standup
無料Write a client update — identify what was done, what's next, and surface risks before they become surprises. End of day, start of day, or end of week.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
2,274 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Write a client update — identify what was done, what's next, and surface risks before they become surprises. End of day, start of day, or end of week.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply network economics to analyze markets with network effects, critical mass dynamics, and platform competition. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate tipping points, lock-in risks, switching costs, or standards wars, especially in technology platforms and two-sided markets.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply AI ethics frameworks (fairness, accountability, transparency, privacy) to evaluate AI systems for algorithmic bias, explainability gaps, and value alignment failures. Use this skill when the user needs to audit an AI system for ethical risks, design fairness constraints, assess explainability requirements, or when they ask 'is this AI system fair', 'how do we detect algorithmic bias', 'what are the ethical implications of this AI deployment', or 'how do we make this model explainable to stakeholders'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"M&A integration playbook covering eight modules: strategic rationale, target screening, due diligence (financial/legal/commercial), valuation with valuation bridge, synergy analysis, deal structuring (stock vs. asset, cash vs. equity, earn-out), SPA key clauses, and post-merger integration (PMI). Use for deal evaluation, valuation disputes, structure design, earn-out design, synergy breakdown, integration risk, or hostile takeover defense. Triggers: 『併購』『收購』『M&A』『盡職調查』『DD』『估值橋』『綜效』『earn-out』『換股比例』『PMI』『買殼』『借殼上市』『敵意併購』『交易結構』. For Taiwan EMBA 財管組 case studies and term reports (台大/政大/陽交). Complements Asgard `biz-dcf` and `fin-modeling` (valuation tools) plus `biz-corporate-governance` (governance layer) by providing the transaction-layer framework.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Perform RFM (Recency, Frequency, Monetary) customer segmentation from transaction data. Use this skill when the user needs to segment customers by purchase behavior, identify high-value buyers, design retention campaigns, or prioritize marketing spend by customer value — even if they say 'who are our best customers', 'which customers are at risk of churning', or 'how do we target our marketing'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply auction theory to compare the four canonical auction formats and assess revenue equivalence. Use this skill when the user needs to choose an auction format, evaluate bidding strategies, or determine when revenue equivalence breaks down due to risk aversion, asymmetry, or correlated values.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a compliance check on a proposed action, product feature, or business initiative, surfacing applicable regulations, required approvals, and risk areas. Use when launching a feature that touches personal data, when marketing or product proposes something with regulatory implications, or when you need to know which approvals and jurisdictional requirements apply before proceeding.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code changes for security, performance, and correctness. Trigger with a PR URL or diff, "review this before I merge", "is this code safe?", or when checking a change for N+1 queries, injection risks, missing edge cases, or error handling gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply PESTEL framework to scan the macro-environment across Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, and Legal dimensions. Use this skill when the user needs to assess external macro factors affecting a business, industry, or market — especially before entering a new country, launching a product, or evaluating regulatory risk. Also use when the user mentions 'macro analysis', 'external environment', or 'what trends should we watch'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Conduct SWOT analysis with TOWS matrix for strategic planning. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate a company, product, or project by identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, or wants to generate strategic options from internal and external factors. Also use when the user mentions competitive positioning, strategic assessment, or asks 'what are our advantages and risks', even without naming SWOT explicitly.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply Benford's Law to detect anomalies in numerical datasets by analyzing first-digit frequency distributions. Use this skill when the user needs to audit financial data for fraud indicators, validate data integrity, or detect fabricated numbers — even if they say 'data manipulation detection', 'first digit test', or 'accounting fraud screening'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auto-activates during requirements analysis to assess security risks using OWASP Top 10 framework, identify security requirements, and recommend mitigation strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess identified vulnerabilities for exploitability, impact, and risk. Provide CVSS scoring and remediation strategies. Use when analyzing security findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze feature requirements, dependencies, and security considerations. Use when starting feature implementation from GitHub issues to understand scope, technical feasibility, and risks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold a new Forge tool end-to-end — type, implementation, registration, permission/risk classification, and unit test. Use when adding anything to src/tools/.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold a new Forge tool end-to-end — implementation, registration, permission/risk metadata, sandbox routing, and a unit test.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold a new Forge tool — implementation, registration, permission/risk metadata, sandbox routing, and a unit test. Use when adding anything to src/tools/.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when independently reviewing a research-paper draft before submission, running a mock top-conference panel, assessing readiness or accept/reject risk, or predicting reviewer concerns for venues such as CVPR, ICCV, ECCV, ICLR, NeurIPS, and AAAI. Does not draft or audit author responses after official reviews arrive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when planning, drafting, revising, compressing, or auditing conference rebuttals and author responses in OpenReview Markdown or PDF. Supports exact reviewer mapping, evidence and experiment integration, guided risk decisions, venue-format validation, and blind reviewer/AC audits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft or restructure research-paper sections, refine local prose, and audit manuscript-wide consistency. Use for evidence-grounded academic writing and revision, not independent acceptance-risk review or official rebuttal management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a diff, commit, branch, PR, or implementation for actionable correctness and risk issues without duplicate reviewer loops or invented findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply risk-based test-driven development to bugs, domain logic, state transitions, parsers, contracts, migrations, and behavior where a failing test sharpens the design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify code or product claims after changes using fresh, risk-matched evidence. Use before saying a bug is fixed, tests pass, requirements are met, or a branch is ready.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Summarize meeting notes or transcripts into decisions, action items, owners, risks, and follow-up messages. Use after meetings when raw notes need a clean recap.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。