「question」の検索結果

Guide a researcher step by step into an unfamiliar research field, or decode a paper, abstract, figure caption, or referee comment they cannot parse. Builds understanding in rungs (motivation, vocabulary, core framework, methods, frontier), anchored to what the user already knows, with a checkpoint before each advance. Use when the user says they are new to a field, asks what a research area or method is, says an explanation was too technical, asks to be walked through something step by step, asks for a reading path, or supplies dense research text. Trigger even when the user only names an unfamiliar field or pastes an abstract without asking to be taught. Do not trigger for a one-line summary, a short overview request, or a direct factual answer; do not use it for translation, editing, search, debugging, or specialist questions inside the user's own field. Also trigger in other languages, including Chinese such as 入门, 一步一步讲, 看不懂, 这篇论文讲什么, 帮我理解这个领域.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and spec an analytical dashboard — define the question each chart answers, write the SQL queries, spec the layout and refresh cadence. Produces a complete dashboard spec ready to implement. Use when asked to "build a dashboard", "analytics dashboard", "BI dashboard", "weekly product health", or "visualize this data".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer a "how do I …" question about the platform with a Gherkin scenario on @datagrok-libraries/bdd that is filmed into a how-to video (grok-bdd guide), so the answer is demonstrated, sent as a video plus numbered steps, and kept as a regression test; the same scenarios, filmed in help mode, are the GIFs of the help pages

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Script the first 1-3 second TikTok hook: the spoken line, the on-screen text, and the opening visual firing at once so the viewer cannot swipe. Picks a 2026 hook formula (cold-open result, pattern interrupt, number reveal, open-loop question, relatable call-out, story) by goal of completion, saves, comments, or shares. The single biggest retention lever on TikTok. Use to script a hook from a video idea. Not for the caption (use tt-caption-writer) or scrubbing a script (use tt-humanizer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post a question to Slack and wait for a reply, or post a reply into a thread using scripts/slack.py.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts a systematic related-work / literature-survey / state-of-the-art review for a research question by defining survey dimensions, searching each axis, building a taxonomy of prior work, identifying the gap, and producing a positioning narrative for a paper's Related Work section. Goes beyond a flat paper list to deliver structured analysis. Use when the user is starting a new research project and needs to map the landscape, asks "what's been done on X?" or "how does my idea compare to existing work?", needs to write or revise a Related Work / Background / Prior Art section, wants to identify a research gap or position their contribution, or asks to build a taxonomy of approaches in a research area.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A survey of the best-known active scientific controversies in nutrition — saturated fat and cardiovascular disease, dietary cholesterol, low-carb vs low-fat, ultra-processed foods, red meat and cancer, salt and blood pressure, and the replication status of popular single-nutrient claims. Use when a question asks whether a widely reported nutritional claim is settled, or when the department needs to distinguish "contested but plausible" from "settled" from "disproven."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Biochemical metabolism of macronutrients and key micronutrients — digestion, absorption, transport, utilization, and excretion — with emphasis on the pathways that matter for dietary-guideline debates (insulin response, lipoprotein metabolism, one-carbon metabolism, iron homeostasis). Use when a question asks what happens biochemically to a food after it is eaten, or when a claim about "metabolic effect" needs to be tested against mechanism.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How nutrition science becomes dietary guidance, and how industry, agriculture, and politics shape that process. Covers the US Dietary Guidelines cycle, food labeling, WIC and SNAP, commodity subsidies, and the documented history of industry influence on research and recommendations. Use when a question asks why a guideline says what it says, how a recommendation got written, or whether an industry-funded study should be trusted.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The discipline of keeping a field notebook — words, pictures, numbers, metadata, and questions captured during sustained outdoor observation. Covers the Laws notebook method, the sit-spot practice, phenology recording, sketch-first-name-later discipline, and the long-term research value of accumulated journals. Use when the task is to teach or structure ongoing field observation rather than answer a one-shot identification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Foundational concepts in nutrition science — macronutrients, micronutrients, energy balance, Atwater factors, reference intakes (DRI/RDA/AI/UL), food composition tables, and the methods of human nutrition research. Grounds the rest of the department in a shared vocabulary and in the measurement limits of the field, including controlled-trial history, observational-study limits, and the biochemical basis for calorie accounting. Use when a question asks what something "is" nutritionally, how energy and nutrients are measured, or what the reference numbers mean.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The pedagogy of feeding — how to talk about food with children, what the Division of Responsibility model says, age-appropriate autonomy in eating, how to handle picky eating without creating disordered eating, and how to teach nutrition concepts to learners at different levels without either moralizing or oversimplifying. Use when a question is about raising, teaching, or advising a child or learner on eating, or when planning curriculum or parent guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Yoga practice with an emphasis on alignment, props, and staged progression as the Iyengar lineage teaches it, alongside enough context about the broader lineage landscape (Krishnamacharya's three students, modern Hatha, Ashtanga vinyasa, restorative, Yin, and chair yoga) that a routing agent can place a user correctly before giving instruction. Covers asana families, alignment heuristics, prop use, sequencing, and the non-negotiable injury-prevention rules. Use for any query about yoga postures, home practice design, teacher-training-level questions, or whether a given pose is safe for a given body.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Traditional Chinese internal arts — tai chi chuan and qigong — as transmitted by classical lineages (Chen, Yang, Wu, Wu/Hao, Sun for tai chi; Ba Duan Jin, Yi Jin Jing, Liu Zi Jue, Wu Qin Xi, and other named sets for qigong) with an emphasis on alignment, rooted stance, breath-posture-mind coordination (the three harmonies), and the traditional lineage voice that Dr. Yang Jwing-Ming's YMAA line preserves. Also covers the safety boundary between traditional practice and clinical "medical qigong" claims. Use for queries about tai chi form learning, qigong set selection, internal-arts pedagogy, and the practical question of where to start.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The logical structure of mathematical proof -- how first-order logic, natural deduction, and semantic reasoning combine to produce rigorous mathematical arguments. Covers the logical skeleton of direct proof, contraposition, contradiction, cases, and induction; the role of definitions, lemmas, and theorems; how informal mathematical prose maps to formal deductive structure; and the difference between proof-as-object and proof-as-activity. Use when the question is "why is this a valid proof?" rather than "what proof technique applies?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meta-cognitive and practical strategies for learning any language -- learner autonomy, goal setting, strategy taxonomy (Oxford's SILL framework), memory strategies, cognitive strategies (note-taking, summarizing, analyzing, reasoning), compensation strategies, metacognitive strategies (planning, monitoring, evaluating), affective strategies (managing anxiety, self-encouragement), social strategies (collaboration, questioning, empathy), immersion design, study habit optimization, plateau diagnosis, and motivation maintenance. Use when designing a language learning plan, diagnosing a learner's stuck points, selecting study methods, or building self-directed learning skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measurement techniques for identifying composition, microstructure, and properties of engineering materials — optical and electron microscopy, x-ray diffraction, EDS and WDS spectroscopy, thermal analysis, mechanical testing, and fractography. Covers when to use which technique, sample-preparation pitfalls, and how to build a characterization plan that answers a specific engineering question rather than accumulating data for its own sake.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The fifteen fundamental cooking techniques that together cover most home kitchen work. Organized by the transformation they perform (heat transfer, water management, emulsion, ferment, cut) rather than by cuisine. Covers knife work, sauté, sear, braise, roast, poach, boil, steam, grill, bake, stew, reduce, deglaze, emulsify, and pickle/ferment, each with the physics, the signal, the common failure, and a diagnostic question. Use when teaching a cook, substituting a technique, or diagnosing why a dish failed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Earth systems science covering plate tectonics, landforms, erosion, biomes, hydrosphere, atmospheric circulation, and the interactions among lithosphere, hydrosphere, atmosphere, and biosphere. Provides frameworks for analyzing how physical processes shape landscapes over geological and human timescales. Use when reasoning about landforms, natural hazards, climate patterns, ocean currents, biogeography, or any question about how Earth's physical systems operate and interact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deductive and inductive reasoning, formal and informal logical structure, validity, soundness, and rules of inference. Covers propositional logic, quantified reasoning, syllogisms, common inference patterns (modus ponens, modus tollens, hypothetical syllogism, disjunctive syllogism), and the distinction between deductive certainty and inductive probability. Use when the question is not whether a premise is true but whether the reasoning from premises to conclusion is logically valid.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluating the quality, provenance, and relevance of evidence that supports or undermines a claim. Covers source credibility, sampling quality, study design, levels of evidence (anecdote to meta-analysis), base rate integration, distinguishing primary from secondary sources, and calibrating belief to evidence strength. Use when the question is not whether an argument is valid but whether its premises are actually supported by the available data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understanding how algorithmic systems shape what users see, know, and do -- from recommendation feeds to search ranking to credit scoring to hiring software. Covers the mechanics of recommendation systems, algorithmic bias and its sources, personalization's effects on information diets, opacity and accountability, AI limitations (hallucination, confident wrongness), and the human-in-the-loop question. Use when a learner needs to think critically about why particular content reached them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Active listening techniques for effective communication. Covers attending behaviors, paraphrasing, reflective listening, clarifying questions, empathic response, barriers to listening, listening in conflict, and cross-cultural listening. Use when building listening skills, improving understanding in conversation, mediating disputes, or analyzing communication breakdowns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run this appropriateness check the moment you are about to integrate a retrieved long-term memory — a Grove content-addressed hit, a chroma/pgvector neighbour, a memory-consolidation digest, or a MEMORY.md line — into a response, especially anything touching private origins, Fox Companies IP, credentials, or Center Camp / consent-governed content. It answers a question intent-router never asks: not WHAT to fetch or HOW, but WHETHER a correctly-retrieved item should reach output. Relevance is not appropriateness — a perfect similarity match can still be a boundary violation. Default is FAIL-CLOSED: if in-context authorization is uncertain, the memory may inform behaviour but must not be surfaced. Backed by RBI-Eval (arxiv 2606.06055v1). Triggers on surfacing recalled sensitive memory into a response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。