「does」の検索結果

Find the root cause of a problem, not just symptoms. Use when the user says "root cause", "why does this keep happening", "5 whys", "fishbone diagram", "cause analysis", "problem investigation", "defect analysis", "incident analysis", "A3 problem solving", "what's causing this", "ishikawa" - even if they don't explicitly say "root cause analysis".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a Business Requirements Document. Use when the user says "write a BRD", "business requirements", "document the business need", "vision and scope document", "business case for this feature", "what does the business need", "strategic requirements", "document why we need this" - even if they don't explicitly say "BRD".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch transcripts from YouTube videos. Use when user says "get transcript", "fetch transcript", "YouTube transcript", "pull captions", "what does this video say", or pastes a YouTube URL and wants the text content extracted. Also use when user wants to research or summarize a YouTube video.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write measurable acceptance criteria for requirements or user stories. Use when the user says "write acceptance criteria", "definition of done", "how do we test this", "fit criteria", "given when then", "Gherkin scenarios", "what does done look like", "testable conditions", "how will we know this works" - even if they don't explicitly say "acceptance criteria".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write structured use cases with main and alternate flows. Use when the user says "write a use case", "document the user flow", "use case diagram", "actor goal list", "main success scenario", "fully dressed use case", "what does the user do step by step", "system behavior for this feature", "interaction flow" - even if they don't explicitly say "use case".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a data pipeline design document. Use when the user says "pipeline design doc", "document this pipeline", "pipeline architecture doc", "data flow document", "how does this pipeline work", "design doc for ETL", "pipeline spec", or needs to capture the architecture, data flow, and operational details of a data pipeline - even if they don't explicitly say "design doc".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a data dictionary documenting entities, fields, and business rules. Use when the user says "data dictionary", "document the data model", "what fields are in this table", "data definitions", "field descriptions", "CRUD matrix", "entity relationship", "data catalogue", "what data does this system store" - even if they don't explicitly say "data dictionary".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write an executive summary using the Pyramid Principle SCQA structure. Use when a consultant says "write an executive summary", "I need a one-pager for the exec", "how do I open this report", "write me the intro for this deck", "draft the cover memo", "I need to frame the findings", "executive doesn't have time to read the full report", "help me write the storyline", or "write the situation-complication-answer". Also trigger when someone has findings or recommendations and needs to communicate them top-down to a time-constrained audience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

<What it does, one line>. Trigger phrases: <phrases>.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Judges whether a user's input suits the Vibe Creating style of video-prompt writing, and when it does, distills single-scene prompts, multi-shot descriptions, emotional imagery, or mixed input into prompts that are easier for a video model to generate from — while preserving any user-specified dialogue, voiceover, music, sound effects, and other hard constraints. Use when a user wants to turn an idea, story, feeling, or rough/over-specified prompt into a strong text-to-video prompt (Seedance, Sora, Kling, Veo, Runway, etc.), or asks to "rewrite", "improve", "clean up", or "vibe-ify" a video prompt. Do NOT use for long narrative films that need precise word-for-word dialogue sync, industrial shot lists meant to be executed verbatim, or functional/UI demos and step-by-step tutorials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure writing-style statistics (sentence length, vocabulary, transitions, phrasing) from 5 to 10 posts you or your client wrote, and produce a voice profile for VOICE.md, blog-persona, and blog-write. Use for "learn my style", "build a writing baseline". It describes style; it does not detect or attribute authorship, and it is not for scoring a post (blog-analyze) or writing brand rules (blog-brand).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read or configure the vault filing methodology and suggest destinations for planned knowledge creation under Generic, LYT, PARA, or Zettelkasten. Use for wiki mode, methodology mode, what is my vault mode, set vault mode, switch to PARA, use LYT, Zettelkasten setup, change mode, configure mode, or methodology routing. This skill does not save content or migrate notes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a deterministic, read-only health check on an Obsidian wiki. Use for lint, vault health check, audit wiki health, find orphans, find dead links, frontmatter audit, provenance audit, or wiki audit. Reports graph, link, frontmatter, provenance-ledger, empty-section, and stale-index findings; it does not reason broadly or repair files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read and search GitHub repository documentation via gitmcp.io MCP service. **WHEN TO USE:** - User provides a GitHub URL - User mentions a specific repo in owner/repo format - User asks "what does this repo do?", "read the docs for X repo", or similar - User wants to search code or docs within a repo

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill, audit this skill, is this skill safe, vet a skill before installing, what does this skill access. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, spec validation, and security auditing of third-party skills before install.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run dialyzer over the Yuzu Erlang gateway. Sources the Erlang toolchain and runs rebar3 dialyzer. Use after any .erl change in gateway/ — CLAUDE.md mandates dialyzer be clean before commit because compilation success does not imply type correctness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run dialyzer over the Yuzu Erlang gateway. Sources the Erlang toolchain and runs rebar3 dialyzer. Use after any .erl change in gateway/ — AGENTS.md mandates dialyzer be clean before commit because compilation success does not imply type correctness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show real token usage and estimated savings for the current session. Reads directly from the Claude Code session log — no AI estimation. Triggers on /caveman-stats. Output is injected by the mode-tracker hook; the model itself does not compute the numbers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate ready-to-paste AI image-gen prompts for 2D game art (character/sprite, icon/UI/item, background/tileset) that stay consistent with the project's art style across separate chat sessions in Claude/Gemini/ChatGPT chat UIs. Use when the user wants to render, generate, or create game art/sprites/icons/backgrounds with AI, or mentions an "art style bible" for a game project. Maintains a persistent `art-style-bible.md` so style doesn't drift between requests, and gives a post-generation checklist plus post-processing guidance for common technical misses (transparency, size, aspect ratio).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when designing the UX and content strategy for a Salesforce-powered self-service portal or help center — pre-deflection article surfacing, Help Center search UX, friction-calibrated case submission forms, community peer support layers, and deflection measurement. Trigger keywords: design self-service portal, case deflection strategy, help center UX design, reduce support volume with self-service, knowledge base search experience. NOT for picking which contact reasons to deflect and through which channel — use architect/case-deflection-strategy. NOT for building the Experience Cloud site itself — use admin/experience-cloud-site-setup. More trigger keywords: article visibility matrix IsVisibleInCsp IsVisibleInPkb, which articles show in the customer portal, case visibility for portal users, CaseComment IsPublished customer visible comment, self-registration profile and account for a portal, Help Center template does not support login, deflection metrics SOQL KnowledgeArticleViewStat, self-service journey map, moderation policy for a support community.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author and run offline evals for Agentforce agents: fixture format, scoring rubrics, hallucination checks, regression baselines, CI integration, prompt-change safety. Trigger keywords: agent eval, hallucination, doesn't hallucinate, agentforce offline evals, rubric for agent response. NOT for deciding which layers of testing the agent needs — use agentforce/agentforce-testing-strategy. NOT for Testing Center, AiEvaluationDefinition or sf agent test runs — use agentforce/agent-testing-and-evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when practitioners need to understand system-managed fields (CreatedDate, LastModifiedDate, SystemModstamp, CreatedById, LastModifiedById, IsDeleted) — their update behavior, indexing, and queryability. Triggers: 'difference between SystemModstamp and LastModifiedDate', 'how to query deleted records', 'set CreatedDate during data migration', 'why does LastModifiedDate not match SystemModstamp', 'Create Audit Fields permission'. NOT for a field's value-change history — use data/field-history-tracking. NOT for Shield Field Audit Trail — use security/field-audit-trail.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-tool decision matrix for field-update automation in Salesforce — Before-Save Flow vs After-Save Flow vs Apex Trigger vs the deprecated Workflow Rule + Field Update. Covers the recursion / re-entrancy rules, governor cost per pattern (Before-Save flow is governor-free for the same record), the order-of-execution slot each tool occupies, and the Workflow-Rule-to-Flow migration playbook for field-update actions. NOT for the full record-save order of execution — use apex/order-of-execution-deep-dive. NOT for building the record-triggered Flow once the tool is chosen — use flow/record-triggered-flow-patterns. Trigger keywords: WorkflowFieldUpdate, reevaluateOnChange, onCreateOrTriggeringUpdate, doesRequireRecordChangedToMeetCriteria, failedMigrationToolVersion, Migrate to Flow, workflow-meta.xml, field update deprecated, double writer, second trigger pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automating post-sandbox-refresh cleanup via the `SandboxPostCopy` interface — the Apex class that runs ONCE after a sandbox refresh or clone completes, before users can log in. Used to mask emails, deactivate users, scrub integration endpoints, disable scheduled jobs, and reapply per-environment configuration the metadata copy doesn't carry. Covers the interface contract (`runApexClass` setting, `SandboxContext` parameter, single-execution semantics), the email-masking pattern that stops sandbox tests emailing production addresses, and the refresh runbook checklist. NOT for choosing sandbox type or refresh cadence — use admin/sandbox-strategy. NOT for re-seeding reference data after a refresh — use data/sandbox-refresh-data-strategies. Trigger keywords: SandboxPostCopy, runApexClass, SandboxContext, Test.testSandboxPostCopyScript, RunAsAutoProcUser, Automated Process user, CronTrigger, System.abortJob, sandbox email masking, post-refresh runbook.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。