review (use `/proofread`) or substance review (use `/review-paper`).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-deployment validation for Azure readiness. Run deep checks on configuration, infrastructure (Bicep or Terraform), RBAC role assignments, managed identity permissions, and prerequisites before deploying. WHEN: validate my app, check deployment readiness, run preflight checks, verify configuration, check if ready to deploy, validate azure.yaml, validate Bicep, test before deploying, troubleshoot deployment errors, validate Azure Functions, validate function app, validate serverless deployment, verify RBAC roles, check role assignments, review managed identity permissions, what-if analysis, validate Container Apps deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Confirm a change before merge. `/check verify` drives the real app to prove behavior against the spec (every acceptance criterion met, every surface built). `/check review` runs a senior code review on a fresh model, one that did not write the code. Verify after /develop, review before a PR. Writes to docs/reviews/, never edits code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run /debug to find and fix a bug's root cause: a test failing for an unclear reason, /check verify finding a failure, or behavior being wrong. Runs a reproduce, localize, hypothesize, test, fix, verify loop, makes the minimal fix, and hands a regression test to /test. No features, no extra refactors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract structured specifications from electronic component datasheet PDFs — pinouts, electrical characteristics, peripherals, topology, and features. Cache extractions per project for consumption by schematic and PCB analyzers. Primary consumer infrastructure for `kicad`, `emc`, `spice`, and `thermal` analyzers. Use this skill whenever the user asks to extract, verify, or read specs from a component datasheet; when analyzers need verified IC knowledge (EN pin thresholds, PG presence, USB peripheral speed); or when a review mentions datasheet coverage, extraction quality, or per-MPN specifications. Also triggers on "extract this datasheet", "what are the specs for MPN X", "verify datasheet extraction", or "check pin functions for part Y".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run automatic SPICE simulations on subcircuits detected from KiCad schematic analysis — validates filter frequencies, divider ratios, opamp gains, LC resonance, and crystal load capacitance. Supports ngspice, LTspice, and Xyce (auto-detected). Generates testbenches, runs batch mode, produces structured pass/warn/fail report. Use when the user asks to simulate, verify, or validate any analog subcircuit — RC filters, LC filters, voltage dividers, opamp circuits, crystal oscillators. Also for "simulate my circuit", "run spice", "verify with simulation", "check my filter cutoff", "does this divider give the right voltage", "what's the bandwidth of this opamp stage". Consider suggesting simulation during design reviews when the schematic analyzer reports simulatable subcircuits and a SPICE simulator is available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run automatic SPICE simulations on subcircuits detected from KiCad schematic analysis — validates filter frequencies, divider ratios, opamp gains, LC resonance, and crystal load capacitance. Supports ngspice, LTspice, and Xyce (auto-detected). Generates testbenches, runs batch mode, produces structured pass/warn/fail report. Use when the user asks to simulate, verify, or validate any analog subcircuit — RC filters, LC filters, voltage dividers, opamp circuits, crystal oscillators. Also for "simulate my circuit", "run spice", "verify with simulation", "check my filter cutoff", "does this divider give the right voltage", "what's the bandwidth of this opamp stage". Consider suggesting simulation during design reviews when the schematic analyzer reports simulatable subcircuits and a SPICE simulator is available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract structured specifications from electronic component datasheet PDFs — pinouts, electrical characteristics, peripherals, topology, and features. Cache extractions per project for consumption by schematic and PCB analyzers. Primary consumer infrastructure for `kicad`, `emc`, `spice`, and `thermal` analyzers. Use this skill whenever the user asks to extract, verify, or read specs from a component datasheet; when analyzers need verified IC knowledge (EN pin thresholds, PG presence, USB peripheral speed); or when a review mentions datasheet coverage, extraction quality, or per-MPN specifications. Also triggers on "extract this datasheet", "what are the specs for MPN X", "verify datasheet extraction", or "check pin functions for part Y".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set a repo up to prove engineering-task work actually works before it ships. Investigates the repo, ensures a one-command dev stack (`dev-local`) exists, asks whether verification runs locally or in a sandbox (crabbox), confirms/installs the driver (the `playwright-cli` skill for web by default). Outputs three artifacts: a committed `/verify` skill (per-task verification SOP — spawn a verifier sub-agent → drive the app → screenshot/video proof → open a PR with the proof embedded), the `/dev-local` skill + script, and the installed driver skill. Use when someone says "set up verification", "make this repo verifiable", "scaffold a verify skill", "set up the verifier".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run one task through the V-model verification loop: CP-2 plan → CP-3 build → CP-3v component verify → CP-4 integration verify (full lane) → CP-5 acceptance. The worker never grades its own homework; evidence rows trace back to AC-n. Opt-in: invoke with /closed-loop or by asking for the closed loop, proper verification, or an evidence trail. Ordinary work does not run this.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify if an email address is valid and deliverable
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QC gate for a generated static ad image — verify the file opens, matches the requested dimensions, shows the correct product/subject (right shape, colour, label, logo), and has no garbled text or severe artifacts. Records pass/fail/needs-human in verification.md. Used as the final check in the static ad remix flow before shipping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Snapshot test email templates using Verify to catch regressions. Validates rendered HTML output matches approved baseline. Works with MJML templates and any email renderer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify that a web app change actually works by driving the running app from the inside (DOM, network, routing, console, framework state) instead of screenshots or guessing. Use after any user-facing change, when a fix is claimed but unproven, when a test passes but the UI is broken, or when you need a real verdict rather than "looks right". Also use to install and wire up Reticle in a project that does not have it yet.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify that every interactive control on a page can take keyboard focus and that its primary action fires from the keyboard rather than only the mouse, and say plainly that Tab order cannot be verified today. Use when a component was hand-tested with a mouse, a custom dropdown/modal/combobox was added, or an accessibility report flags an unreachable control.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up and verify a connection to an NI USRP radio (USRP E320, N300, N310, N320, N321, X300, X310, or X410) using Wireless Testbench. Use when connecting a USRP for the first time, configuring radio hardware, troubleshooting connection failures, or verifying a radio setup. Covers host inspection (OS, NIC type/speed/MTU), device discovery (findsdru, probesdru), UHD version checking, programmatic radio configuration, and basebandTransceiver verification. Also use when the user mentions USRP setup, radio not found, connection errors, dropped samples, or network configuration for SDR hardware.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify claims, quotations, citations and references against live primary sources, and produce a reproducible audit record instead of an assertion. Use when asked to: check whether a quotation, verse, statistic, date, attribution or citation is accurate; verify references before publishing a report, thesis, article, slide deck or legal filing; confirm a text against an authoritative database; cross-check a claim across independent sources; build a citation register or verification appendix; find out whether two datasets agree; detect a misattributed or fabricated quotation; or audit a document's existing citations. Source-agnostic by design, with working providers for REST/JSON APIs, scraped HTML, bulk corpora, bibliographic catalogues (OpenLibrary), DOI resolution (Crossref) and reference works (Wikipedia) -- including scriptural tiers (Qur'an.com, sunnah.com and an independent hadith corpus) with full diacritic handling for Arabic, Hebrew, Greek and any script with optional marks. Covers content-addressed matching when sources disagree on numbering, graded match verdicts, byte-level integrity checks, published-string verification, and a catalogue of silent failure modes (identifier divergence, mojibake, scraper blocking, false-positive keyword rules, missing glyphs, unreliable PDF text layers).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Collect, download, and verify App Store Connect Analytics reports with asc. Use when users need to discover analytics report requests, select report instances by processing date or granularity, download every segment, or verify downloaded files against Apple's size and MD5 metadata before analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "dev-run", "自動実装", "タスクを一括実装", "auto implement", "run all tasks", "タスクを自動実行", "バッチ実装", "dev-run auth 001 005". Plan内の指定範囲のタスクをdev-impl/dev-verify/dev-debugのワークフローで自動実行するオーケストレーションスキル。