2,461 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Reverse-engineer comprehensive specification documents from existing codebases through goal-driven reconnaissance, WBS-based parallel investigation, and iterative question-bank dialogue.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage a GitHub issue filed against skillsaw — classify it (bug, feature, docs, question, other), verify its claims against the codebase, enrich it with missing details, and post one structured triage comment. Use when triaging and labeling incoming issues, not to fix them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a slash command", "add a command", "write a custom command", "define command arguments", "use command frontmatter", "organize commands", "create command with file references", "interactive command", "use AskUserQuestion in command", or needs guidance on slash command structure, YAML frontmatter fields, dynamic arguments, bash execution in commands, user interaction patterns, or command development best practices for Claude Code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects timing side-channel vulnerabilities in cryptographic code. Use when implementing or reviewing crypto code, encountering division on secrets, secret-dependent branches, or constant-time programming questions in C, C++, Go, Rust, Swift, Java, Kotlin, C#, PHP, JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, or Ruby.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clarify requirements before implementing. Use when serious doubts araise.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research a specific technology, library, system, protocol, or tool to answer a concrete technical question with source-traceable evidence. Use when current implementation details, version behavior, configuration, compatibility, or authoritative technical facts must be verified rather than recalled. Also use when explicitly asked to incorporate verified findings into an existing skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use before any CLI/TUI display code is written, modified, or audited — runs the 7-stage discipline (Context, Register, Shape brief, Implement, Critique, Audit, Polish) for Typer, Rich, Textual, and Questionary work, grounded in per-project PRODUCT.md and DESIGN.TUI.md/DESIGN.md. Triggers on output formatting, display design, interactive prompts, visual consistency, TUI layout, progress display, dashboard design, design audit, design polish, design critique, shape brief, register decision (brand-cli vs product-cli), and AI-slop checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes Python engineering tasks to specialist skills by matching trigger patterns before any architecture, plan, or code is written. Use when working with Typer CLI frameworks, Rich or Textual terminal UIs, CLI UI/UX design, questionary prompts, FastMCP/MCP servers, ty type checker, uv package manager, Hatchling build backend, TOML editing, pre-commit/prek hooks, async Python, PyPI packaging, complex linting, technical debt modernization, testing workflows, feature development, or stdlib-only scripting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create and configure slash commands for Claude Code — the legacy .claude/commands/ format. Use when asked to "create a slash command", "add a command", "write a custom command", "define command arguments", "use command frontmatter", "organize commands", "create command with file references", "interactive command", "use AskUserQuestion in command", or for guidance on slash command structure, YAML frontmatter fields, dynamic arguments, bash execution in commands, user interaction patterns, or command development best practices. Commands are the legacy format superseded by skills — for new development prefer /plugin-creator:skill-creator
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating, grooming, planning, or closing a backlog item. Bridges backlog items to SAM planning with issue, project, and milestone tracking against the configured backend. Activates on interactive browsing with no arguments, loading an item by issue reference or title match to run grooming and SAM planning, autonomous unattended runs that substitute evidence-derived decisions for clarifying questions, a quick path for one-file fixes where full grooming is disproportionate, dismissing an item without completion under a required reason (duplicate, out of scope, superseded, wontfix, blocked), marking an item done with an evidence trail and required summary, or initializing GitHub tracking infrastructure for a project. Stops when the item already has a plan or is blocked on missing information.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Local codebase analysis research angle — derives behavioral contracts, coding conventions, SKILL.md flow insertion points, and agent data availability maps from actual source files. Use when the blocking question is answered by reading the repository: what does this function actually do, what pattern does the codebase use for X, where in this workflow does a new step go, or what data does this agent already have.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate why something happens — confirm the question and success criteria with you, then trace the root cause with an evidence chain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when starting a new feature, gathering requirements for an unfamiliar domain, refining a vague idea into actionable scope, or when a user request is ambiguous or underspecified. Conducts SAM Stage 1 discovery — structured requirements gathering through user discussion, asking WHO/WHAT/WHEN/WHY and never HOW. Produces the ARTIFACT:DISCOVERY document containing feature requirements, NFRs, goals, anti-goals, references, and resolved questions. Supports backlog item self-initialization via a
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Activates Standard of Excellence enforcement for the current session. Load before starting any task to apply completion standards: finish the whole thing, fix the root cause, ship the complete working result. Blocks partial solutions, workarounds, deferred threads, and invented content limits when the permanent solve is within reach. Triggers: 'do the whole thing', 'boil the ocean', 'standard of excellence', 'finish it completely', before starting any implementation, refactoring, or multi-step task where partial output is a risk. Does NOT apply to: read-only queries, one-line typo fixes, pure knowledge questions, or single-output summarize requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transforms validated /linear-walkthrough artifacts into one presentation-ready deck outline per major codebase component. Use when the user asks to create a presentation, prepare a walkthrough deck, build an onboarding deck, produce an architecture review deck, or summarize a codebase for a technical audience. Requires walkthrough directory output -- reads unified walkthrough, per-section files, validation reports, coverage maps, entry points, and open questions -- then orchestrates four parallel agent phases to produce slide outlines with speaker notes, evidence references, and suggested visuals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when answering business analytics, RevOps, GTM metric, pipeline, revenue, funnel, customer, or warehouse questions with Deepline. Triggers on phrases like 'query Snowflake', 'analyze pipeline', 'total ACV', 'break down by quarter', 'use the semantic layer', 'run a semantic query', or any use of snowflake_get_semantic_layer / snowflake_run_semantic_query. Skip prospecting, enrichment, contact finding, outbound, or personalization workflows; use deepline-gtm for those.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns raw captures (dictated braindumps in a deliverable's inbox/, or recent macwhspr dictation-log entries) into proposed planning-wiki changes, shown as one unified diff. Classifies each statement as a decision, evidence claim, question, task, or dropped item, traces it to its capture paragraph, tags unconfirmed names, numbers, and citations UNRESOLVED, and writes decisions only with the author's assent. Edits only the planning wiki, never source files. Use when asked to intake, absorb notes, or process the inbox, or after dictating notes from a talk, meeting, or reading session.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Opens a deliverable (talk, course module, paper, book chapter, or referee report) for AI-assisted work across sessions. Interviews the author for the manifest, then scaffolds deliverable.yml, an append-only HANDOFF.md, a numbered planning/ wiki with open questions, an inbox/ for dictated braindumps, a gitignored checks/, and the house deck template for talks. Use when starting deadline-driven work that spans sessions, or when asked to open a deliverable, set up a talk, paper, or module for the pipeline, or make a manifest. Not for one-off tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs a multi-model orchestration workflow led by the session's Fable or Claude Opus model. Sends menial tool-calling work to Haiku subagents, judgment work to Opus subagents at an effort matched to each task, and high-stakes or fresh-perspective questions to a GPT-6 Astra Codex peer. Detects the lead from session context; `--lead fable` or `--lead opus` overrides. Use to orchestrate, delegate, fan out, get a decorrelated Codex opinion, run a blind Opus-Codex cross-check, or act as tech lead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advises on setting up and validating topic models for survey and experimental text. Covers the discovery-versus-measurement question, choosing STM, LDA, or BERTopic, preprocessing consequences, prevalence and content formulas, topic-count selection across coherence, exclusivity and FREX, held-out likelihood, and residuals, validation of topics against human judgment, robustness, and DA-RT-compliant reporting. Use when the user has open-ended responses or another corpus and asks what topics are present, how many topics to use, about STM, searchK, coherence, or FREX, or wants topic prevalence compared across treatment arms or countries. Fixed-codebook coding goes to text-classification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Organizes an author’s response to peer review. Extracts every referee and editor point, tags severity and type, orders the revision by dependency, flags defensible pushbacks as questions, and builds a numbered comment → response → location letter whose substantive answers the author writes. Use when the user has referee reports, a revise-and-resubmit decision, or an editor’s letter and wants to plan the revision, draft the response letter, or check that every point was addressed. The reviewer-side twin is journal-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a theory into falsifiable, pre-registerable hypotheses, covering the DGP and DAG, identification, SATE versus PATE, counterfactual and directional framing, named estimands, justified SESOIs, the choice among NHST, equivalence, interval, and minimum-effect tests, scope conditions, and primary, secondary, and exploratory tiers. Use when the user asks to turn a research question or theory into hypotheses, whether a prediction is falsifiable, what the estimand is, or how to predict a null. Framing goes to narrative-building, the plan to pre-registration-writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and diagnoses list experiments (the item count technique), covering whether indirect measurement is warranted, control-list construction against floor and ceiling effects, design variants, estimators and assumption tests in the list package, and power planning for the precision penalty. Use when the user measures a sensitive attitude or behavior and asks about list experiments, item count, unmatched count, or veiled questioning, or has an implausible prevalence estimate. Deciding whether sensitivity bias exists at all goes to survey-design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds or audits a literature review, producing an evidence map, the closest prior work, source clusters, a gap verdict, and a synthesis plan for the introduction. Use when the user asks whether a contribution is novel, who has studied a question, what the literature establishes, or how to organize a review, or wants a reading list, Zotero export, or pile of papers turned into one. For systematic reviews or meta-analyses it produces the protocol scaffold and routes registration (PROSPERO or OSF) and screening to dedicated tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。