「commit」の検索結果

Use this skill when prioritizing a Salesforce backlog with the MoSCoW method (Must / Should / Could / Won't) plus an effort + value lens, deciding what fits in the next sprint or release, and using WSJF as a tie-break when MoSCoW alone produces ties. Trigger keywords: MoSCoW prioritization, must should could won't, WSJF salesforce, prioritize salesforce stories, sprint commit, backlog grooming. NOT for story writing or splitting (use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce). NOT for release train planning (use agents/release-train-planner). NOT for sizing/estimation method debates — this skill assumes a sizing convention is already in place.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to explore options, weigh approaches, or think through uncertainty before committing to a direction. Collaborative brainstorming and rubber ducking — divergence-first thinking partner.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explore and debate options with fresh documentation and research before committing. Use when facing a real decision with multiple plausible approaches — library/framework choice, architecture call, API or schema design, algorithm selection, or any communication / strategy call where being wrong has cost. Enumerates relevant research domains, looks up current docs and evidence-based methods, weighs options on correctness and elegance, resists bloat. Do NOT use for divergent ideation (brainstorm), extracting user intent (elicit), or reviewing already-written code (quality-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve code structure without changing behavior. Use when refactoring, restructuring, simplifying, or extracting code. Also for reducing duplication, renaming for clarity, or addressing code smells. Enforces one change → test → commit cycle. NOT for style/formatting (use /lint), features, or bug fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve an existing agent SKILL.md through one gated cycle: select the target (default this skill), snapshot the committed baseline, diagnose against skill-design-principles plus four rubric dimensions, apply exactly one focused change, and ship only if a different agent than the author PASSes with quoted evidence. Use when the user says "improve this skill", "improve-skill", "iterate on SKILL.md", or "apply skill-design-principles to a skill". Do not use for code slop over a duration (anneal), generic timeboxed work (timeboxed-iterating), graph orchestration (workgraph), metric hill-climb on a codebase (autoresearch), or stripping slop from existing prose (catalog-deslop).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ship workflow: merge main, run tests, review diff, bump VERSION, update CHANGELOG, commit, push, create PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics with persistent history and trend tracking. Team-aware: breaks down per-person contributions with praise and growth areas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Never read .env files or write secrets to .squad/ committed files

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Customize how a built-in unikit skill behaves in this specific project by writing workflow overrides into its skill-context file. These are per-skill workflow rules (e.g. "/unikit-review should also flag TODO comments", "/unikit-implement should run tests after each task"), not coding conventions. Use when the user wants to change, customize, or override how a particular unikit skill works in this project — "customize the review skill", "make /unikit-fix always add logging here", "the implement skill should do X differently", "add a skill rule for /unikit-commit". Use "validate" to find stale overrides against updated base skills. For a general coding convention (not tied to one skill) use /unikit-rules; to derive rules from past mistakes use /unikit-evolve.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous iterative refactoring workflow. Scans for tactical code quality improvements (DRY, dead code, naming, complexity), implements through SMEs, verifies with QA, commits atomically, and loops until no improvements remain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prospective failure imagination for a plan, decision, or running system. Operates in two modes — **plan mode** (a plan has not yet been committed to; imagine its catastrophic failure broadly) and **scenario mode** (a specific catastrophic scenario is posed against an existing system; investigate causes against the actual code and architecture). Spawns parallel pre-mortemers in isolation across three categories of lens: standard failure classes (technical, operational, estimation, scope, adoption, dependency, team, incentive, detection, reversibility, adversarial), 0-3 ad-hoc target-specific lenses the orchestrator names when warranted, and a first-principles lens that always runs to catch what the prescribed taxonomy misses. Synthesizes into a prioritized risk register with early-warning signals. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous technical lead. Takes commander's intent and drives a project to completion through an OODA loop over implementation, refactoring, review, and bug-hunting skills. Has broad authority — creates tickets, commits, invokes any skill — and only escalates via andon cord for irreversible actions, public releases, or genuinely blocking decisions. User acts as product owner; skill acts as tech lead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run after making changes, before committing — reviews the current git diff for impact and risk via cqs review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Git workflow patterns including branching strategies, commit conventions, merge vs rebase, conflict resolution, and collaborative development best practices for teams of all sizes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create reproducible, cross-platform development environments with Flox — a declarative environment manager built on Nix. ALWAYS use this skill when the user needs to: set up a project with system-level dependencies (compilers, databases, native libraries like openssl, libvips, BLAS, LAPACK); configure reproducible toolchains for Python, Node.js, Rust, Go, C/C++, Java, Ruby, Elixir, PHP, or any language; manage environments that must work identically across macOS and Linux; pin exact package versions for a team; run local services (PostgreSQL, Redis, Kafka) alongside development tools; onboard new developers with a single command; or solve 'works on my machine' problems. Especially valuable for AI-assisted and vibe coding — Flox lets agents install tools into a project-scoped environment without sudo, system pollution, or sandbox restrictions, and the resulting environment is committed to the repo so anyone can reproduce it instantly. Use this skill even if the user doesn't mention Flox — if they describe needing reproducible, declarative, cross-platform dev environments with system packages, this is the right tool. Also use when the user mentions .flox/, manifest.toml, flox activate, or FloxHub.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop an independent visual language and turn the human-chosen direction into a production-ready graphic, brand, campaign, publication, web, or product system. Use when originality and differentiation matter enough to escape generic AI and Big Tech aesthetics. Guides a minimum-evidence start, ten isolated typography-led HTML design directions made only from type, color, and space, visual-first human judgement, explicit commitment, and concrete Round 2 production. Do not use for routine UI fixes, small components, or applying an existing design system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic QA testing for web applications, desktop apps, and workflows. Three tiers: QUICK (critical/high severity only — 5 min), STANDARD (+ medium severity — 15 min), EXHAUSTIVE (+ cosmetic — 30+ min). Tests user flows, finds bugs, reports with severity classification, and optionally auto-fixes with atomic commits. Produces before/after health scores and ship-readiness summary. Use when user says "test this", "QA", "find bugs", "does this work?", or "is it ready to ship?". Voice triggers: "quality check", "run QA", "test the app". For report-only (no fixes), use with --report-only flag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans codebase for hardcoded secrets. Returns normalized findings with severity and remediation guidance. Pre-commit hook integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits layer boundaries + cross-layer consistency: I/O violations, transaction boundaries (commit ownership), session ownership (DI vs local).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies safe auto-fixes for low-risk audit findings (unused imports, dead code, commented-out code). Confidence >=90% only. Creates single commit with summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。