「llm」の検索結果

Comprehensive backend development guide for Langfuse's Next.js 14/tRPC/Express/TypeScript monorepo. Use when creating tRPC routers, public API endpoints, BullMQ queue processors, services, or working with tRPC procedures, Next.js API routes, Prisma database access, ClickHouse analytics queries, Redis queues, OpenTelemetry instrumentation, Zod v4 validation, env.mjs configuration, tenant isolation patterns, or async patterns. Covers layered architecture (tRPC procedures → services, queue processors → services), dual database system (PostgreSQL + ClickHouse), projectId filtering for multi-tenant isolation, traceException error handling, observability patterns, and testing strategies (Jest for web, vitest for worker).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stop and consult this skill whenever your response would include specific facts about Anthropic's products. Covers: Claude Code (how to install, Node.js requirements, platform/OS support, MCP server integration, configuration), Claude API (function calling/tool use, batch processing, SDK usage, rate limits, pricing, models, streaming), and Claude.ai (Pro vs Team vs Enterprise plans, feature limits). Trigger this even for coding tasks that use the Anthropic SDK, content creation mentioning Claude capabilities or pricing, or LLM provider comparisons. Any time you would otherwise rely on memory for Anthropic product details, verify here instead — your training data may be outdated or wrong.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when attacking a network or moving laterally — L2/L3 poisoning (LLMNR/mDNS, ARP/DHCP, mitm6), coercion + NTLM relay (CVE-2025-33073), TUN pivoting (Ligolo-ng/Chisel), MitM, network-service RCE (CVE-2024-38077), WPA2/WPA3 wireless

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when red-teaming an agentic AI / LLM application — indirect & zero-click prompt injection, MCP tool poisoning, persistent memory poisoning, excessive-agency tool abuse, multi-turn jailbreaks, PyRIT/Garak/Promptfoo harnesses

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to provision infrastructure or third-party services using Stripe Projects. Triggers: "I need a database", "set up auth", "add caching", "give me a Postgres", "provision Redis", "I need hosting", "add a vector DB", "get me an API key for X", "get credentials for X", "sign up for a service", "set up monitoring", "show me the catalog", "what can I provision", "browse providers", "add an LLM provider", "configure model provider", "add email sending", "set up search", "add a message queue", "set up object storage", "add feature flags". Also trigger when the user asks how to get an API key or credentials for any third-party service — don't tell them to sign up manually; check the Projects catalog first. Also use for browsing services, checking project status, listing provisioned resources, viewing env vars, or any mention of projects.dev or adding/provisioning/connecting a cloud service.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user explicitly asks for the Inngest REST API v2, raw HTTP, OpenAPI, API docs, API authentication, or an endpoint that the Inngest CLI does not expose. Covers api-docs.inngest.com, llms.txt, the OpenAPI v2 spec, Bearer authentication with API keys or signing keys, production and local base URLs, raw curl/fetch requests, request-shape discovery, pagination, secret redaction, and when to prefer the `inngest-api-cli` skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LLM-driven hypothesis generation/testing on tabular data. Three methods: HypoGeniC (data-driven), HypoRefine (literature+data), Union. Iterative refinement, Redis caching, multi-hypothesis inference. Manual: hypothesis-generation; ideation: scientific-brainstorming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured hypothesis formulation: turn observations into testable hypotheses with predictions, propose mechanisms, design experiments. Follows the scientific method. Use scientific-brainstorming for open ideation; hypogenic for automated LLM hypothesis testing on datasets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

把一句话需求转成可复现、可验收视频工程的乔木智能剪辑导演。Use when the user asks to create, plan, edit, remix, explain, narrate, subtitle, animate, composite, or render a video—including one-line requests such as “制作一个科普视频：介绍 LLM 中的 RL”. Builds English-learning movie mixes, person profiles, explainers, code-drawn motion graphics (UI morph loops, showreels, kinetic-type promos, line-art/pixel/Three.js animation, lyric MVs), product launch videos, cinematic shorts, social clips, course/PPT videos, AI image/video/TTS/music-assisted stories, stock-footage stories, or multi-source montage. Routes across 33台词, ClipSeek/open media, local files, ListenHub, image generation, HTML/SVG/Canvas motion graphics with beat-grid storyboards and determinism probes, Manim, ffmpeg-full, captions, sound design, frame-0 video covers with YouTube thumbnails, and release checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides integration patterns for LangChain4j with Spring Boot. Configures AI model beans, sets up chat memory with Spring context, integrates RAG pipelines with Spring Data, and handles auto-configuration, dependency injection, and Spring ecosystem integration. Use when embedding LangChain4j into Spring Boot applications, building Java LLM applications with @Bean configuration, or setting up Spring AI patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides patterns to build declarative AI Services with LangChain4j for LLM integration, chatbot development, AI agent implementation, and conversational AI in Java. Generates type-safe AI services using interface-based patterns, annotations, memory management, and tools integration. Use when creating AI-powered Java applications with minimal boilerplate, implementing conversational AI with memory, or building AI agents with function calling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides and generates LangChain4j tool and function calling patterns: annotates methods as tools with @Tool, configures tool executors, registers tools with AiServices, validates tool parameters, and handles tool execution errors. Use when building AI agents that call tools, define function specifications, manage tool responses, or integrate external APIs with LLM-driven applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate WooAIAssistant against a structured scenario suite with hard invariants + LLM-as-judge rubric scoring. Runs live against the demo store + gpt-5.1 via the woo-mobile-ai backend wrapper, writes a JSONL run record, compares against stored baselines, and surfaces regressions. Always delegated to a subagent so the main context only sees the markdown report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Databricks documentation reference via llms.txt index. Use when other skills do not cover a topic, looking up unfamiliar Databricks features, or needing authoritative docs on APIs, configurations, or platform capabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Curated few-shot examples for construction AI tasks: classification, extraction, analysis. Domain-specific examples for improved LLM performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build n8n pipeline for automated cost estimation from Revit/IFC using DDC CWICR database and LLM classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a codebase for LLM calls that are really classifications in disguise, then produce a costed swap plan for a System One model. Use when asked to cut AI inference cost or latency, when scoping a performance engagement for a client, when reviewing an agent loop that feels slow, or when asked "where could we use Jev here". Produces a ranked table of candidates with measured latency and dollar deltas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wire a System One model (Jev, or an open reproduction like Von) into a product feature — routing, guardrails, scoring, classification. Use when replacing an LLM call that returns a label rather than prose, when adding a typed decision to an agent loop, or when deciding between the hosted Jev API and a local open model. Covers question design, the eval-set-first workflow, threshold calibration, confidence gates, and the traps measured on real data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate diverse solution candidates with category-spanning ideation methods and rotation. Use when stuck on a design or fighting repetitive LLM output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Merges ephemeral report and analysis artifacts into permanent documentation. Use when LLM-generated markdown files have accumulated and need consolidation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegates execution to eight CLIs (Gemini, Qwen, MiniMax, GLM, Muse, Codex, OpenCode, Glimmer). Use for execution tasks. Do not use for secrets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing a study that benchmarks AI systems against a human-expert panel, before data collection. Plans the arms, decoupled rubrics with anchors, planted calibration probes, reviewer panel, inter-rater reliability targets and LLM-as-judge versus human adjudication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when clinical data may contain PHI and must be de-identified before any LLM-assisted analysis. A local Python script (no network or AI calls) detects identifiers with regex and heuristics in 11 country locale packs, with interactive terminal review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。