「domain」の検索結果

Author and edit Skmtc generators — packages that project an OpenAPI domain model into application code. Method: clone the nearest stock generator, then apply the engine rules imitation can't teach. Assumes zero prior Skmtc knowledge. Use when asked to "write a skmtc generator", "author/clone/customize gen-x", "add a field type", "change export paths", "add enrichment options", or when editing generator source. ALWAYS pair with the target language's skill (skmtc-lang-typescript).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Import cookies from your real browser (Comet, Chrome, Arc, Brave, Edge) into the headless browse session. Opens an interactive picker UI where you select which cookie domains to import. Use before QA testing authenticated pages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent orchestration patterns. Use when multiple independent tasks can run with different domain expertise or when comprehensive analysis requires multiple perspectives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review API DTO implementations for contract/domain separation, mapping patterns, and REST compliance

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert .NET 10 Full-Stack Developer skill. Use this when implementing new features, vertical slices, or modifying existing logic in the JJGNET Broadcasting application. It covers Domain, Data (EF Core), Managers, Api, and Web.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search the web with LLM-optimized results via the Tavily CLI. Use this skill when the user wants to search the web, find articles, look up information, get recent news, discover sources, or says "search for", "find me", "look up", "what's the latest on", "find articles about", or needs current information from the internet. Returns relevant results with content snippets, relevance scores, and metadata optimized for LLM consumption. Supports domain filtering, time ranges, and multiple search depths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qualitative quality review of game design documents — answers "is this design good, and does it follow best practices?" — across all three GDD axes: systems, flows, and content types. Fans out adversarial lenses (completeness, clarity, pillar alignment, systems-math, fantasy-delivery, feasibility, scope) plus domain lenses that check it against the game-design rules, each prompted to find problems rather than validate; produces a severity-graded verdict and a two-bucket report (apply-ready fixes vs research), handed to /unikit-gd-apply or /unikit-gd-explore in one move. Scope is inferred: a named system, flow, or content type reviews that document; "all" runs a cross-document review. Use when the user wants a critique, quality judgment, or rules check of the design, e.g. "review the combat GDD", "review the onboarding flow". This is the subjective quality pass — for a mechanical consistency check (numbers, terms, IDs, references matching the registry) use /unikit-gd-verify.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial project planning workflow. Explores the problem space, drafts tickets in batches, then runs sequential adversarial loops — a mandatory UX loop ("should we build this?"), zero or more discretionary specialist loops (security, performance) for projects with architectural implications in those domains, and a mandatory implementer loop ("could we build this?") — to find gaps before implementation. Creates well-specified, batch-tagged tickets upstream only after every applicable loop signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits project physical structure: file hygiene, ignore file quality, framework convention compliance, domain/layer organization, naming conventions. Stack-adaptive via auto-detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adopt better-result in an existing TypeScript codebase. Use when replacing try/catch, Promise rejection handling, null sentinels, or thrown domain exceptions with typed Result workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures a vague engineering request into a well-scoped task brief before any implementation begins. Use when the user has an engineering goal but the ask is missing which repos are in scope, what "done" means, constraints, or open questions. Triggers on "shape this", "scope this out", "frame this work", "write a brief for", "I want to build" (with unclear scope), or the /shape slash command. Produces a filled task template (multi-repo feature, single-repo change, investigation, or bugfix). Not for already-scoped work — go straight to execution. If the domain is unclear, ask one qualifying question before routing — for marketing intake see marketing-shaper, game-design intake see game-design-shaper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-assembles a domain-specific expert panel (7–10 experts), scores any content or strategy artifact against a typed rubric, and iterates until the aggregate hits 90+ (max 3 rounds). Use as a quality gate on copy, email sequences, landing-page drafts, strategy docs, charts, titles, or recruiting evaluations — or when another skill needs a final review gate on its output. Triggers on "expert panel this", "score this", "rate these variants", "quality check this", "panel review", "expert score", "evaluate this copy/strategy/page". For variant generation and multi-round conversion optimization see autoresearch; for live-URL CRO auditing see conversion-ops; for the scripted content-production pipeline see content-pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opinionated house conventions for NestJS backends — module boundaries and layering, provider wiring and injection scopes, guards/interceptors/pipes/filters, DTOs and validation, domain exceptions, config, and the Nest 11 / Express 5 behaviour that compiles cleanly and fails at runtime. Use whenever the code is NestJS (`@nestjs/*` in package.json, or `@Module`/`@Injectable`/`@Controller`/`@Cron` in the file), including when the question sounds like plain TypeScript, an OOP refactor, a code review, or an ops problem — the Nest-specific answer differs from the generic one. Typical asks: scaffolding a module, adding a controller, provider, or endpoint, wiring an enhancer, a boot-time DI or circular-import failure, a response leaking entity fields despite `@Exclude()`, a cron job firing on every replica, upgrading NestJS, or reviewing a Nest diff. Not for plain Express or Fastify, Angular, frontend, SQL, or CI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply these opinionated TypeScript conventions whenever writing or reviewing TypeScript: branded types for domain modeling, discriminated unions for state, `satisfies` over `as`, const objects instead of enums, type-only imports, and the strict tsconfig baseline beyond `strict: true`. Also use for monorepo project references and incremental build setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design. Use this skill when designing clean architecture for a new microservice, when refactoring a monolith to use bounded contexts, when implementing hexagonal or onion architecture patterns, or when debugging dependency cycles between application layers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discovery, download, and configuration hub for the entire aelf agent skill ecosystem. Use when the user wants to: (1) explore or list available aelf skills, (2) install/bootstrap aelf skills into Cursor, Claude Desktop, OpenClaw, Codex, or Claude Code, (3) route an aelf-related intent to the correct skill, (4) check health or audit installed skills, (5) onboard a new skill into the aelf ecosystem. Covers domains: Portkey CA wallet, Portkey EOA wallet, Awaken DEX, eForest NFT marketplace, AelfScan explorer, TomorrowDAO governance, aelf node interaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A continuously adaptive skill suite that empowers Clawdbot to act as a versatile coder, business analyst, project manager, web developer, data analyst, and NAS metadata scraper. It intelligently discovers free resources, adapts to user context, and ensures reliable, proven guidance across multiple domains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

🛡️ Query AdGuard Home instances for DNS statistics, blocked domains, and client activity 🛡️ 查询 AdGuard Home 实例的 DNS 统计、拦截域名和客户端活动

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "attack Active Directory", "exploit AD", "Kerberoasting", "DCSync", "pass-the-hash", "BloodHound enumeration", "Golden Ticket", "Silver Ticket", "AS-REP roasting", "NTLM relay", or needs guidance on Windows domain penetration testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This is the MistEye security gate skill. It is triggered by pre-installation risk checks (including Skill/MCP dependency manifests), pre-access security checks for domains or URLs, IoC malicious detection, and supply-chain risk blocking, especially for common requests such as "take a look at this address/website." It must use `https://app-api.misteye.io/functions/v1/detect`; in dependency and external-link scenarios it has the highest priority. If the API returns `status="malicious"` or any `matches`, the action must be blocked and explicitly reported as "blocked". Only after the first installation is complete should the user be reminded that daily patrols can be enabled with OpenClaw or Hermes (default once per day).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate SEO research with Ahrefs -- analyze backlink profiles, research keywords, track domain metrics history, audit organic rankings, and perform batch URL analysis through the Composio Ahrefs integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive QA session where user reports bugs or issues conversationally, and the agent files GitHub issues. Explores the codebase in the background for context and domain language. Use when user wants to report bugs, do QA, file issues conversationally, or mentions "QA session".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive guide for creating software diagrams using Mermaid syntax. Use when users need to create, visualize, or document software through diagrams including class diagrams (domain modeling, object-oriented design), sequence diagrams (application flows, API interactions, code execution), flowcharts (processes, algorithms, user journeys), entity relationship diagrams (database schemas), C4 architecture diagrams (system context, containers, components), state diagrams, git graphs, pie charts, gantt charts, or any other diagram type. Triggers include requests to "diagram", "visualize", "model", "map out", "show the flow", or when explaining system architecture, database design, code structure, or user/application flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。