3,412 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when preparing an academic talk such as a journal club, grand rounds, seminar, conference presentation, or lecture/teaching deck. Analyzes the source, drafts audience-adapted speaker scripts, builds or augments the PPTX with speaker notes and prepares Q&A.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when planning how many patients or cases a study needs before data collection (power analysis, IRB justification). Walks a decision tree to the right test and returns reproducible R/Python code and IRB-ready justification text. Analyzing collected data is /analyze-stats.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when data needs statistical analysis. Runs reproducible Python/R code for Table 1, diagnostic accuracy, agreement, regression, survival, propensity score, survey-weighted and repeated-measures models, with publication tables. Sample size is /calc-sample-size; pooling studies is /meta-analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Native macOS/iOS app performance profiling via xctrace/Time Profiler and CLI-only analysis of Instruments traces. Use when asked to profile, attach, record, or analyze Instruments .trace files, find hotspots, or optimize native app performance without opening Instruments UI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ranked next offensive moves from engagement state. Reads state/loot/Killchain, runs the deterministic analyzer, elaborates the top move. Use when asked "what next", "where to focus", "prioritize", or at the start of an engagement session.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Vulnerability-research loop toward a novel CVE. Target triage -> attack-surface map -> ranked hypotheses -> investigate (RE / fuzz / audit) -> a finding deepens the loop, a dead-end pivots to a new approach. Uses the full wiki + hunt skillset. Scaffolds and persists state under raw/research/<project>/. Triggers - "research", "find a cve", "analyze this binary/library", "audit this code for vulns".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes and improves prompts using 31 frameworks across 7 intent categories. Use when a user wants to improve, rewrite, structure, or engineer a prompt — including requests like "help me write a better prompt", "improve this prompt", "what framework should I use", "make this prompt more effective", or any prompt engineering task. Recommends the right framework based on intent (create, transform, reason, critique, recover, clarify, agentic), asks targeted questions, and delivers a structured, high-quality result.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze competitor strategies, content, pricing, ads, and market positioning across Google Maps, Booking.com, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze market conditions, geographic opportunities, pricing, consumer behavior, and product validation across Google Maps, Facebook, Instagram, Booking.com, and TripAdvisor.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track engagement metrics, measure campaign ROI, and analyze content performance across Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates whether an API request is correct based on provided inputs (method, URL, headers, body, auth, query params).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI驱动的综合健康分析系统，整合多维度健康数据、识别异常模式、预测健康风险、提供个性化建议。支持智能问答和AI健康报告生成。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dashboard metric register: metric, source module, formula, period, value, target, trend, owner and last-updated, as CSV, SQL, JSON Schema or Notion on request. Use for KPI dashboards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes your recent Claude Code chat history to identify coding patterns, development gaps, and areas for improvement, curates relevant learning resources from HackerNews, and automatically sends a personalized growth report to your Slack DMs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and optimize tweets for maximum reach using Twitter's open-source algorithm insights. Rewrite and edit user tweets to improve engagement and visibility based on how the recommendation system ranks content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug LangChain and LangGraph agents by fetching execution traces from LangSmith Studio. Use when debugging agent behavior, investigating errors, analyzing tool calls, checking memory operations, or examining agent performance. Automatically fetches recent traces and analyzes execution patterns. Requires langsmith-fetch CLI installed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extracts and analyzes competitors' ads from ad libraries (Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) to understand what messaging, problems, and creative approaches are working. Helps inspire and improve your own ad campaigns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes job descriptions and generates tailored resumes that highlight relevant experience, skills, and achievements to maximize interview chances
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze liquid markets with a strict ICT/SMC framework that combines multi-timeframe bias, liquidity sweeps, displacement, close-confirmed MSS/BOS, FVG/OB/Breaker/OTE retracements, premium-discount location, session timing, invalidation, targets, and risk-to-reward. Use for ICT chart reviews, live-market analysis, OHLCV scans, or validating a user's trade thesis. Return an auditable setup status and conditional plan; do not use for generic indicator analysis, order execution, or claims of proven institutional intent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a comprehensive code review on local source files. Use this skill when the user asks to review, audit, inspect, evaluate, or check code, even if they never use the word "review." Does not post comments to GitHub pull requests — use post-code-review-to-pr for that. Does not analyze architectural structure or module boundaries — use architectural-analysis for that. Does not explain code or a PR to build understanding before reviewing — use code-overview for a written overview, or code-walkthrough to be paced through it one step at a time. Does not map bounded contexts or domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis for that. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes an existing codebase using strategic Domain-Driven Design to discover bounded contexts, surface ubiquitous language and semantic collisions, find places where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries, and produce an evidence-backed domain and context map. Use when the goal is DDD-specific: bounded context discovery, ubiquitous language analysis, domain model discovery, or mapping contested ownership and responsibility. The entire repository is a valid scope; no module or directory must be named first. Does not assess architectural coupling, cohesion, or technical debt — use architectural-analysis. Does not design service communication, integration patterns, or deployment topology — use architectural-analysis or plan-a-feature. Does not refactor code, diagnose bugs, or review code quality — use refactor, investigate, or code-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a plain-language manual test plan from the context supplied to it — an executive summary, a high-level list of named tests, and a detail section per test with the steps a person follows by hand and the outcomes they should expect. Use when you want to create, draft, generate, or outline a manual test plan, manual QA steps, hands-on verification steps, or an acceptance walkthrough for a feature, change, branch, plan, or PR. When the plan holds more than five tests and at least two natural categories emerge, both the test list and the detail sections are organized under plain-language categories. When nothing in the supplied context can be manually tested, it says so and asks for more context instead of producing a document. Does not analyze code for automated test coverage gaps — use automated-test-planning. Does not write test code — use tdd. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a standalone test plan by analyzing code for test coverage gaps and edge cases. Use when you need to create, generate, or draft a test plan for a branch, need to analyze test coverage, or need to identify what tests to write for specific files or directories. Does not produce a plain-language plan for a person to run tests by hand — use manual-test-planning for that. Does not write test code — use tdd to implement behavior test-first. Does not refine existing plans — use iterative-plan-review. Does not review code quality, security, or style — use code-review for full code review. Does not evaluate architectural testability or structural coupling — use architectural-analysis for architectural assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Educator peer review management for Canvas LMS. Tracks completion rates, analyzes comment quality, flags problematic reviews, sends targeted reminders, and generates instructor-ready reports. Trigger phrases include "peer review status", "how are peer reviews going", "who hasn't reviewed", "review quality", or any peer review follow-up task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。