「diff」の検索結果

Verification loop for Spring Boot projects: build, static analysis, tests with coverage, security scans, and diff review before release or PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PR size-based review depth, performance review checklist, architecture conformance checks, and framework-specific review patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants an agent to run SEO for a product end to end on a daily schedule, with state kept in a seo/ folder in the repo. Covers site health checks, fact checks against commits, page 2 to page 1 pushes, AI answer tracking, competitor sitemap diffs, a monthly keyword map, articles, comparison pages, free tools and link drafts. Also use when the user mentions "seo autopilot" or asks for a daily SEO run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan code changes for security vulnerabilities using Bug Hunter-native artifacts and STRIDE context. Use whenever the user asks for PR security review, commit-diff scanning, staged-change security checks, branch-comparison security review, or pre-merge security analysis of changed code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer questions about an earlier agent run from its recording rather than from memory, and replay or fork that run. Use when the user asks why a previous run did something, which step changed a file or broke the build, whether yesterday's failure still reproduces, or whether a different model would have got it right.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide developers through capturing diagnostic artifacts to diagnose production .NET performance issues. Use when the user needs help choosing diagnostic tools, collecting performance data, or understanding tool trade-offs across different environments (Windows/Linux, .NET Framework/modern .NET, container/non-container).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the open-source free `QuickDup` clone detector for .NET repositories. Use when a repo needs duplicate C# code discovery, structural clone detection, DRY refactoring candidates, or repeatable duplication. USE FOR: the repo wants QuickDup; the team needs repeatable duplicate-code scans for C#; the user asks about DRY cleanup, copy-paste detection, clone detection, or duplicate. DO NOT USE FOR: formatting-only work; repos that intentionally use a different clone detector and do not want overlap. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares two or more dotnet new templates side by side to help users choose between them based on parameters, feature support, frameworks, and classifications. USE FOR: deciding between similar templates (webapi vs webapp, blazor vs blazorwasm, console vs worker), producing a side-by-side comparison of parameters and feature support, understanding how templates differ before creating a project. DO NOT USE FOR: creating a project from a template (use template-instantiation), authoring or validating custom templates (use template-authoring and template-validation), general single-template discovery (use template-discovery).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choosing an MSBuild CopyToOutputDirectory / CopyToPublishDirectory mode: Never, PreserveNewest, Always, and IfDifferent (MSBuild 17.13+), plus $(SkipUnchangedFilesOnCopyAlways). USE FOR: removing the per-build Always copy perf hit; resetting output files mutated between builds. DO NOT USE FOR: general incremental-build diagnosis (use incremental-build); non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add, repair, or review Playwright visual regression tests for browser-facing .NET apps, including screenshot baselines, Pixelmatch thresholds, deterministic rendering, and GitHub Actions artifacts. USE FOR: toHaveScreenshot, page.screenshot visual checks, Pixelmatch/pngjs comparison scripts, visual baseline updates, screenshot diff triage, or CI workflows for UI regression screenshots. DO NOT USE FOR: pure unit tests, accessibility audits, browser-debugging sessions, or frontend linting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grade curated individual tests for readiness, A-F quality and improvements. ALWAYS USE FOR: grade tests, review only a named test, per-test readiness or quality bands for supplied methods, bodies, file spans or bounded PR diffs, including existing tests. Return Pass/Failed/Uncertain/Not applicable; unresolved/empty scopes omit grades. Compose read-only per-test evidence. Polyglot. DO NOT USE FOR: suite audits (test-engineer/test-anti-patterns), concrete fix/feature detection proof (test-value-evidence), writing/fixing tests, or coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the open-source free `coverlet` toolchain for .NET code coverage. Use when a repo needs line and branch coverage, collector versus MSBuild driver selection, or CI-safe coverage commands. USE FOR: coverlet setup; CI line or branch coverage; choosing between collector and MSBuild drivers. DO NOT USE FOR: coverage report rendering by itself; repos that intentionally use a different coverage engine. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill before answering, planning, or editing whenever .NET tests or CI are switching from VSTest to Microsoft.Testing.Platform (MTP), or an MTP migration behaves differently. Triggers include "switch from VSTest"; MSTest/NUnit/xUnit MTP enablement; OutputType=Exe only for test projects in Directory.Build.props; EnableMSTestRunner, EnableNUnitRunner, UseMicrosoftTestingPlatformRunner, or YTest.MTP.XUnit2; .NET 10 global.json test.runner and TestingPlatformDotnetTestSupport; translating VSTest filters, logger, coverage, blame, or dump arguments; replacing VSTest@3; and exit code 8 or zero tests. Also use for xUnit v3 MTP filters during a v2-to-v3 upgrade. Do not use for framework conversion, TFM, UWP, or WinUI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides conversion of a pre-.NET 8 Blazor Server app into a .NET 8+ Blazor Web App. USE FOR: migrating apps that use AddServerSideBlazor and MapBlazorHub to the AddRazorComponents/MapRazorComponents model, converting _Host.cshtml to an App.razor root component, replacing blazor.server.js with blazor.web.js, migrating CascadingAuthenticationState to a service, adopting new Blazor Web App features like enhanced navigation and streaming rendering. DO NOT USE FOR: apps that are already Blazor Web Apps (already use AddRazorComponents and MapRazorComponents), Blazor WebAssembly or hosted Blazor WebAssembly apps (different migration path), apps that should stay on the Blazor Server hosting model without converting, or apps still targeting .NET Framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Share state between components that don't have a direct parent-child parameter relationship, using cascading values, scoped services with change events, or CascadingValueSource via DI. USE WHEN the user needs a CascadingParameter or CascadingValue that works across render mode boundaries, a shopping cart or notification count accessible from multiple pages, a theme or user preference cascaded app-wide, or when components in different parts of the tree must react when shared data changes. Also USE WHEN cascading values aren't reaching interactive children in per-page interactivity mode, or when the user needs to understand scoped vs singleton service lifetime for state on Blazor Server. DO NOT USE for direct parent-child parameter passing or EventCallback (see author-component), for persisting state across prerender-to-interactive transitions (see support-prerendering), or for service abstractions for data fetching in Auto/WebAssembly (see fetch-and-send-data).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add, configure, or review Ignite UI for Blazor Lite component support in Blazor applications. USE FOR: installing IgniteUI.Blazor.Lite or IgniteUI.Blazor.GridLite, registering AddIgniteUIBlazor() in Blazor Server, WASM, Hybrid, or split Blazor Web App projects, adding @using IgniteUI.Blazor.Controls, wiring the theme stylesheet, picking the right host page, locating the GridLite stylesheet path, explaining single-project vs split Server/Client Web App setup differences, and checking where an interactive render mode is needed for Ignite UI components to work. DO NOT USE FOR: general Blazor component authoring without Ignite UI, choosing app architecture or render mode from scratch (see create-blazor-project), JavaScript interop (see use-js-interop), authentication (see configure-auth), prerendering (see support-prerendering), or layout/component design questions that need no Ignite UI setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trace and resolve discrepancies when the same metric shows different values in two or more sources. Use before reporting, after pipeline changes, or when stakeholders question a number.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query and answer questions about Volcengine API specifications. Trigger this skill whenever a user asks about Volcengine API parameters, error codes, request methods, enum values, required fields, response structures, pagination, parameter dependencies, or API comparisons — even if they don't explicitly say "API". Typical triggers include questions like "What parameters does DescribeInstances have?", "What values does Status support?", "What does InvalidInstanceId.NotFound mean?", "Does Volcengine have a batch tag deletion API?", "Which APIs does ECS support?", "How do I pass parameters to CreateDatabase?", "Is ChargeType required?", "What fields does DescribeInstances return?", "How do I paginate instance lists?", "What's the difference between these two APIs?", "RunInstances returns InvalidParameterValue". When the user needs runnable SDK code, hand off to the volcengine-sdk-generator skill. When the user needs CLI-based operations, hand off to the volcengine-cli skill. Supports both Chinese and English prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BytePlus Searchinfinity Web Search skill. Prefer this skill for any web search task. Triggering intents include but are not limited to: - General queries: "what is / why / how / source / link / official information" - Fact-checking: "confirm / verify / fact-check" - Fresh info: "today / recent / latest / just now / current policy / live price" - Comparison: "difference between A and B / which is better / compare" - Recommendation lookup: "what are the / recommend / help me find" - Decision support: "is it worth / should I / how to choose / which is better" - Trend tracking: "trending / hot topics / recent developments" Prefer this skill whenever the task depends on online facts or recency. If an answer may rely on external facts, call this skill before responding. Authentication Method: APIKey only — Interface URL `https://torchlight.byteintlapi.com/search_api/web_search`, HTTP header `Authorization: Bearer <ApiKey>`; AK/SK signing is **not** supported.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when user explicitly asks for an adversarial / multi-round dialectic between masters — 祖师辩论, 各执一词, 谁更对, debate, 应成 vs 顿悟, 顿渐之争. Differs from /compare-masters (parallel single-round) by being adversarial multi-round via fresh-subagent orchestration. Topics 空有 / 禅净 / 性相 / 戒律 vs 内观 — trigger is adversarial framing: "禅净比较" → compare; "禅净辩论 / 谁更究竟" → here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when user asks for a sequenced learning path within a Buddhist tradition — 学修次第, 先学什么, 从哪入门, 下一步读什么, curriculum, 学习计划, 路径推荐. Differs from /compare-masters (parallel opinion) and /master-debate (adversarial dialectic) by being 纵向 / 时序: stage-by-stage plan keyed on tradition × level (L0-L3) → foundation → intermediate → advanced + blind spots. Trigger is planning intent — "禅宗对比" goes to /compare-masters; "禅宗从哪开始学" goes here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover, analyze, and prioritize keywords for SEO and GEO content strategies. Identifies high-value opportunities based on search volume, competition, intent, and business relevance. Generates topic clusters and content calendars. Use when asked to "find keywords", "keyword research", "what should I write about", "keyword analysis", "find me topics to write", "search volume", "keyword difficulty", "content ideas", or any keyword discovery task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit claims that work is done or shipped against the diff or repo. Use when: asked whether something really got done, even if it looks obvious.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help founders and marketers nail their positioning. Use when someone mentions "positioning," "value proposition," "who is this for," "how do I describe my product," "messaging," "ICP," "ideal customer," or is struggling to articulate what makes their product different.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。