2,274 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
AI-assisted debugging specialist with deep knowledge of modern debugging tools, observability platforms, and automated root cause analysis. Implements Cursor Debug Mode methodology — structured hypothesis ranking, targeted code instrumentation, human-in-the-loop reproduction gate, log-confirmed root cause, and mandatory cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Canon TDD for humans and AI agents. Use for production code changes by writing tests first, proving RED, implementing minimal GREEN, and refactoring safely. 2026 edition adds TDP, flakiness gate, ralph-loop integration, memory-search in Step 0, PBT as Step 5.5, mutation testing gate in Step 4, and CJS LSP warning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
6-phase multi-agent pipeline with approval gates. Orchestrates Plan→Design→Implement→Review→Test→Deploy phases with explicit entry/exit criteria, phase-level agent assignment, and human-in-the-loop approval checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Feed actual task results back into agent memory for calibration. Compares predicted vs actual outcomes, records accuracy scores, and tracks estimation quality, prediction quality, and decision quality over time to improve future agent performance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Start and manage the full heartbeat ecosystem for agent-studio. Registers all 7 heartbeat loops plus auto-reschedule task via CronCreate to keep the agent ecosystem healthy, indexed, informed, and connected.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scheduled Exa web search monitor. Uses CronCreate to search configured topics every 4 hours via mcp__Exa__web_search_exa, deduplicates URLs via MemoryRecord, and stores summaries for morning briefing integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scheduled ArXiv paper monitor. Uses CronCreate to search configured keywords every 6 hours, deduplicates via MemoryRecord, and stores summaries in named memory for morning briefing integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the open-pr e2e fixture through a real review in a fresh subagent, grade it against e2e/checklist.md with a second independent subagent, diagnose each failure to the prompt file that owns it, fix, and repeat until clean or the round budget runs out. Use when changing anything under src/ and you want evidence the review still behaves, not just green unit tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
RED-GREEN-REFACTOR for process documentation - baseline without skill, write addressing failures, iterate closing loopholes
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dev-Critic loop: implement, review, fix — repeat until clean
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Step 2 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Execute the visualization plan from outline.json — render plots and conceptual diagrams from experimental_log.md and idea.md, optionally refine via VLM critique loop, and produce context-aware captions. Runs in parallel with the literature-review-agent. TRIGGER when the orchestrator delegates Step 2 or when the user asks to "generate the figures for my paper" or "render the plots from this experiment log".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive web pages through the caveman-browse MCP tools (browser_snapshot, browser_act, browser_eval, browser_recover). Use whenever interacting with a web page, dashboard, or form through caveman-browse — it teaches the snapshot→act→verify loop, query-first discipline on large pages, and when to recover exact bytes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate game sprites, 8-direction turnarounds, walk-cycle sprite sheets, SVG characters, ASCII art and animated mascots from images or descriptions, with September 2026 providers: Retro Diffusion (pixel art, 8-dir rotation, frame animation, free palette tools), fal genmedia (GPT Image 2.5, Nano Banana 2, Kling 3, Seedance 2.5, Wan 3, Hailuo 03). Deterministic utilities: feet-line frame alignment, palette-preserving Scale2x/3x/4x pixel scaler, atlas manifest v2 with states/fps/loop/anchor, Aseprite JSON, pipeline profiles. Triggers on sprite, pixel art, sprite sheet, spritesheet, turnaround, 8-direction, walk cycle, atlas manifest, frame alignment, pixel scaler, Retro Diffusion, genmedia, SVG character, ASCII art, mascot, game asset, sprite pipeline profile.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Data analysis workflow kit using the ALIVE loop (Ask, Look, Investigate, Voice, Evolve)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep, iterative, multi-source research that explores a topic from multiple perspectives, detects contradictions, and produces a comprehensive vault note with fact-level citations and a confidence map. Use this skill whenever the user says /deep-research, "deep research X", "research X thoroughly", "investigate X deeply", "I need to really understand X", or wants research that goes beyond a quick web search. Also use when the user wants to understand a complex, contested, or multi-faceted topic, compare competing approaches with evidence, or build a comprehensive mental model they can trust for decisions. This is heavier than /research — it searches web, academic papers, Reddit, and the vault, then loops through exploration and critique rounds until the evidence base is solid. When in doubt between /research and /deep-research, prefer this one if the topic is complex, contested, or the user wants depth over speed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds, validates, packages, tests, and optimizes deployment-ready Skill files (SKILL.md + references/ + scripts/ + agents/) from design specifications. Three pre-build gates + 9-dimension quality gate (with D9a/b/c empirical evidence tiers) + behavioral iteration loop + automated description optimizer + blind version comparator. Use for building, reviewing, revising, testing, or optimizing Skills. Trigger on: "build this Skill," "review this Skill," "test my Skill," "optimize the description," "compare these Skill versions," "should this be a hook instead," "build a template first." Also: "my Skill doesn't activate," "my description truncates," "my SKILL.md is too long," "my Skill is overtriggering." Do NOT use when designing Skill methodology — that's design work, not packaging. Do NOT use for prompt compilation, project auditing, or prompt scoring (use rootnode-prompt-compilation, rootnode-project-audit, or rootnode-prompt-validation if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SEO & GEO content linter — validates Markdown/MDX files for AI search visibility using 92 deterministic rules (35 GEO, 32 SEO, 14 content quality, 8 technical, 3 i18n). Runs an autonomous lint-fix loop: scan content, read structured violations, fix them, re-lint until clean. Use when optimizing content for AI citations, auditing SEO compliance, checking GEO readiness, or running pre-publish content validation. Triggers on: "geo-lint", "lint content", "SEO audit", "GEO", "content optimization", "AI search", "citation readiness".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generalised autonomous optimisation loop — soft RLVR for any artifact a user can measure. Use this skill whenever a user wants to iteratively improve an artifact — code, prompts, documents, configs, designs, content — by running structured experiments, evaluating results against a multi-dimensional rubric, and learning from each attempt. Triggers include: "optimise this", "keep improving until it's good", "run experiments on", "autoresearch", "iterate on this overnight", "try different approaches and pick the best", or any request implying repeated evaluate-and-improve cycles. Also use when the user wants to improve a system prompt, a data pipeline, a writing style, or any artifact where quality can be decomposed into measurable tracks. For inference optimisation tasks (model latency, throughput, quantization, GPU deployment), a* delegates the low-level tuning to AITune while maintaining quality tracking and learning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generalised autonomous optimisation loop — soft RLVR for any artifact a user can measure. Web runtime package: uses memory in this order: connector-backed, project-pack, none. Never assumes subprocess access or unrestricted local files. Use this skill whenever a user wants to iteratively improve an artifact — code, prompts, documents, configs, designs, content — by running structured experiments, evaluating results against a multi-dimensional rubric, and learning from each attempt. Triggers include: "optimise this", "keep improving until it's good", "run experiments on", "autoresearch", "iterate on this overnight", "try different approaches and pick the best", or any request implying repeated evaluate-and-improve cycles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a SaaS founder is deciding on or building a product-led growth motion — assessing PLG readiness, choosing freemium vs free trial vs reverse trial, defining activation and PQLs, designing self-serve onboarding and conversion triggers, building viral loops, or setting up PLG metrics (NRG, activation rate, TTV, NDR, CAC payback) and cohort analysis. Also for hybrid product-led-sales design and PLG-vs-sales-led GTM decisions. Not for paid acquisition channel mix (use channel-expert) or the mechanics of price points and tiers (use pricing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive a GitHub Copilot (or any bot reviewer) pull-request review to a clean pass without babysitting it: fix each finding in its own commit, reply to the review thread with the fix sha, resolve the thread, re-request the bot, and poll for the async re-review. Covers the thread node-id (PRRT_...) vs comment databaseId distinction, the resolveReviewThread GraphQL mutation, the copilot-pull-request-reviewer[bot] slug, and how to read the bot's verdict (COMMENTED plus a "human review recommended" banner is not a blocking finding). Use when Copilot has left review comments on your PR, when bot review threads must be closed out with an auditable fix-reply-resolve trail before merge, or when you need to verify that a re-review actually landed on the new HEAD rather than the old one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monitor, cap, and recover from context accumulation in agentic systems. Covers per-cycle cost tracking, context window auditing, budget caps with enforcement policies, emergency pruning when approaching limits, and progressive disclosure integration to minimize token spend on routing. Use when running long-lived agent loops (heartbeats, polling, autonomous workflows), when context windows are growing unpredictably between cycles, when API costs spike beyond expected baselines, when designing new agentic workflows that need cost guardrails from the start, or when post-mortem analysis reveals a cost incident caused by context accumulation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply software pipelining (double-buffering) to a tiled GPU kernel to overlap global memory loads with Tensor Core computation. Covers prologue/loop/epilogue restructuring, LDG-register vs cp.async (LDGSTS) variant selection based on compute/load ratio, shared memory budget verification against architecture-specific occupancy cliffs, and SASS-level verification of load/compute overlap.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI systematic knowledge acquisition from unfamiliar territory — deliberate model-building with feedback loops. Maps spaced repetition principles to AI reasoning: survey the territory, hypothesize structure, explore with probes, integrate findings, verify understanding, and consolidate for future retrieval. Use when encountering an unfamiliar codebase or domain, when a user asks about a topic requiring genuine investigation rather than recall, when multiple conflicting sources require building a coherent model, or when preparing to teach a topic and deep understanding is required first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。