[Research] Use when you need to review knowledge artifacts for completeness, citation quality, confidence accuracy, and template compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
2,076 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
[Research] Use when you need to review knowledge artifacts for completeness, citation quality, confidence accuracy, and template compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when you need to combine /changes-review + /fix in a recursive loop — each round runs /changes-review (report-only) to surface validated findings over a fixed diff scope, then /fix to resolve them, then loops again with a FRESH full /changes-review over the CHANGED diff until one complete pass produces zero validated findings (nothing left to fix).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies missing information required to complete qualification, segmentation, or outreach preparation. Use when the user provides records and a goal and wants prioritized research gaps with sources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses the quality, composition, and usefulness of a lead list. Use when the user provides a lead list and wants completeness, distribution, quality issues, and recommended next actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or repair a project-local Inspector profile after INSPECTOR_PROFILE_REQUIRED, INSPECTOR_PROFILE_INCOMPLETE, INSPECTOR_PROFILE_INVALID, or PROFILE_AUTHORING_REQUIRED, using Unity component source, custom Inspector evidence, serialized surfaces, and validation diagnostics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master orchestration for repository governance, North Star impact, sub-Star boundaries, and repair-first or evidence-first drift checks. Guides an agent through the complete lifecycle of making architectural decisions, documenting them, writing FAQs, and cleaning up stale plans while adhering strictly to repo ethics and brand tone. Use whenever you need to make a structural change, write an ADR, update the doc lattice, or govern repository architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to create, add, convert, publish, or deploy a blog post from a draft, notes, Markdown, outline, or topic. Turns a draft into a complete, SEO/GEO-optimized post wired into the site (template, blog index, sitemap, routing) with QA and deploy. Framework-agnostic — discover the project's own conventions first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Obtain an independent review of the approach and trade-offs in completed work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
INTERNAL/HELPER skill — do NOT invoke directly from a user query. This is the shared formatter/poster used by create-issue, create-issue-from-issue-number, and update-issue. It formats an implementation-ready GitHub Issue body, runs the pre-posting checklist, executes `gh issue create` or `gh issue edit`, and optionally posts a 確認事項 follow-up comment. Invoke this skill ONLY from one of the three parent skills via the Skill tool, after the parent has completed analysis. If a user asks to 'format an issue body' or similar, route them to the appropriate parent skill (/create-issue, /create-issue-from-issue-number, or /update-issue) rather than invoking this one directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit or update this Windows computer's fixed third-party Codex helper toolchain when the user requests local helper-tool maintenance. Always show the complete registered list and obtain confirmation for each update group; exclude Codex itself and general runtimes unless explicitly added.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mid-run failure recovery for disease-market-sizing-orchestration. Inspects .cache/<slug>/ to determine which phase last completed and which phase to run next. Use when orchestration was interrupted and user wants to continue without restarting from phase 1.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when work produces a deliverable, factual claim, dataset, code change, decision, publication, deployment, automation, or irreversible action whose failure would matter; when the user asks for a quality gate, acceptance criteria, QA, completeness, validation, audit, evidence, preflight, release readiness, or a definition of done; or before claiming completion on medium- or high-risk work. Automatically decide whether a formal gate is warranted, derive task-specific pass/fail criteria, gather evidence, and block unsupported completion. Make sure to use this skill even when the user does not say "quality gate" if consequential work needs acceptance criteria or completion evidence. Skip formal gating for trivial, reversible, low-impact requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GodoMaster — Godot 4.x game development intelligence: GDScript, nodes/scenes, 2D/3D rendering, physics, animation, UI, audio, input, shaders, networking, performance, export, file I/O, testing, localization, AI behavior, asset pipeline, and architecture tooling. Complete workflow for indie and professional game development based on official Godot documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI crawler access analysis. Checks robots.txt, meta tags, and HTTP headers to determine which AI crawlers can access the site. Provides a complete access map and recommendations for maximizing AI visibility while maintaining appropriate control.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack retrospective method for completed workstreams, identifying what worked, what failed, process changes, and role-skill improvements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and implement unit, conformance, integration, timing, boot, trace, video, audio, and regression tests for EMULATORS processors, chips, peripherals, and complete machines. Use when creating a verification strategy for a new emulator, converting hardware documentation into tests, adding diagnostic programs or golden artifacts, measuring behavioral coverage, or proving that components interact correctly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, scaffold, implement, and integrate a complete new emulated computer or console in the EMULATORS repository. Use when Codex creates a new machine, platform, hardware model, or emulator executable; decides which existing CPUs, chips, memory, I/O, video, sound, ROM, and framework classes to reuse or extend; or coordinates several emulator subsystems into a bootable tested system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit packages for documentation completeness, detect drift between code and docs, and maintain documentation quality across the monorepo. Use when checking package docs, running audits, or reviewing documentation health.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verified lookup pack for crouton's schema→CRUD generation domain — the fieldsFile JSON format, the complete field-type catalog with aliases, the naming contract, the exact artifact list one generate run produces, the seed/default-layout pipeline, dialect defaults, and rollback semantics. Use when writing or reviewing a collection schema, when asking "what field types exist / what does `crouton config` actually generate / where did this file name come from / why did I get a pg schema", when a generated file's name or path doesn't match the docs, or when removing/regenerating a collection. Trigger phrases — "what field types are supported", "schema JSON format", "what files does crouton generate", "naming convention for collections", "rollback a collection", "dialect default". The generation WORKFLOW (steps + sign-off gates) lives in the `crouton` skill — this is the reference it doesn't carry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing, editing, debugging, or reviewing dealer language code in btn, dlr, or script files. Provides the complete dealer DSL syntax reference for bridge hand generation constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author a complete both-seats coaching lesson for a BBA-NATIVE bidding scenario and produce all served artifacts in one consistent pass: curate the pool → tokenized coaching-curated/<scn>.pbn → gated promote to served coaching/<scn>.pbn → resolve to South=student coaching-non-rotated/<scn>.pbn (bridge-classroom) → update both toc.json files. Invoke as `/coach-lesson <Scenario>` (e.g. `/coach-lesson Fourth_Suit_Forcing`). Use ONLY for conventions BBA bids natively (its bba/<scn>.pbn [Auction] is the answer key — Basics, New_Minor_Forcing, Fourth_Suit_Forcing). For conventions BBA CANNOT bid (Spiral Raises), use the py/spiral_auction.py substitution path instead — not this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。