Analyze NFT projects for investment decisions — evaluate fundamentals, identify red flags, assess risk, and provide buy/hold/avoid recommendations
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
2,100 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Analyze NFT projects for investment decisions — evaluate fundamentals, identify red flags, assess risk, and provide buy/hold/avoid recommendations
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a short executive summary for the current rolling-wave project. Use when the user wants a concise status update, investor/team-friendly summary, leadership summary, project progress snapshot, or TL;DR of completed slices, the current slice plan, and upcoming slices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically find root causes and fix bugs. Use when debugging errors, investigating test failures, reproducing bugs from issue trackers (GitHub, Linear, Jira), or when stuck on a problem after failed fix attempts. Also use when the user says 'debug this', 'why is this failing', 'fix this bug', 'trace this error', or pastes stack traces, error messages, or issue references.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research the codebase to answer a question without making any changes. Use when exploring code, understanding architecture, or investigating how something works.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research a technical topic thoroughly by exploring the codebase and summarizing findings. Use when asked to investigate how something works, research an area of the codebase, trace a data flow, or understand a component in depth.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate and fix failing CI. Takes a PR reference, one or more CI run/job URLs, or freeform text describing where the failures are, then enumerates failing workflows/jobs/steps, determines the root cause (often one shared cause behind several red checks), proposes a fix plan, applies code changes, commits, pushes, watches the new runs, and repeats until checks pass. Use when the user says "fix CI", "CI is red", "checks are failing", "the build is broken on my PR", "fix the failing jobs", or pastes a failing CI run URL. Do NOT use for authoring new workflows, or for read-only diagnosis with no fix intent — use gha-log-reader for that.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture the findings as a Markdown file in the repo. Use when the user wants a topic researched, docs or API facts gathered, or reading legwork delegated to a background agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Update Codex's pinned `v8` / `rusty_v8` versions, validate the release-candidate path, and investigate failed V8 canary or artifact builds. Use when asked to bump V8, update `rusty_v8` artifacts, prepare or validate a V8 release candidate, check `v8-canary`, or diagnose why a V8 version update no longer builds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically find and fix performance problems in applications, frontend and backend, by measuring first. Use this skill whenever the user reports slow endpoints, high latency, poor throughput, memory leaks, large bundles, or slow page loads; wants to profile with cProfile, py-spy, Chrome DevTools, Node --cpu-prof, or perf; run load tests with locust or k6; set performance budgets or SLOs; optimize database queries (EXPLAIN, indexes, N+1); add caching (Redis); improve frontend performance (code splitting, lazy loading, image optimization, memoization, virtualization); or tune the network (CDNs, gzip/br, HTTP/2/3). Also trigger for p50/p95/p99 latency, throughput, error rate, connection pooling, async vs threads, GIL, and memory leak investigations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Isolate the root cause of ML performance drops, inconsistent evaluations, prediction errors, and training-serving mismatches across data, labels, splits, pipelines, models, metrics, and runtime behavior. Use when investigating a reproducible failure or regression, not routine model selection or general performance validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specialized GitHub PR intelligence agent for automatically gathering comprehensive context from Pull Requests. Activate when users need CI failure analysis, review comment investigation, or PR status assessment. Triggers on requests like "CI 실패 원인 찾아줘", "gather review comments", "check PR status", "analyze PR".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user shares a Sentry URL, says "check Sentry", or wants to investigate production errors. Uses Sentry MCP tools for deep analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Wing-4 valuation cognition for a CFO / finance-partner. Use when a deal, internal investment, or board ask names DCF, intrinsic value, WACC, terminal value, or 'what's it worth on a 5-year hold'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous multi-step investigation — deep research carried end-to-end without per-step approval; explicit request only, never for normal feature work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Kit de ferramentas de product ownership ágil para Senior Product Owner, incluindo geração de histórias de usuário compatíveis com INVEST, planejamento de sprints, gerenciamento de backlog e rastreamento de velocidade. Use para escrita de histórias, planejamento de sprints, comunicação com stakeholders e cerimônias ágeis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Workflow] Use when activating the Integration Test Green workflow — drive an integration-test suite to fully green with a bounded convergence loop: verify the whole system (or the named target), adjudicate every failure with /debug-investigate + /integration-test-review before any edit, fix at the owning layer, /changes-review each round's fix diff, re-verify from scratch, then sync spec TCs, the integration-test reference doc, and feature docs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Workflow] Use when activating the Visual Diagram workflow for create visual excalidraw diagrams from codebase investigation or web research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Workflow] Use when activating the Feature Implementation workflow for implement a well-defined feature with investigation, planning, implementation, and review. Also covers TDD/test-first development and spec-driven feature implementation with test specs written before code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Investigation] Use when quickly locating relevant files and affected areas across a large codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Research] Use when starting a web research task — discover, gather, and triage candidate sources on a topic to feed deeper investigation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Workflow] Use when activating the Bug Fix workflow for systematic debugging with root cause investigation, fix, and verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Intelligence] Use when investigating what happens when code executes, understanding blast radius, or tracing frontend-to-backend flows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Testing] Use when you need to drive an integration-test suite to fully green — each round runs /integration-test-verify (whole system by default, or the target named in the prompt), and on ANY failure combines /debug-investigate + /integration-test-review (report-only) to adjudicate the fault (test wrong · test not optimal · source wrong), then /fix to resolve it at the owning layer, then /changes-review on that round's fix diff, then re-runs a FRESH full verify — looping until the whole suite passes its 2-consecutive-green-runs gate with zero failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use after PROJECT_GUIDE.md exists, when the user asks if a project is worth their time, should they build vs buy, or invokes project-worth-my-time. Follow-up to explain-new-project—weighs project context (files, git history, chat) to recommend whether to invest in a repo, cherry-pick a feature, park the idea, pass, or use an existing polished product instead. Optionally enriched by a personal-memory MCP (e.g. Pieces) when one is available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。