「verification」の検索結果

Ralph - persistent self-referential execution loop wrapping ultrawork with independent verifier verification

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review changes for correctness, security, accessibility, and performance. Use for scoped quality reviews or verification plans; bug fixes use oma-debug.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design AI content detection systems for authenticity verification. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-content-detector related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stop AI agents from secretly bypassing your rules. Mechanical enforcement with git hooks, secret detection, deployment verification, and import registries. Born from real production incidents: server crashes, token leaks, code rewrites. Works with Claude Code, Clawdbot, Cursor. Install once, enforce forever.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full adversarial quality loop — implement, self-attack, parallel verification, quality gates, final validation. 全品質循環：實現、自攻、並行驗證、質量關卡、最終確認. Use when: implement task with quality, run adversarial review, verify code quality, run quality gates, complete workflow task

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply Adobe security best practices for OAuth credentials, secret rotation, I/O Events webhook signature verification, and least-privilege scoping. Use when securing API credentials, implementing webhook validation, or auditing Adobe security configuration. Trigger with phrases like "adobe security", "adobe secrets", "secure adobe", "adobe credential rotation", "adobe webhook signature".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to identify and test for account takeover vulnerabilities in web applications. Use this skill whenever the user mentions account takeover, authentication bypass, password reset attacks, email verification bypass, session hijacking, or any technique to compromise user accounts. This includes testing authorization issues, unicode normalization attacks, reset token reuse, CORS/CSRF/XSS exploitation, cookie manipulation, and OAuth vulnerabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MANDATORY deploy after every code change. Typecheck → deploy → purge CDN → E2E on production → visual verify → fix-forward loop. Workers Builds native CI/CD, D1 Time Travel PIT recovery, D1→R2 long-term backups, wrangler rollback, wrangler secrets management, structured observability, cross-browser smoke tests, rollback procedures, and GitHub auto-configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, review, or audit this repository's technical documentation, including README.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, root and scoped AGENTS.md files, docs pages, and documentation drift. Use for source-backed documentation authoring, behavior verification, and cross-surface consistency. Do not use for code review, deslop diff cleanup, or whole-page rewrites, splits, or reorganizations handled by docs-refactor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Unity Test Runner and report detailed results. Use for EditMode/PlayMode tests, change verification, or failure diagnosis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep GPT-5.6 and other coding-agent work proportional to the request by locking scope, choosing the smallest sufficient implementation, matching verification to risk, and stopping when success is proven. Use for implementations, bug fixes, refactors, reviews, or maintenance where scope creep, speculative abstractions, unrelated cleanup, repeated test runs, unnecessary dependencies, or polishing beyond the request are risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Download genome assemblies, gene records, and ortholog data from NCBI using the modern Datasets v2 CLI (replaces assembly_summary.txt scraping and many EFetch workflows). Use when bulk-pulling genome assemblies, gene metadata across species, ortholog sets, or BLAST databases; when E-utilities are too slow for genome-scale work; or when automatic checksum verification, parallel download, and clean accession-driven retrieval are required. Encodes the JSON-lines output format, dataformat conversion, --dehydrated for cloud workflows, and when Datasets is/isn't the right tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Download large datasets from NCBI efficiently using EPost, history server, batching, rate limiting, and retry logic. Use when bulk-fetching tens of thousands of sequences, pulling all results of a large ESearch, designing reproducible pipelines, comparing E-utilities to NCBI Datasets v2 CLI, or implementing checksum-validated downloads. Encodes WebEnv TTL (~8h), EPost 200-ID limit, retmax caps, parallelization design, and integrity verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality control for pooled CRISPR screens covering library representation, Gini index, log-skew, replicate Pearson and Spearman concordance, essentialome precision-recall AUC against CEGv2 (Hart 2017), Cas9 cut-toxicity diagnostics, copy-number amplicon detection (Aguirre 2016 / Munoz 2016), bottleneck propagation through plasmid pool, infection, selection, and endpoint stages, MOI verification, and DepMap-style screen-quality scoring. Use when assessing screen quality before hit calling, deciding whether to repeat or rescue a screen, diagnosing low-confidence hits, choosing between MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / Chronos based on quality grade, picking a normalization strategy from QC signatures, or evaluating whether an in-vivo screen retained adequate library complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses RNA-seq data quality specifically for alternative splicing analysis. QC layers include experimental design audit (library prep, read length, depth, replicates), STAR 2-pass cohort-style alignment, junction saturation curves and discovery plateau detection, novel-vs-known junction ratio diagnostics, junction-overhang distribution, splice-site strength scoring (MaxEntScan intrinsic + SpliceAI context-aware), strandedness verification, GENCODE basic vs comprehensive choice, and rRNA contamination screening. Splicing analysis is more demanding than DGE on read length, depth, library prep, alignment strategy, and annotation choice — failures silently bias PSI estimates and inflate novel-junction false positives. Use when evaluating data suitability for splicing analysis, troubleshooting low event detection, or designing sequencing experiments where AS is a primary endpoint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the refactor workflow — mandatory architectural justification, test verification, risk-based implementation, and scope enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Genera tickets profesionales de soporte para Meta Business Suite / WhatsApp Business API optimizados para recibir prioridad URGENTE 24hr resolution. Úsala SIEMPRE que el usuario mencione crear un ticket a Meta, escalar un caso WABA, apelar un ban o restricción, reportar un false positive, abrir caso de soporte WhatsApp Business, problema de onboarding, rechazo de template, errores de Cloud API, OTP delivery, verification stuck, BM restricted, display name rejection, o cualquier issue de una WhatsApp Business Account. También activa cuando el usuario dice frases como "ayúdame a redactar un caso para Meta", "necesito reportar esto a soporte", "hay que escalar esto a WhatsApp", "ticket para Meta", o describe un problema de una cuenta de cliente de Vambe sin pedir ticket explícitamente pero claramente necesita uno. También activa ante preguntas del tipo "¿cómo apelar esto?" o "¿qué hago si Meta dice X?" relacionadas con WABA, BM o verificación.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure Key Vault Keys SDK for .NET. Client library for managing cryptographic keys in Azure Key Vault and Managed HSM. Use for key creation, rotation, encryption, decryption, signing, and verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a coding task should be driven end-to-end from issue intake through implementation, review, deployment, and acceptance verification with minimal human re-intervention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate implementation failures using root-cause-first debugging. Use when an implementer is blocked, verification fails, or repeated remediation does not converge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a task implementation against approved specs, task boundaries, and verification evidence. Use after an implementer finishes a task, after remediation, or before accepting a task as complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Step through versioning, tagging, and verification

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial verification of one SDD Composy task in verify_required: reproduce every claim with fresh commands, build the truth table, refute stale evidence, and produce the verdict that gates complete. Use when review is done and the task claims to be finished — 'verificar a TASK-003', 'a task está pronta mesmo?', 'is this task really complete'. Do NOT use for QA, code review, or a general 'verify my work' outside an SDD task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。