2,725 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
QA test a live website with Firecrawl browser and scrape evidence. Use when the user wants exploratory QA, form testing, navigation/link checks, responsive checks, performance observations, bug reports, or a pre-launch quality review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured persuasion for tech leads, PMs, and founders—not activity logs. Five scenarios (kickoff, status update, wrap-up, investor pitch, solution selling) on one 5-part framework (Hook→Context→Proposal→Evidence→Ask). AI prompts for missing materials and audience context; pre-submit checklist. Claude Code plugin; Cursor, Codex, and chat via prompts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create evidence-aware, interactive visual explainers as self-contained offline HTML. Use when a user asks to explain a concept, repository module, engineering tradeoff, or incident with a diagram, walkthrough, ELI5 treatment, data/request trace, failure view, or teach-back. Do not use for a plain short answer, ordinary prose rewrite, generic website implementation, or unsupported claims presented as facts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when tutoring a learner through MATLAB debugging, error interpretation, failed tests, incorrect outputs, array-shape problems, indexing mistakes, function argument issues, or code repair practice. Use for guided debugging sessions, debugging drills, teach-the-agent critique, and evidence-based MATLAB troubleshooting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute approved, bounded work in an isolated implementation conversation and return a structured evidence receipt. Use with inherited history or an explicitly identified source; no particular planning, testing, or review skill is required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn approved planning evidence or partially completed work into a portable, verifiable execution goal. Use when work needs to cross sessions, people, agents, or harnesses; no other skill or tracker setup is required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and adapt monkey patches in vllm_metax/patch/ against a target upstream revision. Decide whether to retain, update, migrate, or remove each patch; maintain patch headers and explanations; validate changes and record evidence. Use only for compatibility work on this directory, not standalone attention backend, model, kernel, or other adaptations elsewhere in vllm_metax.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish the shared environment, source/runtime correspondence, target confirmation and validation evidence for MetaX vLLM upgrades. Use as the common prerequisite of the patch, attention, registry and model upgrade skills, or for an explicitly requested MetaX environment preflight; it does not perform domain-specific adaptations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a vague bug report into a VERIFIED minimal reproduction and then a failing regression test, agent-driven end to end. Covers extracting the implicit repro from a thin report (env, build, steps, data), the reproduce-minimize-isolate-capture loop, git bisect to find the introducing commit, building a deterministic minimal repro (fixed seeds, frozen time, stubbed network), writing the failing regression test BEFORE the fix (red) and confirming the fix flips it green, and writing repro evidence back into the ticket. Distinguishes flaky-not-reproducible from environment-specific. Use when: "reproduce this bug," "minimal reproduction," "repro steps," "find the commit that broke it," "git bisect," "make the repro deterministic," "write a failing test for this bug," "regression test for a defect," "can't reproduce this bug." Not for: Classifying/deduplicating/severity-routing existing failures without reproducing them — that is ai-bug-triage. Generating tests from specs rather than from a defect — that is ai-test-generation. Related: ai-bug-triage, ai-test-generation, test-reliability, systematic-debugging, qa-project-context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bulk-regenerate broken test selectors after a UI refactor or redesign. Detects drift between old and new DOM with an aria-snapshot diff, maps old locators to new equivalents using role-first + region scoping, validates against the new build, and produces a single PR with grouped per-file selector updates and per-change evidence. Assumes Playwright >= 1.50 (trace viewer DOM-snapshot panel, getByRole filtering, ariaSnapshot). Use when: "UI refactor broke tests," "redesign broke tests," "bulk update selectors," "regenerate selectors after refactor," "selector drift," "fix N broken tests after redesign." Not for: healing one flaky test at runtime — use test-reliability. Not for: writing a new test suite from scratch — use playwright-automation. Not for: re-recording tests after a framework switch (Selenium to Playwright) — use test-migration. Related: test-reliability, playwright-automation, test-migration, ci-cd-integration, visual-testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate release readiness with evidence-based go/no-go decisions. Covers go/no-go checklists, smoke test suite design, staged rollout validation, rollback criteria and procedures, and post-deployment verification. Ensures release confidence comes from data, not feelings. Use when: "release ready," "go/no-go," "smoke test," "release checklist," "rollback plan," "staged rollout," "canary deploy." Not for: safe-release techniques (flags, canary, dark launch) applied during the rollout itself — use testing-in-production; scheduled probes that run continuously after release — use synthetic-monitoring; designing new tests from prod telemetry — use observability-driven-testing. Related: testing-in-production, qa-metrics, ci-cd-integration, ai-system-testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a whole regression suite and prune/restructure it with evidence: per-test coverage fingerprinting, AST near-duplicate clustering, CI-history mining for never-failing and flaky tests, prune decision rules (redundant/obsolete/low-value/keep), smoke/core/extended tiering by risk and defect-detection history, and a defensible "what we deleted and why" record. Deletion is destructive — quarantine and human sign-off are mandatory. Use when: "audit the test suite," "prune redundant tests," "find duplicate tests," "which tests can we delete," "restructure into smoke/core/extended," "is this test pulling its weight," "shrink the regression suite." Not for: Judging whether an individual test is WELL-WRITTEN (smells, assertions) — that is ai-qa-review. Healing one flaky test at runtime — that is test-reliability. Bulk selector regeneration after a UI refactor — that is selector-drift-recovery. Related: ai-qa-review, coverage-analysis, test-reliability, risk-based-testing, qa-project-context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runtime per-test healing with evidence: multi-attribute selector healing, environment-aware diagnosis, flake classification, quarantine management, and confidence-scored auto-repair. Goes beyond simple locator fallbacks to cover action-level healing, data healing, and observable repair workflows. Use when: "flaky test," "test stability," "self-healing locator," "broken locator recovery," "unreliable test," "quarantine flaky test." Not for: bulk regenerating selectors after a planned UI refactor — use selector-drift-recovery (this skill heals ONE test at runtime; that one rewrites many tests offline). Not for: classifying/clustering CI failures into bug reports — use ai-bug-triage. Related: playwright-automation, selector-drift-recovery, ci-cd-integration, qa-metrics, ai-bug-triage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build customer case studies as marketing and chasm-crossing reference assets during PRD v1.0 Market Adoption. Triggers on requests to build case studies, produce customer stories, create reference content, or when user asks "build a case study", "customer story", "reference account", "case study interview", "before/after story", "social proof page", "logo wall". Outputs CFD-CASE-* evidence entries, GTM-CASE-* marketing assets, and updates ADO-REF-* with story status.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define measurable success metrics (KPIs) tied to product type during PRD v0.3 Commercial Model. Triggers on requests to define success metrics, set KPI targets, determine what to measure, establish go/no-go thresholds, or when user asks "how do we measure success?", "what metrics matter?", "what's our target?", "how do we know if this works?", "define KPIs", "success criteria". Consumes Product Type Classification (BR-) from v0.2. Outputs KPI- entries with thresholds, evidence sources, and downstream gate linkages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform validated pain points into articulated user value statements for PRD v0.1 Spark. Triggers on completing problem framing, defining user outcomes, articulating value propositions, or requests like "what value do users get", "define outcomes", "articulate the benefit", "finish v0.1", "pain to value", "what do they gain". Outputs CFD- entries tagged as value hypotheses with evidence tiers. Follows Problem Framing skill in workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesize behavioral personas from prior stage evidence for journey mapping and marketing during PRD v0.4 User Journeys. Triggers on requests to define personas, create user profiles, identify target users, or when user asks "who are our users?", "define personas", "user profiles", "target users", "persona creation", "who uses this product?". Consumes CFD- (v0.1-v0.3), BR- (targeting from v0.3 Moat), FEA- (v0.3 Feature Value Planning). Outputs PER- entries with behavioral profiles and feature relationships. Feeds v0.4 User Journey Mapping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish weekly customer-discovery cadence and Opportunity Solution Tree practice using Teresa Torres's Continuous Discovery Habits framework during PRD v1.0 Market Adoption. Triggers on requests to set up discovery cadence, build opportunity solution tree, run weekly customer interviews, or when user asks "Torres", "continuous discovery", "opportunity solution tree", "outcomes vs outputs", "weekly interviews", "assumption mapping". Outputs CFD-* discovery entries and updates to ADO-STAGE-* and PER-* with new evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Choose and run ACU-only, adaptive PPU in-kernel timeline, or optional bounded joint analysis for a PPU kernel. Use for device-level bottleneck diagnosis, kernel-internal critical-path questions, or evidence that genuinely needs both; do not require all three modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Let AKA autonomously add, run, inspect, and revise intra-kernel timeline probes for standalone CUDA/inline PTX or CuTe DSL when ordinary benchmark, NSYS, or NCU evidence cannot answer a specific kernel-internal timing question.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the evidence loop of one long-horizon GPU kernel optimization episode. Use this skill to reconstruct the incumbent, profile and localize a bottleneck, research progressively, plan one coherent direction, implement and repair, validate development correctness and performance, and record every decisive experiment in the episode journal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cut a new TMDb release — work out the next SemVer version from the evidence, do the pre-tag housekeeping a tag would otherwise freeze in place, draft release notes, then tag and publish the GitHub release. Presents the version (with its reasoning) and the full notes for approval and STOPS; nothing is tagged or published until you say go.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically QA test any application — web apps, native macOS apps, Electron apps, CLI tools, interactive REPLs, or anything on screen. Three modes: browser (chromux/CDP, fast, DOM-level), computer (MCP computer-use, screenshot + pixel clicks, any app), and cli (tmux, send-keys + capture-pane for interactive terminals). Auto-selects mode or accepts --browser / --computer / --cli override. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "test this app", "find bugs", "test and fix", "fix what's broken", "dogfood", "exploratory test", "bug hunt", "QA this app", "사이트 테스트", "앱 테스트", "브라우저 QA", "화면 보고 테스트해줘", "네이티브 앱 테스트", "screen test". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DyNote: systematically and efficiently extract raw Douyin/DY video data and analyze videos, comments, accounts, hashtags, and short-video scenes into evidence-graded learning notes, summaries, research briefs, scripts, and knowledge-base material. Use when the user asks to 抓取/提取/整理 抖音视频字幕、视频文案、ASR 转写、Qwen3-ASR 中文转写、原始材料归档、学习笔记、analysis plan、note budget、避免返工、复用已有素材、评论洞察、账号分析、赛道/话题研究、竞品拆解、电商/本地生活视频分析、事实核查、自动搜索素材, save Douyin content as Markdown/TXT, or use subtitle/local ASR as the factual spine with logged-in Douyin Web built-in AI / Doubao fallback as visual or quick-reading supplements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。