「how to use」の検索結果

Use when persuasion principles have to be applied to a specific asset — reciprocity, scarcity, authority, social proof, liking, commitment, and unity mapped onto copy, a landing page, an email, or an ad, each with a hypothesis and a test plan. Trigger on 'marketing psychology', 'Cialdini', 'persuasion principles', 'how do I add urgency', 'make this more convincing', 'behavioral triggers for this page'. Also use when the user asks why people read the whole page and still do not buy. Not for — price framing and margin math, see `17-pricing-strategy-global`; building the offer itself, see `31-offer-design-global`; running the experiment properly, see `19-ab-test-setup-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a designer needs hands-on production direction inside a tool — Canva, Figma, or Adobe Express: which template to start from, the operating order, element-by-element mapping, grid and spacing, brand kit colors and fonts, export checklist, and the dos and do-nots. Trigger on 'Canva brief', 'Figma brief', 'production direction', 'how do I build this in Canva', 'layout direction for the designer', 'the junior designer needs step by step'. Not for — the creative concept for a static, see `42-image-brief-global`; the concept for a slide sequence, see `43-carousel-brief-global`; the brand rules being applied, see `46-brand-guideline-global`; adapting one master into every size, see `50-asset-resize-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a WINNING ad has to be scaled without breaking it — readiness checks, vertical scaling at plus 20 to 30 percent per step, horizontal scaling into new audiences, creatives, and channels, learning-phase reset risk, how Advantage+ and Performance Max behave when scaled, creative refresh cadence, and the signals that mean stop. Trigger on 'scale ads', 'increase the ad budget', 'scale a winner', 'CPA went up after I scaled', 'how fast can I scale', 'it worked at 50 a day and broke at 200'. Not for — fixing an account that is not working yet, see `03-performance-eval-global`; warm audience plans, see `56-retargeting-plan-global`; proving the winner first, see `19-ab-test-setup-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task touches Ecto, even a how-to question: schemas, changesets, validations, queries, preloads, Multi, migrations, constraints, money fields. Load it before writing Ecto code. Skip for Ash.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route ambiguous or mixed Phoenix/LiveView/Ecto requests before choosing a workflow. Use when user is unsure where to start/how to approach work, asks for the right workflow, or combines intents such as fixing and refactoring. NOT for a clear task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a product quality review on a journey, feature, landing page, onboarding flow, or AI/agent surface and returns a friction log, a scored critical-journey review, and a taste bar your team can calibrate against. Use when someone asks is this good enough to ship, how polished should it be, why do users bounce, what is our quality bar, how do we build taste, or to review a design, prototype, onboarding, or checkout. Draws on 264 insights from 100 Lenny's Podcast guests incl. Katie Dill, Dylan Field and Stewart Butterfield.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sets up how you and your team build and work with AI agents, and produces an Agent Workflow Charter (agent lanes, plan-mode loop, autonomy ladder with promotion criteria, rules file, review policy, security rules, rollout plan). Use when you ask 'how should we work with Claude Code / Codex / Cursor', 'how many agents should I run', 'should the agent be autonomous', 'plan mode', 'CLAUDE.md', 'AI-native team', 'roll out AI to my team', or 'my agent keeps screwing up'. Draws on 110 Lenny's Podcast guests incl. Claire Vo, Boris Cherny and Aishwarya Naresh Reganti.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When user is asking for guidance for which role to assign to an identity given desired permissions, this agent helps them understand the role that will meet the requirements with least privilege access and how to apply that role.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

For frontend engineers authoring UI — how to make components reliably locatable by tests and AI agents. Covers the official Playwright locator priority, semantic/accessible markup first, and how to add valid, unique, stable `data-testid` attributes (naming convention, uniqueness in lists, stability rules) for React, Vue, Angular, and Svelte. Use when writing or reviewing components, or when an agent needs durable locators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagrams and checkable docs from a codebase. Draws ERDs, C4 context/container/component views, API endpoint catalogues, lifecycle/state machines, and service-to-service call maps as a validated JSON spec plus a standalone HTML viewer, with Mermaid export. Imports OpenAPI, GraphQL SDL and Prisma; otherwise reads the code (NestJS, TypeORM, Express) and writes the spec. Use for: database diagram, ERD, data model, table relationships, C4 or architecture diagram, system context, API map, endpoint list, "show me the endpoints", status flow, state machine, allowed transitions, "what happens after X is approved", how services call each other, microservice map, Mermaid diagram. Also writes documentation as a fact graph: each statement carries its source and a computed confidence, and a drift check fails CI when the code moves. Use to document a system, write architecture or onboarding docs, or explain how a system works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user wants to configure and launch a WorkBuddy Bench evaluation run from scratch, or is unsure how to set one up. Walks them interactively through environment setup, model config, .env credentials, job config, and launching the run, then hands off to wbbench-report-skills for metrics and trajectory analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an animation from scratch, making the decisions in the order that determines whether it feels right — should it animate at all, what purpose, which tool, which properties, which curve and duration, how it interrupts, how it exits. Writes the implementation. Use when asked to animate something, add motion, make a component feel alive, or build a transition. For critiquing existing motion use review-animations; for auditing a whole codebase use improve-animations. Only runs when explicitly invoked; it does not trigger on its own.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides workflows to write, debug, and optimize prompts for LLMs, including few-shot example selection, chain-of-thought structuring, system prompt design, and template composition. Use when the user asks to write or improve a prompt, wants help with few-shot examples, chain-of-thought, system prompts, prompt templates, or asks how to get better results from an LLM.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user wants step-by-step help making an audio-first image-story, AI narration, slideshow, illustrated story, AI 讲书, 图片联播, 有声故事, or 静态图叙事视频 with Codex or WorkBuddy; not for a standalone script, single image, or ordinary video editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design the UX of custom-code Databricks Apps (AppKit/React) data screens — KPI/overview pages, reports, charts, tables, and Genie/chat data assistants — mapped to concrete AppKit components. Use when BUILDING or reviewing the UI of an AppKit/React app that displays data or answers data questions: choosing genre, layout, charts, KPIs, semantic color, required states (loading/empty/error), IBCS notation, and AI-result trust (showing generated SQL/sources for Genie/chat). A plain "create a dashboard" request means a managed AI/BI (Lakeview) dashboard → use databricks-aibi-dashboards, NOT this skill. Also NOT for non-data frontend (forms, settings, auth, marketing) or scaffolding/build/deploy (→ databricks-apps). Complements databricks-apps; use it alongside whenever a custom app has a chart, table, KPI, report, or Genie/chat/AI surface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds estimates, quotes, and bids for trades and field-service businesses (HVAC, plumbing, electrical, roofing, landscaping, painting, cleaning, remodeling, general contracting, IT/AV installs). Turns a scope into line items with waste factors, burdened labor, materials, equipment, subs, permits, mobilization, contingency, overhead, profit, and tax, then writes a client-ready xlsx (live formulas) and PDF plus an internal cost sheet, with good/better/best options, add-ons, a payment schedule, exclusions, and assumptions. Use whenever someone asks for a quote, estimate, bid, proposal price, or job price, asks "how much should I charge for this job", wants to check a price or margin on a job, or is confused about markup vs margin. Computes deterministically with a script instead of mental math, because models routinely treat a 30% markup as a 30% margin and drop labor burden, waste, and mobilization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs relational and document database schemas from requirements or an existing app - tables and collections, keys, relationships, constraints, indexes driven by real query patterns, ERDs, and reversible migration scripts - with PostgreSQL (including Supabase) as the default and MySQL, SQLite, and MongoDB supported. Use when the user wants to model data for a new app or feature, review or fix an existing schema, choose keys or indexes, plan multi-tenancy, normalize or denormalize, or write CREATE TABLE statements or migrations, even if they just describe their app and ask "how should I store this". For moving data between database providers, use database-migrator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research-first content creation optimized for both human readers and AI search engines (Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini). Creates authentic, authoritative content that becomes the go-to citation source for AI models answering user questions. Use this skill when: - Creating content that should appear in AI search results (Perplexity, ChatGPT, Claude) - Building topical authority to become THE source AI cites for a topic - Launching a new product and need compelling, citable content - Creating blog posts, articles, social media, or press releases - Need content that references real trends, people, and recent events - Want AI-assisted content that doesn't sound AI-generated - Creating thought leadership content in any industry Triggers: "create content for", "write about", "research and write", "find experts for", "content for launch", "blog post about", "article on", "press release for", "AI search", "show up in AI", "Perplexity", "be cited by AI"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix slow Flutter app startup caused by blocking network operations during initialization. Use when: (1) App takes several seconds to show first frame, (2) Startup logs show sequential network operations (WebSocket connections, API calls), (3) Services initialize during startup that aren't needed until user authenticates. Covers: converting sequential network ops to parallel with Future.wait(), deferring service initialization until actually needed (lazy init), and identifying blocking operations in Riverpod/provider initialization chains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain why counterexamples violate specifications by analyzing formal specifications (temporal logic, invariants, pre/postconditions, code contracts), informal requirements (user stories, acceptance criteria), test specifications (assertions, property-based tests), and providing step-by-step traces showing state changes, comparing expected vs actual behavior, identifying root causes, and assessing violation impact. Use when debugging test failures, understanding model checker output, explaining runtime assertion violations, analyzing static analysis warnings, or teaching specification concepts. Produces structured markdown explanations with traces, comparisons, state diagrams, and cause chains. Triggers when users ask why something failed, explain a violation, understand a counterexample, debug a specification, or analyze why a test fails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an animation from scratch, making the decisions in the order that determines whether it feels right — should it animate at all, what purpose, which tool, which properties, which curve and duration, how it interrupts, how it exits. Writes the implementation. Use when asked to animate something, add motion, make a component feel alive, or build a transition. For critiquing existing motion use review-animations; for auditing a whole codebase use improve-animations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Abusing Active Directory object ACLs (DACL/ownership) for privilege escalation and lateral movement (GenericAll, GenericWrite, WriteDACL, WriteOwner, AddMember, ForceChangePassword, and replication rights via DS-Replication-Get-Changes-All). Use when BloodHound CE shows an outbound control edge from a principal you own toward a higher-value object, and you want the exact bloodyAD/impacket command to weaponize that ACE, plus detection and remediation. DCSync is covered here strictly as a post-compromise technique, not a user entry path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply test quality principles when generating or reviewing test code. Enforces Arrange-Act-Assert structure, one behavior per test, assertion quality, test isolation, meaningful naming, and test data management. Use when writing tests, reviewing test code, or when the user mentions 'write tests', 'test this', 'test quality', 'test review', 'improve tests', or 'test structure'. Loaded automatically by the code-generating molecules (code-forge, refactor-safely, bug-fix). This skill governs the craft of writing individual test cases -- not what to test (that is driven by the code being implemented) but how to write tests that are reliable, readable, and maintainable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Protocol for handling ambiguous decisions and missing/conflicting knowledge during code generation, design, and review. Ensures AI surfaces genuine judgment calls with structured options and stops on hallucination risk instead of silently assuming. Use when a decision has multiple valid approaches, when facts are missing or contradictory, when the user asks 'what should we do here?', 'is this a judgment call?', 'should I ask about this?', 'am I guessing here?', 'what are the tradeoffs?', or when deciding between two reasonable architectural or design options. Also composed by molecules to define how judgment calls and clarification requests are surfaced and resolved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。