「audit」の検索結果

Use when writing, moving or auditing any .md in imp - deciding which file a paragraph belongs in, adding a doc, fixing a stale claim, or when docs_lint.py fails in CI. Covers the four reader layers (L0 README / L1 operators / L2 kernel devs / L3 agents), the HTML-comment metadata header, [PROV:] provenance, the single-source-of-truth map, generated perf blocks, which numbers may appear in prose, plan-doc closure. Triggers on "which doc does this go in", "docs lint failed", "add a doc", "this claim is stale", "update the README", "PROV block", "layer", "STALE.md". Do NOT use for the CHANGELOG or a release body (shipping-prs), or for code-comment accuracy (codebase-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinates regulatory and compliance information requests from institutional LPs including FOIA, regulatory filings, and audit support. Use when responding to compliance requests, managing FOIA inquiries, or supporting LP audit processes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GEO+SEO audit of asdlc.io — analyzes the codebase for Generative Engine Optimization across AI citability, technical infrastructure, content quality, schema markup, and knowledge base discoverability. Produces a composite GEO Score (0-100) with prioritized action plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive SEO analysis for any website. Full site audits, single-page analysis, technical SEO (crawlability, indexability, Core Web Vitals with INP), schema markup, E-E-A-T content quality, image optimization, sitemap analysis, GEO for AI search, local SEO, and strategic planning. Uses Wove browser tools for real-page execution. Triggers on: "SEO", "audit", "schema", "Core Web Vitals", "sitemap", "E-E-A-T", "AI Overviews", "GEO", "technical SEO", "content quality", "structured data", "local SEO", "page speed".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive 7-phase SEO optimization workflow covering technical SEO auditing, keyword research strategy, on-page optimization, content SEO and E-E-A-T, structured data implementation, link building, and AI search optimization. Use when auditing search engine visibility, diagnosing ranking issues, implementing schema markup, conducting keyword research, optimizing content for E-E-A-T signals, or adapting for AI-driven search (AI Overviews, SGE).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive health check across CC auto-memory and agent-studio memory systems — detects orphans, duplicates, staleness, and threshold violations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit memory retrieval quality (drift, staleness, citation-groundedness) and produce remediation backlog.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ultra-granular code analysis for deep architectural context building. Line-by-line and block-by-block analysis using First Principles, 5 Whys, 5 Hows methodology at micro scale. Builds mental models, tracks invariants and assumptions, and maps cross-function call flows for security audit preparation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Filter and summarise the cross-library KB audit log. Reports confidentiality events (attribution drops, synthesis aborts, dispatcher failures, no-evidence markers, cross-library promotions) over a date range, by event type, and by source handle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used to spawn specialized OpenAI Codex CLI subagents for code review, debugging, architecture analysis, security audits, refactoring, documentation, comparative evidence adjudication, and autonomous /goal runs. It adds each persona through process-local developer instructions while preserving the project's AGENTS.md chain, including during parallel launches. Supports GPT-6-Astra across low, medium, high, xhigh, max, and ultra reasoning with default or priority service tiers, plus GPT-5.6 and GPT-5.5 models. Triggers on 'delegate to Codex', 'Codex Astra', 'Astra subagent', 'Codex subagent', 'code review agent', 'security audit', 'refactor with Codex', 'goal run', 'autonomous goal', 'have Codex weigh this'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when creating, auditing, or maintaining AGENTS.md files and Codex CLI configuration for any project—including initializing AGENTS.md for cross-agent compatibility (Codex, Cursor, Copilot, Devin, Jules, Amp, Gemini CLI), generating config.toml or .rules files, scaffolding .agents/skills/, converting CLAUDE.md to AGENTS.md, or auditing existing agent configs for bloat and staleness. Complementary to codex-orchestrator (which executes subagents; this skill creates the config files they consume).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit recent high-relevance papers from a target venue to identify claim-relevant experimental evidence gaps after core P0 results exist. Use for venue completeness and reviewer-risk analysis; not for redefining the research question or running experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds complete, optimized Claude prompts and Project scaffolds from task descriptions. Use when building, designing, creating, or structuring a Claude prompt or system prompt. Trigger on: "build me a prompt," "compile a prompt for," "create a system prompt," "write a Claude prompt," "design a prompt for," "help me write a prompt," "scaffold a Claude Project," "design a Project for." Uses a four-stage methodology (Parse, Select, Construct, Validate) and a tested 5-layer architecture (Identity, Objective, Context, Reasoning, Output + Quality Control). In Project Mode, the Compiler is global-layer-aware — checks User Preferences, installed Skills, and MCP Connectors to avoid redundancy and flag gaps. Do NOT use for auditing existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or diagnosing existing Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a structured Project Brief — a comprehensive markdown document that extracts goals, architecture, knowledge file inventory, Custom Instructions summary, Memory contents, current state, ecosystem position, and key decisions from a Claude Project. Briefs serve as uploadable context documents: add one to any other Project for immediate deep awareness of the source Project's purpose, architecture, and progress. Use when user says "create a brief," "brief this project," "extract project context," "generate a project summary for another project," "I need to share this project's context," "prepare this project for cross-project reference," or "document this project." Also use when the user is preparing to work across Projects and needs portable context. Do NOT use for session handoffs, project audits, or Memory optimization (use rootnode-session-handoff, rootnode-project-audit, or rootnode-memory-optimization respectively, if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds, validates, packages, tests, and optimizes deployment-ready Skill files (SKILL.md + references/ + scripts/ + agents/) from design specifications. Three pre-build gates + 9-dimension quality gate (with D9a/b/c empirical evidence tiers) + behavioral iteration loop + automated description optimizer + blind version comparator. Use for building, reviewing, revising, testing, or optimizing Skills. Trigger on: "build this Skill," "review this Skill," "test my Skill," "optimize the description," "compare these Skill versions," "should this be a hook instead," "build a template first." Also: "my Skill doesn't activate," "my description truncates," "my SKILL.md is too long," "my Skill is overtriggering." Do NOT use when designing Skill methodology — that's design work, not packaging. Do NOT use for prompt compilation, project auditing, or prompt scoring (use rootnode-prompt-compilation, rootnode-project-audit, or rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized business strategy prompt methodology for Claude. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output formats) for consulting, M&A, corporate strategy, and strategic planning tasks. Use when building prompts for deal evaluation, due diligence, portfolio strategy, business model analysis, board narratives, investment cases, market entry plans, or strategic options assessments. Trigger on: "build a prompt for M&A analysis," "due diligence prompt," "board narrative," "investment case," "market entry strategy," "strategic options," "portfolio strategy prompt," "business model analysis prompt," "consulting-style analysis." Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or for auditing Claude Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized research and analysis prompt methodology for Claude. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output) for data analysis, policy research, systematic evidence review, investigative research, and research-specific deliverables. Use when building prompts for quantitative data interpretation, evidence-based policy recommendations, literature reviews, causal analysis, hypothesis-driven investigation, or briefing documents. Trigger on: "prompt for data analysis," "research prompt," "policy brief prompt," "literature review prompt," "prompt for investigating," "systematic review prompt," "build a prompt for evidence synthesis," "causal analysis prompt," "briefing document prompt." Also use when user describes a research or analytical task and needs a structured Claude prompt for it. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or auditing Claude Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tested reasoning approaches for Claude prompts — 18 variants across 6 categories (Analytical, Strategic, Creative, Technical, Research, Comparative). Use when the user wants a specific reasoning template — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or combining reasoning instructions for a prompt. Trigger on: "give me the Root Cause Diagnosis approach," "show me the reasoning template for," "I need the Evidence Synthesis method," "show me analytical reasoning options," "combine reasoning approaches for," "show me all reasoning variants." Also use when a prompt produces shallow output and the fix is a reasoning upgrade. Provides 18 tested approaches for analytical, strategic, creative, technical, research, and comparison tasks. If the user is unsure which reasoning method fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for project-level audits — use rootnode-project-audit if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SEO & GEO content linter — validates Markdown/MDX files for AI search visibility using 92 deterministic rules (35 GEO, 32 SEO, 14 content quality, 8 technical, 3 i18n). Runs an autonomous lint-fix loop: scan content, read structured violations, fix them, re-lint until clean. Use when optimizing content for AI citations, auditing SEO compliance, checking GEO readiness, or running pre-publish content validation. Triggers on: "geo-lint", "lint content", "SEO audit", "GEO", "content optimization", "AI search", "citation readiness".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit RuField tests, trust boundaries, privacy projections, and evidence promotion. Use for conformance review, security regression review, release validation, or checking whether field accuracy claims have support.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qualify a vendor or supplier of GxP-relevant software or services. Covers vendor risk classification, assessment questionnaire design, desk and on-site audit approaches, quality agreement evaluation, SLA review, and ongoing monitoring cadence definition. Use when selecting a new vendor for a GxP-critical system, onboarding a cloud provider for regulated data, performing a periodic re-qualification, when a vendor audit finding requires re-assessment, or when EU Annex 11 or ICH Q10 requires supplier qualification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit, classify, and selectively forget stored memories. Covers memory enumeration and classification by type/age/access frequency, staleness detection for outdated references, fidelity checks using external anchors, a decision tree for selective withdrawal, tombstoned deaccession so removed content stays recoverable, counter-memory inoculation for failed strategies that would otherwise be re-derived, preemptive filtering rules for what should never become memories, and an audit trail so forgetting itself is reviewable. Use when memory has grown large and uncurated, when project state has shifted significantly since memories were written, when retrieval quality has degraded, or as periodic maintenance alongside manage-memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement policy-as-code enforcement using OPA Gatekeeper or Kyverno to validate and mutate Kubernetes resources according to organizational policies. Covers constraint templates, admission control, audit mode, reporting violations, and integrating with CI/CD pipelines for shift-left policy validation. Use when enforcing resource configuration standards, preventing security misconfigurations such as privileged containers, ensuring compliance before deployment, standardizing naming conventions, or auditing existing cluster resources against policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。