「apply」の検索結果

Apply when integrating a new requirement into an existing design. Redesign as if the requirement had been a foundational assumption from day one, instead of bolting it on.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply after completing a task, before declaring done. Verify against the real artifact (run the feature, read the actual value, inspect the diff), not a proxy, self-report, or 'it compiles.'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when tempted to ask 'should I do X?' on reversible work. Proceed, present the result, let the human course-correct after the fact; reserve confirmation for irreversible actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when wiring validation, error handling, or framework adapters. Concentrate guards at system boundaries (CLI, config, network, external APIs); trust internal types and keep business logic in pure functions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when context is filling up: large outputs, long files, repeated reads, fan-out planning. Route bulk to subagents; keep summaries in the main thread, not raw payloads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when debugging. Trace each symptom to its root cause and fix it there; reproduce first, ask why until you reach it, resist nil-check guards that silence crashes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when refactoring, evaluating diff size, or tempted to add abstractions, layers, or signal threading. Bias toward deletion and the smallest change that solves the problem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when product, UX, or feature-scope tradeoffs come up. Choose user delight over implementation convenience; ship fewer polished features over more rough ones.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when facing a novel UI interaction or architectural decision with no precedent in the codebase. Build 2-3 competing prototypes and compare side by side before committing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply to any non-trivial work, not just bulk work: edits, migrations, analyses, checks. Build the tool that does it or proves it (codemod, script, generator, or a skill your subagents follow) instead of working by hand. The tool is the artifact a reviewer can rerun.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply during planned rewrites and migrations with explicit phase boundaries. Converge on the target architecture; don't preserve smooth intermediate states with throwaway compatibility code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when writing stateful logic, or when code branches a lot or repeats a shape assumption across files. Encode the domain in a structure instead of scattered conditionals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when introducing a new internal API while old callers still exist. Migrate callers and delete the old API in the same wave instead of preserving compatibility layers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when you catch yourself writing the same instruction a second time, or notice a recurring correction. Encode the rule as a lint, metadata flag, runtime check, or script instead of more text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply before writing logic: choosing core types and data structures, sequencing scaffold-vs-feature work, asking what concurrent actors share. Get the data structures right so downstream code becomes obvious.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply poteto's rigorous engineering workflow to non-trivial coding, investigation, review, migration, and verification tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cut AI tells from any writing. Must always apply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when designing types, reviewing a function signature, or writing code in any statically-typed language. Make illegal states unrepresentable, brand semantic primitives, parse external data at boundaries, refuse to lie to the compiler, exhaust variants, derive from authoritative schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dart 3 modern features (through 3.10) and Effective Dart best practices including records, patterns, sealed classes, dot shorthands, null-aware collection elements, and wildcard variables. Use when adopting Dart 3.7+ syntax, using dot shorthands for enums or static members, using null-aware elements in lists or maps, using wildcard _ parameters, improving code quality, or reviewing Dart code conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements BLoC (v9.x) event-driven state management for Flutter with unidirectional data flow using the flutter_bloc package. Use when implementing Bloc/Cubit classes, mapping Events to States, consuming state with BlocBuilder/BlocListener/BlocConsumer, applying event transformers (restartable/droppable/sequential) for concurrency control, setting up BlocProvider/MultiBlocProvider DI, integrating Freezed for sealed union types and exhaustive pattern matching, or testing with blocTest. Ideal for enterprise apps requiring business logic separation, precise concurrency control (search debouncing, form deduplication), or event replay debugging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements Riverpod (v3.3.x) compile-safe state management for Flutter apps. Use when implementing @riverpod code generation providers, handling AsyncValue loading/error/data states, using ref.watch/ref.read/ref.listen, setting up ProviderScope, writing Notifier/AsyncNotifier classes, using FutureProvider/StreamProvider, applying autoDispose and family modifiers, combining providers, testing providers in isolation, scoping rebuilds with Consumer instead of ConsumerWidget, using ref.watch with select() for field-level precision, migrating from StateNotifierProvider or Riverpod 2.x patterns, handling Notifier resource lifecycle with ref.onDispose, or using experimental Mutation and offline persistence APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use ast-grep (sg) for AST-aware code search and rewrite across 25 languages. Trigger for structural code matching or deterministic codemods: find every function/call/class/import shaped like X, rewrite console.log to logger.info, strip `as any`, migrate require() to import, find empty catch blocks or missing await, and scan/apply YAML rules. Prefer this over rg/grep when the target is syntax shape rather than text; use rg for string contents, comments, filenames, or regex-style byte searches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experimental workflow for babysitting one explicitly authorized pull or merge request. Use to monitor its live review state and checks, fix actionable in-scope findings, and apply separate reply, approval, merge, and soak gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to \\\"analyze competitors", "assess competitive landscape", "identify differentiation", "evaluate market positioning", "apply Porter's Five Forces",...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。