9,499 件 ・ 関連度順
Reviews Remix v2 loaders and actions for mutations-in-loader, missing validation, leaked server fields, wrong return helpers, v1 useTransition holdovers, and revalidation traps. Use when reviewing loader/action code in a Remix v2 codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct rigorous, citation-backed desk market research: quick go/no-go market scans, market sizing (TAM/SAM/SOM), competitor analysis, customer demand signals, and trend/macro (PESTEL) analysis. Use this skill whenever the user wants to research, size, validate, or enter a market — "is there a market for…", "how big is the market for…", "who are the competitors of…", "should I build/launch/sell…", "validate this business idea", "market research for…", "market entry" — in any language and for any country's market (e.g. "nghiên cứu thị trường", "étude de marché", "市場調査", "análisis de mercado"), even when the user never says the words "market research". Also use it when another skill or workflow (strategy-board, design-thinking, a product brief) needs external market facts delivered into its fact base or research folder.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a Meta-Harness-style optimization loop NATIVELY — automatically search over the scaffolding around a FIXED base model (memory, retrieval, context construction, prompt templates, summarization, tool-selection logic) by proposing candidate variants, scoring each on a cheap deterministic eval, and keeping a Pareto frontier of quality vs cost — using native Agent / Workflow / loop tools instead of a standalone Python harness. Use this whenever the user wants to optimize, evolve, tune, distill, or search over a harness, scaffold, prompt system, memory or retrieval policy, context-assembly code, or summarizer while keeping the model fixed; whenever they mention Meta-Harness, harness optimization, scaffold evolution, automatic prompt/memory optimization, an evolutionary or Pareto search over candidate implementations, or "make the harness/agent better without retraining"; and whenever the gain must come from the code AROUND the model rather than the model weights. Reproduces the Meta-Harness paper's method natively, with no claude_wrapper.py and no metered solver API.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debt payoff strategy generator. Compares avalanche (highest interest first) vs snowball (smallest balance first) methods, calculates payoff timelines and total interest saved, and recommends optimal payment allocation across multiple debts. Includes credit card consolidation and refinancing analysis. Use when the user says "/finance debt", "pay off my debt", "snowball or avalanche", "consolidation", or asks for any debt strategy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ownership-validation preflight for a warp route. For each chain in the route, determine the owner type (ICA / Safe / Squads / other multisig), confirm it exists on chain (or deploy if missing for ICAs), and reject EOAs. Run before /warp-deploy-init-route generates the deploy.yaml so the deployment never proceeds against an invalid owner set.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the post-deploy send test that validates a freshly deployed or updated warp route end-to-end — real token transfers across the route's legs, delivery confirmation, and fee-accrual checks. Use when asked to send-test, round-trip, or validate transfers on a warp route. Defaults to a full collateral-mesh test for multi-collateral routes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Data governance strategy, quality validation rules, and data dictionary management for vehicle insurance platform. Use when defining data quality standards, implementing validation rules, managing field mappings, resolving data conflicts, or establishing data governance processes. Covers data cleaning standards, quality metrics, and mapping management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
API endpoint design and testing for vehicle insurance data platform. Use when designing new API endpoints, testing existing ones, validating response formats, or debugging API issues. Covers 11 core endpoints including 3 new pie chart distribution endpoints, parameter validation, error handling, and integration patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guide for ephemeral WebAssembly (WASM) and isolated micro-runtime sandboxes to securely execute AI-generated code, validate database migrations in-memory, and perform sub-millisecond fuzzing / Panduan ahli sandbox WebAssembly (WASM) efemeral dan micro-runtime terisolasi untuk eksekusi kode AI yang aman, validasi migrasi database in-memory, dan fuzzing sub-milidetik.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guide for multi-pass autonomous AI code self-review — syntax validation, logic correctness, architectural conformance, security audit, and performance analysis without external tooling — enabling the agent to catch its own errors before presenting code / Panduan ahli review kode otonom multi-pass oleh AI — validasi sintaks, kebenaran logika, konformitas arsitektur, audit keamanan, dan analisis performa tanpa tooling eksternal — memungkinkan agen menangkap errornya sendiri sebelum menampilkan kode.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates GitHub Pull Requests with automated validation and task tracking. Use when user wants to create PR, open pull request, submit for review, or check if ready for PR. Analyzes commits, validates task completion, generates Conventional Commits title and description, suggests labels. NOTE - for merging existing PRs, use github-pr-merge instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Merges GitHub Pull Requests after validating pre-merge checklist. Use when user wants to merge PR, close PR, finalize PR, complete merge, approve and merge, or execute merge. Runs pre-merge validation (tests, lint, CI, comments), confirms with user, merges with proper format, handles post-merge cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates, supersedes and validates decision records (ADRs) against the convention a collection already follows, instead of imposing a published one. Use when the user wants to record a decision, write an ADR, supersede an existing decision, audit or lint a decisions folder, check that an ADR index is in sync, or asks "why did we decide X". Deduces the filename scheme, section set and status vocabulary from the records already there; ships a validator with an exit code, so the audit is a check and not an opinion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Integrate MDMA into an application and build features with it — wire up parsing, the runtime store, React rendering, LLM streaming, custom components, prompts, and CI validation. Use this skill when the user asks to add MDMA to an app, build a chat that streams MDMA, author or maintain a custom prompt, validate MDMA documents, register a custom component, or expose MDMA to an agent via MCP. Generates focused, correct wiring that uses the right packages for the job instead of reinventing them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Balancing chemical equations, reaction classification, stoichiometric calculations, acid-base chemistry, oxidation-reduction (redox) reactions, and thermochemistry. Covers conservation of mass, mole ratios, limiting reagents, percent yield, Bronsted-Lowry and Lewis acid-base theory, pH calculations, oxidation states, half-reaction balancing, enthalpy, Hess's law, and calorimetry. Use when solving quantitative chemistry problems involving reactions, energy changes, or solution chemistry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you have captured session evidence — session-retro / session- observatory-live traces in .planning/patterns/, tool logs, correction records — and want to induce a reusable skill from it. Segments the traces into candidate skill units (an LLM judgment, not a deterministic parse) and decomposes each candidate into a four-part structured spec: workflow structure, execution semantics, and runtime attachments (verification, safety, rollback, state). It emits a spec object, NOT a finished SKILL.md, and hands that spec to skill-forge. It sits between skill-integration (upstream frequency detector) and skill-forge (downstream author). Backed by Agent-Trace-to-Skill Induction (arxiv 2606.06893v1). Triggers on inducing a skill from captured traces, turning a repeated pattern into a skill spec, and preparing evidence for skill-forge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidance for verifying documentation accuracy against running OpenStack infrastructure. Use when detecting documentation drift, validating operations procedures against live systems, or confirming that runbooks produce expected results on the deployed cloud. Implements NASA Product Verification (SP-6105 SS 5.3) applied to documentation artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test and validate MaaFramework Pipeline JSON, recognition nodes, action nodes, CustomAction/CustomRecognition wiring, resource loading, and end-to-end task behavior. Use when running `run_pipeline`, checking OCR/TemplateMatch/ColorMatch ROI, validating `context.run_task()` results, auditing `action: Custom` or `recognition: Custom` registrations, or choosing the right resource-check command.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates GF(3) conservation across triadic braindance replays. Ensures MINUS+ERGODIC+PLUS=0.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs several language models as independent coders on the same labeling or discovery task and reads their disagreement as data — panel assembly for model diversity, keeping votes independent, consensus rules, agreement statistics (Cohen's and Fleiss kappa, Krippendorff's alpha), the correlated-errors caveat that stops agreement being mistaken for validity, human validation beyond the panel, and reporting. Use when the user asks about a council, panel, ensemble, or jury of models, asks how to combine several models' labels, or asks what kappa or alpha to report for model coders. Single-model codebook and validation work goes to text-classification, per-item confidence to llm-calibration-logprobs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs several language models as independent coders on one labeling or discovery task and treats disagreement as data. Covers diverse panel assembly, independent voting, consensus rules, Cohen’s and Fleiss kappa, Krippendorff’s alpha, correlated-error limits on validity claims, human validation, and reporting. Use when the user asks about a council, panel, ensemble, or jury of models, how to combine model labels, or what kappa or alpha to report for model coders. Single-model codebook and validation work goes to text-classification, per-item confidence to llm-calibration-logprobs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auto-selects and enforces the strongest valid Python typing lane for the detected Python version and dependencies — no user input required. Use when adding or tightening type annotations, eliminating Any usage in internal code, designing boundary validators or parsers, choosing between stdlib typing (TypedDict, Protocol, dataclasses), Pydantic models, or Hypothesis property tests, addressing ty or mypy failures, or applying version-specific features (TypeIs, ReadOnly, PEP 695 generics, PEP 649 deferred evaluation). Enforces boundary isolation — raw payloads validated immediately at ingress and returned as typed internal objects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and improve processes or systems using an explicit semantic model, adaptive instruction resolution, evidence-driven change, and claim-level validation. Use when reviewing process quality, resolving ambiguity or gaps, deciding how much procedural detail is necessary, or validating consequential process behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit agent lifecycle — validates agent execution capability against configuration. Accepts plugin path, runs 8 semantic audits (capability vs config alignment, skill loading correctness, inter-agent contracts, prompt contradictions, tool sufficiency, dead agents, scriptable patterns, pattern learning), writes reports to .plugin-creator/audits/. Use when auditing agent lifecycle, checking agent capabilities, verifying tool access, finding dead agents, validating agent contract alignment, or confirming agents can execute workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。