2,273 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Practice AI safety across the lifecycle — risk assessment, alignment concepts, evaluation, deployment safeguards, and governance. Use when building or deploying AI systems responsibly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Risk analysis and approach selection before planning. Use when requirements are ambiguous, approaches vary, or work touches hub/bridge nodes. Skip for typo fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fast sprint status check. Reads the current sprint plan, scans story files for status, and produces a concise progress snapshot with burndown assessment and emerging risks. Run at any time during a sprint for quick situational awareness. Use when user asks 'how is the sprint going', 'sprint update', 'show sprint progress'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Estimates task effort by analyzing complexity, dependencies, historical velocity, and risk factors. Produces a structured estimate with confidence levels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates a comprehensive milestone progress review including feature completeness, quality metrics, risk assessment, and go/no-go recommendation. Use at milestone checkpoints or when evaluating readiness for a milestone deadline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translate approved GDDs + architecture into epics — one epic per architectural module. Defines scope, governing ADRs, engine risk, and untraced requirements. Does NOT break into stories — run /create-stories [epic-slug] after each epic is created.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on function structure, naming, parameters, shared context, or phase boundaries, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on behavior/data ownership, statement placement, loops, or dead-code knowledge, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on legacy OO hierarchies, subtype responsibilities, superclass extraction/collapse, or delegation, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on record, collection, value, responsibility, delegation, or algorithm boundaries, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on function API shape, flags, dependencies, mutability, construction, or command/function trade-offs, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for general frontend code review, PR review, merge-readiness assessment, architecture maintainability, type-safety, rendering/state risks, style consistency, testability gaps, or a cross-cutting review summary. Delegate deep security, accessibility, E2E, or performance investigations to their specialized skills; Chinese triggers include code review, code review, review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when planning or reviewing a frontend testing strategy, selecting the right test layer by risk, mapping coverage across static checks, unit tests, component tests, integration tests, E2E, Storybook/visual regression, a11y, security, performance, or CI gates. Do not use to write individual component/E2E tests or merely run existing validation commands; Chinese triggers include test strategy, test layering, test plan, coverage matrix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on conditional complexity, repeated branches, guards, special cases, or internal invariants, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on variable meaning, field naming, derived state, or reference/value identity, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Develop research proposals with solicitation alignment, reviewer-focused logic, evidence-bounded preliminary results, milestones, risks, and compelling figures. Use for federal, foundation, equipment, partnership, or internal research proposals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate OpenClaw release candidates through OCM using the built OpenClaw artifact, a broad reusable scenario matrix, copied existing-user state, clean new-user state, concise pass/fail reporting, and focused failure notes. Use when asked to test OpenClaw origin/main, release readiness, upgrade behavior, plugins, services, channels, doctor recovery, packaging, or broad release risk.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Energy Auditor — running a blower-door/duct-leakage diagnostic sequence on a home or light-commercial building, testing combustion appliances for worst-case backdraft risk before recommending air sealing, reconciling utility billing history against walkthrough findings, ranking retrofit measures by savings-to-investment ratio (SIR) for a weatherization or utility rebate program, or writing the prioritized scope of work an install crew executes without the auditor on site. Distinct from an energy-engineer (industrial/commercial capital planning, IPMVP measurement and verification, calibrated simulation) — this role owns the field diagnostics and the residential/light-commercial audit-to-scope handoff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an emergency medicine physician — risk-stratifying an undifferentiated chief complaint against a can't-miss diagnosis, deciding an ED disposition (discharge/observation/admit/transfer) under time and bed pressure, reasoning through EMTALA screening-and-stabilization obligations, or triaging a department under crowding/boarding load.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Epidemiologist — investigating a disease outbreak and identifying its source, designing a case-control or cohort study to test an exposure hypothesis, calculating attack rates/odds ratios/relative risk from surveillance data, evaluating whether a surveillance system is sensitive and timely enough to catch a real signal, or judging whether an observed case cluster is a true outbreak or expected background variation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an environmental scientist — scoping or reviewing a Phase I/Phase II environmental site assessment, interpreting soil or groundwater sampling results against regulatory action levels, drafting an environmental impact statement or NEPA scoping document, running a contaminant fate-and-transport screening calc, or assessing ecological risk to a receptor.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a professional dancer — preparing for a company audition, managing rehearsal load against injury risk, deciding whether to dance through pain or report it, negotiating a casting or return-to-dance plan with a rehearsal director, or critiquing a performance for technical and artistic fidelity to the choreography.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a credit authorizer, checker, or clerk — deciding a real-time point-of-sale credit authorization against available credit, verifying a credit application's income/employment documentation, issuing an adverse-action notice on a declined application, or intaking a chargeback/dispute within its filing window. Distinct from a credit analyst, who underwrites commercial credit with a multi-year financial spread and a risk rating — this role runs a high-volume rules engine against a preset limit, it does not assess creditworthiness from first principles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Customs and Border Protection officer — scoring a shipment or traveler for secondary-inspection referral, evaluating a manifest discrepancy for contraband risk, deciding whether a traveler is admissible under immigration law, structuring a seizure or penalty referral, or triaging a primary-inspection queue under time pressure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。