「code mode」の検索結果

Writes, debugs, and refactors JavaScript code using modern ES2023+ features, async/await patterns, ESM module systems, and Node.js APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds Python 3.11+ applications with type safety, async programming, robust error handling, mypy strict mode, pytest suites, and code validation with black and ruff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

World-class prompt powerhouse that generates production-ready mega-prompts for any role, industry, and task through intelligent 7-question flow, 69 comprehensive presets across 15 professional domains (technical, business, creative, legal, finance, HR, design, customer, executive, manufacturing, R&D, regulatory, specialized-technical, research, creative-media), multiple output formats (XML/Claude/ChatGPT/Gemini), quality validation gates, and contextual best practices from OpenAI/Anthropic/Google. Supports both core and advanced modes with testing scenarios and prompt variations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when authoring a Relayflows flow (@relayflows/surface / @relayflows/sdk, the journal-based v2 engine — the CLI is `flows`, package versions 2.0.x) in TypeScript or YAML/JSON. Covers the three-rung ladder (run/llm/agent), the resident verbs (human/dispatch/done), verification gates, TypeScript vs YAML authoring, per-step cli/model selection and its resolution order, flows.json, and `flows check`/`run`/`resume` with their real refusal shapes and exit codes. Not for the older, unrelated `@relayflows/core` WorkflowBuilder engine (`.pattern('dag')`/.agent()/.step() chains) that `writing-agent-relay-workflows` and `migrating-persona-to-relayflow` cover — that's a different product despite the similar name.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating or improving Claude Code agents. Expert guidance on agent file structure, frontmatter, persona definition, tool access, model selection, and validation against schema.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect whether an API endpoint is backed by genuine Claude (not a wrapper, proxy, or impersonator) using 9 weighted rule-based checks that mirror the claude-verify project. Also extracts injected system prompts from providers that override Claude's identity. Fully self-contained — copy the code below and run, no extra packages beyond httpx. Use when the user wants to verify a Claude API key or endpoint, check if a third-party Claude service is authentic, audit API providers for Claude authenticity, test multiple models in parallel, or discover what system prompt a provider has injected.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brief statutes and legislative Acts using the MAPS + RULES framework. Use when briefing statutes, analyzing legislative text, mapping statutory structure, extracting rule-modules from provisions, applying statutes to scenarios, or any statutory analysis task. Triggers include "brief this statute," "analyze this Act," "map the statute," "apply [statute] to [scenario]," "what are the elements of [provision]," "statutory analysis," or references to codified sections (such as 42 U.S.C. sections or Texas Health & Safety Code). Supports two modes - (A) text-only briefing for structural analysis, and (B) scenario-driven briefing that applies statutory provisions to specific facts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Edit mathematically, empirically, or technically dense papers for readers outside the author’s specialty, including empirical legal scholarship, law-and-economics models, and legal-technology research. Clarifies terminology, antecedents, study design, and claim–statistic relationships while checking equations, numbers, quotations, and citations against the source. Use to clarify exposition or de-jargonize a technical draft; not to rewrite briefs or doctrinal arguments. Produces an edited draft and audit memo. Full integrity checks and original-format rendering require suitable extraction, code execution, and document tools; otherwise provides proposed edits with verification limits disclosed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a high-fidelity interactive legal assessment as a single self-contained HTML artifact. Output includes a live countdown timer, contract review tasks with hover-annotated problem clauses, candidate answer textareas, model answers hidden behind reveal blocks, scenario-based legal memo tasks, strategy and function-building questions, and a pre-submission checklist that encodes the marking criteria. Use when the user needs to (1) assess a legal candidate with a realistic timed exercise, (2) train or onboard junior lawyers using problem sets rather than doctrine, (3) help a candidate prepare for a real take-home assessment they are facing, (4) build educational materials for law students, in-house teams, or compliance training, or (5) produce scenario-based training modules on specific legal topics. Triggers on "legal test", "take-home", "mock exam", "contract redline exercise", "candidate assessment", "legal training exercise", "practice test", or similar phrasing even when informal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) compliance advisor — risk classification across all four tiers, all 9 prohibited practices (Art. 5, including the nudification/CSAM prohibition from Dec 2, 2026), all 8 Annex III high-risk use case areas, provider and deployer obligations (Arts. 9–17, 26), GPAI model obligations including the July 2025 Code of Practice (Arts. 51–55), conformity assessment and CE marking (Arts. 43–48), EU AI database registration, Art. 50 transparency (chatbots, synthetic media, AI-generated content), governance (AI Office, AI Board), penalties (Art. 99), confirmed phase-in timeline (Digital Omnibus adopted June 29, 2026: Annex III deferred to Dec 2, 2027; Annex I to Aug 2, 2028), and cross-framework mapping to ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and GDPR. Use for any EU AI regulation, AI system classification, or AI compliance question. Current as of July 2026. GPAI enforcement powers activate August 2, 2026.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When your bar comes asking "show me how you billed AI-assisted work" — and ABA 512, Florida 24-1, California, New York, and DC all have opinions out — you need an artifact that survives review. billable-time produces it. From your Claude Code session logs, it drafts reviewable time entries plus a printable HTML audit packet with: SHA-256 chain of evidence (source files + matter.yml + active disclosure pack + verifiable artifact self-hash), attorney identity and signature block, a bar-opinion disclosure pack with starter language for five jurisdictions, and content-aware deterministic narratives derived from filename and tool shape — never from prompt text by default. The tool refuses to bill on its own. --strict mode refuses to ship the artifact if any audit invariant fails (broad routes, missing attorney, missing/unverified disclosure). Comes as a Node CLI and a self-contained browser version (no backend; JSONL never leaves the page). 15 invariant tests verify the contract. AGPL-3.0.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to learn Godot while building — teaching mode that explains the concept, the editor setup, and what to verify, instead of just delivering code. Triggers on "teach me", "explain as we go", "I'm learning Godot", "guide me", "walk me through", "help me understand".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-assisted pair programming with multiple modes (driver/navigator/switch), real-time verification, quality monitoring, and comprehensive testing. Supports TDD, debugging, refactoring, and learning sessions. Features automatic role switching, continuous code review, security scanning, and performance optimization with truth-score verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SwiftUI's actual mental model — view identity, lifetime, and dependencies (the Demystify canon), state ownership decision rules, Observation's per-property tracking, body-performance discipline, and the main-actor concurrency contract. Use when state resets mysteriously, views re-render too often, animations glitch between branches, choosing @State vs @Bindable vs plain property, or debugging "why did body run."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate test fixture factories for your models. Builder pattern and static factories for zero-boilerplate test data. Use when tests need sample data setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modern SwiftUI toolbar patterns including customizable toolbars, search integration, transition effects, and platform-specific behavior. Use when implementing or customizing toolbars in SwiftUI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide to macOS 26 Tahoe APIs and features. Covers Apple Intelligence (FoundationModels), MLX framework, and Continuity. Use when implementing macOS 26 specific features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates technical architecture specification from PRD. Covers architecture pattern, tech stack, data models, and app structure. Use when creating ARCHITECTURE.md or designing system architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assistive Access implementation for cognitive accessibility including simplified scenes, navigation icons, runtime detection, and design principles. Use when optimizing apps for Assistive Access mode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep dive into SwiftData design patterns and best practices. Covers schema design, query patterns, repository pattern, and performance optimization. Use when designing data models or improving SwiftData usage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates StoreKit 2 subscription paywall with modern SwiftUI views. Use when user wants to add subscriptions, paywall, or in-app purchases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apple Intelligence skills for on-device AI features including Foundation Models, Visual Intelligence, App Intents, and intelligent assistants. Use when implementing AI-powered features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security category index for Apple platforms. Routes to the privacy-manifests skill. General secure-storage/biometrics/ATS guidance was retired in the 2026 blind-test audit — current models cover it natively.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SF Symbols end-to-end — choosing and configuring the 7,000+ system symbols (rendering modes, variable color/draw, gradients), authoring custom symbols that interpolate across weights, and the animation preset vocabulary. Use when picking iconography, building custom symbols, animating symbol state changes, or rendering values as symbols.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。