한국+일본 병기 처리방침·이용약관 자동 생성. 한국 본사가 일본 사용자까지 대상으로 서비스할 때 사용. 한국어(PIPA)·일본어(APPI) 두 세트 문서를 동시 생성하고, Footer에 언어·관할 전환 링크 자동 삽입.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
3,363 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
한국+일본 병기 처리방침·이용약관 자동 생성. 한국 본사가 일본 사용자까지 대상으로 서비스할 때 사용. 한국어(PIPA)·일본어(APPI) 두 세트 문서를 동시 생성하고, Footer에 언어·관할 전환 링크 자동 삽입.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
한국 서비스용 처리방침·이용약관·회원가입 동의 모달·쿠키 배너 자동 생성. 개인정보보호법 §30, 2025.4.21 작성지침, 2026.3 개정법, 공정위 전자상거래 표준약관 10023호 반영. Next.js 13~16 프로젝트 대상.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
처리방침·이용약관 자동 생성 진입점. 호출 즉시 6개 하위 스킬(privacy-kr·privacy-eu·privacy-us·privacy-jp·privacy-global·privacy-global-jp)을 번호 메뉴로 제시하고, 번호 입력 즉시 해당 스킬 인터뷰로 직행한다.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
처리방침·이용약관 자동 생성 스킬 패키지 (v4.0). 호출 시 privacy-kr·privacy-eu·privacy-us·privacy-global 4개 하위 스킬을 번호 메뉴로 제시하고 번호 입력 즉시 해당 스킬 인터뷰로 직행. 한국 PIPA + EU GDPR + US CCPA/CPRA 대응.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain a clear intake summary and support help, details and summary requests without asserting legal conclusions. Use for this Bot Generator Bot template; creates drafts or simulations within its declared scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gather legal matter facts one question at a time and prepare an organized summary for qualified review. Use for this Bot Generator Bot template; creates drafts or simulations within its declared scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Red Team persona for Business Logic and Auth manipulation. Generates and executes stateful fuzzing scripts (Playwright/Python) to test RBAC bypasses, BOLA/IDOR, race conditions, and complex multi-step transaction flaws.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Probe for hardcoded secrets, injection surfaces, unguarded routes, business logic flaws, and platform-specific weaknesses across backend (Node, Go, Java, Python, Rust), frontend (React, Angular, Vue), and mobile (iOS, Android, Flutter) codebases. Use when performing security audits, vulnerability scans, secrets detection, or penetration testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Initialize plugin in a project — install Iron Laws, auto-activation; Use when setting up or updating the plugin.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Initialize plugin in a project — install Iron Laws, auto-activation rules, and reference auto-loading into CLAUDE.md. Use when setting up or updating the plugin.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Initialize plugin in a project — install Iron Laws, auto-activation rules, and reference auto-loading into CLAUDE.md. Use when setting up or updating the plugin.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GDPR compliance - data subject rights, lawful basis, DPIA, privacy by design, breach notification, consent management, cross-border transfers, PII masking
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
检测并管理挂载在工作区 /root/.openclaw/workspace/ 下的网盘(TOS 存储桶挂载)。当你需要将文件保存到持久化存储、检查已挂载的 TOS 存储桶或列出可用的工作区网盘时使用此技能。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer a hard question by fanning it out to a PANEL of models running in parallel — each answering independently with web search and bash, none seeing the others' work — then having Opus 4.8 judge every response into a structured analysis (consensus, contradictions, partial coverage, unique insights, blind spots) and write a final answer grounded in it. The panel is two independent Opus 4.8 runs (slug opus4.8-4.8), Opus 4.8 + GPT-5.5 via codex (opus4.8-gpt5.5), Opus 4.8 + Gemini 3.1 Pro via agy (opus4.8-gemini3.1pro), or all three (opus4.8-gpt5.5-gemini3.1pro). Opus always judges and writes the final answer — the pipeline can't be reversed. Runs on local CLI subscriptions (no metered API), and saves a timestamped provenance .md per run. Use this whenever the user asks to "run it through Fusion", says /fusion, wants a multi-model / panel / ensemble answer, wants a question cross-checked across models, or wants a higher-confidence answer with consensus and blind spots surfaced — even if they don't say "fusion". General-purpose: any topic (research, law, strategy, technical, personal). Best for high-stakes research, design calls, and debugging where being confidently wrong is expensive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically generate production-ready Skills for any software, API, CLI tool, library, workflow, or service. Use this skill whenever the user wants to create a skill from scratch for a target application, convert an existing tool into an agent-native skill, generate skills for multiple platforms (Claude Code, OpenClaw, Codex), or automate the full skill creation pipeline including analysis, design, implementation, testing, optimization, and multi-platform packaging. Also use when the user mentions "skill-anything", "generate a skill for", "make a skill from", "skillify", or wants to turn any software into an agent-ready skill. Even if they just say "create a skill for X" where X is any tool or API, this skill should trigger.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that may support EU Market Abuse Regulation concerns, market surveillance, suspicious order and transaction reports, insider dealing controls, unlawful disclosure controls, market manipulation detection, inside information disclosure workflows, insider-list evidence, PDMR transaction notifications, alert explainability, model or rule provenance, reviewer decisions, or compliance escalation. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java trading surveillance system for MAR controls; Design suspicious order and transaction monitoring evidence; Add alert explainability and reviewer-decision audit trails; Assess AI-assisted market-abuse detection before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to apply Java secure coding best practices — including validating untrusted inputs, defending against injection attacks with parameterized queries, minimizing attack surface via least privilege, applying strong cryptographic algorithms, handling exceptions securely without exposing sensitive data, managing secrets at runtime, avoiding unsafe deserialization, and encoding output to prevent XSS. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for secure coding; Find input validation risks in Java code; Review Java code for injection vulnerabilities; Improve secure error handling in Java services; Harden Java code against common security flaws. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform black-box / grey-box web application penetration testing on an authorized target — auth bypass, IDOR, session handling, business-logic flaws, parameter tampering, Burp Suite / OWASP ZAP workflows. Use when the user mentions 'web pentest,' 'web application penetration test,' 'pentesting,' 'bug bounty,' 'Burp Suite,' 'ZAP,' 'OWASP testing,' 'authentication testing,' 'session testing,' 'authorization testing,' 'business logic testing,' 'web vulnerability testing,' or has explicit authorization to test a live web application.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement and audit privacy controls in product and infrastructure — GDPR, CCPA / CPRA, LGPD, PIPEDA. Covers data minimization, lawful basis, consent management, data subject access requests (DSARs — access, deletion, portability), data processing agreements, DPIA / TIA, breach notification timing, data classification, and the technical implementation of 'right to be forgotten' across backups, caches, analytics, and third parties. Use when the user mentions 'GDPR,' 'CCPA,' 'CPRA,' 'data privacy,' 'privacy engineering,' 'data subject access request,' 'DSAR,' 'right to deletion,' 'right to be forgotten,' 'data portability,' 'consent management,' 'cookie consent,' 'data minimization,' 'DPIA,' 'data protection impact assessment,' 'breach notification,' 'BAA,' 'DPA,' 'data processing agreement,' 'sub-processor,' 'cross-border data transfer,' 'SCCs,' or needs to implement or review privacy controls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Public records requests under Brazil's Access to Information Law (LAI). Use for Fala.BR filings, e-SIC, and CGU/CMRI appeals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interview preparation and recording-consent law. Use for research, question frameworks, one-party or all-party consent rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete UI/UX design capability — a wiki-style knowledge map of design theory (UX laws, Nielsen heuristics, usability, visual hierarchy, typography, contrast/WCAG, design systems, aesthetics-vs-conversion) fused with a hands-on execution playbook for building distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces. Use when designing or building any UI (websites, landing pages, dashboards, components, apps), reviewing or critiquing UI/UX, diagnosing why a design doesn't convert, or styling/beautifying web interfaces. Grounds every visual decision in UX principles and avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use remindctl to inspect and manage Apple Reminders on macOS 14+, including show/list/add/edit/complete/delete/status/authorize workflows, due dates, alarms, recurrence, and location triggers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a scored heuristic critique of the UI using Nielsen's 10 + 6 design laws + optional persona walkthroughs. Outputs a machine-parseable scorecard plus a 0-100 UsabilityScore (the judged companion to the deterministic UICraftScore). Invoke when the user asks for heuristic on their UI, or mentions 'heuristic' alongside design / UI / frontend work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。