1.4万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Refactor and review SwiftUI view files with strong defaults for small dedicated subviews, MV-over-MVVM data flow, stable view trees, explicit dependency injection, and correct Observation usage. Use when cleaning up a SwiftUI view, splitting long bodies, removing inline actions or side effects, reducing computed `some View` helpers, or standardizing `@Observable` and view model initialization patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Senior engineering analyst for code review, plan review, and automation review. Use when: (1) "review this", "analyze the code", "check this plan", (2) After implementation to verify quality, (3) "is this good enough?", (4) Before marking a task complete, (5) Reviewing a blueprint from /architect, (6) Reviewing output from /refinery. Four-lens review: architecture, code quality, reliability, performance. Reads from system/blueprints/ and source code. Outputs to system/reviews/.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for implementing smooth, native-feeling animations using React's View Transition API (`<ViewTransition>` component, `addTransitionType`, and CSS view transition pseudo-elements). Use this skill whenever the user wants to add page transitions, animate route changes, create shared element animations, animate enter/exit of components, animate list reorder, implement directional (forward/back) navigation animations, or integrate view transitions in Next.js. Also use when the user mentions view transitions, `startViewTransition`, `ViewTransition`, transition types, or asks about animating between UI states in React without third-party animation libraries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan a user interview topic in PostHog — pick who to target (cohort, emails, or PostHog distinct IDs), draft what to ask about, and prepare the voice-agent context plus a question list. Use when the user asks to "talk to users", "check how users feel about X", "interview some customers", "set up a user interview", "run a user-research call", "find users to ask about Y", or otherwise wants qualitative feedback through a conversation. Walks the user through targeting (cohorts-list, persons-list, or accepting emails / distinct IDs directly), captures the topic, and prompts for agent context and questions before calling user-interview-topics-create. Cohort targeting is resolved to explicit emails/distinct_ids at create time — topics snapshot their audience and do not re-evaluate cohort membership later. Do NOT trigger when the user is uploading a recorded interview audio file (that's the separate UserInterview/transcript flow) or only browsing existing topics with user-interview-topics-list.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for implementing smooth, native-feeling animations using React's View Transition API (`<ViewTransition>` component, `addTransitionType`, and CSS view transition pseudo-elements). Use this skill whenever the user wants to add page transitions, animate route changes, create shared element animations, animate enter/exit of components, animate list reorder, implement directional (forward/back) navigation animations, or integrate view transitions in Next.js. Also use when the user mentions view transitions, `startViewTransition`, `ViewTransition`, transition types, or asks about animating between UI states in React without third-party animation libraries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Self-review, audit, or verify CS/AI/ML paper drafts as a critical peer reviewer. Three-round review (evidence→argument→style) with Verification Status and debt tracking. Use when: reviewing a paper draft before submission, checking evidence compliance of claims, simulating peer reviewer feedback, verifying citation closure and evidence debts, performing cross-section consistency checks. Triggers on: 审修, self review, 自查, verification, revise, 修订, check draft, 审稿, evidence compliance, peer review, 论文审查, draft audit, 验证论文, 检查引用, cross-section review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
親イシュー配下のサブイシュー（孫以下の全子孫を含む）を依存順を保ちつつ worktree で並列に自動実装・push 前 review・PR 作成・CI 監視・マージ可能状態化まで一括自動化。 「イシューツリーを並列実装」「配下のサブイシューをまとめて実装」「ツリー全体を並列で実装して」「イシュー階層を自動開発」で使用。 per-issue 計画立案（Plan: セッション継承モデル）→実装（Implement: sonnet）の分業。push 前 review（Review 通過後にのみ push・PR 作成して CI を 1 回だけ起動）。 外部チェック構成は args の externalChecks で明示（{"app", "context"} の組で宣言。[] で「なし」を確定して不要待機なし・未指定なら自動マージ停止・slug のみの旧形式は自動マージ fail-closed）。 自動 squash merge は autoMerge: true + externalChecks 明示（全 App の信頼済み context 宣言込み）の opt-in で実行（merge-exec の自己取得再検証 + サーバー側 branch protection 実測が前提。既定 false はマージ可能状態で停止し人間がマージ。サーバー側 workflow サンプル（upstream の docs/implement-issue-tree/auto-merge-sample.yml 参照）+ branch protection への委譲も可）。並列度（parallel）と依存（dependsOn）で実行順を制御。 Phase 単位で厳密に直列化したい場合は phaseGate: true（opt-in。ルート直下の子〔Phase 親〕を sub-issues リスト順に直列化し、前 Phase の全子孫が merged/closed になるまで次 Phase 配下に着手しない。既定 false は現行の post-order 優先度のみ）。 着手できる件数・blocked になる件数を事前に知りたい場合は dryRun: true（何も書かずに見積りだけ返す）。 単一イシューの実装は implement-issue、PR レビューは implement-review-pr を参照。
Auto-review pipeline — reads the full CEO, design, eng, and DX review skills from disk and runs them sequentially with auto-decisions using 6 decision principles. Surfaces taste decisions (close approaches, borderline scope, codex disagreements) at a final approval gate. One command, fully reviewed plan out. Use when asked to "auto review", "autoplan", "run all reviews", "review this plan automatically", or "make the decisions for me". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan file and wants to run the full review gauntlet without answering 15-30 intermediate questions. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "auto plan", "automatic review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when previewing files with nuxt-ui-tools as a package consumer. Covers mounting UiFilePreviewProvider, opening one file or a gallery with useFilePreview() or useNuxtApp().$filePreview, file descriptors (URL, File/Blob, or a function that returns a signed URL), options (index, mode, gallery, loop, pdf page, callbacks), the returned handle, the built-in renderers (image, video, audio, PDF, text/JSON, CSV, Markdown, Office and archive fallbacks), renditions, download and custom header actions, the markdown render hook, custom renderers with defineFilePreviewRenderer and UiFilePreviewTools, theming tokens, and how the upload field uses the preview.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when building analytics dashboards with nuxt-ui-tools as a package consumer. Covers schema and view functions (defineDashboardSchema, defineDashboardView) that take their context as typed params, useDashboard with a getter that rebuilds on input change, typed injection (useDashboardView, injectDashboard, InferDashboard, InferDashboardView), filters declared inline with the f builder and synced with the URL, memory, or an external store (one value per key across views), headless filters, filter controls and the shipped UI (UiDashboardPage, UiDashboardFilters, UiDashboardFilter, UiDashboardViewTabs) with slot overrides, remote paginated pickers and remoteTableOptions, staged queries (essential / background / deferred) with select and dependent requires, lazy enabled conditions on views, queries, and filters (blocks of disabled queries hidden, grids closing up), derived values, views (tabs), query-scoped filters, number formats (presets, Intl options, useDashboardFormat), and the dashboard blocks (stats with trends, goals, and comparisons, stat groups, gauges, unovis charts with highlights, value labels, and totals, lists with progress rings, bars, funnel, alerts, activity feeds, sortable tables, custom widgets) with their automatic loading, error, empty, and refresh states, card menus, header and footer actions, row actions, drill-down and selected state, card tabs, split cards, comparison periods, auto-refresh, and data freshness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for implementing smooth, native-feeling animations using React's View Transition API (`<ViewTransition>` component, `addTransitionType`, and CSS view transition pseudo-elements). Use this skill whenever the user wants to add page transitions, animate route changes, create shared element animations, animate enter/exit of components, animate list reorder, implement directional (forward/back) navigation animations, or integrate view transitions in Next.js. Also use when the user mentions view transitions, `startViewTransition`, `ViewTransition`, transition types, or asks about animating between UI states in React without third-party animation libraries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
機能の実装後やマージ前に、別のエージェントへコードレビューを依頼します。変更内容と要件、対象のコミットを渡し、指摘の重要度に応じて修正を進めるスキルです。
Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review the current diff, or a PR number/branch/path target, for correctness bugs (plus reuse/simplification/efficiency cleanups where the model's review recipe covers them) at the given effort level (low|medium|high|xhigh|max: from few high-confidence findings up to many, some of them uncertain; ultra: deep multi-agent review in the cloud); with no level given, it reuses the level you typed last. Pass --comment to post findings as inline PR comments, or --fix to apply the findings to the working tree after the review. Pass --max-findings <n> to report up to n findings, or --max-findings all for every finding. The choice stays until you pass --max-findings default. For ultra on a GitHub.com PR target, --post asks to post the finished review’s findings to the PR as a single comment from the user’s GitHub account (not a review; the launch dialog still confirms in interactive sessions, while non-interactive mode posts on the flag alone) and --no-post hides that option.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build personas," "customer personas," "jobs to be done," "JTBD," "what do customers say," "what are customers struggling with," "Reddit mining," "G2 reviews," "review mining," "digital watering holes," "community research," "forum research," "competitor reviews," "customer sentiment," "PMF survey," "product/market fit survey," "customer interview questions," "interview outreach," "Sales Safari," or "find out why customers churn/convert/buy." Use for analyzing existing research assets, mining online sources, AND running primary research (interviews and surveys). For writing copy informed by research, see copywriting. For acting on research to improve pages, see cro.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs one or more installed review lenses — adversarial critique, edge cases, verification gaps, structure, prose — and reports triaged findings. Use when, and only when, the user asks you to review a diff, a pull request, or an artifact — code or documents, one or many — and actually says "review"; an explicit skill:bmad-review directive from another skill counts as that ask. A request to act on feedback from an earlier review is a change, not a review. Never invoke this uninvited, including on edits you just made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, WHY HOW WHAT papers, 3W literature scan, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 三段式文獻掃描, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題, 심층 연구, 문헌 조사, 체계적 문헌고찰, 메타분석, 사실 확인, 연구 방향을 잡아줘, 연구 주제 정하는 것을 도와줘, revisión de literatura, metaanálisis
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-grounded context refresh: reads constitutional files, TELOS, and CURRENT_STATE/IDEAL_STATE dimension files via TelosFreshness, pulls observed data (Oura sleep/HRV, Conduit app-time, work registry, git, expenses via StateEvidence), and drives a peer conversation that opens with claim-vs-evidence contradictions, drafts corrections for ratification, and closes with a ComputeGap-grounded ideal-state review. Routes to ContextCheckin; Phase0Setup on fresh install. USE WHEN /interview, resume interview, context check-in, telos check-in, what's stale, stale data, freshness check, update current state, update my current state, state sync, statusline says interview due, interview due, review TELOS, update ideal state, quarterly context refresh, fresh LifeOS install, configure DA name. NOT FOR single edits (Telos), bulk intake (Migrate), identity-only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous multi-round research review loop. Repeatedly reviews using Gemini via gemini-review MCP, implements fixes, and re-reviews until positive assessment or max rounds reached. Use when user says "auto review loop", "review until it passes", or wants autonomous iterative improvement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous multi-round research review loop. Repeatedly reviews using Claude Code via claude-review MCP, implements fixes, and re-reviews until positive assessment or max rounds reached. Use when user says "auto review loop", "review until it passes", or wants autonomous iterative improvement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Two-thread adversarial review: a fresh reviewer constructs the strongest 200-word rejection memo, then a second fresh reviewer defends the paper point-by-point and surfaces still-unresolved critical issues. Use when user says "kill argument", "adversarial review", "hostile review", "rebuttal preparation", "reviewer-2 simulation", or before submitting a theory paper that has already passed standard review rounds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep file-focused code review for correctness bugs. Unlike shallow-review which runs 6 specialists in parallel across the entire patch, deep-review focuses on user-specified files with full pattern catalogs (500+ patterns), codebase investigation, and source-level context gathering. Use when: the user specifies particular files for focused review, a shallow review flagged areas that need deeper investigation, reviewing critical-path code changes, examining complex serialization/lifecycle/state-machine changes. The user instructs which files to focus on (typically a subset of files in the patch).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs an autonomous review-and-fix improvement loop over a Claude Code skill until a review comes back clean, with a cross-round findings ledger, escalation when fixes stop converging, and a mechanical scope guard. Reviews are performed by the plugin-dev skill-reviewer agent. Use to fix skill quality issues, iteratively refine a skill, or resume a loop after an escalation ('fix my skill', 'improve this skill until it passes review', 'skill improvement loop'). NOT for a one-time review — use the plugin-dev skill-reviewer agent directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。