「verify」の検索結果

Archive completed plans. Moves finished folder plans from .unikit/code/plans/<folder>/ to .unikit/code/archive/plans/<folder>/, so plan lookup and the plan lists stop offering them; an unfinished plan moves only when the user picks it, and is marked as unfinished. Lists every plan with its created and last-change dates; plans can be picked by number or by date. Never deletes, renames or commits. Use when user says "archive plans", "archive completed", "archive old plans", "clean up plans", or "show archived plans". Not for .unikit/code/PLAN.md or FIX_PLAN.md; to check that a plan is really done use /unikit-verify, to commit the move use /unikit-commit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mutation testing workflow. Systematically mutates source code to verify tests actually catch bugs. Multi-session with progress tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

別の tmux ペインで動いている Claude Code インスタンスを、このセッションから tmux send-keys / capture-pane で駆動するオーケストレーション。プランモード投入 → プラン再点検 (1 回目の検証) → ユーザ承認ゲート → auto mode 実装 → レポート未記載追記 → レポート矛盾再チェック (2 回目の検証) の定型フロー。長時間タスクをもう 1 体の claude に「ダブルチェック付きで」実行させ、要所だけ自分が監督したいときに使う。

Verify that browser profiles are actually isolated from one another instead of assuming it - confirm each profile's timezone agrees with its own exit IP, that WebRTC exposes only the proxy, that canvas and WebGL hashes stay identical across relaunches of one profile, and that no two profiles share a persona, a cookie jar, or an address. Use when several of your own accounts or test identities run from one machine and the setup needs checking, when a profile tested clean but something still looks off, when choosing which detection suites to run (CreepJS, whoer, browserleaks WebRTC, pixelscan, liarjs), when auditing what a vendor runtime does with API and proxy credentials, or when asking which layers browser isolation cannot cover at all. Also for 'profile isolation check', 'fingerprint consistency test', 'timezone mismatch', 'WebRTC leak', 'canvas hash unstable', 'account association', 'temporary profile', '防关联', '多账号', '隔离自检'. The SDK is anti-detect-browser; MCP is browser-mcp-agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify a native LLM voting advisor before trusting advisor-sensitive evaluations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check the local environment for Spec Kit by running `specify check` (and `specify version`). USE FOR: verifying required tools are installed, diagnosing a broken spec-kit setup, reporting CLI version/feature capabilities. DO NOT USE FOR: installing or upgrading the CLI itself (use the speckit-self skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and install the Spec Kit `specify` CLI that every other speckit skill depends on. USE FOR: checking whether `specify` is installed/on PATH, installing it when missing, fixing "command not found: specify", confirming the CLI is new enough (>= 0.11). DO NOT USE FOR: upgrading an already-installed CLI to a newer release (use speckit-self) or verifying project tools (use speckit-check).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to monitor and verify a deployed URL after releases — checks HTTP endpoints, SSE streams, static assets, console errors, and performance regressions after deploys, merges, or dependency upgrades. Smoke / canary / post-deploy verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose GitHub bug reports in wordbricks/onequery. Use when given a GitHub issue URL from wordbricks/onequery and asked to decide next steps such as verifying against the repo, requesting more info, or explaining why it is not a bug; follow any additional user-provided instructions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify documentation keeps up with a code change in dynamic-neural-field-composer - Doxygen on public API, the matching wiki page, and stale references elsewhere. Use before opening a PR, or when asked whether docs need updating.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure, build and test dynamic-neural-field-composer. Use whenever you need to compile the library, run the GoogleTest suite, verify a change builds, or reproduce a test failure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete MCP engineering work on the live path: build or repair servers and Apps, debug stdio or Streamable HTTP, migrate protocol/SDK/transport versions, reconcile source with package and activated runtime, inspect capability/effect authorization, and verify named-host claims without promoting weaker evidence. Use for real Model Context Protocol implementation, review, migration, runtime, or host-integration tasks. Do not use for ordinary non-MCP APIs, generic frontend work, or incidental product copy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarially verifies DATA_MODEL.md property rows against cited Source files. Use after data-model-documenter when DATA_MODEL.md changed — inventories each property in added/changed catalog sections and classifies VERIFIED / REFUTED / UNVERIFIABLE. Triggers on "verify DATA_MODEL", "check catalog against source", "data model verification".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when recording, tallying, or triaging stochastic review findings — the append-only JSONL ledger where Tier 2 (advisory, unevidenced) reviewer output goes instead of blocking language. Triggers on "log this finding", "ledger add", "tally the findings", "triage findings", "is this finding recurring", "retire this noise", or whenever a reviewer produces an unevidenced concern that should be measured for recurrence rather than chased. For the review itself see code-review-and-quality or skill-library-review; for verifying formal claims with deterministic evidence see adversarial-claims-reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adversarially reviewing a document that makes formal or technical claims — math derivations, physics papers, statistical analyses, benchmark reports, whitepapers. Inventories every equation and quantitative claim, verifies each AS NAMED in the text (never a paraphrase or a neighboring statement), and classifies VERIFIED / REFUTED / UNVERIFIABLE / VACUOUS. Triggers on "check this paper", "verify these claims", "is this derivation right", "review this proof", "audit this benchmark", "does the math hold up". For source-code review see code-review-and-quality; for skill/agent library audits see skill-library-review; for content quality scoring see content-ops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests in real browsers. Use when building or debugging anything that runs in a browser. Use when you need to inspect the DOM, capture console errors, analyze network requests, profile performance, or verify visual output with real runtime data via Chrome DevTools MCP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unified verification engine for Python data science projects. Covers environment checks, type checking, linting, tests, security scans, code review with DS anti-patterns, and notebook checks. Commands (/verify, /quality-gate) invoke different subsets of this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。