「research」の検索結果

Publish finished creatives as live Meta (Facebook/Instagram) ads via the Meta Marketing API, plus research and ad-copy support. Uploads an image or video, builds a multi-variant creative (5 bodies / 5 titles / 3 descriptions in an asset feed), and creates a PAUSED ad in an existing ad set. Also pulls top-performing ads (ranked by ROAS) and competitor ads from the Ad Library to inform copy. Use when the user asks to deploy / publish / launch a creative as a Meta or Facebook ad, build a Meta ad, push a video or image into an ad set, pull their top ads, or research competitor ads. Not for generating creative (use the image/video skills) and not for writing ad-table rows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end AI website generation pipeline. Claude Opus 4.8 emits Bolt-style <boltArtifact> envelopes (multi-file, plan-first) that customize Vite+React+Tailwind templates from pre-researched business data. Pre-research via APIs, media acquisition, brand extraction, visual inspection via GPT Image 2 vision, R2 upload (per-file content-type by extension), D1 status updates. Supports all business types: SaaS, portfolio, non-profit, restaurant, salon, medical, legal, retail, tech.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research what people have discussed in the last 30 days across high-signal public platforms. Use when the user asks for `/last30days`, recent trend research, competitive intelligence, market pulse briefs, or engagement-ranked synthesis from Reddit, Hacker News, GitHub, X, YouTube, Polymarket, and similar sources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Broad, pre-curation evidence reconnaissance for a declared Gaia skill, intake batch, upstream repository, or proposed generic capability. Run before choosing a discovery strategy or mapping topology, to give the curator independent research leads and counterevidence. Context only: never scores, grades, ratifies, ingests, or mutates the registry. Later ev-discovery and ev-pipeline phases validate/promote any selected leads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research and populate tracked stablecoin compliance sidecars for the U.S. GENIUS Act, EU MiCA, or both. Use when adding or auditing authorization, applicability, pathway, or disclosure evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research stablecoin reserve composition, review provenance, custody evidence, dependency edges, and backing-pillar slices; populate the owning reserves sidecar only when explicitly requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage the Gaia issue backlog and skill-batch intake queue. Use this skill when someone asks to: "triage issues", "clean up the issue tracker", "review the backlog", "close stale issues", "process the intake queue", "review skill-batches", "evaluate draft skill proposals", "approve or reject pending skills", "is this issue still valid?", "what's clogging the backlog?", "run a triage pass", or /gaia-triage. Covers two workstreams: (1) GitHub issue lifecycle — identifying resolved, stale, or need-more-info issues and acting on them via gh CLI; (2) skill-batch intake — evaluating draft proposals in registry-for-review/skill-batches/ and routing them toward promotion or rejection. This is the gatekeeping step before new skills enter the canonical registry; and (3) a cross-repo triage sweep — sizing, P0-P4 prioritization, umbrella/epic synthesis, and assignment across every gaia-research org repo, on the one headquarters tracker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fuse all of a contributor's named skills into a single fusion node (suite capstone) in the registry. Use when the user says "fuse <contributor>'s skills", "create a suite for <contributor>", "build a capstone for <user>", "fuse all of <user>'s named skills", "create a suite fusion", "consolidate <contributor> into one skill", or explicitly types /gaia-fuse-full-suite. Also triggers when a contributor has accumulated 3+ named skills and the user asks what to do next with them, or when someone asks "can we make a suite from these?". This skill: collects component IDs from registry/named/<contributor>/, verifies nodes exist, researches evidence and appraises Trust Magnitude, runs `gaia dev fuse` to write the fusion node and suite manifest, validates, and opens a PR on a review/meta/ branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research libraries and APIs automatically by pulling live documentation into the agent's context before answering. Use when writing code against unfamiliar or fast-moving libraries so examples match current versions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Marketing analytics and data-driven optimization for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when analyzing marketing performance, optimizing conversion rates, running A/B tests, conducting customer research, creating marketing dashboards, building attribution models, analyzing funnel metrics, or storytelling with data. Also triggers on: marketing ops, performance analytics, CRO, A/B testing, data storytelling, customer insights, tracking plan, event taxonomy, UTM taxonomy, GA4 audit, consent mode, instrumentation contract, sample size calculation, minimum detectable effect, test duration, not enough traffic to A/B test, statistical significance, Bayesian vs frequentist, sample ratio mismatch, experiment feasibility, martech stack, marketing tech stack audit, tool consolidation, build vs buy, vendor evaluation, shadow IT tools, ESP/CRM/platform migration, switching cost, cutover plan, suppression list migration, data portability, customer interviews, survey design, sampling frame, non-response bias, how many people should I interview, thematic saturation, voice of customer, jobs-to-be-done, buyer persona research, is this finding real, data enrichment, which enrichment provider should we buy, waterfall enrichment, contact data quality, match rate, our list data is bad, email verification, catch-all domain, accept-all, bounce rate from bad data, B2B data decay, how often should we re-verify contacts, ZoomInfo vs Apollo vs Clearbit evaluation, cost per usable record, where did this list come from, GDPR Article 14 notice, purchased list compliance, suppression screening, TAM list building, demand planning, marketing plan, how many leads do we need, what pipeline target should marketing carry, funnel model, top-down vs bottom-up plan, plan of record, annual marketing planning, quarterly planning, pipeline coverage we have to create, sales cycle lag, our leads cannot close this quarter, carry-in pipeline, scenario planning, conservative moderate aggressive forecast, stretch target, reforecast, re-forecast triggers, assumption register, capacity ceiling, addressable audience ceiling, marginal cost per lead, blended CPL is wrong, we missed plan and nobody knows why, AI policy for the marketing team, AI governance, AI acceptable use policy, which AI tools are we allowed to use, can I paste customer data into ChatGPT, shadow AI, AI use register, human review of AI output, when can we stop reviewing every AI draft, can the agent send on its own, the AI made a mistake now what, pull back AI autonomy, AI evals, our AI vendor changed the model, AI output went out wrong, prompt injection, can our AI read prospect replies safely, lethal trifecta, the AI leaked internal notes, turn off auto-generated ad assets, auto-applied recommendations, AI literacy training, EU AI Act Article 4, duplicate records in the CRM, dedupe before import, which value wins in a merge, CRM cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end SEO operations for B2B SaaS organic visibility. Use this skill when you need keyword research, technical SEO audits, content optimization, link building strategy, international expansion, AI/AEO optimization, schema markup, Core Web Vitals improvements, and organic traffic growth planning. Also triggers on: SEO, keyword research, can we rank for this keyword, which keywords are actually worth it, qualify these keywords, check the SERPs, keyword shortlist, too many keywords, technical SEO, link building, content optimization, international SEO, hreflang, x-default, multilingual site, translated pages not ranking, our German site gets no traffic, language switcher, auto-redirect by country, machine translation SEO, content parity, ccTLD vs subfolder, AI search, AEO, GEO, Core Web Vitals, schema markup, organic traffic, G2 listing, Capterra, TrustRadius, review-platform category page, best software roundup, listicle placement, directory submissions, do we need a Google Business Profile in [country], local SEO with no office, Google Business Profile eligibility, virtual office address SEO, coworking address business profile, business profile suspended, NAP consistency, local citations for SaaS, LocalBusiness schema, server log analysis, log file analysis, what is Googlebot crawling, is Googlebot hitting errors, verify Googlebot, fake Googlebot, crawl budget, do we have a crawl budget problem, Crawl Stats report, new pages not getting crawled.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold a PhysicsIntern research workspace in the current folder. Run only when the user explicitly invokes it to set up a new physics/maths research workspace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a topic and save findings to vault

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect to and query WRDS (Wharton Research Data Services) from any research project. Use this skill whenever the user needs to download, query, or explore data from WRDS — including Compustat, CRSP, FactSet, I/B/E/S, or any other WRDS-hosted database. Also trigger when the user mentions WRDS tables, WRDS libraries, or wants to look up variable definitions or coverage in WRDS datasets. Do NOT trigger for general SQL or database questions unrelated to WRDS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build Opportunity Solution Trees using Teresa Torres' framework for structured product discovery. Use this skill when: - You need to map a desired outcome to opportunities, solutions, and experiments - You want to decide WHAT to build next based on user research and discovery data - You have workshop findings, pilot feedback, or user research to structure into actionable options - You need a visual tree diagram showing the path from outcome to testable experiments

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and maintain the shared knowledge/ context files that every other marketing skill reads - brand voice, ICP personas, positioning, KPIs, and the learnings log. Run this once per company or client before using any other marketing skill. Use when the user says "set up brand context", "onboard my brand", "set up the marketing knowledge base", "the skills don't know my brand", "update our positioning", "our voice has changed", "add a new persona", or when any marketing skill reports that a knowledge/ file is missing. Also use when output sounds generic or off-brand. For writing a positioning statement as a standalone document, see positioning-doc. For deep persona research from raw sources, see customer-research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn raw customer material into evidence-backed personas and verbatim voice-of-customer language. Two modes - analyse sources the user already has (call transcripts, support tickets, survey responses, sales notes, reviews), or source new material from public places customers actually talk. Produces quoted pains, objections, and switch triggers that other skills consume, never invented ones. Use when the user says "customer research", "voice of customer", "what do our customers actually say", "we need real quotes", "analyse these call transcripts", "read our support tickets", "build a persona from data", "find what customers complain about", or when a persona is marked provisional. For structuring the finished persona into the knowledge base, see brand-context. For the JTBD persona template itself, see customer-persona.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Clinical Research Coordinator — managing patient recruitment/enrollment against a trial's screen-fail rate, handling a protocol deviation, tracking informed consent and regulatory documentation, or coordinating a multi-visit study schedule against patient retention risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Computer and Information Research Scientist — designing an ablation to attribute an empirical gain, budgeting an NSF CISE proposal against page and content limits, deciding what reproducibility artifacts to release with a paper, screening a draft for mathiness or terminology misuse, or scoping the consent/ethics review needed before running an experiment on real users.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use ENCODE functional genomics data for disease mechanism research. Use when the user wants to connect GWAS variants to regulatory elements, annotate disease-associated loci with functional data, identify therapeutic targets from epigenomic data, build disease regulatory models, cross-reference with clinical trials and drug databases, or conduct any disease-focused, pathology-driven, or clinical variant interpretation workflow. Covers the full pipeline from disease-tissue mapping through GWAS variant annotation, heritability enrichment, cancer epigenomics, drug target identification, and clinical trial cross-referencing. Integrates ENCODE with Open Targets, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and bioRxiv.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-first academic research workflow for topic ideation, scholarly search, paper reading, literature and systematic reviews, study and experiment design, statistics and data analysis, scientific figures, manuscript drafting and polishing, citation checks, peer review, rebuttals, submission packages, theses, and paper-to-presentation work. Use when an agent must plan, execute, audit, write, revise, or package research while keeping claims traceable to verified sources, data, analysis, or official requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Thorough, consistently formatted competitor and product research. Produces a structured "About" doc, a "Recent News" log, and a row in a tracking spreadsheet. Use whenever the user researches a company or competitor, builds or updates a competitor doc, compares products, or logs a competitor to the tracker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit research data management infrastructure -- score FAIR principles compliance (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) across all sub-principles, evaluate data governance frameworks and lifecycle management, assess metadata schema quality (Dublin Core, DataCite, DDI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run multi-source web research with adversarial verification and produce a cited report: decomposes the question into 3-6 distinct queries (broad, specific, comparative, recency-anchored), searches and ranks sources by authority, recency, and specificity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。