3,087 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Review mathematical modeling competition papers from a complete problem and paper, with an optional strict bzd-paper-format-checker audit, itemized problem-specific scoring, a bottom-up low-score safeguard, and CUMCM award calibration by problem type, division, region, school and advisor. Generate a Chinese HTML judge report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a coherent, whole-paper mathematical modeling solution framework from a complete contest problem. Use after the user supplies a CUMCM or other modeling problem and asks for modeling ideas, an overall solution plan, question-by-question analysis, candidate-model comparison, model-selection reasons, innovations, validation, or cross-question linkage. For every question, explain the task and mathematical essence, compare multiple feasible models in tables, recommend a route with explicit reasons, and keep all questions connected through shared data, variables, parameters, constraints, and validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage a single security finding — from a scanner, audit, advisory, or report — to a defensible disposition with a mitigation plan, false-positive justification, or accepted-risk writeup. Use when the user mentions 'triage this finding,' 'is this a real vulnerability,' 'mitigation plan,' 'false positive,' 'accept this risk,' 'compensating controls,' 'risk justification,' 'security ticket,' 'CVSS this,' 'should we fix this,' 'disposition,' 'sign off on,' or has a single security finding and needs to decide what to do.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research a specific CVE or vulnerability disclosure end-to-end — what version is affected, is your code reachable, is there a public PoC, is there a patch, what's the exposure window, what's the mitigation if you can't patch immediately. Use when the user mentions 'CVE,' 'vulnerability research,' 'is this CVE relevant,' 'zero-day,' 'CISA KEV,' 'GitHub Security Advisory,' 'reachability analysis,' 'patch analysis,' 'exploit availability,' 'EPSS,' 'CVSS,' or 'should we drop everything and patch this.'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit project dependencies, frameworks, languages, and dev tools for known vulnerabilities, CVEs, and security anti-patterns. Use when the user mentions 'dependency audit,' 'npm audit,' 'CVE,' 'vulnerable packages,' 'supply chain security,' 'outdated dependencies,' 'known vulnerabilities,' 'security advisory,' 'package security,' 'framework vulnerability,' 'is this package safe,' or needs to check whether their stack has known security issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to design experiments, plan ablation studies, structure baselines, or create incremental evaluation strategies. Triggers on phrases like "design ablation", "plan experiment", "what experiments should I run", "baseline comparison", or "experiment matrix".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Same-epoch comparison of training runs across wandb, neptune, tensorboard, or mlflow. Aligns runs at the student's current step (never current-vs-final-of-baseline) and separates proxy metrics from downstream targets. Use when the user asks to compare runs, check if a run is improving, track lag against a baseline, rank experiments, or evaluate run-vs-run performance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
HTML explainers, diagrams, architecture, timelines, source maps, slide decks, comparison tables, recaps, plan and diff reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate podcast clip visualization video prompts for Seedance 2.0 on Higgsfield. Use for podcast clip videos, audio-to-visual content, audiogram alternatives, podcast highlight reels, interview clip visuals, or any video that transforms audio content into engaging visual format. Triggers on podcast, audio clip, audiogram, interview clip, sound bite, audio visual, podcast video, episode highlight, podcast clip.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AMM pool mechanics comparison across Raydium, Orca, and Meteora including fee structures, pool types, creation patterns, and volume efficiency
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shared rules for test runs that drive the running app or run a test target: isolation from concurrent runs, stubs for infrastructure that cannot be stood up, provisioning privileged state, approval before writes to shared external systems, and cleanup of only what the run created. Not typically invoked directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically investigate bugs, test failures, build errors, performance issues, or unexpected behavior by cycling through characterize-isolate-hypothesize-test steps. Use when the user asks to "investigate this bug", "debug this", "figure out why this fails", "find the root cause", "why is this broken", "troubleshoot this", "diagnose the issue", "what's causing this error", "look into this failure", "why is this test failing", or "track down this bug".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement Kubernetes security policies including NetworkPolicy, PodSecurityPolicy, and RBAC for production-grade security. Use when securing Kubernetes clusters, implementing network isolation, or enforcing pod security standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Database schema validation, data integrity testing, migration testing, transaction isolation, and query performance. Use when testing data persistence, ensuring referential integrity, or validating database migrations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stop and consult this skill whenever your response would include specific facts about Anthropic's products. Covers: Claude Code (how to install, Node.js requirements, platform/OS support, MCP server integration, configuration), Claude API (function calling/tool use, batch processing, SDK usage, rate limits, pricing, models, streaming), and Claude.ai (Pro vs Team vs Enterprise plans, feature limits). Trigger this even for coding tasks that use the Anthropic SDK, content creation mentioning Claude capabilities or pricing, or LLM provider comparisons. Any time you would otherwise rely on memory for Anthropic product details, verify here instead — your training data may be outdated or wrong.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when gaining initial access to a target — phishing, payload delivery, HTML smuggling, ISO/IMG/MOTW bypass, supply-chain, credential stuffing, exposed-service exploitation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when attacking an AI/ML system or model — prompt injection & jailbreaks (Crescendo, Skeleton Key, Best-of-N), RAG/vector poisoning, agentic/MCP exploitation (CVE-2025-54136), ML supply-chain RCE (pickle CVE-2025-32434), model extraction / membership inference / adversarial suffixes (GCG)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when attacking or auditing a CI/CD pipeline or software supply chain — pwn requests, poisoned pipeline execution, compromised/mutable-tag actions, dependency confusion, registry worms, runner backdoors, OIDC trust abuse, SLSA/provenance
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when attacking a network or moving laterally — L2/L3 poisoning (LLMNR/mDNS, ARP/DHCP, mitm6), coercion + NTLM relay (CVE-2025-33073), TUN pivoting (Ligolo-ng/Chisel), MitM, network-service RCE (CVE-2024-38077), WPA2/WPA3 wireless
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when pentesting a web application or API — injection, XSS/CSP, SSRF/cloud-metadata, HTTP desync & cache poisoning, SSTI/prototype-pollution/deserialization, JWT/OAuth/GraphQL/IDOR, business logic & single-packet race
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Survey a codebase's animation and motion code as a senior motion advisor, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the animations", "audit the motion", "make this app feel better", or wants a roadmap of animation fixes rather than a review of a single diff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Survey any codebase as a senior advisor and produce prioritized, self-contained implementation plans for OTHER models/agents to execute. Strictly read-only on source code — never implements, fixes, or refactors anything itself. Use when asked to audit a codebase, find improvement opportunities (bugs, security, performance, test coverage, tech debt, migrations, DX), suggest features or where to take the project next (roadmap, product direction), or generate handoff plans for another agent to implement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare EPD products on normalized GWP and other impacts while checking declared units, system boundaries, and LEED eligibility. Use for side-by-side EPD comparison.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft Project Manual specification requirements for EPD submittals and sourced GWP limits. Use for embodied-carbon requirements in project sections; use the EPD parsing, research or comparison skills for product evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。