rename
無料Manually-invoked skill that renames the current thread or session to 2-5 lowercase descriptive words. Use when the user says "rename", "rename this", "rename thread", or "rename session".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
5,811 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Manually-invoked skill that renames the current thread or session to 2-5 lowercase descriptive words. Use when the user says "rename", "rename this", "rename thread", or "rename session".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive guide for AntV L7 geospatial visualization library. Use when users need to: (1) Create interactive maps with WebGL rendering (2) Visualize geographic data (points, lines, polygons, heatmaps) (3) Build location-based data dashboards (4) Add map layers, interactions, or animations (5) Process and display GeoJSON, CSV, or other spatial data (6) Integrate maps with AMap (GaodeMap), Mapbox, Maplibre, or standalone L7 Map (7) Optimize performance for large-scale geographic datasets
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinate Lark/Feishu CLI tasks from Codex. Use when a request involves Feishu/Lark docs, wiki, Drive files, Sheets, Base, Calendar, Minutes, IM, Mail, Tasks, Contacts, Slides, whiteboards, approvals, attendance, or when a Lark URL/token must be read, edited, summarized, routed, or turned into a real work artifact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a git diff or explicit file scope for reuse, code quality, efficiency, clarity, and standards issues, then optionally apply safe Codex-driven fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify code", "review changed code", "check for code reuse", "review code quality", "review efficiency", "simplify changes", "clean up code", "refactor changes", or "run simplify".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Show results as interactive UI inside Codeg's chat (cards, tables, charts, tabs, accordions, badges, progress bars, simple forms) by writing a json-render spec code block in your reply. Use when the user invokes this skill or asks to see something as a card, table, chart, dashboard or other visual layout in Codeg.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a read-only preview for a specified Marin infra/pulumi stack and trace each pending resource change to merged pull requests since its latest successful update when that update records a clean Git checkout. Use when a stack has unapplied changes or drift and someone needs to know which PRs explain the preview.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage Google Ads — performance, keywords, bids, budgets, negatives, campaigns, ads, search terms, QS, location targeting, bulk operations, experiments, asset management, portfolio bidding, offline conversions. Use for any mention of Google Ads, CPA, ROAS, ad spend, or campaign settings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full SEO audit combining Google Search Console, URL Inspection API, PageSpeed Insights, a technical crawl, keyword research, and metadata, schema, search intent and Core Web Vitals checks. Surfaces quick wins, diagnoses traffic drops and content gaps, and produces an actionable 30-day plan. Use whenever the user asks about SEO, search rankings, organic traffic, Google Search Console, keyword performance, search visibility, technical SEO, URL indexing, or LCP, INP, CLS or Lighthouse scores. Also trigger on: "why is my traffic down", "what keywords am I ranking for", "improve my rankings", "check my search console", "SEO audit", "analyze my SEO", "technical SEO", "meta tags", "indexing issues", "crawl errors", "content strategy", "keyword cannibalization", "search intent", "schema markup", "structured data", "URL inspection", "page speed", "performance score", "core web vitals", "lighthouse", or any organic search question. If in doubt, trigger.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a read-only, evidence-based paid-media performance review across connected platforms or supplied exports. Use for weekly or monthly reports, scorecards, performance, CPA, ROAS, CTR, spend trends, pacing, or conversion-tracking health.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize title tags, meta descriptions, Open Graph, and Twitter cards for maximum click-through rate. Generates multiple A/B test variations with character counting and SERP preview. Use when asked to "optimize title tag", "write meta description", "improve CTR", "Open Graph tags", "fix my meta tags", "social media preview", "my click rate is low", "title optimization", or any meta tag task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ACTIVATES ONLY on an explicit user request for the ulw-plan workflow: the user themselves saying ulw-plan, ulw plan, /skill:ulw-plan, or asking in their own words for a work plan before coding. NEVER self-activates: a bare ulw/ultrawork run, an agent-side routing decision, or reading this file is not a request, and the plan-gated reviewers (metis/momus) stay locked without a user request plus a written .omo/plans plan file. Explore-first planning consultant (Prometheus) that grounds in the codebase, asks only the forks exploration cannot resolve - or researches them to best practice when the intent is fuzzy - waits for explicit approval, then writes ONE decision-complete work plan a worker executes with zero further interview. Triggers: ulw-plan, ulw plan, plan this, make a plan, plan before coding, interview me, break this down, start planning, plan mode.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Domain routing and boundary guidance for authorized subdomain takeover testing, including dangling CNAME records, NS takeover, and cloud service takeover paths such as S3, Azure, and Heroku. Use when a task belongs to the subdomain takeover domain and needs scope, evidence, pivot, or exit criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or update project governing principles and development guidelines. Use at project start to establish code quality, testing standards, and architectural constraints that guide all development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured clarification workflow for underspecified requirements. Use before planning to resolve ambiguities through coverage-based questioning. Records answers in spec clarifications section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write research/technical reports with strong structure + figure standards. Supports Markdown/HTML/PDF outputs (Quarto optional), executive summary, methods, results, discussion, and reproducibility appendix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive healthcare AI toolkit for developing, testing, and deploying machine learning models with clinical data. This skill should be used when working with electronic health records (EHR), clinical prediction tasks (mortality, readmission, drug recommendation), medical coding systems (ICD, NDC, ATC), physiological signals (EEG, ECG), healthcare datasets (MIMIC-III/IV, eICU, OMOP), or implementing deep learning models for healthcare applications (RETAIN, SafeDrug, Transformer, GNN).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive scientific and statistical data visualization library for Python. Use when creating charts, plots, or visualizations including scatter plots, line charts, bar charts, heatmaps, 3D plots, geographic maps, statistical distributions, financial charts, and dashboards. Supports both quick visualizations (Plotly Express) and fine-grained customization (graph objects). Outputs interactive HTML or static images (PNG, PDF, SVG).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prowler documentation style guide and writing standards. Trigger: When writing documentation for Prowler features, tutorials, or guides.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality. Industry standard from BigCode Project used by HuggingFace leaderboards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate outliers, rare events, spikes, and suspicious records in datasets. Use as an explicit anomaly-analysis helper when you want concrete anomaly-detection workflow guidance, not generic data validation or end-to-end ML ownership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create analytical charts and plots from existing data. Use for exploratory or reporting visuals such as bars, lines, scatters, and dashboards; not for publication-grade scientific figures or AI-generated schematics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain the current subject in HTML with large visuals and minimal text while preserving key details.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。